Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5961-5980 of 6458 results.
Tozammel Hussain Chowdhury Vs. State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ng so the High Court committed no illegality. In the result the appeal stands dismissed. The appellant is directed to surrender to his bail to serve out the sentence. Ed. ......ng so the High Court committed no illegality. In the result the appeal stands dismissed. The appellant is directed to surrender to his bail to serve out the sentence. Ed. ......ng so the High Court committed no illegality. In the result the appeal stands dismissed. The appellant is directed to surrender to his bail to serve out the sentence. Ed. ......olved: S.R, Pal, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Mohd. A. Aziz, Advocate-on- Record.—For the appellant. A.T.M. Afzal, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent. Criminal appeal No. 3 of 1975. (From..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
M.A. Zaher and others Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....n Criminal) Present: Syed AB Mahmud Hussain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Fazle Munim J M.A. Zaher………...Appellant And Haji Jalal Ahmed …….... Appellant And Md. Khurshed Alam Khan………….Appellant Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and another……..Responde......g the appellant Khurshed Alam Khan for abetment of the offence of contempt of court and sentencing him therefor. In the result this appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......g the appellant Khurshed Alam Khan for abetment of the offence of contempt of court and sentencing him therefor. In the result this appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... Choudhury J Fazle Munim J M.A. Zaher………...Appellant And Haji Jalal Ahmed …….... Appellant And Md. Khurshed Alam Khan………….Appellant Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and another……..Respondent Judgment April 27, 1976. Result: The appeal is dismissed..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 142
....pinion that the High Court took the correct view in answering
the question referred to it under section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act.
Both
the appeals are dismissed with costs.
Ed.
......pinion that the High Court took the correct view in answering
the question referred to it under section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act.
Both
the appeals are dismissed with costs.
Ed.
......pinion that the High Court took the correct view in answering
the question referred to it under section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act.
Both
the appeals are dismissed with costs.
Ed.
.......
14, 1976.
Cases Referred to:
Messers
Octavius Steel Company Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Income-tax, Dacca reported
in 12 DLR (SC) 121 same case in PLD 1960 SC 371; Octavious Steel and Company
Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Income-tax, Dacca, 12 DLR (SC) 121 same case PLD
160 SC 3..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Messres A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....sturb the decision of the High Court Division. Subject to the observation made above, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 120. ......sturb the decision of the High Court Division. Subject to the observation made above, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 120. ......sturb the decision of the High Court Division. Subject to the observation made above, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 120. ......d. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 120. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Karnaphuli Rayon and Chemical Ltd. Vs. The Govt. of BanglaÂdesh and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....shy;nufacture by the appellant Company is declared to have been issued without lawful authority and was of no legal effect. There shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......shy;nufacture by the appellant Company is declared to have been issued without lawful authority and was of no legal effect. There shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ...... (1910) A.C. 444 of page 445; Messers Usmania Glass Sheet Factory Limited Vs. Sales T s Officer, Chittagong (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 43T— PLD 1971 SC 205. Lawyers Involved: M. Habibur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by A. Bakkar, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Syed ...... to costs in this appeal. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Mozaffar Ahmed Vs. Md. Osman and anr, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....on (Civil) Present: Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Mozaffar Ahmed………...Appellant. Vs. Md. Osman and anr.........Respondents. Judgment &n...... is .barred by limitation. The appeal shall be disposed of on the evidence already on record. The appeal is disposed of in aforesaid terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ......hy;tion that the land in dispute formed part of a Wakf estate of which the appellant, Mozaffar Ahmed is the Mutwalli and for khas possession thereof. The lands in dispute belonged to Mokhlesur Rahman who and his three brothers were recorded in the R. S. Khatians as korfa tenants. He, by......Civil) Present: Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Mozaffar Ahmed………...Appellant. Vs. Md. Osman and anr.........Respondents. Judgment &..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 239
Azizur Rahman and another Vs. Sree Kailash Chand Burmecha and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....the basis of what is just and convenient in each case. The result therefore is that this appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 65. ......the basis of what is just and convenient in each case. The result therefore is that this appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 65. ......1976) 65. ...... also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 65. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
....l)
Present:
Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ
Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J
Kemaluddin HoÂssain J
Lal Meah, being dead his heirs Momena Khatun & others………..Appellants.
Vs.
Haji Md. Ibrahim Meah and others......Respondents
Judgment
November 28, 1975.
Result:
The ...... call such additional evidence on the question as it may deem fit.
In the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 61. ......bai, 51 C.W N. 175, Narendra Vs. Rajendra, 45 C.W.N. 654 , Rai Kiran Chandra Roy Bahadur Vs. Srinath, Chakrabarti 31 C.W.N. 135, Kumar Rai Vs. Baraboni Coal, A.I.R. 1935 Calcutta 36, Jemarat Ali Vs. Rahman Sardar, 17 DLR 589, Pramatha Nath Vs. Kamir Mondal, 17 DLR (SC) 392.
Lawyers Involved: ......
Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ
Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J
Kemaluddin HoÂssain J
Lal Meah, being dead his heirs Momena Khatun & others………..Appellants.
Vs.
Haji Md. Ibrahim Meah and others......Respondents
Judgment
November 28, 1975.
Result:
The appeal is allowed..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Syed Mofazzal Hossain Vs. The Election CoÂmmissioner and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ......the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ......€¦...Appellant. Vs. The Election CoÂmmissioner and others……..Respondents. Judgment November 24, 1975. Result: The Appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Shah Azizur Rahman with Latifur Rahman, Advocates, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appell......Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Bangladesh Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... Pakistan in Civil Re-vision Case No. 101 of 1968). Judgment: Kemaluddin Hossain, J.—Facts leading to the grant of Special leave to appeal are as follows: Respondent 1, Md. Abdur Razzak obtained a money decree against Respondent 2, Md. Belayet Ali Khan, a Government C......l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: A. M. Sayem, C. J. Syed A. B. Mahmud Hussain, J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya. J. Bangladesh……Appellant. Vs. Mohd. Abd..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for exÂpeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for exÂpeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for exÂpeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......e case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 225
Abdur Razzaque & anr Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......din Ahmed, Attorney-General, instructed by A.M. Khan Chowdhury, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 1976 (From the Judgment and order dated 24-2-75 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 330 of 197 3...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Government of BangÂladesh & ors Vs. M/s. Samir & Co, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....d, Additional Attorney-General, with Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by A.W. Mallik, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellants. Ahmadur Rahman Khan, Advocate, insÂtructed by Md. Nurul, Huq, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 10 of 1972. (From......ct, and therefore no quesÂtion of irregular exercise of jurisdiction does arise in this case. The result therefore is that this appeal is dismissed but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Additional Attorney-General, with Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by A.W. Mallik, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellants. Ahmadur Rahman Khan, Advocate, insÂtructed by Md. Nurul, Huq, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Respondent. ......ment of BangÂladesh & ors........Appellant Vs. M/s. Samir & Co…………..Respondent Judgment November 20, 1975. Cases referred to- Council Vs. Bilas Singh, 52 C.W.N. 54; Sanday Patrick Vs. Mayammal, 7 I.C. 588; R. Vs. Bolton, reported in (1835-42) All England Reporter 71..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 258
Golam Hafez Mia Vs. Khadem Ali Meah, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....9 DLR 333; Tarangini Debi 19 DLR 57; Keramat Ali Vs. Mohammad Yunus, 15 DLR (SC) 130. Lawyers Involved: M. Nurullah, Advocate, instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Md. Fazlul Karim, Advocate instructed by A, W. Mian, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civ......s of the arrival of the records in the court below, shall be dismissed with cost. The cost of this appeal shall abide the result of the suit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 311. .......I.R. 1954, Calcutta 113; Mohammad Moslemali Molla Vs. Sk. Azharali P.K.R. 1957 Dacca 6; Tarangini Debi Vs. Govinda Mallik, 9 DLR 57; Purna Chandra Vs. Dinabandhu Mukherjee I.L.R. 34 Cal 811; Abtabur Rahman Vs. Madan Mia, 19 DLR 333; Tarangini Debi 19 DLR 57; Keramat Ali Vs. Mohammad Yunus, 15 DLR (...... result of the suit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 311. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Amir Sultan Ali Hyder Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed ABM Husain CJ Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Amir Sultan Ali Hyder................................ Appellant. Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others............. Respondents Judgment July 1, 1977. R...... not be binding on the Courts below. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. We, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295.......msingh vs. Basant AIR 1936 PC 93 and Adnikappu vs. Chandrasekhar. PIR 1948 PC 12. Muhammad Alladad Ismail Khan ILR 10 Allahabad 289; Saddique Hussain Khan Vs. Hashim Ali Khan, 43 IA 212, Syed Habibur Rahman Chowdhury Vs. Syed Altaf Ali Chowdhury. L.A.48 IA 114: 26 CWN 81 ILR 48 Cal 856: AIR 1922 PC ......however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295...Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 182
Bikash Ranjan Das Vs. The Chairman, Second Labour Court, Dacca and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... Vs. The Chairman, Second Labour Court, Dacca and others..............Respondents Judgment June 14, 1977. Lawyers Involved: B.N. Chowdhury, Advocate, with Md. Ismail Khan, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Huq Advocate-on-record—For the peti......c tribunal or not. That a different conclusion is possible is no ground for interference. We therefore do not find any good reason to grant leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ......c tribunal or not. That a different conclusion is possible is no ground for interference. We therefore do not find any good reason to grant leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ......in J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazal Munim J Bikash Ranjan Das…………............ Petitioner. Vs. The Chairman, Second Labour Court, Dacca and others..............Respondents Judgment June 14, 1977. Lawyers Involved..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 151
The State Vs. Fazu Kazi alias Kazi Fazlur RahÂman and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....boration thereof. It is not, however, necessary that independent evidence by itself should be sufficient to sustain a conviction. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......boration thereof. It is not, however, necessary that independent evidence by itself should be sufficient to sustain a conviction. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......on, Rajshahi. 2. The prosecution case was that over Dayarompur Union Council affairs there were trouble and bitter feelings between Dr. Abdus Salam (deceased) on one hand and accused Azizur Rahman and respondent Golam Rabbani and their supporters or the other. Accused Azizur Rahman b......in CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Fazle Munim J The State.....................Appellant. Vs. Fazu Kazi alias Kazi Fazlur Rahman and others .................Respondents. Judgment March 9, 1977 Cases Referre..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Afsar Ali Moral Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....bsp; January 20, 1977. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate with Md. Abdur Rahim, Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Abu Bakkar, Advocate on-Record.—For P...... to transportation for life under section 364 B.P.C. In our view the sentence passed should be read as one passed under section 303/109 B.PC instead of under Section 364 B.P. Code. Ed. ...... order. 2. The prosecution case against them was that as Rajakars they collaborated with Pak Army and on 1st of Kartick, 1378 B.S. they along with 40/50 other Rajakars caught hold of Anisur Rahman, son of P.W. Bajitulla Gazi at Chapatola Bazar and took him to his village Noali wherefrom h......llate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed A.B. Mahmud Hossain CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattachary J Fazle Munim J &nbs..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Fakhruddin Mia and other Vs. Mohammad Khodabaksh Sheikh, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....th as second appellate court and a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circumstances. With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......th as second appellate court and a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circumstances. With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..............Petitioners. Vs. Mohammad Khodabaksh Sheikh... ……………Respondent Judgment June 30, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rahman Advocate, instructed by B. C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. B,......e Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed A.B M. Husain CJ Kemaluddin Hussain J D. C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Fakhruddin Mia and other.........................Petitioners. Vs. Mohammad Khodabaksh Sheikh... &he..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
K. M. Zaker Hossain Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ion and as such there was no question of prejudice. There is, therefore, no question of law which calls for our interference. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ion and as such there was no question of prejudice. There is, therefore, no question of law which calls for our interference. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......o be noted that Contractor Hazi Mansur Ali faced the trial on charges under section 409/109 of the Bangladesh Penal Code and 5(2) of Act II of 1977/109 and Safiquddin, the then Secretary and Syedur Rahman, the then officiating Engineer of the District Council on the charge under section 5(2)...... Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
968967959957956953950949947946945944942938937934932931930928