Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Abdul Jalil and others Vs. Islamic Bank Bangladesh Ltd and others, 2000, 29 CLC (AD)
....rrect appreciation of both law and fact. There is therefore no merit in this petition. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 12. ......atifur Rahman CJ Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J AMM Rahman J Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Abdul Jalil and others.................................Petitioners Vs. Islamic Bank Bangladesh Ltd. and others.... ............Respondents Judgment June 1,......Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed (Dr. Kamal Hossain, Mahmudul islam, and Rokanuddin Mahmud, Senior Advocates with him) instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record — For Petitioners. Md. Nurul Huq, Senior Advocate (Nazrul Islam, Senior Advocate with him) instructed by AKM Shahidul H......rrect appreciation of both law and fact. There is therefore no merit in this petition. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 12. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Shahid Miah Vs. State, 2000, 30 CLC (AD)
....AD) (2001) 11. ...... section 561A Cr.P.C. by the High Court Division. 6. The submissions do not merit consideration. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 11. ...... dispensation of personal appearance of the accused before such court does not fall within the meaning of section 561A Cr.P.C. Lawyers Involved: Nazrul Islam Chowdhury, Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioners. Not resented—The Respondents. Cri...... section 561A Cr.P.C. by the High Court Division. 6. The submissions do not merit consideration. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 11. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Mahmudul Islam alias Ratan vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (AD)
....t: Latifur Rahman CJ Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J AMM Rahman J Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Mahmudul Islam alias Ratan.......................Appellant Vs. State............................ ........................Respondent Judgment August 14, 2000....... Present: Latifur Rahman CJ Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J AMM Rahman J Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Mahmudul Islam alias Ratan.......................Appellant Vs. State............................ ........................Respondent Judgment August 14......msul Haque Siddique, Advocate-on-Record — For the Respondent. B Hossain, Advocate-on-Record — For the Appellant. (In Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 1996) Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record — For the Respondent(In Criminal Appeal Nos. 26-28 of 1996) C......ge of the High Court Division. Let a copy of this judgment be transmitted to the author Judge of the High Court Division forthwith. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 1. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Mostafa alias Mosto Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....d. ...... Ed. ......atisfactory. For the above reasons, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... the explanations offered for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For the above reasons, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 94
State Vs. Nurul Islam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner Concerned. Ed ......uty Commissioner Concerned. Ed ......rict, Shariatpur be arrested immediately and then enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner Concerned. Ed ......esh Ali kabiraj of village Putia, Police Station Bhedorganj, District, Shariatpur be arrested immediately and then enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner Concerned. Ed ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Syed S.M. Hasan Vs. Bangladesh, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....try of Finance, Banking Division and another.......Respondents Judgment December 18, 2002. Cases Referred to- Madras City Wine Merchants' Association V. State of T. N. (1994) 5 SCC 509, Schmidt Vs. Secretary of State for Home Affairs. 1969 2 Chanc......on (Civil) Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Syed S.M. Hasan.............Appellant Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Banking Division and a...... Madras City Wine Merchants' Association V. State of T. N. (1994) 5 SCC 509, Schmidt Vs. Secretary of State for Home Affairs. 1969 2 Chancery 149, Secretary, Ministry of Establishment Vs. Md. Jahangir Hossain, 51 DLR (AD) 148. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rob Chowdhu......le of equity and good conscious. In the result, this appeal is dismissed without an order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 76. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Agrabad Hotel Ltd. & another Vs. Revenue Deputy Collector, Cox's Bazar & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....y action until 20.03.1995 when he issued a letter fixing salami amount at Tk. 27,37,632/- without mentioning the basis of such fixation. The writ-petitioner then filed an application to the State Minister for land for payment of the said salami money by 10 installments after adjusting the ...... cost. Ed. ......he High Court Division was not justified in discharging the Rule. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. No order of cost. Ed. ......e discussions made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division was not justified in discharging the Rule. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. No order of cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 127
Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue) Vs. Sree Ratan Chandra Roy and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....its. 4. No other submission of any significance has been made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner. We find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed ......A.M. Mahmudur Rahman J Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue), Dhaka and Assistant Custodian Vested and Non-resident Property, Collectorate Building, P.S. Kotwali , Dhaka.........Petitioner Vs. Sree Ratan Chandra Roy and others..........Respondents Judgment 23rd May 1999 L......S. Kotwali , Dhaka.........Petitioner Vs. Sree Ratan Chandra Roy and others..........Respondents Judgment 23rd May 1999 Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior, (Md. Shahidul Alam Chowdhury, Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record......its. 4. No other submission of any significance has been made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner. We find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Abdul Matlib and others Vs. Abdul Malik, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....his case". 3. Facts of the case, briefly, are that the respondent as pre-emptor instituted a Miscellaneous Case No. 7 of 1992 for preemption of the case land under Section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act as contiguous land owner by inheritance stating inter alia th...... Ed. ......hbubey Alam, Senior Advocate and J. N. Deb, Advocate with him) instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-record-For the Appellants. Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-record.....For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 119 of 1......ument of Mr. T.H. Khan. Accordingly, we allow the appeal by setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division and affirm those of the courts below. No order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Abdus Quddus Vs. Administration of Waqf & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....bsp; 16. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. The writ petition is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit and in accordance with law. Ed. ......dance with law. Ed. ...... as to cost. The writ petition is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit and in accordance with law. Ed. ......bsp; 16. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. The writ petition is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit and in accordance with law. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Md. Abdul Jalil Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdul Jalil Khan…………Petitioner Vs. The State.................Respondent Judgment 23rd June 2004 Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Za......me Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdul Jalil Khan…………Petitioner Vs. The State.................Respondent Judgment 23rd June 2004 Lawyers Involved: ......ion is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......rit consideration. Moreover, the petition is also delayed by 444 days but the reasons for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. The criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 94
State Vs. Abul Kalam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The State...........................Petitioner Vs. Abul Kalam...................Respondent......sp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The State...........................Petitioner Vs. Abul Kalam...................Respondent Judgment August 3, 2005. ......y;dent namely, Abul Kalam, son of late Abdur Rahim of Village-Charlapang, Police Station-Nabinagar, District-Brahmonbaria arrested and to release him on bail to his satisfaction. Ed. ......y;dent namely, Abul Kalam, son of late Abdur Rahim of Village-Charlapang, Police Station-Nabinagar, District-Brahmonbaria arrested and to release him on bail to his satisfaction. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Panna Biswas Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ent: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J K. M. Hasan J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Judgment 19th May 2002 Panna Biswas…………………Petitioner Vs. The State..........................Respondent Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on......sp; Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J K. M. Hasan J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Judgment 19th May 2002 Panna Biswas…………………Petitioner Vs. The State..........................Respondent Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Ad...... J Judgment 19th May 2002 Panna Biswas…………………Petitioner Vs. The State..........................Respondent Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-Respondent. Crimi......rred by 324 days and the explanation given for the delay is not satisfactory. This petition on merit as well as on point of limitation has got no leg to stand and hence is dismissed. Ed ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Enamul Haque Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Enamul Haque... .............Petitioner Vs. The State..........Respondent Judgment July 20, 2002. Lawyers Involved:&n......ion (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Enamul Haque... .............Petitioner Vs. The State..........Respondent Judgment July 20, 2002. Lawy......mises this petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......greement with the findings and decisions of the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises this petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Janata Bank Vs. Khalilur Rahman, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ndamental Rule 29 we are of the view that the submission have no substance. We, therefore, do not like to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......rul Kabir Chowdhury J Janata Bank, represented by its Chairman, Board of Directors, Janata Bank, 110, Motijheel Commercial Area, Police Station Motijheel, Dhaka and others..........Petitioners Vs. Mr. Khalilur Rahman...................Respondent Judgment 19th June 2004 Lawyers ......Dhaka and others..........Petitioners Vs. Mr. Khalilur Rahman...................Respondent Judgment 19th June 2004 Lawyers Involved: Shamim Khaled Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Abu Siddique, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners Badruddoza, Advocate, instructed by A.K......ndamental Rule 29 we are of the view that the submission have no substance. We, therefore, do not like to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 83
Srwardi Shaikh and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Division (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Srwardi Shaikh and others……….....Petitioners. Vs. The State……………..Respondent Judgment 22nd July 2002 La......ppellate Division (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Srwardi Shaikh and others……….....Petitioners. Vs. The State……………..Respondent Judgment 22nd July 2002&......ssed the appeal. Interference is not called for accordingly this petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ecord, the learned Judges of the High Court Division rightly dismissed the appeal. Interference is not called for accordingly this petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Ali Akbor Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....p; Ali Akbor Khan.................Petitioner Vs. The State.........................Respondent Judgment &n......san J Ali Akbor Khan.................Petitioner Vs. The State.........................Respondent Judgment  ......reme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Mahmudul Amin CJ Md. Ruhul Amin J K. M. Hasan J &nb......ntitled to be discharged from the charge framed against him. 6. In the afore state of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....in J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Judgment 20th July 2002 Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others………………Petitioners. Vs. The State................................Respondent Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Shahidul Hu...... Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Judgment 20th July 2002 Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others………………Petitioners. Vs. The State................................Respondent Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Sh......uld not be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. The points raised merit consideration. Accordingly leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed ......uld not be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. The points raised merit consideration. Accordingly leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal ...................Appellant. Vs. The State…...Respondent. Judgment August 14, 2004. ......vision (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal ...................Appellant. Vs. The State…...Respondent. Judgment August 14, 2004. ......nt reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......sion rightly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95
National Board of Revenue and others Vs. Mustafizur Rahman, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....he respondent filed another application on 27.7.1996 to the said Minister for permission to import 400 tons of duplex board from South Korea and the said application was forwarded by the Ministry for State, Labour and Manpower for special consideration on 7.8.1996 with endorsement to enquire into th......late Division Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J KM Hasan J Md. Fazlul Haque J National Board of Revenue and others...............Appellants Vs. Mustafizur Rahman ..................Respondent Judgment January 21, 2003. Result: ......ny order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ith reference to the relevant provisions of the concerned SRO. In view of the above matter, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 130