Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5941-5960 of 6818 results.
Sr. Manager, M/s. Dosta Tex Mills Ltd., Ranirhat, Feni & ors Vs. Sudhansu B Nath, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
.... and the lower appellate court arc set aside and that of the trial court is restored, though on different grounds. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 45 ......s managerial or administrative in nature. He got no power to control or to supervise the work of any other person. Nature of his work does not bring him within the category of 'employer'. It is, therefore, clear that the respondent is not an’ employer' but is a ‘worker’ under the Act. The very...... and the lower appellate court arc set aside and that of the trial court is restored, though on different grounds. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 45 ......(AD) 282, Mosharraf Hossain Chowdhury v. General Manger, Titas Gas Transmission & Distribution Co. Ltd. 1981 BLD (AD) 61, M/s. Eastern Mercantile Bank Ltd. v. Mohammad Shamsuddin, 21 DLR (SC) 365. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate,(Syed Amirul Islam, Advocate, with him) instru..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Jamal and others Vs. The State, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....entence is set aside and the appellants are acquitted of the charges. They be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 38. ......ed 12 March 1984 passed by the High Court Division (Rangpur Bench) in appeal upholding the conviction and sentence of the appellants under sections 302/109 Penal Code. 2. The appellants along with forty (40) others were put on trial before the Additional Sessions Judge, Rajshahi. Forty two (42) a......entence is set aside and the appellants are acquitted of the charges. They be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 38. ......Division on guard against accepting evidence of PW 4 Mobarak and others. The evidence on does not justify the order of conviction under section 302/109 and 148 Penal Code…………(15 & 16) Lawyers Involved: Shaukat Ali, Senior Advocate instructed by A. Baset Majumder, Advocate-on-Recor..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Tajabunnessa and others Vs. Mrs. Nazma Begum and others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....nd decrees of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the trial Court restored. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 36 ......(A.T.M. Afzal, J.) on 12th February, 1984. 2. Plaintiffs' predecessor Abdul Aziz Bepari instituted S.C.C. Suit No.1 of 1973 in the court of Small Causes Court Judge-cum-Munsif, 1st Court, Chandpur for eviction of defendant- respondent Nos. 1 and 2 from the suit premises. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 w......nd decrees of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the trial Court restored. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 36 ...... the suit premises is found non-existent, she cannot be allowed to defeat the appellants' claim to evict her from the suit premises on the ground of some technical objection…………(7 & 8) Lawyers Involved: A.T.M. Kamrul Islam, Advocate instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Rahima Akhter and others Vs. Asim Kumar Bose and others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....al court restored, and the plaintiff gets the Kabala in pursuance of the decree of the trial court. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 23. ......mergency Provisions) (Repeal) (Amendment) Ordinance, 1976 (Ordinance No. 93 of 1976), section 2 The contract was made by Hemnalini and she died within a year of the agreement. Plaintiff was asking for the kabala and since the property became enemy property the defendants, the heirs of Hemnalini c......al court restored, and the plaintiff gets the Kabala in pursuance of the decree of the trial court. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 23. ......¦.(40, 42 & 44) Cases Referred to- Benoy Bhusan Bardhan Vs. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Brahmanbaria & another 30 DLR SC 139, RJ. Reuter Co. Ltd. vs. Fred Mulhens 1953 All E.R. 1160. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahbubey Alam, Advocate with him),..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Mohammad Mobarak Hossain and others Vs. Mohammad Mustafa Hossain and others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....rt Division correctly refused to interfere with the discretionary order passed by the lower court. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 20 ......ers ...................Respondents Judgement April 8, 1987. Â The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908) Order 39, rule 7 Ordinarily a notice is to be given to the defendant before an order is passed under rule 7 of Order 39 of the Code. This is the requirement of law as prov......rt Division correctly refused to interfere with the discretionary order passed by the lower court. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 20 ......5 C.W.N. 353, Ram Charan and others V. Murli and others AIR 1975 All. 399, Nepal Chandra Dutta V. Mrinal Chandra Dutta AIR 1980 Cal. 184, Nitindra Nath Roy Chowdhury vs. Subhas Ch. Kar 85 CWN 915. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbub Uddin Ahmad, Senior Advocate (Mahbubey Alam, Advocate with him)..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 94
Md. Mostafa Hossain Vs. Sikder Md. Faruque and another, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
..... In the result, the appeal is dismissed. In view of the circumstances of the case, no order as to costs is made. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 10, BLD 1988 (AD) 170. ......isqualified from holding the office and the Court in its extraÂordinary jurisdiction will entertain the petition and examine the question on merit. Mere delay in raising the question is not a ground for denying this extraordinary remedy……………….(12) (ii) The Local Government (Upazilla ....... In the result, the appeal is dismissed. In view of the circumstances of the case, no order as to costs is made. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 10, BLD 1988 (AD) 170. ...... & F. 537, King v. Spyer and The King v. Cassel, 1 KB (1916) Vol.1, p. 595, Farzand Ali v. Province of West Pakistan, PLD 1970 SC 98, Laliteshwer Prasad vs. Bateshwar Prashad, AIR 1966 SC 580. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him), instr..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 132
The State Vs. Tayeb Ali and others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....der section 304 Part-I, but the sentence of 10 years' imprisonment is maintained. Subject to this, the appeal is allowed. Ed.This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 6; 1987 BLD (AD) 265. ......p; 307/34 Reversal of the appellate Court's finding will not bring the case within the ambit of murder u/s. 302 P.C. It was nobody’s case that death was caused due to surgical operation for treatment of the victim after the impugned injuries were sustained in the occurrence. In view of......der section 304 Part-I, but the sentence of 10 years' imprisonment is maintained. Subject to this, the appeal is allowed. Ed.This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 6; 1987 BLD (AD) 265. ...... appellants under section 302/34 altering the same under section 307/34 on appeal by the High Court Division is altered with conviction under section 304 part 1 of the Penal Code…….(8 & 9) Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - For the Appellant. Rafiqur Rahman, Se..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Moulana Mokhtar Ahmed Vs. Mohammadul Huq Usmani & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....nfortunate it may seem though that the decision in the case turned on two marginal votes only. 18. The appeal is accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......lection Tribunal), confirmed in appeal, declaring the election of the petitioner void and further declaring respondent No. 1 as Chairman of the said Union Parishad. 2. Chairman election for the aforesaid Union Parishad was held on 7.1.84 Appellant secured 4263 votes and his nearest r......nfortunate it may seem though that the decision in the case turned on two marginal votes only. 18. The appeal is accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......hellip;……Appellant Vs. Mohammadul Huq Usmani & others………………Respondents Judgment March 19, 1987. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, (Abu Taher Chowdhury, Advocate, with him) ins..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Md. Naimuddin Sardar Vs. Md. Abdul Kalam Biswas, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... In the result, therefore, the appeal is allowed with cost. The impugned judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the first appellate court restored. Ed. ...... plaintiff from the suit land. Defendant No.1 has no right, title and interest in the suit land. Having failed to obtain the land amicably on demand the plaintiff was constrained to file this suit for declaration of title and khas possessions. 3. Defendant-1 Appellant contested the suit ...... In the result, therefore, the appeal is allowed with cost. The impugned judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the first appellate court restored. Ed. ......……………Respondents Judgment April 5, 1987. Cases Referred to- Erfan Ali vs. Joynal Abedin Mia, 1983 BLD (AD) 342=DLR 35 (AD) 216. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Abani Mohan Saha Vs. Asst. Custodian (S. D. O) Vested Property, Chandpur & ors, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....H Rahman J. Order of the Court By a majority decision the appeal is dismisÂsed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 223. ......xpressed in the judgment by my learned brother MH Rahman J. 2. Facts are simple. Plaintiff is the appeÂllant. He filed the suit being Title Suit No. 264 of 1977 in the Court of Munsif, Chandpur, for a declaration that the proceeding of E. P. Case No. 255 of 1972-73 was illegal, void and collusi......H Rahman J. Order of the Court By a majority decision the appeal is dismisÂsed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 223. ......vs. Hodges (1838); 28 DLR (1976) 437; AIR 1928 (Cab 705; Mohd. Cherag vs. Dullay Khan PLD 1954 (Dhaka) 134; Ihtesham Ali vs. Jamna Prasad and others 48 I.A 365= AIR 1928 (P.C) 56; 32 DLR (AD) 29. Lawyers Involved: B. N. Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by Shamsul Hoque Siddique, Advocate-on-Re..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 115
Sudhir Chandra Sil & another Vs. Harimohan Das & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....The impugned judgment and decree are set aside and those of the lower Appellate Court affirmed. There will, however, be no order as to cost. The application for substitution is rejected. Ed. ......M. H. Rahman J. - This appeal by leave is at the instance of defendant Nos. 2 and 5. 2. Respondent No.1, Han Mohan Das, filed Title Suit No. 45 of 1972 in the 1st Court of Munsif, Madaripur for specific performance of the contract, the defendants alleged to have entered with him on 10th ......The impugned judgment and decree are set aside and those of the lower Appellate Court affirmed. There will, however, be no order as to cost. The application for substitution is rejected. Ed. ......an, 30 DLR (SC) 236. Erfan Ali vs. Joynal Abedin, 35 DLR (AD) 216. Sk. Abdul Latif and another vs. Abdul Malek Kazi, 38 DLR (AD) 22. Nafar Chandra Pal vs. Sukur Sk., AIR 1918 (PC) 92. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. S. S, Ha..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Kalitara Biswas Vs. Mrinal Kanti Biswas and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....t below are set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. The original suit will now proceed expeditiously from the stage where it was left. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......983 summarily dismissing the application. 2. Plaintiff-appellant and the predecessor of respondents 3 to 6 instituted Title Suit No. 262 of 1975 in the First Court of Munsif, Gopalganj for a declaration that order of mutation dated 10.5.1975 was null and void and not binding upon the......t below are set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. The original suit will now proceed expeditiously from the stage where it was left. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......;……………….Appellant. Vs. Mrinal Kanti Biswas and others…………Respondents Judgment June 10, 1987. Lawyers Involved: Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. Md..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Sonali Bank, Local Office, Dhaka Vs. Gazi Abdur Rashid & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....on 35A does not come into conflict with the limitation provided in the schedule as to the maximum ad valorem fees which may be determined under the schedule. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......tion raiÂsed in this appeal by special leave is whether section 35A of the Court Fees Act, 1870, has become inoperative, ineffective and infructuous in view of the substitution of Schedule I of 1981 for Schedule I of 1960 of the said Act. In other words, whether the High Court Division has correctl......on 35A does not come into conflict with the limitation provided in the schedule as to the maximum ad valorem fees which may be determined under the schedule. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ingangouda Patil (AIR (31) 1944 Bombay 259); Messrs. Kohinoor Mercantile Corporation vs. Hazera Khatun and another (14 DLR 47); 14 DLR 47= PLD 1963 Dhaka 238; AIR 1955 All, 353; (1941) 2 K.B. 89. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, AdvoÂcate-..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Kobad Ali and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ot to have summarily rejected the application. We condone the delay, allow the appeal and remand the matter to the High Court Division for hearing in accordance with law. No costs Ed. ......inst a summary rejection of an application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. Plaintiff-respondents' Title Suit No. 194 of 1973 in the Court of Munsif, 1st Court, Pabna for declaration of title and confirmation of possession was dismissed by the trial Court. On ......ot to have summarily rejected the application. We condone the delay, allow the appeal and remand the matter to the High Court Division for hearing in accordance with law. No costs Ed. ......;…Respondents Judgment March 9, 1987 Case Referred to- Muhammad Swaleh V. Messrs United Grain & Fodder Agencies PLD 1964 (SC) 97—16 DLR (SC) 155. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate on Record—For the Appellant. Ex-parte&m..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Amin Scales Limited and another Vs. Md. Yakub, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....her proceeding to meet the ends of justice. We do not find any ground to interfere with either of these two orders. The appeals are dismissed without however any order as to costs. Ed. ......bsp; Shahabuddin Ahmed J. - These two appeals have been preferred by a private limited company against whom a proceeding for winding up, being Company Matter No. 27 of 1986 is pending before the learned Company Jud......her proceeding to meet the ends of justice. We do not find any ground to interfere with either of these two orders. The appeals are dismissed without however any order as to costs. Ed. ......shy;pondent (In both the appeals) Judgment March 8, 1987 Cases Referred To- Ellal Textile Mills Ltd., 38 DLR (AD) 26; Re Sulekha Works Ltd, AIR 1965, Cal. 98. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed and Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocates (Mahmu..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 76
....y."
Though the war between India and
Pakistan continued only for 17 days, the above-mentioned war legislations
continued for a few years. It may, however, be mentioned that the Proclamation
of Emergency made on 6th September, 1965 was revoked by the President of Pakistan......owdhury died leaving respondent Nos. 2-6 as his heirs.
2. Appellant instituted Mortgage
Suit No. 43 of 1964 in the 1st court of Subordinate Judge, Chittagong against
respondent Nos. 2-5 for sale of the mortgage property for realisation of
mortgage dues. Permission of the Board of Reve......
order of the Executing Court is set aside and it is directed that the Execution
Case No. 4 of 1967 be proceeded with and disposed of in the light of this judgment.
No order as to cost.
Ed.
......September 24, 1986
Cases
Referred to-
Rahima Aktar Vs. Asim Kumar Bose
1985 BLD (AD) 155; Watson v. Winch, 1 K. B. (1916) 688; Surtees v. Ellison
(1829) 9 B & C. 750, 752.
Lawyers Involved:
S. R.
Pal, Senior Advocate, Nurul Islam Chowdhury, Advocate with him instr..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
The State Vs. Fazal and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....rt Division as would call for interference by this court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Order of the Court By the majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......; Shahabuddin Ahmed J. - I have gone through the judgment proposed to be delivered by my learned brother, A.T.M. Afzal, J, but as I could not agree on the reasons for which acquittal of the respondents is sought to be supported I am giving my own reasons against......rt Division as would call for interference by this court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Order of the Court By the majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......……....Respondents Judgment March 12, 1987. Cases Referred to- AIR 1917 PC 25; Siraj Din v. Kala, 16 DLR, SC 95; A.I.R 1917 P.C. 25; 16 D.L.R (SC) 94. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Abdul Malek, Seni..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Bangladesh Biman Corporation Vs. Syed Aftab Ali and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....h that of the Chief Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the impugned decree is set aside and the suit is dismissed. The appeal is allowed. No order as to cost’s. Ed. ...... concurrently by the Courts below. 2. Plaintiff-respondents case is that they along with others numbering 42 persons in all were, on the basis of a written test examination and interview, selected for appointment as SeÂnior Account Assistants. In the list prepared in order of merit respondent No......h that of the Chief Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the impugned decree is set aside and the suit is dismissed. The appeal is allowed. No order as to cost’s. Ed. ......nd others……………….......Respondent Judgment May 14 1986. Cases Referred to- Nava KuÂmar vs. Radhashyam. AIR 1931 (PC) 229; United Provinces Vs. Atiqa Begum, AIR 1984 PC 16. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 97
State Vs. Lalu Miah and another, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....sed Kabir and Lalu who are on bail are directed to surrender to their bail bonds at once and serve their sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 117; 1987 BLD (AD) 212. ......leave is directed against an order of acquiÂttal passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Reference No. 1(C) of 1982 and Appeal No. 40(C) of 1982. The High Court Division rejected the reference for confirmaÂtion of sentence of death of accused No. 1 and allowed the appeal after setting aside ......sed Kabir and Lalu who are on bail are directed to surrender to their bail bonds at once and serve their sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 117; 1987 BLD (AD) 212. ......an Upadhyay AIR 1960 S.C. 1125; Kauda Paduyachi vs. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 1972 S.C. 66(69); Bhuboni Sahu vs. The King AIR 1949 P.C. 257 (259); H.S. Rathod vs. State of Gujrat AIR 1979 S.C. 1232. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.- For the Appellant. Habib Ahmed, Advocate, i..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Ayub Vs. Bangladesh, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... appeal is, therefore, allowed in part and the impugned order of the High Court Division adding respondent No. 7 as a party is set aside. There will, however, be no order as to cost. Ed. ...... claims to be the owner of holding No. 67, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka filed Writ Petition No. 288 of 1985 against the respondents challenging the validity of Government orders declaring the aforesaid property as abandoned and refusing to release the same and also its action inviting offers...... appeal is, therefore, allowed in part and the impugned order of the High Court Division adding respondent No. 7 as a party is set aside. There will, however, be no order as to cost. Ed. ......aria vs. Additional Member Board of Revenue, AIR 1963 SC 786; Zahirul Huq Vs. Ejamul Huq (1982) 34 DLR AD 25; Abdul Khaleque Bains vs. Government of Bangladesh, Civil Appeal No. 21 of 1986. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, M. A. Mahbub Miah, Advocate with him, instruc..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
16691668166716661665166416631661165916571656165516541653165216501649164816471646