Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5741-5760 of 7111 results.
Badal Chandra Das and others Vs. Amena Khatun, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ountry made wine; that against whereof said Sudhir Chandra put objection in Miscellaneous case No.137/63-64 and which was dismissed and against whereof he preferred Appeal No.11 of 1964 before the Divisional Commissioner and by order dated 10.9.1964 the requisition proceedings was withdrawn...... No infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division could be pointed out for our interference. In that view of this, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... and order dated 12 November 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2468 of 2001 discharging the Rule issued against the judgment and decree dated 11.01.2001 of the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Rajshahi in Title Appeal No.130 of 1999 reversing those dated 28.02.19..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Kazi Muhammad Khokon Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......the High Court Division dated January 26, 2003 discharging the Rule obtained in Civil Revision No. 3497 of 1999. The civil revision was filed against the judgment and order of the Court of District Judge, Dinajpur in Miscellaneous Appeal was filed against the order dated April 13, 1998 and Apri..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Sree Girish Chandra Barman Vs. Md. Yasin Ali and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ion of materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. 9. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ion of materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. 9. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......6.5.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3948 of 2002 discharging the Rule obtained against the judgment and order dated 18.5.2002 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Lalmonirhat in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 6 of 1999 affirming, with some modification, th..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Humayun Kabir Khan Vs. Md. Nurul Haque & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....of the view that the High Court Division erred in law in not assessing the evidence properly and thereby discharging the Rule. The appeal is accordingly allowed without costs. Ed. ......of the view that the High Court Division erred in law in not assessing the evidence properly and thereby discharging the Rule. The appeal is accordingly allowed without costs. Ed. ......evision No. 1233 of 1996 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts are that the respondent-pre-emptor filed the Miscellaneous Case (Preemption) No. 44 of 1987 in the Court of Assistant Judge, Bhandaria, Pirojpur seeking pre-emption of the case land stating, inter alia, that Hara Kuma..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Mir Kalimuddin and others Vs. Md. Dukhi Mondal and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....gh Court Division. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......gh Court Division. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......f those documents has filed this suit. 5. The trial Court decreed the suit. Being aggrieved by the decision, the defendant-petitioners filed Title Appeal No. 125 of 1970 before the District Judge, Kushtia, which was allowed by judgment and decree dated 13-7-1972. 6. The plaintiff r..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Khan Md. Firoj Kabir Vs. Rupali Bank Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......nbsp; Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......judgment dated 17.8.2000 of the High Court Division passed in Civil Revision No. 2363 of 1998 discharging the Rule which was obtained against the order dated 14-5-98 passed by the learned Assistant Judge, 4th Court, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 278 of 1997 rejecting the application filed by the plain..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Shahid Hossain Khan (Md) Vs. Abdul Bashed Lashkar and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... decree of permanent injunction. 15. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ...... decree of permanent injunction. 15. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ......f a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 876 of 2002 discharging the Rule obtained against the judgment and order dated February 10, 2002 of the 2nd Court of Joint District Judge, Jhalokathi in Title Appeal No.5 of 2001 (in fact Miscellaneous appeal) allowing the same and..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 216
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdur Razzak and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....17. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any grounds to interfere with the impugned judgement and order. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......found unsatisfactory and inquiry officer was appointed and inquiry officer submitted report and thereafter charges were brought against him under sections 3(a) and 3(b) of the Government Servants (Special Provisions) Ordinance, 1979 and he was asked to show cause in reply to which he submitted a......17. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any grounds to interfere with the impugned judgement and order. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 117
Kadam Rosul Silicate Works and others Vs. Sonali Bank, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....is set aside. The Money Execution case be struck off and the attachment of the appellants' property shall be deemed to be withdrawn. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 294.......is set aside. The Money Execution case be struck off and the attachment of the appellants' property shall be deemed to be withdrawn. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 294.......by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Civil Revision No. 287 of 1984). Judgment: ATM Afzal J. - Appellants are judgment-debtors in Money Execution Case No. 12 of 1983 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Narayanganj. The question for consideration in this appeal by leave is whether the appellants..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 134
Jashimuddin Kanchan (Md) Vs. Md. Ali Ashraf, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....ts and decrees of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the lower appellate Court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 289 ......ts and decrees of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the lower appellate Court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 289 ......Civil Revision Nos. 117 & 118 of 1983 respectively). Judgment: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ. - These two appeals by special leave are directed against a common judgment and decree of a learned Single Judge of the High Court Division reversing in revision the concurrent decision of the trial Court ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Upendra Chandra Rishi and ors. Vs. Sufia Begum and ors., 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
.....12.80 passed in Title Suit No. 789 of 1980 is set aside and the said suit is restored to its file and number. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 285; 1990 BLD (AD) 194. .......12.80 passed in Title Suit No. 789 of 1980 is set aside and the said suit is restored to its file and number. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 285; 1990 BLD (AD) 194. ......ellants' Miscellaneous Case No. 151 of 1981 under Order 9 rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. Plaintiff-respondent Nos. 1-4 instituted Title Suit No. 589 of 1980 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Dhaka for declaration of title to the suit land. The suit was decreed ex parte on 1.12.80 The..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Azizul Huq @ Azizul Haque and ors. Vs. State, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....he appellants may make a prayer for bail to the High Court Division which should then consider it. This appeal is thus disposed of. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 284 ......he appellants may make a prayer for bail to the High Court Division which should then consider it. This appeal is thus disposed of. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 284 ...... 1986 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in Criminal Appeal No. 215 of 1986). Judgment: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ. - In this appeal by special leave the short question is whether the learned Judges of the High Court Division properly exercised their discretion in refusing bail to the accu..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Managing Director, WASA Vs. Md. Ali and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ent and order of the High Court Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (AD) (2007) 185. ......ent and order of the High Court Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (AD) (2007) 185. ......ent and order of the High Court Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (AD) (2007) 185. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 100
Ali Hussain Faraji & others Vs. Abdul Ali Pradhania @ Abul and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....The learned Counsel could not point out any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......The learned Counsel could not point out any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ch of the High Court Division passed in Civil Revision No. 28 of 2001 discharging the Rule. 2. The respondent, as plaintiff, filed Title Suit No. 35 of 1997 in the Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Matlab, Chandpur seeking permanent injunction on the averments that 8.77 acres of land apper..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Ambia Khatun and anr Vs. Syed Altaf Hossain and another, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
.... of the Rent Control Ordinance, does not come within the mischief of either of the said provisions. We do not find any merit in this petition which is dismissed. Ed. ...... of the Rent Control Ordinance, does not come within the mischief of either of the said provisions. We do not find any merit in this petition which is dismissed. Ed. ......976 passed by the High Court in S.A. No. 1126 of 1962) Judgment D. C. Bhattacharja J.— This petition for special leave to appeal is against a judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court, dismissing a Second Appeal, arising out of a suit for specific perfor..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Abu Taher Chowdhury & others Vs. State, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....e Chowdhury @ Kala Mia and (5) Akhtarul Haque Chowdhury be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 253. ......e Chowdhury @ Kala Mia and (5) Akhtarul Haque Chowdhury be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 253. ......1989. (From the Judgment and Order dated 9.5.88 passed by the High Court Division, Chittagong Bench, in Death Reference No. 2/87 with Criminal Appeal No.122/87 and Jail Appeal No. 123 of 1987). Judgement Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ. - This appeal by special leave calls in question the propriety of..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Niamat Ali Sheikh and others Vs. Begum Enayetur Noor and others, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....me. We, therefore, find no ground for interference with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 250 ......me. We, therefore, find no ground for interference with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 250 ......st the same set of accused persons by the same set of complainants upon the self-same allegations is permissible or not. It arises from the judgment and order dated 21.7.86 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court Division, Dhaka Bench in Criminal Revision No. 29 of 1986 discharging the Ru..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Shaikh Abdul Quader Vs. Chairman, Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
.... petition to decide whether the said view of the learned Judges of the High Court was correct. We do not find anything to interfere with the order. The petition is dismissed.. Ed. ...... petition to decide whether the said view of the learned Judges of the High Court was correct. We do not find anything to interfere with the order. The petition is dismissed.. Ed. ...... affect the enquiry. For the said proposition reliance was placed upon decision of the High Court Division in the case of Syed Md. Sakk Vs. Bangladesh (1975) 27 DLR 328. 4. The learned Judges of the High Court have distinguished the said case on facts and have pointed out that it was..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Syed Abdul Haque and other Vs. Surendra Nath Majumder & others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....sion has not committed any error in making the Rule absolute and thereupon setting aside the judgment of the appellate Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......sion has not committed any error in making the Rule absolute and thereupon setting aside the judgment of the appellate Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... 13, 2000 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1781 of 1990 making absolute the Rule upon reversing the judgment and decree dated June 9, 1990 of the Court of District Judge, Jhalakathi in Title Appeal No. 34 of 1988 reversing the judgment and decree dated May 29, 1..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Shahabuddin and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....d Advocate-on-Record failed to point out any error in the judgment of the High Court Division of the kind calling for interference by this Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......d Advocate-on-Record failed to point out any error in the judgment of the High Court Division of the kind calling for interference by this Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......f a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2580 of 2000 making absolute the Rule obtained against the judgment and decree dated March 22, 2000 of the 1st Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge) Kishoreganj in Other Appeal No. 139 of 1995 allowing the same upon ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 156
23412340233923382334233323312330232923282327232623242312230923082307230523042303