Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5941-5960 of 6796 results.
Governor, Bangladesh Bank & others Vs. Shamsul Huda Khan and another, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
.... Vs. Shamsul Huda Khan and another……………..ResponÂdents (In C.A. No. 26 of 1974). And Mozammel Huq Khan and another…………..ResponÂdents (In C.A. No. 27 of 1974). And Md. Nurul Huq & another……………………....Respondents (In C.A. No. 28 of 1974) Judgment ......hamÂmad Khan, 12 D.L.R. (S.C.) page 50; High Court, Calcutta and another Vs. Amal Kumar Roy and others, A.I.R. 1962 S.C. page 1704. Lawyers involved: S. R. Pal, Senior Advocate with Dr. Ahmed Hossain, Advocate, instructed by Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant (In all the appea......rightly declared by the High Court Division to be without jurisdiction and of no legal effect. The appeals are dismissed, but without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......Division (Civil) Present: A. M. Sayem CJ A. B. Mahmud Husain J M. A. Jabir J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Governor, Bangladesh Bank & others…......Appellant (In all the Appeals). Vs. Shamsul Huda Khan and another……………..ResponÂdents (In C.A. No. 26 of 1974). And ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Badal Rani Misra alias Badal Rani Goswami and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....d. The case of Gordon, Dadds & co. supports the contention of the learned Attorney-General. There is accordingly no merit in this appeal which is dismissed but without any order as to cost. Ed. ......d. The case of Gordon, Dadds & co. supports the contention of the learned Attorney-General. There is accordingly no merit in this appeal which is dismissed but without any order as to cost. Ed. ......d. The case of Gordon, Dadds & co. supports the contention of the learned Attorney-General. There is accordingly no merit in this appeal which is dismissed but without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: AM Sayem CJ ABM Husain J MA Jabir J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Badal Rani Misra alias Badal Rani Goswami and others………..Appellants. Vs. Bangladesh and others …………….Respondents Judgment May 2, 1975. Lawyers inv..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Osman Gani Mondal Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and others, 1974, 3 CLC (AD)
....ani Mondal……………….....Petitioner Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and others…......Respondents Judgment April 26, 1974. Result: The petition is dismissed. Lawyers involved: Md. Ansar Ali, Advocate, instructed by Mohammad A. Aziz, Advocate-on-Record. —For the Petitioner. ......d by the learned Additional Attorney-General thus sucÂceeds. This petition which was lodged on the 14th day of May, 1973 is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 61. ......d by the learned Additional Attorney-General thus sucÂceeds. This petition which was lodged on the 14th day of May, 1973 is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 61. ......(1975) 61. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 148
Saokat Ali and others Vs. Shamsun Bibi and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....nally. We find no substance in the only contention raised in support of this petition, which is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 DLR (AD) (1975) 59. ......dar, 15 DLR 634; Umar Din Vs. Fazal Din, PLR 5 Lah. 196; Visheswar Vs. Durgappa, AIR 1940 Bom. 339; Vithoba Kadhar Vs. Madhar jemedar, (1918) ILR 42 Bom. 344. Lawyers involved: Akram Hossain Amin, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Not represented—the Respondents. ......nally. We find no substance in the only contention raised in support of this petition, which is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 DLR (AD) (1975) 59. ...... Present: A. M. Sayem CJ A. B. Mahmud Husain J M.A. Jabir J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Saokat Ali and others…………...Petitioners. Vs. Shamsun Bibi and others……….....Respondents Judgment J..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Bangladesh Enemy Property ManageÂment Board and ors. Vs. Md. Abdul Majid, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....ppellate Division (Civil) Present: AB Mahmud Husain J MA Jabir J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Bangladesh Enemy Property ManageÂment Board and ors………….... .Appellants. Vs. Md. Abdul Majid…………..... Respondent Judgment March 27, 1975. Cases Referred to- ......view of what have been stated above, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order passed by the learned Judges of the High Court Division are set aside. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......view of what have been stated above, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order passed by the learned Judges of the High Court Division are set aside. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......urt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: AB Mahmud Husain J MA Jabir J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Bangladesh Enemy Property ManageÂment Board and ors………….... .Appellants. Vs. Md. Abdul Majid…………..... Respondent Judgment March 27, 1975. Cases Referred..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 125
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Ahmed Nazir, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....e the Proclamation of Emergency issued on the 28th December, 1974 and the Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1975 dated the 25th January, 1975 effected changes in the said Constitution. Ed. ......e the Proclamation of Emergency issued on the 28th December, 1974 and the Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1975 dated the 25th January, 1975 effected changes in the said Constitution. Ed. ......e the Proclamation of Emergency issued on the 28th December, 1974 and the Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1975 dated the 25th January, 1975 effected changes in the said Constitution. Ed. ...... Present: AM Sayem CJ AB Mahmud Husain J Muhammad Abdullah Jabir J Government of Bangladesh represented by Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs.....Appellant. Vs. Ahmed Nazir………….... Respondent Judgment March..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Jamdhar Khan Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....of a sum of Rs. 915/- by the petitioner. There is no merit in this petition and the Leave prayed for is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 35. ......llip;……………………....Respondent Judgment February 28, 1973. Lawyers involved: Abdul Hamid, Advocate, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Petitioner. Not represented—the Respon......of a sum of Rs. 915/- by the petitioner. There is no merit in this petition and the Leave prayed for is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 35. ......Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed A. B. Mahmud Husain J M. A. Jabir J Jamdhar Khan……………….....Appellant. Vs. The State………………………....Res..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Lutfun Nahar Begum Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....antial, to connect the appellant with the murders. There is no direct evidence in this case against her. The learned Deputy Attorney General referred to certain passages in the evidences of P. W. 2 Md. Solaiir an, P. W. 3 Dulia Mia. P. W. 10 Sepoy Yakub Ali and P. W. 20 Serajul Islam Kazmi which,......h Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, 1952 SCR (India) 526; Emperor Vs. Lalit Mohan, (1911) ILR 38 Cal. 559; In re Periyaswami Moopan, 1981 1LR 54 Mad. 75; Joygun Bibi Vs. State, 12 DLR (SC) 156; Maqbool Hossain Vs. State, (1962) 12 DLR (SC) 217; Pakala Narayan Swami Vs. King Emperor, LR 1939 IA LXVI 6......al is allowed and the order of commitment of the appellant is set aside. The appellant is discharged from the bail bond. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 29. ...... ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Solicitor, Government of Bangladesh Vs. Syed Sanwar Ali and others, 1974, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Criminal Appeal No. 2 of 1974). Subhas ChanÂdra Ghose…… Respondent (In Criminal Appeal No. 3 of 1974). Alam Shaikh & another……. Respondent (In Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 1974). Md. Tara Miah …………………..ResÂpondents. (In Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 1974). Khalil M......y of the circumstances indicated in the preceding paraÂgraph can be shown to have rendered the proÂceeding relating to him coram non judice. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) 16. ......y of the circumstances indicated in the preceding paraÂgraph can be shown to have rendered the proÂceeding relating to him coram non judice. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) 16. ...... (Criminal) Present: AM Sayem CJ AB Mahmud Hussain J Muhammad Abdullah Jabir J Ahsanuddin J Solicitor, Government of Bangladesh…………...Appellant (In all the appeals) Vs. Syed Sanwar Ali……………... Respondents (In Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 1974). Dr. Abdu..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Mazharul Huq Vs. Returning Officer & Circle Officer, (Dev.) Double Moorings, Ctg, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....in Chowdhury, J.—This appeal by special leave, is against an order of a Bench of the High Court Division dismissing an application under article 102 of the Constitution. 2. Respondent No.14, Mr. Md. Abdullah and one Dr. Shafiqur Rahman, were the only contesting candidates for Chairmanship of No......Writ Jurisdiction under Article 102(2) of the Constitution. In the result, the appeal is dismissed withÂout any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 11. ......Writ Jurisdiction under Article 102(2) of the Constitution. In the result, the appeal is dismissed withÂout any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 11. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: A M. Sayem CJ A. B. Mahmud Hussain J A. Jabir J Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Mazharul Huq alias Mazharul Huq Chowdhury………...Appellant. Vs. The Returning Officer and Circle Officer, (Dev.) Double Moorings, Chittagong, and others …â..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 133
Abdur Rashid Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....de. The prisoner is found not guilty of the charge under section 302 of the Penal Code against him. He is acquitted of the said charge and is directed to be set at liberty forthwith. Ed. ......de. The prisoner is found not guilty of the charge under section 302 of the Penal Code against him. He is acquitted of the said charge and is directed to be set at liberty forthwith. Ed. ......de. The prisoner is found not guilty of the charge under section 302 of the Penal Code against him. He is acquitted of the said charge and is directed to be set at liberty forthwith. Ed. ......Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: A. M. Sayem CJ A. B. Mahmud Husain J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Abdur Rashid……Appellant Vs. The State ……… Respondent Judgment February 25, 197..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Shamsuddin Ahmed @ Tofa Mia & others Vs. Abdul Latif Bhuiyan, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ah 18 C.W.N. 890, Kheyali Prosad vs. Mullick N. Islam 20 C.W.N. 1048; Radhakishan Toshniwal vs. Shidhar Ramchandra. A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 1368; Ram Saran Lai vs. Domini Kuer AIR. 1961 SC 1747 Begum vs. Md. Yakub ILR 16 All. 344; Sitaram Bhaurao vs. Jiaul Hasan Khan AIR 1923 P.C. 41; Jadu Lal Sahu vs......of the High Court Division is set aside and those of the Courts below are restored. Ed. ...... the facts of this case. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and those of the Courts below are restored. Ed. ......ofa Mia & others……………………………………………………Appellants Vs. Abdul Latif Bhuiyan, being dead, his heirs: Asia Khatun and ors………&..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Bangladesh Bank Vs. Debendra Nath Dutta, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....view of the above, the appeal is allowed, the decision of the Appellate Beach is set aside and that of the company Judge restored. However, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......de and that of the company Judge restored. However, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......view of the above, the appeal is allowed, the decision of the Appellate Beach is set aside and that of the company Judge restored. However, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......aluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh Bank .................................Appellant Vs. Debendra Nath Dutta …………………….......Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Sunil Kumar Biswas Vs. Mohammad Idris and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ......entions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ......right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ...... Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Sunil Kumar Biswas …………………….Appellant Vs. Mohammad Idris and others…………Respondents Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Sanjib Kumar Bose and another Vs. Syed Shamsuddin Ahmed and another, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Vs. Syed Shamsuddin Ahmed and another…………….Respondents Judgment April 22, 1981 Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, Md. Yasin, Advocate, with him, instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Ap......h him, instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellants. Khondaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mahbubey Alam, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Respondent No. 1. Ex-parte—Respondent No. ......h Court Division must be reversed. The appeal is allowed, judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the trial court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. ......on (Civil) Present: Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Sanjib Kumar Bose and another.....................Appellant Vs. Syed Shamsuddin Ahmed and another…………….Respondents ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Dr. Jamshed Bakht Vs. Ameaur Rashid Chowdhury, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.....; Sanjibi Raddy vs. Konary Raddy, 1926 I.L.R. 49 Mad. 315; Ahmedbhai vs. Framji (1903) I.L.R. 28 Bom 228; Golapjan vs. Bholanath Khattry (1911) I.L.R. 38 Cal. 888. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. B.K. Das, Advocate, instr......r Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court In view of the decisions of the majority, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......r Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court In view of the decisions of the majority, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ...... Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Dr. Jamshed Bakht……………………….. Appellant Vs. Ameaur Rashid Chowdhury…………………Respondent..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Md. Abdur Rouf and others Vs. Ahmuda Khatun and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J And Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Md. Abdur Rouf and others…………………….Appellants......f the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ....... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ...... Fazle Munim J And Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Md. Abdur Rouf and others…………………….Appellants Vs. Ahmuda Khatun and others...................Respondents Judgment July 10, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Bangladesh Freedom Fighters Welfare TrÂust Vs. Burhanuddin Chowdhury, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....pellant, a statutory body, is amenable to be impugned in the writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ......rt Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ......pellant, a statutory body, is amenable to be impugned in the writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ......pellant, a statutory body, is amenable to be impugned in the writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 112
A.S.A. Nur Vs. Registrar of Joint Stock Companies, Dacca, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ge and the Division Bench are set aside. The case is remitted back to the Company Judge for disposal of the matter in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......sposal of the matter in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ge and the Division Bench are set aside. The case is remitted back to the Company Judge for disposal of the matter in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ip;…………………………………………………………..Appellant. Vs. Registrar of Joint Stock Companies, Dacca………………..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 107
....
Judgment
March
10, 1981.
Lawyers Involved:
Hamidul
Huq Chowdhury, Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury, Senior Advocates, with
A.N.M. Skahidullah, Advocate, with him instructed by Md. Aftab
Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants.
Rafiqur
Rahman, Senior Advo......ent
March
10, 1981.
Lawyers Involved:
Hamidul
Huq Chowdhury, Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury, Senior Advocates, with
A.N.M. Skahidullah, Advocate, with him instructed by Md. Aftab
Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants.
Rafiqur
Rahman, Senior Advocate instru......ler the appeal is allowed.
The application filed by the
appellants under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure is allowed
We make no Order as to costs.
Ed.
......unim J
Ruhul
Islam J
Badrul
Haider Chowdhury J
Shahabuddin Ahmed J
Baitul Aman Co-operative Housing
Society Ltd. and another.....................Appellant
Vs.
Muhammad Shamsur Rahman and
others………………&helli..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 60
15871586158515841583158215801579157715761575157415731572157115701569156815671566