Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5801-5820 of 6149 results.
Bangladesh Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....Civil) Present: A. M. Sayem, C. J. Syed A. B. Mahmud Hussain, J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya. J. Bangladesh……Appellant. Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another…&hel......J. Syed A. B. Mahmud Hussain, J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya. J. Bangladesh……Appellant. Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another………. Respondents Judgment ......l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Pakistan in Civil Re-vision Case No. 101 of 1968). Judgment: Kemaluddin Hossain, J.—Facts leading to the grant of Special leave to appeal are as follows: Respondent 1, Md. Abdur Razzak obtained a money decree against Respondent 2, Md. Belayet Ali Khan, a Government C..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ion In Criminal Revision No. 360 of 1969). Judgment Ahsanuddin Chowdhury, J.—These two appeals, by special leave, arise out of a single judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Bangladesh refusing in exercise of powers under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to q...... Fazle Munim J Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others...............Appellants (In Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 1974). Sk. Sarwaruddin……..... Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 1974). Vs. The State ………………...Respondent Judgment February 10, 1976. Result: T......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for expeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for expeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 225
Abdur Razzaque & anr Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... Cr.P.C. and on conclusion of the trial they were found guilty and convicted under section 19(A) & (f) of the Arms Act read with President's Order No. 50 of 1972, namely, Bangladesh Scheduled Offences (Special Tribunals) Order and sentenced to rigorous imprison...... F.K.M.A. Munim J Abdur Razzaque & anr………………..Appellants. Vs. The State............................Respondent Judgment Jan. 14, 1976. ...........Respondent Judgment Jan. 14, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Aleem-Al-Razee, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Rccord.—For the Appellants. Faqeer Shahabuddin Ahmed, Attorney-General, instructed by A.M. Khan Chowdhury, Advocate-on-Record—F......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
The Com. of Income-tax Chittagong zone, Ctg. Vs. M/s Everett Orient Line Corpn, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ght in so far it allowed the three assessees' initial depreciation under s. 10(2)(vi) of the Act. We find no reason to interfere. All the three appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya, J. The Commissioner of Income-tax Chittagong zone, Chittagong.............Appellant. Vs. M/s. Everett Orient Line Corporation and others........... Respondents Judgment ......ght in so far it allowed the three assessees' initial depreciation under s. 10(2)(vi) of the Act. We find no reason to interfere. All the three appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ocate, Supreme Court, instructed by A.M. Khan Chowdhury Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Asrarul Hosain, Senior Advocate will Mohammad Hassan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent in C.A. No. 15-D/71 S.R. Pal, Sen..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 134
Government of Bangladesh & ors Vs. M/s. Samir & Co, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ct, and therefore no question of irregular exercise of jurisdiction does arise in this case. The result therefore is that this appeal is dismissed but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ppellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed A.B.M. Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D. C. Bhattacharya J Government of Bangladesh & ors........Appellant Vs. M/s. Samir & Co…………..Respondent Judgment November 20, 1975. Cases ref......ct, and therefore no question of irregular exercise of jurisdiction does arise in this case. The result therefore is that this appeal is dismissed but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......d, Additional Attorney-General, with Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by A.W. Mallik, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellants. Ahmadur Rahman Khan, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nurul, Huq, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 10 of 1972. (From..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 258
Amir Sultan Ali Hyder Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....DLR.442; Azizul Huq Vs. M/S. Hanif Ltd. and others, (1955) 7 DLR; 287; Aswad Mia and another vs. Shahidulla Mia, (1958) PLR Dacca 1163; Anil Das and others Vs. Mostaque Ahmed, (1966) 18 DLR 86; IDBP (Bangladesh) Vs. M/S. Master Industries, (1974) 36 DLR 157 and Bangladesh Fisheries Society Ltd. Vs. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed ABM Husain CJ Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Amir Sultan Ali Hyder................................ Appellant. Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others............. Respondents Judgment July 1, 197...... not be binding on the Courts below. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. We, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295.......ellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed ABM Husain CJ Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Amir Sultan Ali Hyder................................ Appellant. Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others............. Respondents Judgment July 1, 1977. R..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 182
Bikash Ranjan Das Vs. The Chairman, Second Labour Court, Dacca and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....Not represented—Respondents. Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 123 of 1977. (From the Judgment and order dated the 28th January, 1977 passed by the High Court of Bangladesh in Writ Petition No. 355 of 1975) Judgment: .......M. Hussain CJ A. Chowdhury J K. Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazal Munim J Bikash Ranjan Das…………............ Petitioner. Vs. The Chairman, Second Labour Court, Dacca and others..............Respondents Jud......c tribunal or not. That a different conclusion is possible is no ground for interference. We therefore do not find any good reason to grant leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Vs. The Chairman, Second Labour Court, Dacca and others..............Respondents Judgment June 14, 1977. Lawyers Involved: B.N. Chowdhury, Advocate, with Md. Ismail Khan, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Huq Advocate-on-record—For the peti..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 151
The State Vs. Fazu Kazi alias Kazi Fazlur Rahman and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....boration thereof. It is not, however, necessary that independent evidence by itself should be sufficient to sustain a conviction. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ...... (Criminal) Present: Syed A.B.M. Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Fazle Munim J The State.....................Appellant. Vs. Fazu Kazi alias Kazi Fazlur Rahman and others .................Respondents. ......boration thereof. It is not, however, necessary that independent evidence by itself should be sufficient to sustain a conviction. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......boration thereof. It is not, however, necessary that independent evidence by itself should be sufficient to sustain a conviction. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Afsar Ali Moral Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J: The petitioner along with one Akkas AH Dafadar faced a trial on three charges viz. under section 148 read with Article II(c) of Bangladesh Collaborators (Special Tribunal) Order, 1972, 364/34 and 302/34 in the alternative under......tion 364. The law in respect of the charge for the offence of abduction followed by murder and the recovery of the dead body has been clearly laid down by this court in the case of Hafez Abul Khair Vs. The State in Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 1975 of this court. Needless to say that the decision of...... to transportation for life under section 364 B.P.C. In our view the sentence passed should be read as one passed under section 303/109 B.PC instead of under Section 364 B.P. Code. Ed. ......bsp; January 20, 1977. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate with Md. Abdur Rahim, Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Abu Bakkar, Advocate on-Record.—For P..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Fakhruddin Mia and other Vs. Mohammad Khodabaksh Sheikh, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Special leave to appeal No. 153 of 1977. ( From the judgment and order dated the 9th November,1976 passed by the High Court of Bangladesh in Civil Revision No. 1458 of 1970) Judgment: &nb...... Present: Syed A.B M. Husain CJ Kemaluddin Hussain J D. C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Fakhruddin Mia and other.........................Petitioners. Vs. Mohammad Khodabaksh Sheikh... ……………Respondent ......th as second appellate court and a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circumstances. With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......th as second appellate court and a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circumstances. With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
K. M. Zaker Hossain Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J: The petitioner K.M. Zaker Hossain faced a trial in the Court of the Special Judge, Pabna on two charges namely, under section 409 of the Bangladesh Penal Code as well as under section 5 (2) of Act II of 1947. He was acquired of the char......hmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J K. M. Zaker Hossain................Petitioner Vs. The State.............................Respondent Judgment Feb. 21, 197......ion and as such there was no question of prejudice. There is, therefore, no question of law which calls for our interference. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ion and as such there was no question of prejudice. There is, therefore, no question of law which calls for our interference. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Md. Abdur Rahim Mondal Vs. State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....al No. 1, Bogra. 2. The appellant along with 11 others were put on trial before the aforesaid Special Tribunal on charges under section 302/34 Penal Code read with Article 11 (a) and (b) of the Bangladesh Collaborators (Special Tribunal) Order, 1972, which is commonly known as President's Orde......l) Present: Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hosain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Md. Abdur Rahim Mondal............Appellant Vs. The State................. Respondent Judgment April 21, 1977. Result: The ap......n of the appellant as well as of Pakistan Army in killing Saimuddin in the manner it were done. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 246. ......upreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hosain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Md. Abdur Rahim Mondal............Appellant Vs. The State................. Respondent Ju..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Mansur Ali Vs. Bangladesh and another, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Mansur Ali............................. Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and another............... Respondent Judgment ......ud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Mansur Ali............................. Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and another............... Respondent Judgment ...... For the reasons we allow the appeal, set aside the orders of the High Court Division, accept the reference of the Sessions Judge Dacca, and quash the proceedings. Ed. ......t Judgment February 23, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Md. Ansar Ali, Advocate, instructed by Md. A. Aziz, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Yusuf Sk. alias Sk Abu Yusuf Vs. Appellate Tribunal and another, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....e cigarettes and another shopkeeper named Harunur Rashid. The police after investigation submitted a charge sheet when the appellant faced the trial before the Special Tribunal under section 392, Bangladesh Penal Code read with section 28 of the Special Powers Act. The trial ended in conviction ......Mahmud Hossain CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Yusuf Sk. alias Sk Abu Yusuf.................................Appellant. Vs. Appellate Tribunal and another............................... Respondent. Judgment A......nths more. The sentences are accordingly modified. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with the modification of the sentence indicated. Ed. The Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 211. ......14 DLR (SC) 81 (86) = PLR 1962 (SC) 102 (106); Hari Vishnu vs. Ahmed Ishaque AIR 1955 (SC) 233, Syed Yakoob vs. Radha Krishnan AIR 1964 (SC) 477. Lawyers Involved: Mainul Hossain, Advocate with Md. Joynal Abedin, Advocate, Mozammel Huq Khan, Advocate—For the Appellant. Sultan Hossain Khan..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Punjab Ali Pramanik and others Vs. Mohd. Mokarram Hossain, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....954 S. C. 349 where it had been held that the Court would not invoke the inherent power to circumvent the mandatory provisions of the Code. 79. A Division Bench of the pre-constitution Bangladesh High Court had to consider the question of the applicability of section 151 of the Code f......risdiction (Civil) Present: AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Punjab Ali Pramanik and others.................Appellants. Vs. Mohd. Mokarram Hossain... ……………….Respondents Judgment March 4, 1976. Re......er to set aside the sale. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) (1977) 185. ...... cream He Bank Ltd. Vs. SardarKishan Singh, AIR 1963 Pun. 230; Income Tax, AIR 1955 S.C. 74 ; Shyamlal Vs Jagannath, AIR 1969 Cal 424; Fhtcrotts case (1883) 21 Ch. 519 (CA.); Abdur Rahim Vs. Syed Abu Md. Bark at AH LR55 IA 96—32 CWN 482-AIR 1928 ' P.C 16— ILR Cal. 519 ; Asmatunnessa Begum Vs. As..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Bangladesh and another Vs. M/S. A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ion (Civil) Present: Syed A.B. Mahmud Husain C J Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Bangladesh and another………………………&hell......azle Munim J Bangladesh and another……………………………………………Petitioners. Vs. M/S. A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others................. Respondents Judgm......show its lawful authority to dispossess forcibly the company from the property upon an alleged plea of cancellation of the lease. For these reasons this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......show its lawful authority to dispossess forcibly the company from the property upon an alleged plea of cancellation of the lease. For these reasons this petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Kumar Ram Narain Roy Chowdhury & anr. Vs. Sonatannessa Bibi & ors., 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ce Company vs. Mis. Muralidhar Benechand, reported in (1955) 10 D.L.R. (S.C.) 136: P. L. D. 1958 S.C. 138, that in the absence of a reciprocal arrangement between the Governments of India and Bangladesh regarding examination of witnesses on commission the Court had no jurisdiction to issue ......Chowdhury J D.C. Bhattacharya J Kumar Ram Narain Roy Chowdhury & anr....................Appellants Vs. Sonatannessa Bibi & ors.......................................... Respondents ...... countries was not regarded sufficient in the said case to take away the jurisdiction of the Court to authorise the Indian Ambassador in Kabul to take the evidence of certain witnesses. 28. Shahabuddin J, who delivered the judgment of the Bench deciding the case of The Hanover Fire Insura......e, is that the appeal is allowed, and the order of the Subordinate Judge dated 31-5-75 is set aside. There shall not however be any order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Mosharraf Hossain Vs. Bangladesh Jute Industries Corporation and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....hellip;……………………………………………………..Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh Jute Industries Corporation and others……………&hell......p;…………………………………………………………..Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh Jute Industries Corporation and others…………&h......gned order has anything to do with the non-suiting of the plaintiff, if he has an arguable case on merit. For these reasons we find no merit in this petition. It is dismissed. Ed. ......gned order has anything to do with the non-suiting of the plaintiff, if he has an arguable case on merit. For these reasons we find no merit in this petition. It is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Haji Abdul Motalib Sowdagar Vs. Faiz Ahmed Chowdhury and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....Second Appeal which was preferred by the petitioner to the Dacca High Court against the appellate decree mentioned above. The Second Appeal was dismissed the High Court Division of the Supreme Com of Bangladesh on 8-1-74. When after the disposal of the Second Appeal, the proceeding the execution cas...... Syed A.B. Mahmud Hussain C J Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Haji Abdul Motalib Sowdagar...................Petitioner Vs. Faiz Ahmed Chowdhury and others…………….Respondents Judgment March 22, 1977. ......ejecting civil petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 141 of 1975. The Courts below were right in rejecting the petitioner's plea. There is no substance in this petition which is dismissed. Ed. ...... Borough Council 1951(1) All E.R, 587. Lawyers Involved: M, H. Khandker, Senior Advocate — For the Petitioner. Mian Abdul Gafur, Advocate, instructed by B.C. Pandey, Advocate-on-Record. Md. A. Aziz, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appea..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Nurun Nabi Mondal and others Vs. Joynal Abedin Khondkar & ors, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....of Dacca High Court also has adopted the same reasoning in the judgment under appeal before us. 63. This Court had to examine in one of its recent decisions, Messers Amin Jute Mill Ltd vs. Bangladesh in the relative role of the preamble of an enactment in the interpretation of its enacti......bsp; Nurun Nabi Mondal and others………………………..Appellants Vs. Joynal Abedin Khondkar & ors ………………&hellip......s divergence of judicial opinion on this point. 8. It should be pointed, at the outset, that, so far as, the Dacca High Court was concerned, a Division Bench of the said Court consisting of Shahabuddin, CJ. and Faiaz Ali, J, has given a well considered judgment on......ll. 617; Union Bank Ltd., Vs. Mst. Ram Rati, AIR 1954 All. 595; Maniram Kolita vs. Keri Kolitani, LR 7 IA 115: ILR 5 Cal. 776; 19 WR 367—13 BLR 1 (FB). Lawyers Involved: Md. Golam Rabbani, Advocate, instructed by B. C. Panday, Advocate-on-record—for the Appellant..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
946945944943942937934932931930928927926924923922921920919918