Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Zahid Vs. Tanzir Hossain Mallick and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ecord-For the Petitioner. Not represented-the Respondents Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 334 of 2005. (From the Judgment and Order dated June 20, 2005 passed by the High "Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.2783 of 2004) Judgment &nb...... point out any infirmity of the kind calling for interference by this Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 434. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Jamil Ahmed Khan Vs. Md. Delwar Hossain and another, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....d against the judgment and order dated 03.03.2009 passed by this Division in Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.72 of 2009 filed against the judgment and order dated 25.02.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No.573 of 2003 making the Rule absolute and setting aside ......opolitan Magistrate, Dhaka to the satisfaction of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka till disposal of the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 429. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Dr. Md. Abdul Jalil Sarder Vs. Selina Akhter, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 585 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 02.02.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2196 of 1990.) Judgment &n...... Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 427. ..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 169
Samsuddin Nakib and others Vs. Syed Fakruddin Ahmed and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....cord-For Respondent No. 1. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-21 Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 598 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 30.6.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 6498 of 2001). Judgment &n......ality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 424. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Jamira Khatun and others Vs. Md. Fazlul Karim and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....s.1-6. Not Represented- Respondent Nos.7-17. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 492 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated the 8th day of February, 2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3975 of 2001). Judgment &nb......ind no substance in the submissions of the learned advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 419. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Banka Bihar Mondal Vs. Md. Tufazzel Sardar & others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-For the Respondents Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.623 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 7.2.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1401 of 1990.) Judgment &......rrived at a correct decision. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 416. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
M.S. Zaman alias Sukur Mahmud & another Vs. Kazimuddin Feraji & others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
..... Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners Respondents-Not represented Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.452 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 11.04.2006 passed by the High Court Division in civil order No.5531 of 2004) Judgment MM Ruhul Amin J. - This petitio......vision upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 414, 19 BLT (AD) (2011)137...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Md. Lal Miah Vs. Md. Anwar Hossain @ Anu, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....p; Not represented- the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.211 of 2006 (From the judgment and order dated 25th July, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2651 of 1999). Judgment &nb......e, the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner deserve no consideration. Accordingly, the petition dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 409. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Capt. Mohammad Lutfar Rahman Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 531 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 31.8.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.5072 of 1996). Judgment &nbs......is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 406. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Dhaka Bank Limited Vs. Monir Hossain and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....espondent No.1. None represented- For Respondent Nos. 2-4. Civil Appeal No.136 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated the 12th day of December, 2000 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3067 of 2000). Judgment Mohammad Fazlul Karim J.......Court as security against the decree that may be passed till final decision of the suit." Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 402. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 142
Monowara Begum and others Vs. M.A. Siddique and other, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ourt dismissed the suit. On appeal being Title Appeal No. 804 of 1999 the appellate Court allowed the appeal and decreed the suit. Being aggrieved, the defendants moved the High Court Division in revisional jurisdiction and obtained Rule which after hearing was discharge......ot rehearing of the matter. There is no cogent ground for review of the impugned judgment. The review petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 387. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Md. Matiur Rahman Vs. Md. Shah Alam and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....t No.1 None represented- For Respondent Nos. 2-3 Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 391 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated the 14th March, 2006 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.5668 of 2005) Judgment ......ns of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed with cost of Tk. 10,000.00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 385. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Md. Kamal Uddin Akand Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 936 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 20.3.2007 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 6930 of 2004). Judgment &n......there is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 383. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Abu Taher & another Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....itioners. Zainul Abedin, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.454 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 06.02.2007 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.1677 of 2003.) Judgment &nbs...... Division upon correct Assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 381. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Md. Golam Wahed Mandal and others Vs. Abu Bakkar Mia and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....on-Record-For the Petitioners Not represented-the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1231 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 05.03.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.344 of 1995.) Judgment &nbs......e are not inclined to interfere with such finding of fact. We find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 377. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Nur Islam Sharif alias Eslam Ali Vs. Amjed Ali Molla and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Not represented- Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 456 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 13.12.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 961 of 1998) Judgment &nb......there is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 373. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Kazi Abdul Hoque Vs. Md. Baharuddin and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....For Respondent No.1 Not represented- Respondent Nos.2-7. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1003 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 21-05-2006 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.3129 of 2004. Judgment ......ssions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner have got no merit and accordingly, the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 370. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
City Bank Limited Vs. M/s. Oscar Fashionwear Ltd. and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....r the Petitioner. Not represented-the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 444 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 24.8.2005 passed by the High Court Division in F.A. No.849 of 1991). Judgment ...... no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 366. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Md. Abdul Motaleb Sarker and others Vs. Md. Laskar Ali and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....espondents No.2. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 1, 3-10. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 665 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 12.03.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2832 of 1997.) Judgment &nb......y held that the suit as framed is not maintainable. We find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 361. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Md. Nurul Islam Sarker Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Gazipur and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record - For Respondent No. 3. Not Represented - Respondent No. 4. Civil Appeal No. 178 of 2000. (From the Judgment and Order dated 30th January 2000 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 3737 of 1998) Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J.- The appea......ed without lawful authority and is of no legal effect. The Respondents are to pay Tk. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) as cost of this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 643. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 128