Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5961-5980 of 6822 results.
Saokat Ali and others Vs. Shamsun Bibi and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....nally. We find no substance in the only contention raised in support of this petition, which is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 DLR (AD) (1975) 59. ......dar, 15 DLR 634; Umar Din Vs. Fazal Din, PLR 5 Lah. 196; Visheswar Vs. Durgappa, AIR 1940 Bom. 339; Vithoba Kadhar Vs. Madhar jemedar, (1918) ILR 42 Bom. 344. Lawyers involved: Akram Hossain Amin, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Not represented—the Respondents. ......nally. We find no substance in the only contention raised in support of this petition, which is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 DLR (AD) (1975) 59. ...... Present: A. M. Sayem CJ A. B. Mahmud Husain J M.A. Jabir J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Saokat Ali and others…………...Petitioners. Vs. Shamsun Bibi and others……….....Respondents Judgment J..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Bangladesh Enemy Property ManageÂment Board and ors. Vs. Md. Abdul Majid, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....view of what have been stated above, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order passed by the learned Judges of the High Court Division are set aside. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......view of what have been stated above, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order passed by the learned Judges of the High Court Division are set aside. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......nment of Bangladesh under the aforesaid President's Order does not arise and so the contention raised on behalf of the appellant regarding the non-maintainability of the application had no force. Mr. Khandaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed appearing for the responÂdent, on the other hand contended that under t......urt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: AB Mahmud Husain J MA Jabir J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Bangladesh Enemy Property ManageÂment Board and ors………….... .Appellants. Vs. Md. Abdul Majid…………..... Respondent Judgment March 27, 1975. Cases Referred..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 125
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Ahmed Nazir, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....y Attorney-General, Mahmudul Islam, A. Wadud Bhuiyan, Assistant Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossein, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant. S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, with Humayun Kabir Chowdhury S.C. Das, Advocates, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record—For ......e the Proclamation of Emergency issued on the 28th December, 1974 and the Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1975 dated the 25th January, 1975 effected changes in the said Constitution. Ed. ......tant Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossein, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant. S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, with Humayun Kabir Chowdhury S.C. Das, Advocates, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent, Criminal Appeal No. 27 of 1974 (From th...... Present: AM Sayem CJ AB Mahmud Husain J Muhammad Abdullah Jabir J Government of Bangladesh represented by Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs.....Appellant. Vs. Ahmed Nazir………….... Respondent Judgment March..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Adam Ali Sardar and others Vs. The State and another, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
.... A. B. Mahmud Husain, J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 37. ...... A. B. Mahmud Husain, J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 37. ...... Abdur Rahman Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioners. S.S. Hoda, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 1. M. R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 2. Criminal Appeal No.10-D of 1971.......ate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed A.B. Mahmud Husain J M. A. Jabir J Adam Ali Sardar and others…………….... Appellants. Vs. The State and another……………………&he..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Jamdhar Khan Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....of a sum of Rs. 915/- by the petitioner. There is no merit in this petition and the Leave prayed for is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 35. ......llip;……………………....Respondent Judgment February 28, 1973. Lawyers involved: Abdul Hamid, Advocate, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Petitioner. Not represented—the Respon......is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 35. ......Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed A. B. Mahmud Husain J M. A. Jabir J Jamdhar Khan……………….....Appellant. Vs. The State………………………....Res..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Lutfun Nahar Begum Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....al is allowed and the order of commitment of the appellant is set aside. The appellant is discharged from the bail bond. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 29. ......h Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, 1952 SCR (India) 526; Emperor Vs. Lalit Mohan, (1911) ILR 38 Cal. 559; In re Periyaswami Moopan, 1981 1LR 54 Mad. 75; Joygun Bibi Vs. State, 12 DLR (SC) 156; Maqbool Hossain Vs. State, (1962) 12 DLR (SC) 217; Pakala Narayan Swami Vs. King Emperor, LR 1939 IA LXVI 6...... 1955 Cal. 599; Shamsuddin Sarker Vs. State, 11 DLR (SC) 365; Hariballav Saha Vs. Gopiballav Saha, 11 DLR (SC) 394; Mozhanil Huq Vs. Ishaque Sardar, 14 DLR (SC) 251. Lawyers involved: Khan Bahadur Naziruddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Mr. Behtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record — ...... ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Abdul Matin Munshi Vs. Idris Pandiat and ors., 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....;tion 307/34. The result, therefore, is that both the appeals are dismissed subject to the modification of the Penal Code to that under section 302/34 and 307/34 of the Penal Code. Ed. ......;tion 307/34. The result, therefore, is that both the appeals are dismissed subject to the modification of the Penal Code to that under section 302/34 and 307/34 of the Penal Code. Ed. ......sented—the Respondents. Abdur Rob, I, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant (In Appeal No. 3 of 1973). Faqeer Shahabuddin Ahmad, Attorney-General, instructed by W. R. Khan, Advocate-on- Record—For the Respondent. Judgment: ...... Court Appellate Division (Criminal) A. M. Sayem CJ Syed A. B. Mahmud Husain J Abdullah Jabir J Abdul Matin Munshi...............Appellant. Vs. Idris Pandiat and ors .............Respondents. Idris Pandit and others …..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Solicitor, Government of Bangladesh Vs. Syed Sanwar Ali and others, 1974, 33 CLC (AD)
....y of the circumstances indicated in the preceding paraÂgraph can be shown to have rendered the proÂceeding relating to him coram non judice. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) 16. ......y of the circumstances indicated in the preceding paraÂgraph can be shown to have rendered the proÂceeding relating to him coram non judice. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) 16. ......y of the circumstances indicated in the preceding paraÂgraph can be shown to have rendered the proÂceeding relating to him coram non judice. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) 16. ...... (Criminal) Present: AM Sayem CJ AB Mahmud Hussain J Muhammad Abdullah Jabir J Ahsanuddin J Solicitor, Government of Bangladesh…………...Appellant (In all the appeals) Vs. Syed Sanwar Ali……………... Respondents (In Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 1974). Dr. Abdu..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Mazharul Huq Vs. Returning Officer & Circle Officer, (Dev.) Double Moorings, Ctg, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....Writ Jurisdiction under Article 102(2) of the Constitution. In the result, the appeal is dismissed withÂout any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 11. ......Writ Jurisdiction under Article 102(2) of the Constitution. In the result, the appeal is dismissed withÂout any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 11. ......Writ Jurisdiction under Article 102(2) of the Constitution. In the result, the appeal is dismissed withÂout any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 11. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: A M. Sayem CJ A. B. Mahmud Hussain J A. Jabir J Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Mazharul Huq alias Mazharul Huq Chowdhury………...Appellant. Vs. The Returning Officer and Circle Officer, (Dev.) Double Moorings, Chittagong, and others …â..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 133
Abdur Rashid Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....de. The prisoner is found not guilty of the charge under section 302 of the Penal Code against him. He is acquitted of the said charge and is directed to be set at liberty forthwith. Ed. ......de. The prisoner is found not guilty of the charge under section 302 of the Penal Code against him. He is acquitted of the said charge and is directed to be set at liberty forthwith. Ed. ......ahore 69; Abdul Gani Vs. The State, 19, DLR. Dacca 388; The State Vs. Puma Chandra Mondal 22 DLR. Dac. 280. Lawyers involved: Abdur Rashed, Advocate— For the Appellant. Khan, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 1972. ......Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: A. M. Sayem CJ A. B. Mahmud Husain J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Abdur Rashid……Appellant Vs. The State ……… Respondent Judgment February 25, 197..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Shamsuddin Ahmed @ Tofa Mia & others Vs. Abdul Latif Bhuiyan, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... the facts of this case. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and those of the Courts below are restored. Ed. ......of the High Court Division is set aside and those of the Courts below are restored. Ed. ......W.N. 1048; Radhakishan Toshniwal vs. Shidhar Ramchandra. A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 1368; Ram Saran Lai vs. Domini Kuer AIR. 1961 SC 1747 Begum vs. Md. Yakub ILR 16 All. 344; Sitaram Bhaurao vs. Jiaul Hasan Khan AIR 1923 P.C. 41; Jadu Lal Sahu vs. Janaki Koer (1900) 35 Cal 575. Naresh Chandra Dutta vs. G......ofa Mia & others……………………………………………………Appellants Vs. Abdul Latif Bhuiyan, being dead, his heirs: Asia Khatun and ors………&..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Bangladesh Bank Vs. Debendra Nath Dutta, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....view of the above, the appeal is allowed, the decision of the Appellate Beach is set aside and that of the company Judge restored. However, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......de and that of the company Judge restored. However, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......view of the above, the appeal is allowed, the decision of the Appellate Beach is set aside and that of the company Judge restored. However, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......aluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh Bank .................................Appellant Vs. Debendra Nath Dutta …………………….......Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Sunil Kumar Biswas Vs. Mohammad Idris and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ......entions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ......llip;…….Appellant Vs. Mohammad Idris and others…………Respondents Judgment April 16, 1981 Lawyers Involved: M.H. Khandkar, Senior Advocated instructed by B.C. panday Advocate-on-Record.-For the Appellant. ...... Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Sunil Kumar Biswas …………………….Appellant Vs. Mohammad Idris and others…………Respondents Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Sanjib Kumar Bose and another Vs. Syed Shamsuddin Ahmed and another, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....h Court Division must be reversed. The appeal is allowed, judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the trial court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. ......h him, instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellants. Khondaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mahbubey Alam, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Respondent No. 1. Ex-parte—Respondent No. ......h Court Division must be reversed. The appeal is allowed, judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the trial court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. ......on (Civil) Present: Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Sanjib Kumar Bose and another.....................Appellant Vs. Syed Shamsuddin Ahmed and another…………….Respondents ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Dr. Jamshed Bakht Vs. Ameaur Rashid Chowdhury, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....r Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court In view of the decisions of the majority, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......r Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court In view of the decisions of the majority, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......r Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court In view of the decisions of the majority, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ...... Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Dr. Jamshed Bakht……………………….. Appellant Vs. Ameaur Rashid Chowdhury…………………Respondent..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Md. Abdur Rouf and others Vs. Ahmuda Khatun and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
..... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ......f the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ......ip;………….Appellants Vs. Ahmuda Khatun and others...................Respondents Judgment July 10, 1978. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate instructed by S.M. Haq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. M...... Fazle Munim J And Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Md. Abdur Rouf and others…………………….Appellants Vs. Ahmuda Khatun and others...................Respondents Judgment July 10, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Bangladesh Freedom Fighters Welfare TrÂust Vs. Burhanuddin Chowdhury, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....pellant, a statutory body, is amenable to be impugned in the writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ......rt Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ......pellant, a statutory body, is amenable to be impugned in the writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ......pellant, a statutory body, is amenable to be impugned in the writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 112
A.S.A. Nur Vs. Registrar of Joint Stock Companies, Dacca, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ge and the Division Bench are set aside. The case is remitted back to the Company Judge for disposal of the matter in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......sposal of the matter in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ge and the Division Bench are set aside. The case is remitted back to the Company Judge for disposal of the matter in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ip;…………………………………………………………..Appellant. Vs. Registrar of Joint Stock Companies, Dacca………………..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 107
....ler the appeal is allowed.
The application filed by the
appellants under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure is allowed
We make no Order as to costs.
Ed.
......ent
March
10, 1981.
Lawyers Involved:
Hamidul
Huq Chowdhury, Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury, Senior Advocates, with
A.N.M. Skahidullah, Advocate, with him instructed by Md. Aftab
Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants.
Rafiqur
Rahman, Senior Advocate instru......ler the appeal is allowed.
The application filed by the
appellants under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure is allowed
We make no Order as to costs.
Ed.
......unim J
Ruhul
Islam J
Badrul
Haider Chowdhury J
Shahabuddin Ahmed J
Baitul Aman Co-operative Housing
Society Ltd. and another.....................Appellant
Vs.
Muhammad Shamsur Rahman and
others………………&helli..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Mohd. Jabed Ali and others Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others , 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....e dealing with the application under section 96 of the Act for preemption. Therefore, we do not find any substance in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......, we do not find any substance in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......peals) Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others..........................Respondents (In C.A. Nos. 143 to 146 of 1978) Judgment June 7, 1979. Lawyers Involved: Khandkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, K.S. Nabi, Advocate (on 6.6.79) instructed by.Mr. Khan, Advo......sain CJ Ruhul Islam J K.M. Subhan J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Mohd. Jabed Ali and others.................................... Appellants. (For all the appeals) Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others..........................Respondents (In C.A. Nos. 143 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 49
15841583158215811580157915781577157615751574157315721571157015691568156715661565