Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5721-5740 of 6822 results.
Abdul Latif Mirza Vs. Government of Bangladesh and other, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....Magistrate, Burdwan, 1964 (SC) 334; Motilal Jain Vs. The State of Bihar, AIR 1968 (SC) 1309; Shushanta Goshwami, AIR 1969 (SC) 1604; Mahbub Anam Vs. The Govt. of East Pakistan PLD 1959 Dacca 774; Md. Humayun Kabir Vs. The State, (1976) 28 DLR 259; Arbab Md. Hashem Khan on behalf of Arbab Abdul Gafur...... above I would allow this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 1. ......, (1968) 20 DLR (SC) 249; Government of West Pakistan Vs. Begum Agha Abdul Karim Shorish Kashmiri, (1969) 21 DLR (SC) 1; PLD 1969 (SC) 14; Government of East Pakistan Vs. Rowshan Bijoya Shaukai Ali Khan, (1966) 18 DLR (SC) 214; Tofazzal Hossain Vs. Province of East Pakistan, (1965) 17 DLR, 498; Ma......t Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed ABM Husain CJ Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Abdul Latif Mirza..............Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and other..............Respondents Judgment September 2, ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 408
Moyezuddin and another Vs. State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... The appeal is dismissed. The appellants are directed to surrender to their bail bonds and serve out the remainder of the sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 37. ......ail bonds and serve out the remainder of the sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 37. ......State................................Respondent Judgment December 7, 1977. Cases Referred to- Adalat Vs. The Crown, 41 956; 8 DLR (FC) 69, PLD 1956 (FC) 171. Lawyers Involved: Khandaker Mahbubuddin Ahmad, Advocate instructed by A. Rab-11, Advocate-on-Record - For the Appellan......1979) 37. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Bangladesh Vs. Moslem Mia, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....dinary litigant. We do not find any substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. We make no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 45. ......t, the appeal is dismissed. We make no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 45. ......dinary litigant. We do not find any substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. We make no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 45. ......lso Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 45. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 101
....the High Court and restore that of the Income Tax authority. As there is no appearance on the other side we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 48. ......pearance on the other side we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 48. ......resent:
Kemaluddin Hossain CJ
Fazle Munim J
Ruhul Islam J
E Rahman, Chairman, Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Chittagong & others.........Appellants
Vs.
Khan Saheb Ata Mohammad Khan...........Respondent
Judgment
February 14, 1978.
Lawyers In......l)
Present:
Kemaluddin Hossain CJ
Fazle Munim J
Ruhul Islam J
E Rahman, Chairman, Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Chittagong & others.........Appellants
Vs.
Khan Saheb Ata Mohammad Khan...........Respondent
Judgment
February 14, 1978.
La..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Enamul Huq and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... 16. In view of the discussion above, we are of view that the High Court Division was well justified in dismissing the appeal. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......d Waliullah caught hold of him and accused Enamul Haq inflicted sora blow on him and within a short time the deceased died. She also saw injury just below the chest of the deceased. P.W.5, Mofazzal Hossain Sikder stated that on hearing hue and cry from the direction of the tubewell of the school,...... 16. In view of the discussion above, we are of view that the High Court Division was well justified in dismissing the appeal. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......(Criminal) Present : Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Enamul Huq and another..........................................Petitioner Vs. The State...........................Respondent Judgment February 1, 2005 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Mohirruddin Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e find that the view taken by the High Court Division is a correct one. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 420. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Mohirruddin............................................... Petitioner Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others ...................Respondents Judgment May 8, 200......e find that the view taken by the High Court Division is a correct one. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 420. ......ion (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Mohirruddin............................................... Petitioner Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others ...................Respondents Judgment&nb..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Matiur Rahman Vs. Habibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... holder in the suit land. 7. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. 8. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......atiur Rahman....................... Petitioner Vs. Habibur Rahman and others .......Respondents Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quayum, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Not represented- For Respondents Judg...... holder in the suit land. 7. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. 8. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Matiur Rahman....................... Petitioner Vs. Habibur Rahman and others .......Respondents Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quayu..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Sultan Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....s, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 378. ......s, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 378. ......s, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 378. ......ul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of Bangladesh represented by the Principal Secretary to Prime Minister's Office, Tejgaon, Dhaka & another...............Petitioner Vs. Md. Sultan Ahmed ........................................................Respondent ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Jashimuddin & other Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sion upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e State.........................................................Respondent Judgment January 31, 2006. Lawyers Involved: A.M. Mahbuddin Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Not represented- Respondent&nb......sion upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Jashimuddin & other.....................................Petitioners Vs. The State.........................................................Respondent Judg..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Md. Alimuzzaman Khan Vs. Mohammad Golam Kibria, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....aterials on record arrived at a correct decision. We find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... that has been rightly done…………………..(7 & 8) Cases Referred to- Bangladesh Small Industries Corporation, Dhaka vs. Mahbub Hossain Chowdhury 29 DLR (SC) 41; M/S. Amin Jute Mills Ltd. vs. M/S. A.R.A.G. Ltd. 28 DLR (AD) 76. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Alimuzzaman Khan...............................Petitioner Vs Mohammad Golam Kibria.................laim damages for the breach of contract committed by the employer. In this connection, the High Court Division relied on the decisions in the case of Bangladesh Small Industries Corporation, Dhaka Vs. Mahbub Hossain Chowdhury reported in 29 DLR (SC) 41 and the case of M/S. Amin Jute Mills Ltd. V..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Sree Hare Krishna Das Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ring the review petition filed by the petitioner, rejected the same. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 146. ......ring the review petition filed by the petitioner, rejected the same. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 146. ......ring the review petition filed by the petitioner, rejected the same. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 146. ......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sree Hare Krishna Das...................................................... Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, President Secretariat, Govt. of t..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Md. Abdul Ali Bhuiyan Vs. Jahura Khatun and Others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....s any instance of misreading and non-reading. So the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the courts below can not be disturbed. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......s any instance of misreading and non-reading. So the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the courts below can not be disturbed. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ...... Suit No.236 of 1972 praying for partition of ejmali property measuring 5.22 acres of land claiming seven annas share therein stating inter alia that the suit property originally belonged to Suruz Khan in raiyati right and he died in July, 1961 leaving behind his wife Kad Banu (defendant No.2), ......(Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Ali Bhuiyan.........................................Petitioner Vs. Jahura Khatun and Others...................................Respondents Judgme..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Osimuddin, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ......ta Kumar Bepari vs. Jamini Mohan Das and others 4 DLR, 487. Chapala Sundari Devi vs. Wahed Ali and others 11 DLR, 376. Lawyers Involved: Jainal Abedin, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants. Ex parte- the Respondent. ...... other words, he will have to prove that the notice of the previous suit was not served on him, and this non-service was due to the fraud of the plaintiff in the previous suit". 21. In the case of Khan Saheb M. Abdul Khaleque Sowdagar Vs. Majutar Rahman Khan and another reported in Pakistan Law R......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Forest, Secretariat Building, Dhaka and others ..........Appellants. Vs. Md. Osimuddin................................Respondent. Judgment June 20, 2005. Cas..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules 1988 and therefore is not maintainable. Consequently, the Review Petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ...... is not maintainable. Lawyers Involved: S. M. Zillul Haque, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For respondent No.1. Not represented- For re......e Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules 1988 and therefore is not maintainable. Consequently, the Review Petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......ainur Reza Chowdhury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahmed J Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman.......................Petitioned Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others…….........Respondents Judgment ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Badsha Miah (Md) Vs. Sonali Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......bsp; June 15th, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Firoz Shall, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by M Khaled Ahmed, Advocate- on-Record—For Resp......cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Bangladesh Vs. AKM Enayetullah, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ...... Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by Firoz Shah, Advocate-on- Record— For the Appellant. TH Khan, Senior Advocate, (Mr. Ajmalul Hossain, QC Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Mr. Mvi Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record—Fo...... Judgment December 6, 2004. Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by Firoz Shah, Advocate-on- Record— For the Appellant. TH Khan, Senior Advocate, (Mr. Ajmalul Hossain, QC Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Mr. Mvi Wah......t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Mustafizur Rahman Vs. Md. Amjad Hossain, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......llate Division (Civil) Present: Md Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Mustafizur Rahman....................Appellant vs Md. Amjad Hossain................Respondent Judgment October 24, 2005. Cases Referred to......the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ......ate and another... .........Respondents Judgment March 21st, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, (Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zah...... Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate........Petitioner vs State and another... .........Respondents ......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Farida Akhter and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ng the cause of democracy through a process which could not be termed as undemocratic. In the result, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 237. ......gladesh represented by the Secretary, Cabinet Division & others .........Respondents Judgment July 19, 2005. Result: The petitions are dismissed. Cases Referred to- Dr Ahmed Hossain vs Bangladesh and others 44 DLR (AD) 109; Smt. Indira Gandhi vs Raj Narayan AIR 1975 SC 2275......ng the cause of democracy through a process which could not be termed as undemocratic. In the result, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 237. ......Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Ruhul Amin J Md Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Farida Akhter and others.........................Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Cabinet Division & others .........Respondents..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 221
Majid Sheikh alias Majid and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ...... Lawyers Involved: Ozair Farooq, Senior Advocate, instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Golam Kibria, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 25 of 2002. ......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
19401938193619351932193119301925192219191918191719151914191319111910190819071905