Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Chatteswari Debi Bigraha Vs. Shirih Chandra Das & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....en by defendant 1(a) Chandra Sekhar) that the land surrounding the temple may be sold for the purpose of development and preservation of the temple, that the land should be told to the members of the Hindu Community by the Shebayets, that with the sale proceeds a house should be constructed and that..Category: Property Law | Date: 1 Apr, 1984 | Hits: 2
Priyatosh Talukder Vs. Asstt. Custodian of Enemy Property, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....tia Sugar Cane Mills Ltd. and others, 29 DLR 32. Late Uroesh Chandra Chowdhury, the mortgagor admittedly died leaving behind 4 soae (judgment debtor No.1 to 4) and a widow (judgment debtor No.5). The Hindus ia Bangladesh are generally governed by the Dayabhanga School of Hindu Law Mr. A.K.M. Shafiqu..Category: Property Law | Date: 4 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 4
Nezamat Ali Vs. Syed Ahmed Chowdhury and others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....le properties of the temple was sold in which the Privy Council was concerned with Article 124 of the Limitation Act and in the case of Damodar Das Chela's disciple's (sale of the property of Hindu religious endowment was challenged by a succeeding Chela where the status and character o..Category: Limitation Law, Property Law, Trust/Waqf Law | Date: 18 Jan, 1984 | Hits: 1
Anil Kumar Sarker & others Vs. Sree Sree Kalimata Bigraha, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....ill in 1964 and hence the suit is time barred. From Ext. F the power of attorney, it appears that Charu Bala was continuing the seba-puja of the deity. There is evidence on record that members of the Hindu community make their offerings of the deity. In view of the continuance of puja of the deity t..Category: Property Law | Date: 4 Apr, 1983 | Hits: 4
Narendralal Chowdhury & others Vs. Bimal Kanti Chowdhury & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....the case of a lease where the condition is for the benefit of the lessor or those claiming under him. Provided that property may be transferred to or for the benefit of a woman (not being a Hindu, Mohammadan or Buddhist) so that she shall not have power during her marriage to transfer or c..Category: Civil Law, Property Law | Date: 4 May, 1982 | Hits: 1
Nemai Kumar Vs. Ramesh Chandra Dutta and others, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....llip;.................................Appellant Vs. Ramesh Chandra Dutta and others...................Respondents Judgment June 30, 1980. Result: Appeal is allowed Hindu Law - Initial Burden Of Proof of Joint Family Property is on One Who Asserts It— Bu..Category: Property Law | Date: 30 Jun, 1980 | Hits: 51
Dr. Mohammad Hossain and anr. Vs. Abdul Malek Khan, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....im. 7. Multiplication of these instances is uncalled for, but, one relevant decision for our purpose may also be referred to: Musammat Sundar Vs. Musammat Parbati 16 IA 187 is a case where two Hindu widows were found to be in lawful possession of the property of their deceased husband, and ..Category: Contract Law | Date: 23 Aug, 1979 | Hits: 236
Mohammed Chand Mia & others Vs. Barista Krishna Kundu & others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....thin his district. (2) Except in cases to which section 57 applies no court in any local area beyond the limits of the towns Calcutta, Madras and Bombay, shall, where the deceased is a Hindu Muhamadan, Buddhist, Sika or Jain or an exempted person, receive, applications for probate or ..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 15 Dec, 1977 | Hits: 8
Ibrahim Hossain and Delwara Begum Vs. Md. Khorshed Ali and others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....egard to suits are applicable in all Independent proceedings of original nature, such as proceedings under the Provincial Insolvency Act, Guardian and Wards Act, Succession Act, Land Acquisition Act, Hindu Marriage Act, Arbitration Act, Rent Control Ordinance & Act and W.P. Urban Rent Restrictio..Category: Property Law | Date: 17 Nov, 1977 | Hits: 2
Sreemati Tripti LalaKar Vs. Govt. of the People's Republic of Bangladesh & others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....tional. The plaintiff was born and brought up in the disputed premises about 35 years ago. The plaintiff's father gave her in marriage according to the rites prescribed by the Dayabhaga School of Hindu law with proforma Defdt Khitish Chandra Kar in the prevailing their Gharjamai system and promi..Category: Property Law | Date: 8 Jul, 1977 | Hits: 2
Ramjan Khan alias Ramjan Ali Khan Vs. Obaidul Huq Chowdhury and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....115 of the Code. 12. In Joy Chand Lai Babu Vs. Kamalaksha Chowdhury 1 DLR 46, the Privy Council held in favour of the exercise of the High Court's revisional jurisdiction and in Venkatgiri Vs. Hindu Religious Endowments Board, 1 DLR 81, it held against it. 13. In Joy Chand’s case a qu..Category: Contract Law | Date: 5 Feb, 1975 | Hits: 271
Mrs. June Ferguson & others Vs. Ameenur Rasheed Chaudhury and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....hable from the facts of the present case and it does not lend any support to the contention of the learned Advocate in that case a suit was brought by the sons of one Rajayya, who being a member of a Hindu copercenary, constituted by himself and his sons, entered into an agreement with the defendant..Category: Property Law | Date: 5 Jul, 1972 | Hits: 0
Rai Kishori Saha Vs. Md. Motaleb Ali and Others, 1892, 11 CLC (HCD)
....….Petitioner Vs. Abdul Aziz and others…………….Opposite Parties Judgment February 9, 1982 Result: This Rule is made absolute Hindu women's Right to Property Act (XVIII of 1937); Section 3 State Acquisition and Tenanc..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 3
Adhir Das Vs. Arati Rani Das and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....ce, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the Ordinance, 1985). 3. The case of the plaintiffs, in short, is that plaintiff No.1 was given in marriage to defendant No.1, 20 years back in accordance with Hindu Law. Plaintiff Nos.2 and 3 were born out of their wedlock. Defendant No.1 used to serve in Ban..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Md. Abul Kashem and others Vs. Mst. Robila Khatoon and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....had been possessing the suit lands. Pursuant to promulgation of East Pakistan Disturbed Persons (Rehabilitation) Ordinance, 1964 execution and registration of the exchange deeds for the properties of Hindu community in the then East Pakistan was stopped for which the exchange deed for the suit lands..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Shafiqul Islam Khan Vs. The Commissioner of Taxes, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....hich deals in with the definition of ‘person’, which reads as follows; Income Tax Ordinance 1984 Section 2(46): “person” includes an individual, a firm, an association of persons, a Hindu undivided family, a local authority, a company and every other artificial juridical person.”..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Mst. Rahima Khatun and another Vs. Sree Monoranjon Saha and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....ha. After the death of Panchamoni Dasi the next reversioner heirs of Jadunath Saha the defendant Nos. 1-5 by way of inheritance became the absolute owners and possessors of the suit land according to Hindu law as reversioners and from whom the plaintiffs purchased the suit land by 2 registered Kabal..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Md. Akkas Ali Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
.... 5. The respondent No.11 is an inhabitant of the village Biaghat where the proposed new place is situated. With a view to satisfying his personal interest, the petitioner has taken the land of the Hindu Kalimata applying his illegal influence. The said land belongs to the Kalimata and the same ca..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 261
Amarbati Natya Mandir Vs. State, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....scription clearly justifies its claim that the plaintiff is not a private individual but an 'Akhra' or Temple which is a religious organization established for charitable and religious service of the Hindu community. The object of the legislature is lo secure correct particulars regarding the partie..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Alam Taj Begum @ Monowar Begum & others Vs. Nimai Chandra Roy, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....ears from the date of the disputed deed and, as such, the suit is barred by limitation. The learned trial Court further found that the defendant No. 5, brother of the plaintiff being the karta of the Hindu family, executed and registered the deed on behalf of the minor and, as such, the deed is a ge..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 69