Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 5961-5980 of 6818 results.

M/S. Zaman and Co. Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)

....cation for review is dismissed for, hit non-ap­pearance he should rush to the Court, law says within fifteen days, for its restoration. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......gment                    M. H. Rahman J. - The appellant entered into a contract with respondents Nos. 1-4 for supply of bricks. A deed of agreement was exe­cuted on 20th June, 1975. Subsequently a disp......cation for review is dismissed for, hit non-ap­pearance he should rush to the Court, law says within fifteen days, for its restoration. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......lip;……...Respondents Judgment August 24, 1986. Cases Referred to- Md. Chand Miah Sowdagar Vs SMH Rahman 1985 BLD 337; Kalu Vs. Sowaria 27 1C 703. Lawyers Involved: Miah A. Gafur, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant. Khalilu..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 84

Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Sa­mity Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....nd shall not act arbitrarily or in discriminatory manner. In these circumstances, writ jurisdic­tion is quite available to the lessee. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ...... the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 179 of 1985. 2. Facts in a nutshell are as follows: The appellant Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity was granted the lease of the fishery in question for a term of six years for 389 B.S. at 50% enhanced rate over the existing rent and the lease deed ......nd shall not act arbitrarily or in discriminatory manner. In these circumstances, writ jurisdic­tion is quite available to the lessee. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ......itation AIR 1961 Assam 101; Talekhal Fishermen Co-op­erative Society vs. Bangladesh 1981 BLD (AD) 103; EFO Vs. Ram Sanchi AIR 1973 (S.C) 205; Ramana V.I.A. Authority of India A.I.R 1979 SC. 1628. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instruc..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87

Feroza Majid and another Vs. Jiban Biman Corpo­ration, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)

.... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ....... Judgment Shahabuddin Ahmed J.-The question raised in this appeal by special leave is whe­ther the High Court Division is well-founded in law in holding that the plaintiff-respondent's suit for permanent injunction against the de­fendants-appellants is maintainable. 2. Plaintiff-respo...... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ...... Kandaswami v. Vegheesam Pilial AIR 1941 (Mad) 822; Prabirendra Nath Nandy v Narendro Nath Nandy, AIR 1958 Cat. 179; Delhi Gate Service Private Ltd. v. M/s. Caltex (India) Ltd. AIR 1962 Pan. 370. Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Ad­vocate, Mahbubey Alam, Ad­vocate, Supr..

Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 104

Sree Gopal Chandra Mondal and another Vs. Lasman Dasi & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)

....e suit pro­perty. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, ac­cordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......              M.H. Rahman J. - This appeal by special leave, at the instance of the heirs of the plaintiff, has arisen out of a suit for partition. 2. The appellants' predecessor Debendra Chandra Mondal instituted Title Suit ......e suit pro­perty. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, ac­cordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......hellip;…………………………………………..Respondents Judgment September 2, 1986. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate (M.A. Wahab Miah, Advocate) instructed by Kazi ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37

Comm Taxes, Dhaka (East Zone) Vs. M/S. Macneil & Kilburn Ltd., Adamjee Ct, Dhaka, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)

.... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ......of termination of the agency was a capital receipt or a revenue receipt. 3. The assessee claimed that the amount of Tk. 1, 50,000/- was compensation paid by the Pakistan River Service Ltd., for premature termination of secretaryship agreement which was executed between the assessee and B....... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ......R 910; Hari Kailash vs. CIT 22 ITR 195, AIR 1953 ALL 170; Kettlewell Bullen Vs. C.I.T. AIR 1965 S.C. 65; C.I.T. Vs. Chari & Chari Ltd. AIR 1966 S.C. 34; Karam Chand Thapra 80 I.T.R. 167. Lawyers Involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate, instruc­ted by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advo..

Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 84

Dira Dockyard & Engineers Ltd. & ors Vs.Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & ors, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)

....in Article 33 of the Order. For the reasons stated above, we are of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......pa Rin Sangstha Order, 1972 (President's Order No. 128 of 1972).  2. Facts are: Respondent No. 1, namely, Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha, hereinafter called the Sangstha instituted the aforesaid Miscellaneous Case No. 117 of 1983, in the Court of District Judge, Dhaka against the appe......in Article 33 of the Order. For the reasons stated above, we are of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ellip;Respondent Judgment July 14, 1986. Cases Referred To- Ocean Industries Ltd. Vs. Indus­trial Development Bank. (1966) 18 DLR (SC) 354; PLD 1966 SC 1938. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) in..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 100

Siraj Miah & another Vs. State & another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)

....nd allow the appeal. The appell­ants are acquitted of the charge leveled aga­inst them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ...... Criminal appeal No. 83 of 1983). Judgment:                     M H. Rahman J. - In a trial for house-tres­pass and mischief by fire on a dwelling hut the trial court convicted the two a......nd allow the appeal. The appell­ants are acquitted of the charge leveled aga­inst them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ......ts Vs. State & another…………………………………..Respondents Judgment May 15, 1986. Lawyers Involved: Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Record.-For the Appellants. Syed Mudassir Huss..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57

Sufia Khanam Chowdhury Vs. Faizun Nesa Chow­dhury, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)

....irection for amendment of the plaint is set aside and that of the trial Court is resto­red. With this modification the appeals are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ught to the effect that a sale-deed dated 9-9-59 purportedly executed by the respondent was void, and in the other suit, T.S No. 87 of 1969, recipient of the sale-deed namely, the appellant prayed for establishment of her title on the basis of the said sale-deed. The sale-deed has been held 'voi......irection for amendment of the plaint is set aside and that of the trial Court is resto­red. With this modification the appeals are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......LR (F-B) 119; Katia Pillai. AIR 1929 Mad 393; Petherpermal ILR 35. Cal.551; V. Konar Vs.R. Konar, AIR 1939 Mad. 894; Kanchanmala Bepari (1954) 6 DLR 254; Mono Mohini Devi (1969) 21 DLR 626. Lawyers Involved: M H Khondkar, Senior Advocate (B. K. Das, Advocate, with him), instructed ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 86

Chunnu Mia Vs. Monindra Lal Roy & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)

....rgu­ment was advanced before the High Court Division with regard to the merit of the settle­ment. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......  M.H.Rahman J.-The respondents, on behalf of the deity Nrisingha Jue, filed Title Suit No. 115 of 1959 in the First Court of Munsif Habiganj, against the appellant and some other defendants for declaration of title to the suit land, recovery of khas possession and for mesne profit. The pl......rgu­ment was advanced before the High Court Division with regard to the merit of the settle­ment. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... (PC) 112; Shibessouree Debya M.I.A. 270; Vidya V.T. Swamigal AIR 1922 P.C. 123; Sridhar Suar AIR 1976 (SC) 1860; Srimath D. P. Desikar AIR 1936 (P.C.) 183; Atyam Veerraju AIR 1966 (SC) 629. Lawyers Involved: Sheikh Afzalur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36

Hazera Begum and others Vs. Roushan Ara Be­gum and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)

....r with the judgment of Badrul Haider Chowdhury J. Order of the Court By a majority decision, the appeal is dismi­ssed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......urt Division, Dhaka Bench, in Second Appeal No. 368 of 1974. Respondents filed Title Suit No. 163 of 1968 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court, Dhaka, against the defendants praying for partition of the suit lands on declaration of the plaintiffs' title la certain share of the sui......r with the judgment of Badrul Haider Chowdhury J. Order of the Court By a majority decision, the appeal is dismi­ssed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......8 (P.C) =38 C.W.N. 285; Maharaja Srischandra Nandy vs. Bajjnath Jugal Kishore 39 CW.N. 352 (P.C.); Corea vs. Apuhamy A.I.R. 1914 P.C. 243; Culley vs. D.D. Taylerson 11 A & E 1008(1840). Lawyers Involved: S R, Pal, Senior Advocate, M. H. Khondkar, Senior Advocate & A. J.Moh..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50

Narendra Nath Basu Roy and another Vs. Municipal Commit­tee, Mymensingh, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....s landlord and tenant. And there ends the matter. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dis­missed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:39 DLR (AD) 16. ......Court Division in S.A. No. 402 of 1975. 2. Plaintiff-respondent instituted Title Suit No. 106 of 1965 in the 1st Court of Subor­dinate Judge Mymensingh, against the defen­dant appellants praying for declaration of title to the land in suit appertaining to C.S. Plot No. 95 of Mouza Mymensingh to......s landlord and tenant. And there ends the matter. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dis­missed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:39 DLR (AD) 16. ......ssed. Cases Referred to- 18 DLR 618 (622); Sk. Abdul Latif vs. Malek 38 DLR (AD) 22; Raishaeb Pandit vs. Bombay, Baroda Rly. 39 CWN 552P.C.; D.M.D. National Bank vs. Ataul Huq, DLR (SC) 74. Lawyers Involved: S R Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Recordâ€..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34

Nur Muhammad & others Vs. Moulvi Moinuddin Ahmed & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....r Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the appeal is dis­missed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) 1. ......t has, in clear and unmistakable terms put an express embargo on entertainment of any suit or application against any order or action under the Act…………..(20) The Act itself provides remedy for any mala fide action in respect of acquisition under the Act and the appellant took advantage of......clause may be worded." 40. This Division in the case of Khondker Ehteshamuddin @ Iqbal 33 DLR (AD) 154 agreed with an approval the aforesaid proposition of law by holding that, "Of course when, a Martial Law Court or Tribunal has acted without jurisdiction or such Court or Tribunal is not proper......y of States vs. Mask & Co. 44 CWN 70—AIR 1940 PC 105; Mian Mohammed Latif vs. Province of West Pakistan, 221 DLR 98 SC—PLD 1970 SC 180; Abdul Rauf Vs. Abdul Hamid 17 DLR 515 SC at p. 519. Lawyers Involved: S. R. Pal, Senior Advocate, M. H. Khondker, Senior Advocate and A. J. Mohammad..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48

Muslimuddin & others Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....nts is set aside and all of them are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 311. ......0th May, 1983. 2 Facts as stated in the ejahar which was recorded by Officer-in-Charge, Kuliarchar P.S. are that on the night of 31st Bhadra, 1386 B.S. corresponding to 17th September 1979 when; informant Majeda Khatun was sleeping with her husband Idris Miah and two daughters, Minara Khatun and ......nts is set aside and all of them are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 311. ......rial is that the accused shall be presumed innocent and that he is not required to prove his innocence. The entire burden of proof of his guilt lies on the prosecution alone………….(49) Law does not require a parti­cular number of witnesses to prove a case. A conviction can be founded..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 56

Waliullah Munshi Vs. Lodu Mia Patwary & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....1979 of the Court of Subor­dinate Judge, Lakshmipur will now proceed in accordance with law. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed.This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 308 ......­sion, Comilla (Mr. Justice A.T.M. Afzal and Justice Nurul Huque Bhuiyan on 30th October 1984). 2. Respondent No 1 instituted Title Suit No. 181 of 1979 in the court of Subordinate Judge, Noakhali for declaration that the suit land was not vested and non-resident property. Allegations were that t......1979 of the Court of Subor­dinate Judge, Lakshmipur will now proceed in accordance with law. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed.This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 308 ...... more reason or urgency to protect his interest in the suit land than the lessor………………….(5) Cases Referred to- Prassanna Moyee vs. Kali Das, (1881) 9 Cal. L.R. 347; 31 DLR 107. Lawyers Involved: M.H. Khandker, Senior Advocate, A. J. Mohammad Ali, Advocate with him instructe..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42

Mrs. Amena Hoque Vs. Rajab Ali & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....Sessions Judge are hereby set aside. The proceeding of S.T. Case No. 232 of 1983 will commence from the stage where it was on 22.12.83. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 303 ......tal without complying with the provisions under section 265F Cr.P.C. In a criminal trial the State being the prosecutor, it was the duty of the State to secure attendance of the witnesses and for any reason, if needed, the process of the court if should be issued on the application of the pr......Sessions Judge are hereby set aside. The proceeding of S.T. Case No. 232 of 1983 will commence from the stage where it was on 22.12.83. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 303 ......s provision and as such it means stoppage of the trial only. Passing the order of acquittal before the period of limitation under section 339C was over, was not an order under section 339C Cr.P.C. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-Recor..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38

Ghyasuddin Ahmed Vs. Q.N. Faruque & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

.... of the learned Company Judge are modified ac­cordingly. The appeal is allowed is part. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 296 ......76(3) Having regard to the powers conferred under sections 76 (d) and 79 (d), the Court may order a meeting of the company only under the conditions provided under those provisions. Before exercising the powers conferred under section 79 (3), the Court must be satisfied that it has b...... of the learned Company Judge are modified ac­cordingly. The appeal is allowed is part. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 296 ...... Cal. 658 ; Re EL Sombero Ltd., (1958) 3 All ER P. 1, Captain John Johnston vs. G B. Potts & Co. Ltd. PLD 1967 Kar 496 ; Satish Chandra Banik vs. Dacca Jute Miils Ltd., PLD 1968 Dac 610 at p. 641. Lawyers Involved: Raifique-Ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, (Md. Fazlul Haque, Advocate with him) instruc..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 111

Maqsood Alam Vs. Bangladesh, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

.... result, the appeal is allowed. The impugned orders of the High Court Division and the trial Court are set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 290 ......Estate Officers as specified in the Schedule of the said Notification, to sign and verify the plaint or written state­ment in a suit by or against the Govern­ment. The Deputy Commissioner has, therefore, no competence to do it. In respect of the Ministry of Defence, under sub-head "Military...... result, the appeal is allowed. The impugned orders of the High Court Division and the trial Court are set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 290 ......emise in the Cantonment Area. The Military Estate Officer is the person is the specifically appointed by the Government to sign and verify a plaint or written statement on behalf of the Government. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate (M. A. Wahab Miah, Advocate with him) instructed by ..

Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 108

Srish Chandra Das Vs. Sri Sri Chatteswari Debi Bigraha, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....e judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial Court restored. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 283. ......testing witness to a document admitting such attestation cannot be allowed to turn back and assail the transaction, its nature, genuineness and its validity. There must be some tangible justification for making such a claim or resisting this consequences arising from the agreement……(12) ......e judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial Court restored. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 283. ......ry of Indus­tries Vs. Saleh Ahmed(1981) BLD 91 AD; Planters (Bangladesh) Ltd. Vs. Mohaluxmi Book Ltd. (1985) 37 DLR 129 AD; Profulla Choron Requittee vs. Satya Choron Requittee, AIR 1979 SC 1682. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Mahmudul Islam and Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 88

A. B. M. Tofayel Ahmed Vs. Sheikh Aminuddin & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....rnment's order as to Withdrawal did not show any reason for withdrawal. We find nothing to interfere. Both the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 282 ......t May 8, 1986. The Code Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898), Section 494 Under this provision of section 494 of the Code the Public Prosecutor alone is authorised to file an application for withdrawn of a case from the prosecution. In this case the Magistrate having passed the order of......rnment's order as to Withdrawal did not show any reason for withdrawal. We find nothing to interfere. Both the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 282 ......from the prosecution. In this case the Magistrate having passed the order of withdrawal without any application from the Public Prosecutor is an illegality and such order has rightly been reversed. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-R..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 71

Md. Shajahan Vs. Md. Sadeq & another , 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....sing the Tribunal's order and dismissing the election-petition. The appeal is, accord­ingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 275. ......wn and their secrecy should not be infringed by reopening the sealed packet unless the recounting beco­mes indispensably necessary to determine the dispute. Recounting should be refused if no prayer for recounting had been made to the Presiding Officer who is alone empowered to recount on the spot ......sing the Tribunal's order and dismissing the election-petition. The appeal is, accord­ingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 275. ...... on the requests of any candidate......(13) Cases Referred to- Mofazzal Hossain Vs. Election Commissioner, (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51; Nurul Islam V. Munsif, Election Tribunal 28 DLR (Dhaka) 375. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him), instr..

Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 140