Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Golam Hafez Mia Vs. Khadem Ali Meah, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....s of the arrival of the records in the court below, shall be dismissed with cost. The cost of this appeal shall abide the result of the suit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 311. ......nda Mallik, 9 DLR 57; Purna Chandra Vs. Dinabandhu Mukherjee I.L.R. 34 Cal 811; Abtabur Rahman Vs. Madan Mia, 19 DLR 333; Tarangini Debi 19 DLR 57; Keramat Ali Vs. Mohammad Yunus, 15 DLR (SC) 130. Lawyers Involved: M. Nurullah, Advocate, instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the App..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Amir Sultan Ali Hyder Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....t Pakistan) Judgment Fazle Munim J.- This appeal arises agaiÂnst the judgment and order of a Division Bench of the High Court of East Pakistan Dacca as it then was, which was passed in Civil Rule No. 1687 of 1968 on July 1, 1969. 2. The appellant who claims to be the eldest son of one M...... Board reported in (1949) 1 DLR 81; Ramjan Khan vs. Obaidul Huq.reported in (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 57; and Shahzada Muhammad Umar Beg vs. Sultan Mahmood Khan and another; reported in PLD 1970-SC 139. Lawyers Involved: M.H. Khondker, Advocate, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record—For the..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 182
Mannujan Begum Vs. A. Samad Molla & others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....e appellant under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, challenging the validity of the two orders passed by the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Khulna in a proceeding under Order 33, Rule 1 of the Code, instituted by Respondent No. 1, by which the proceeding in execution of a decre......llip;…………………..Appellant. Vs. A. Samad Molla & others................... Respondents. Judgment Nov. 24, 1976 Lawyers Involved: Nizamuddin Haider, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record&m..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 61
The State Vs. Fazu Kazi alias Kazi Fazlur RahÂman and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
..... S. Hoda,Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Re cord—For the Respondents. A. T. M. Kamrul Islam, Advocate, Supreme Court—U/o. XXIII, Rule 1, Supreme Court Rules. Criminal Appeal No 18-D of 1970. (On appeal......thers .................Respondents. Judgment March 9, 1977 Cases Referred to- Joygun Bibi State (1960) 12 DLR (SC) 157, Moqbul Hossain Vs. State 12 DLR (SC) 217. Lawyers Involved: Sultan Hossain Khan. Deputy Attorney General with B. B. Roy Chowdhury, Ass..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Mansur Ali Vs. Bangladesh and another, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ake over the management of the Company. But the said Order clearly recited that the Company shall continue to be a company under the Companies Act and that subject to the Martial Law Order and the Rules made thereunder, the provisions of the Companies Act shall apply. The fluctuating details of ......r............... Respondent Judgment February 23, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Md. Ansar Ali, Advocate, instructed by Md. A. Aziz, Advocate-on-Record&md..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Abdur Rahim Afroze Vs. B. C. Aga and Co. Ltd. and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....therefore, jurisdiction to enter upon arbitration on his appointment and the award made by him was not void. In the result the appeal is dismissed withÂout, however, any order as to costs. Ed. ......houdhury J Abdur Rahim Afroze.......................................Appellant Vs. B. C. Aga and Co. Ltd. and others…………………… Respondents Judgment February 18, 1975. Lawyers Involved: S. R. Pal. Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Abdur Rab, (absent) Ad..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Yusuf Sk. alias Sk Abu Yusuf Vs. Appellate TribuÂnal and another, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....193 of 1975). Judgment Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J.- This is an appeal by Special leave from the Judgment and order of the High Court Division passed in Writ Petition No. 193 of 1975 discharging the Rule issued earlier. 2. The appellant was prosecuted on the allegation that he along with 2 other...... Cases Referred to- Ali Ahmed vs. State (1962) 14 DLR (SC) 81 (86) = PLR 1962 (SC) 102 (106); Hari Vishnu vs. Ahmed Ishaque AIR 1955 (SC) 233, Syed Yakoob vs. Radha Krishnan AIR 1964 (SC) 477. Lawyers Involved: Mainul Hossain, Advocate with Md. Joynal Abedin, Advocate, Mozammel Huq Khan, A..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Punjab Ali Pramanik and others Vs. Mohd. Mokarram Hossain, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... in the properties beÂlonging to the company, such share-holders cannot be said to have their interests affected by the sale of the properties of the company within the meaning of the relevant Rule and has referred, in addition to the cases of Vaiydanatha Vs. Indian Bank Ltd. A.I.R. 195......li AIR 1933 Mad. 635; Basanta Kumar vs. Mihirlal AIR 1968. Cal. 604; Manilal Mohan Lai vs. Sajdu Ahmad AIR. 1954 SC 349; S.M. Yousuf and another Vs. Kh. Hafizur Rahman and others 36 DLR 124. Lawyers Involved: Syed A.N.M. Nasiruddin, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. M.H. K..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Bangladesh and another Vs. M/S. A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... was dismissed on contest on March 13, 1976. Since order of the Court was not being implemented. Contempt petition No. 4 of 1977 was filed against some of the officers of the Government, and Rule was issued on June 30, 1976. During the pendency of the said Rule, the Government filed the Re......p;……………Petitioners. Vs. M/S. A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others................. Respondents Judgment April 12, 1977. Lawyers Involved: K. A. Bakr Attorney-General, A. Wadud Bhuiyan, Assistant Attorney-General,..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Kumar Ram Narain Roy Chowdhury & anr. Vs. Sonatannessa Bibi & ors., 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... with S.A. Latif, Advocate—For the Respondents. K.A, Bakar, Attorney-General with A. Wadud Bhuiyan, Asstt, Attorney General, instructed by S.S. Hoda, Advocate on Record—U/O. XLV Rule 1 of S.C. (A.D.) Rules. Civil Appeal No. 1 of 1976. (From the Judgment and Orde........................ Respondents Judgment April 15, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Faqeer Abdul Mannan, Advocate with M.B. Rahman Advocate, instructed by S.M..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Mosharraf Hossain Vs. Bangladesh Jute InÂdustries Corporation and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....irst, submitted that the learned Judges of the High Court following Noman's case, 16 DLR 537, ought to have held, that the Corporation, a nationalised organisation, could not, without framing Rules, start any disciplinary proceeding against the officer. We reserve our opinion on the correct......titioner. Vs. Bangladesh Jute Industries Corporation and others…………………Respondents Judgment March 2, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Ahmad Sobhan, Senior Advocate, instructed by S.M. Huq. Advocate-on-Record...Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Nurun Nabi Mondal and others Vs. Joynal Abedin Khondkar & ors, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....A. Aziz, Advocate-on-record—For Respondents Nos. 1-4 & 8. Ex-parte. — Respondents No. 5-7 and 9-13. B. N. Chowdhury, Advocate— U/O XLV, R. 1 of the Supreme Court Rules. Civil Appeal No. 6-D of 1971 (From the judgment and Decree dated 29-6-67 &am......Mst. Kausilla, AIR 1932 All. 617; Union Bank Ltd., Vs. Mst. Ram Rati, AIR 1954 All. 595; Maniram Kolita vs. Keri Kolitani, LR 7 IA 115: ILR 5 Cal. 776; 19 WR 367—13 BLR 1 (FB). Lawyers Involved: Md. Golam Rabbani, Advocate, instructed by B. C. Panday, Advocate-on-recor..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Bangladesh Vs. M/s. Sree Kundeswari Aushadhalaya, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....er as both facts and law are the same. The consideration is the vires of a Notification dated 19th December, 1974 issued by the Ministry of Finance (National Board of Revenue) amending rule 15 of the Rules framed under section 86(2) of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909 (Bengal Act IV of 1909). These Rules......¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Respondent (In Appeal No. 24 of 1976) Mr. M.A. Quddus for M/s. Ayurvedic Kutir .......Respondent (In Appeal No. 25 of 1975) Judgment February 2, 1977. Lawyers Involved: K A Bakar, Attorney-General with M/S Sultan Hossain Khan, Deputy Attorney-Gener..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 137
Abul Hayat Choudhury Vs. Nurul Amin and ors., 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....the case by filing a joint written objection and their case, inter alia, was that the election petition as framed and filed by Respondent No. 1 was not maintainable, that the same was barred under Rules 56, 59, 63 and 61 of the Union Parishad & Paurashava (Election) Rules, 1973 and that the ..........................................Respondents Judgment December 8, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmad, Md. Abdur Rouf, Advocate Khademul Islam Chowdh..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 141
Mohiuddin Khan and others Vs. Pakistan River Steamer Ltd. and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....o in such manner as may be prescribed, and a copy thereof has be3a sent to the Director of Labour and to the Conciliation Officer concerned." A perusal of the Industrial Disputes Rules and different forms given in the Schedule thereto indicate that a registered Trade Union......unim J Mohiuddin Khan and others......................Appellants. Vs. Pakistan River Steamer Ltd. and others. ...Respondents Judgment January 4, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab-1, Advocate on Record—For the appellants. Kazi Sha..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 138
Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Khaleque and ors., 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....he matter in the manner indicated above. The appeal No. 26 of 1976 subject to the observation made above is dismissed. We however make no order as to costs in all the appeals. Ed. ......llip;……………………………….. Respondents. (In C. A. No. 26 of 1976) Judgment Feb. 11, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Sultan Hossain Khan, Deputy Attorney-General with B. B. Roy Choudhury, Ass..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
M/s Amin Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ll be determined 'in the prescribed manner', which means "according to rules framed by the Government under section 14 of the Act. Accordingly, the East Pakistan Urban Immoveable Property Tax Rules, 1957 was framed by the Government and Chapter II of the said Rules lays down procedure as to......1957 A.C. 436 same case 1957 (1) All. E.R. 49; M/s Speed Bird Navigation Company and another vs. Bangladesh in (1975) 27 D.L.R. 170; Md. Rejaul Haque vs. Bangladesh m (1976) 28 D.L.R. 38. Lawyers Involved: M.H. Khandker, Senior Advocate, with Syed Mozaffar Hossain, Advocate, inst..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 244
Bangladesh Small Industries CorporaÂtion, Dacca Vs. Mahbub Hossain Chowdhury, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....untries and sturdy of their legislative attempts will be of great assistance for our courts to formulate princiÂples of interpretation of legislation aiming to achieve a socialist economy within the Rule of Law. 11. Study of techniques adopted by the Government indicates that one of the methods......n and others Vs. Rustom Ali and others, 19 DLR (SC) 186 = PLD 1966 (SC) 848; Eastern Mercantile Bank Ltd. Vs. Mohammad Shamsuddin 21 DLR (SC) 368; Secretary EPIDC Vs. Serajul Haq 22 DLR (SC) 284. Lawyers Involved: Faqeer Shahabuddin Ahmad, Attorney-GeÂneral, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocat..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 170
Managing DirecÂtor, Janata Bank Vs. Hafijuddin AhÂmed and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....er, rejected the petition filed by the appellant. As against that the appellant moved the High Court Division in revision and the learned Single Judge of the High Court Division discharged the Rule affirming the order of the learned Munsif. 4. The defendant-Bank obtained leave agains...... Managing Director, Janata Bank .................Appellant Vs. Hafijuddin Ahmed and others .....................Respondents Judgement May 7, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Rafique-ul Huq, Advocate, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record&mda..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 70
A.K.M. Muklesur Rahman Vs. Govt. of BanglaÂdesh, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....es under sections 395 and 397 B P. Code read with President's Order No. 50 of 1972 were also started against him and more than one detention orders under rule (5)(a)(1) of the Emergency Powers Rules were also served upon him. The Writ Bench of the High Court Division found that all the deten......ovt. of Bangladesh...............................Petitioner Judgment December 7, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Sultan Hussain Khan, Deputy Attorney General instructed by Abu Backkar, Ad..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69