Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5861-5867 of 5867 results.
Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....que-Ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 1st and 2nd November 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Contempt Petition No. 3 of 2003...... contemner appellant No. 1 that his inaction in holding the AGM of the Bank is, in effect, violation of the order of Court and amount to disregarding the order of Court and this may be brought to the notice of the Court and the contemner appellants may be held liable for defiance of the order of the......and 2nd November, 2003 passed by the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh in Contempt Petition No.3 of 2003 arising out of Company Matter No.2 of 2000 convicting the appellants for contempt of Court and sentencing them to pay fine of Tk. 2000/- each, in default, to suffer simp..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Syed Ehsanul Hussain & ors Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lved: Muhammad Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners. Not represented-Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 229 of 2002. (From Judgment and order dated 2.8.2001 passed by the High Court Division in First Miscellaneous Appeal No. 51 of 1998 with C...... and against security of which the appellant petitioner had received house building loan from the respondent on 3.11.84. It also appears that the learned District Judge considered the legal notice dated 23.7.1996, Exhibit-2 by which the respondent requested the petitioner to......spondent. Judgment April 27, 2003. Lawyers Involved: Muhammad Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners. Not represented-Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 229 of 2002. (From Judgment and order dated 2.8.2001 passed by the High Cou..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Md. Nurul Hoque Miah Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....M. Kamal, Additional Attorney General- For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 257 of 2003. Judgment Mohammad Fazlul Karim J.- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.11.2001 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal dismissing the Miscellaneous Appeal...... the hearing of this appeal (181/95) as to the subsequent promotions. Thus was necessary for strengthening the litigation and doing justice to the case. In that event the Tribunal could take judicial notice of the event happening after institution of the case. One would fairly expect that Government......ffirming those dated 7.12.2000 of the Administrative Tribunal, Dhaka rejecting the appellant's Execution Case No.3 of 2000. 2. The facts, leading to this appeal, are that the appellant filed the aforesaid Miscellaneous Appeal No.4 of 2000 for declaration that as per judgment dated 24.6.1996 of t..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Md. Mojibul Huq alias Shaikh Md. Mojibul Huq Vs. Md. Yakub Ali, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent No. 1. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 2-7. Civil Appeal No. 52 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated June 8, 2000 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5011 of 1998). Ju......-1' were indistinct and those were made indistinct by putting thumb impressions subsequently over the initial one. The Court of Additional District Judge on examination of the deed dated 14.3.1980 noticed that the date 14.3.1980 was written in the said deed upon erasing the date 7.12.1979 and th...... who died later on, on December 7, 1979 and upon putting thumb impressions in the undertaking received Tk. 36,000/- as loan. It was stipulated in the said undertaking that in case of return of the aforesaid amount of money the appellant and his brother would return the shop no. 235 (kha) to him a..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Director of Housing and Settlement Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....1-8 & 11-13. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 9-10 & 14-23. Civil Appeal No. 66 of 2003 Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin, J. - This appeal by leave is against the judgment and order dated August 7, 2001 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Rule No. 800 (condonation......n Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ......e judgment and decree dated April 16, 1997 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 decreeing the same. The suit has been filed seeking declaration of title and for further reliefs that the plaintiff-Respondent Nos. 1-19 are entitled to get the property describ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 189
Aynul Sheikh and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....minal Appeal Nos. 42 and 43 of 2003 Judgment Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- Criminal Appeal No. 42 of 2003 is at the instance of convict appellant Shafiuddin Sheikh against the judgment and order dated 30.04.2001 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal no. 2180 of 1997. 2. Crimin......deceased while P.W.1 Abdul Hamid Matbar and P.W. 2 Khaleque Matbar deposed that the two appellants tied the two hands of the deceased. The learned Advocate-on-Record brought this inconsistency to our notice and submits emphatically that in view of such inconsistency in the evidence the order of conv......nd order dated 30.04.2001 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal no. 2180 of 1997. 2. Criminal Appeal No. 43 of 2003 is at the instance of convict appellant Jaber Sheikh against the aforesaid judgment and order. 3. Both the appeals being heard analogously were disposed of by the ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 97
M. A. Rashid and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....or Leave to Appeal No. 591 of 2002. Judgment Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- At the instance of the writ petitioners this petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 18.10.2001 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 940 of 1995 discharging the ......gment and on the reasoning given above we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......spondents Result: The leave petition is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-On- Record- For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 591 of 2002. Judgment Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- At the instance of ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 74
324323307306303302297