Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Kazi Mukhlesur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and another, 1974, 3 CLC (AD)
....he same race or occupation. It is the fact, clearly established, of injury to the complainant—not to others—which justifies judicial intervention." ......al, (1971) I WLR 1037; Walker Vs. Baird, 1892) AC 491 PC; Johnstone Vs. Pedler, (1921) 2 AC 262; Nissan Vs. Attorney-General (1970) AC 179; Canada Vs. Attorney-General, AIR 1937 PG 82. Lawyers Involved: Ahmad Sobhan, Senior Advocate with Abdul Malek, Md. Amar Ali, A.Z.M. Khali..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 716
Begum Hamida w/o Abdul Hamid Vs. Abdul Hamid, 1974, 3 CLC (AD)
....on the aforesaid application refused to make the reference to the High Court. The respondent then moved the High Court under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and obtained a Rule, being Criminal Revision No. 813 of 1968. 5 The High Court took the view that the orde...... Vs Sm Soroju Devi. AIR 1933 Cal 406 ;M Bulteel, Vs R C. Bulteel, AIR 1938 Md 721 ; Bai Pravabati Vs. Sumatilal, AIR 1954 Bom 546: Mohammad Ali Vs. Mt Sakina Begum, AIR 1944 Lah. 392. Lawyers Involved: Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Md. Nurul ..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 146
Solicitor, Government of Bangladesh Vs. A. T. Mirdha, 1974, 3 CLC (AD)
....ha moved the Sessions Judge of Khulna who also rejected the prayer for bail on 14-12-72. Thereafter on 22-12-72 he filed Criminal Revision Case No. 264 of 1972 in High Court Division which issued a Rule that day and on 12-1-73 directed. A.T Mridha to be enlarged on bail pending the disposal of t......welyn Evans. AIR 1926 Bom. 551; Lala Jairam Das Vs Emperor, AIR 1945 P C. 94; State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Md. Naim AIR 1964 (SC) 703; Ghulam Mohd. Muzammel Khan, 19 DLR (SC) 439. Lawyers Involved: Fakir Shahabuddin Ahmed, Attorney-General assisted by Ismailuddin Sarkar, ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 125
Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, Govt of BD Vs. Jobed Ali & ors, 1974, 3 CLC (AD)
.... to its own directions or owing to continuance of custody under the second part of clause (2) of Article 16 of the Collaborators Order. The appeals are accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......ip;………. Respondents Judgment July 18, 1971 Cases Referred To: Sate Vs. Mohammad Hossain.25 DLR 207; Md. Ismail vs. State, 21 DLR (SC) 16. Lawyers Involved: Faqueer Shahabuddin Ahmed, Attorney-General instructed by Abdur Rab 1..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Bangladesh Vs. Professor Golam Azam and others, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
.... of 1973 by Molla Harunur Rashid, mentioned at serial No. 13 of the notification. Subsequently by a notification dated 13 May 1974 the writ-petitioner's name was omitted from the notification and the Rule issued in the writ petition was discharged as infructuous. After a change in the Government and...... Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Bangladesh .................................Appellant Vs. Professor Golam Azam and others…………………Respondents Judgment June 22, 1994. Lawyers Involved: Aminul Huq, Attorney‑General, (AF Hasan Ariff, Deputy Attorney-General, and ..Category: Immigration and Citizenship Law | Date: | Hits: 522
Nurul Islam and another Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice & others, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....p; ATM Afzal J.- This petition is from Judgment and order dated 30th June, 1992, passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division, Dhaka, in Writ Petition No. 696 of 090, discharging the Rule. 2. Petitioners, claiming themselves as the President and Secretary respectively of the......; ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J. Nurul Islam and another ………….. Petitioners Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice and others…………Respondents Judgment Feb..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Jafar Ali Vs. Hushiar Ali and others, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
.... Latifur Rahman J: This appeal by special leave by the pre‑emptee is directed against the judgment of the High Court Division, Sylhet, in Civil Revision No. 1391 of 1978 discharging the Rule and upholding the orders of the Courts below arising out of an application under section 96 of......ATM Afzal J and Latifur Rahman J. Jafar Ali ....................Appellant vs. Hushiar Ali and others...........Respondent Judgment June 7th, 1990. Lawyers Involved: Mohammad Habib Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Hemayatuddin alias Auranga Vs. State, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....referred Criminal Revisional No. 933 of 1993 against the said order of the trial Court dated 19.6.93. By a judgment and order dated 27.7.93, a Division Bench of the High Court Division discharged the Rule and upheld the impugned order of the trial Court directing the trial Court to afford fair oppor......fzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Hemayatuddin alias Auranga ……Petitioner Vs. State ..........................................Respondent Judgment August 26, 1993. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Shamsul Haque Siddique, Advocate-on..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Chittagong Chemical Complex Vs. The Chairman, Labour Court and another, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....n Complaint Case No. 193 of 1986, is declared to have been passed without any lawful authority and it is of no legal effect. No costs. Ed. This case is also reported in: 46 DLR (AD) (1994) 182. ...... Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Chittagong Chemical Complex ……Appellant Vs. The Chairman, Labour Court and another ..............Respondents Judgment November 30, 1993. Lawyers Involved: Khalilur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Rec..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Sultana Jute Mills Ltd. and others Vs. Agrani Bank and others, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....) whether a defendant can claim in written statement a set-off or counter-claim against the plaintiff in a suit filed under the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990; (ii) whether an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC lies for rejection of that counter-claim; and (iii) whether a writ petition or a civil r......f or counter-claim under rule 6 in a suit under the Adalat Act in whatever form, as Order VIII rule 6 is inconsistent with the jurisdictional provisions of the Adalat Act…………………(17) Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Rokanuddin Mahmud, Advocate with him..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 168
Bangladesh Vs. Luxmi Bibi and others., 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....s delay they (respondents) had filed a writ petition, WP No. 1004 of 1983‑seeking a direction Upon the appellant to issue notice for acquisition. The result of this writ petition was that the Rule issued thereon was made absolute by an order on 11 March 1984 and the appellant was directed ......lder Vs. Nani Gopal Mondal, AIR 1960 Cal. 258; Kedar Nath Vs. Golam Hossain 40 CWN 83; Ramji Lal and ors. Vs. Giani and another, AIR 1921 Lab 250; Abdul Gafur Vs. Bangladesh 42 DLR (AD) 100. Lawyers Involved: AW Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney‑General, (Sharifuddin Chaklader, Ass..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Moni Begum and others Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha and others, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
.....63 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Dhaka and a notice dated 4.7.87 issued by respondent No. 1 Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha asking the appellants to vacate the requisitioned land. A Rule Nisi was issued thereupon on 15.7.87. Neither respondent No. 1 nor the Government-respondent ......ni Begum and others......................Appellants Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha and others ...........................Respondents Judgment March 31st, 1994. Lawyers Involved: Awlad Ali, Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Secretary, Min of Ind., Nationalised Industries Division Vs. Saleh Ahmed & anr, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
.... petitioner. It was stated that the Mill was taken over under President's Order No. 27 of 1972 and this order of taking over was challenged by an earlier Writ Petition being No. 112 of 1974 and the Rule was issued on 5.3.74. It was stated that during the pendency of the said writ petition in pur......bsp; Lawyers Involved: Md. Khalilur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by MR Khan, Advocate-on-Record ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 157
Chairman, Civil Aviation Authority of Bangladesh Vs. Kazi Abdur Rouf and others, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....of 1992). Judgment Mustafa Kamal J.- This appeal by leave by respondent No.4 in Writ Petition No.3901 of 1992 is from the judgment and order of the High Court Division dated 26.4.93 making the Rule absolute. 2. Respondent No. 1, Kazi Abdur Rouf as Headmaster and Secretary of the Staff Welf......Rahman J Chairman, Civil Aviation Authority of Bangladesh.......................Appellant VS. Kazi Abdur Rouf and others ……………….Respondents Judgment February 16, 1994. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate-on-Re..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Abdul Mannan alias Manu Vs. Sajedul Hoque and others, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....bsp; Mustafa Kamal J.- This appeal by leave is from the judgment and order of the High Court Division dated 22.6.93 in Writ Petition No. 1389 of 1982, making the Rule Nisi absolute. Md. Abdul Mannan @ Manu, respondent No. 4 in the writ petition, is the appellan......ul Mannan alias Manu........ ..................... Appellant Vs. Sajedul Hoque and others.................Respondents Judgment April 3rd, 1994. Lawyers Involved: Abu Nesr Md. Gaziul Haque, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Ozair Faroo..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 136
Rekha Datta and others Vs. Chittagong Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
.... and the balance amount to be paid within 6 months from the date. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This case is also reported in: 46 DLR (AD) (1994) 133 ...... March 10th, 1980. Cases Referred to- Mst. Siraj Fatima Vs. Mahmood Ali AIR 1932 (All) 293; Iftekhar Hussain Vs. Beant Singh AIR 1946 (Lah) 233. Lawyers Involved: Ahmed Sobhan, Sr. Advocate, instructed by Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-R..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Abul Kalam Azad and another Vs. Sunhar Ali and others, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....n J.- These two appeals by the plaintiffs following leave, is directed against the judgments passed by a Single Judge of the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos. 146 and 147 of 1987, making the Rules absolute after setting aside the two orders passed by the Munsif, Additional Court, Sylhet in ...... August 5th, 1993. Cases Referred to- 26 DLR 205; 9 DLR 217; Golam Hafiz Mia Vs, Khadem Ali Miah, 29 DLR (SC) 311; 41 DLR 190; Narsingh Prasad Paul Vs. Still Products Ltd. AIR 1953 (Cal) 15. Lawyers Involved: SR Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Post Office High School Vs. Asgar Ali & others, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....t and decree of the trial Court are restored and those of the appellate Court and the High Court Division are set aside. No costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 46 DLR (AD) (1994) 127. ......ndhu Misra Vs. IG of Police and others AIR 1970 Orissa 213; RJ Singh Vs. State of Delhi AIR 1971 (SQ 1552 (1553); Bashir Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh Jute Mills Corporation and others 44 DLR (AD) 267-270. Lawyers Involved: M Nurullah, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate -on-Reco..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Helaluddin Ahmed alias Swapan. Vs. Bangladesh, 1993, 22 CLC (AD)
.... 259 of 1989 was also filed by accused Md. Idris himself. 6. By separate judgment delivered on the same day i.e. 15 November, 1990 which are impugned in the respective appeals before us the Rules were discharged in both the writ petitions. 7. In WP 1457/88, it was argued, inter al......August 6th, 1992 Cases Referred to- 43 DLR (AD) 104; 33 DLR (1981) 233 & 358; 33 DLR (AD) 154; PLD 1973 (SC) 49; PLD 1974 (SC) 151; PLD 1989 (SC) 26 & 32 DLR (AD) 110. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Wahidullah, Advocate..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 174
AKM Nurul Alam Vs. Bangladesh, 1993, 22 CLC (AD)
.... is no provision for appeal, and where under review the President has extensive power to make any order as he deems fit, a Government servant will be entitled to the remedy available to him under the Rule 23. The Act and the Rules deal with the terms and conditions of the service in the Republic and......application for review………………………………..(13 & 14) Cases referred to- Kadir Bux Vs. Province of Sind 1982 SCMR 593, FA Khan Vs. Government of Pakistan 16 DLR (SC) 405. Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Advocate instructed by Shamsul Haque Siddique, Advocate-on-Rec..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 129