Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Qazi Karnal Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....Mustafa Kamal J.- These two appeals, one certificated and the other by leave are from the judgment and order of the High Court Division dated 18.6.90 in Writ Petition No. 10 of 1989 discharging the Rule Nisi. The writ petitioner is the appellant in both the two appeals. They have been heard toge...... Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha and another .....................Respondents [In both the appeals] Judgment August 30th, 1992 Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) in..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Sharifa Khatun @ Sharbat Banu and others Vs. Md. Yusuf and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ng the appellants in place of their deceased predecessor and the High Court Division was not justified in interfering with the same. The appeal is, therefore, allowed but without any costs. Ed. ................Respondents Judgment April 19th, 1992. Cases Referred to- Pradhip Das alias Shambhu vs. Kazal Das Sarma, 44 DLR (AD) 1; Abdus Sattar vs. Suresh Chandra Das, 32 DLR (AD) 171. Lawyers Involved: Khander Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader,..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Bangladesh Freedom Fighters Welfare Trust and another Vs. Md. Momtazul Hossain, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....rvice was terminated by an order dated 26th October, 1986 communicated under the signature of the Secretary of the Trust. The order was purported to have been made under the following sub-rule (1) of Rule 7 of the Bangladesh Freedom Fighters' Welfare Trust (Head Office) Service Rules 1979, framed by......ution (Seventh Amendment ) Act, 1986 (Act I of 1986) The General Clauses Act ,1897 (Act X of 1897), Section 6 When the impugned order of termination from service was not passed under Martial Law or any Martial Law Regulation the same was not protected just because the president of the Trust..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Bashir Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh Jute Mills Corporation and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD
....unds of misconduct. Leave was granted by us to see whether the High Court Division duly considered the questions raised in the writ petition namely, the Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, though applicable to the appellant's case, were not followed and the principle of natural ju...... Latifur Rahman J Bashir Ahmed...................Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Jute Mills Corporation and others............Respondents Judgment March 19th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, (Mahbubey Alam..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Subash Chandra Halder & another Vs. Abdul Bari & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....hus cannot be sustained. The order is, accordingly, set aside. The appeal is allowed without any order as to Cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1992) 12 BLD (AD) 174; 44 DLR (AD) 253. ......and the minimum that is required to be found in such a case is that the presence of such a party is necessary within the meaning of Order 1 rule 10(2) CPC or for the ends of justice............(8) Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate, (SK Sinha, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Manik Chand Bibi @ Rezian Nahar & anr Vs. Abdul Mutakabbir Chy @ Sufi Mia Chy, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ision No. 204 of 1998 (Sylhet) Judgment: Latifur Rahman J.- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court Division passed in Civil Revision No. 104 of 1989 making the Rule absolute and directing to proceed with the execution case in accordance with law. 2. The mat......Bibi alias Rezian Nahar and another.........................Appellant Vs. Abdul Mutakabbir Chowdhury alias Sufi Mia Chowdhury……………….Respondents Judgment December 3rd, 1991 Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 175
Habibur Rahman Vs. Sree Jogiswar Roy Chowdhury Chand and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ment and decree dated 27.6.80 affirmed the same. A learned Single Judge of the Barisal Bench, High Court Division by judgment and order dated 24.11.85 in Civil Revision No. 311 of 1981 discharged the Rule, maintaining the judgment and decree of the lower appellate Court. 2. The property described......eing dead his heirs Saleha Begum and other ...................Appellants Vs. Sree Jogiswar Roy Chowdhury Chand and others…………………… Respondents Judgment April 23, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahabubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mahbubey Alam, Advocate with him..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....thin the jurisdiction of the court where the plaint was filed. We find no good ground to interfere with the concurrent order of the courts below. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... Cal. 659; Peoples Insurance Co. Vs. Benoy Bhusan AIR 1943 Cal. 199 (202); Read Vs. Brown 22 QBD 128 (132); Cooke Vs. Gill LR 8 CP 107; G. Venkatesha Vs. Kamlapath 1957 AIR 201 (Mad). Lawyers Involved: Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mr. Kazi Shahabuddin Ahm..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Shamser Ali (Md) and others Vs. Mosammat Kafizan Bibi, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Latifur Rahman J.- This appeal by the plaintiff calls in question the judgment and order of the High Court Division, Rangpur Bench, passed in Civil Revision No. 1627 of 1981 making the Rule absolute and setting aside the judgment and decree of the lower appellate Court which in turn ......……Appellants. Vs. Mosammat Kafizan Bibi………..…………….Respondent Judgment August 18th, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Narayan Chandra Rajak Das Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....round that the appellant "has made submission on facts" and has "not been able to point out any error of law in the decision" of the lower appellate Court "for issuance of Rule." 12. Leave was granted to consider the appellant's submission that the finding of......ahman J Narayan Chandra Rajak Das......... Appellant Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others………...Respondents Judgment November 21 st, 1991. Lawyers Involved: SS Halder, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abdul Hamid Mollah Vs. Ali Mollah and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....der of acquittal, the appellant took a revision, No. 90 of 1985, in which a Division Bench of the High Court Division, Dhaka by the Impugned judgment and order dated 24 October, 1989 discharged the Rule. 12. Leave was granted to consider the case as against respondent No. 1 Ali Mollah only............. Complainant-Appellant Vs. Ali Mollah and another…………………... Accused-Respondents Judgment March 25th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Moksudor Rahman, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, (Lutfur Rahman Mazumdar,..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Chairman, Kushtia Cooperative Industrial Union Ltd Vs. Mujibur Rahman & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....n need not also call for any consideration. 18. All the opposite parties have shown sufficient contrition in throwing themselves at the mercy of this Court. Their apologies are accepted. The Rule is discharged. Mustaf...... Mujibur Rahman & others...............Respondents Judgment June 10th, 1991 Lawyers Involved: Moinul Huq, Advocate, instructed by Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate-on-Record -..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Muhammad Muslim Ali Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....y. The said inquiry was held against the petitioner as a member of the public and not as a Government servant which is not contemplated under the ‑Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules 1985, the Petitioner submitted further. 5. There is no substance in the contenti...... Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment and others……………Respondents Judgment May 21st, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Muhammad Muslim Ali, In person-For the Petitioner. Not ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 123
Ishaque Khan (Md) and another Vs. Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ovember, 1981 and Appellate No 2 was suspended on 26 December, 1981. Formal charge‑ sheet was submitted against them on 26th April, 1982 under the Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1976 for "misconduct corruption". 3. They denied the charge taking the plea......ration of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Principal Office, Kawran Bazar, Dhaka………………Respondent Judgment October 31st, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab‑I, Advocate‑on‑Record, Supreme Court‑..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Fazlur Rahman Molla Vs. Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Ex parte‑Respondent No. 2. Criminal Appeal No. 16 of‑1989. (From the judgment and order dated 28.5.1989 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in Suo Motu Contempt Rule No. 189 of 1989) Judgment: &nb......n J Fazlur Rahman Molla ...................Appellant Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice Division and another ………………… Respon..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Rafiqul Islam (Md) Vs. Mir Abdul Ali, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....r section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, but as this plea was not taken in the written statement the learned Single Judge did not allow the plea to be raised for the first time in revision. The Rule was made absolute, the concurrent judgments of the Courts below were set aside and the suit was......ause it could not stand up to the challenge thrown up by the defendant on other grounds. So, the impugned judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is dismissed……….(12,17,18) Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate ‑ For the Appellant. Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Adv..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Siddique Munshi Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....e same Judge. However, departure from this practice has caused no prejudice to the appellant. 13. In the result, we do not find anything to interfere. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..........Respondent Judgment October 24th, 1991. Cases Referred To: Duga Mia vs. Crown 7 DLR 395; Shahed Ali Vs. State 13 DLR 414 and Sadik Vs. State (1971) PLD (SC) 713. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Huq, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossa..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Sec, Min of Food, Food Div., Govt. of Bangladesh, Dhaka & others Vs. M/s. MF Ltd, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....tee to collect "octrol" on goods imported into the octroi barrier of the Municipality. The main question is whether the "certificate", as required of that the appellants, under Rules that the goods in from question are Government properties and that these that goods are inten...... Private company limited by shares........................Respondent Judgment February 10th, 1992. Case Referred to- Pratap Singh vs. Krishna Gupta AIR 1966 SC 140. Lawyers Involved: AW Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney‑General, instructed by Md. Sajjadul ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 92