Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Ali Haider Chowdhury Vs. State, represented by the DC, Dhaka and another, 2015, 44 CLC (AD)
....t and order dated 8-11-2012 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 20499 of 2009 under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure discharging the Rule. 2. The leave-petitioner herein, Ali Haider Chowdhury, filed an application before the Hig......or whether he abetted the principal accused in manipulating the tender for sale of the case property or whether he is a bona fide purchaser for value.………… (8-10) Lawyers Involved: SM Rezaitl Karim, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 11 Feb, 2015 | Hits: 16
Shamvunath Karmaker and another Vs. State and another, 2015, 44 CLC (HCD)
....n J Shamvunath Karmaker and another........Accused-Petitioners Vs. State and another......... .......Opposite Parties Judgment February 10, 2015. Result: The Rule is discharged. Trap Case under Rule 16 of the Bidhimala — “ফাঁদ মা......sion it is bound to prepare and to conduct a proceeding...... (19 & 20) Case Referred to- A. Mirzazada Vs. The Crown, PLD 1956 (WP) Karachi 273; Abdur Rahman Vs. State, 27 DLR 268. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mizanur Rahman with Shasti Sarker and Ashoke Kumar Banik, Advocates&mdas..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws, Procedural Law | Date: 10 Feb, 2015 | Hits: 4
State Vs. Engineer Monjurui Ahsan Munshiand another, 2015, 44 CLC (AD)
....unshi was put on trial before the Special Judge, 5th Court, Dhaka in Special Case No. 4 of 2007, for offences punishable under sections 26(2) and 27(1) of Durnity Daman Commission Ain, 2004 read with Rule 15(Gha) (5) of the Jaruri Khamata Bidhimala, 2007 and section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corrupt......f that offence no notice is required to be served upon the accused person...........(6-8) Case Referred To- Anti-Corruption Commission Vs. Mohiuddin Khan Alamgir, 62 DLR (AD) 290. Lawyers Involved: Momtazuddin Fakir, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by Sufia Khatun, A..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 2 Feb, 2015 | Hits: 11
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 11 Jan, 2015 | Hits: 1
Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited Vs. Commissioner of Taxes, 2015, 44 CLC (HCD)
....Ahsanul Karim, Ehsan A. Siddiq—For the applicantRazik-Al-Jalil, DAG with Mahfuza Begum, AAG, Nurun Nahar, AAG—For the respondent. Income Tax Reference Application No.20 of 2005 (Rule No.132(Ref) of 2011) Income Tax Reference Application No.21 of 2005 (Rule No.142 (Re......n (c) to Income Tax Reference Applications No. 20 of 2005. No answer to question (b) to Income Tax Reference Applications No. 21 of 2005, 22 of 2005, 23 of 2005, 24 of 2005 and 156 of 2006. Lawyers Involved Rafiq-ul Huq with Ahsanul Karim, Ehsan A. Siddiq—For the applicantRazik-..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 11 Jan, 2015 | Hits: 58
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 15 Dec, 2014 | Hits: 1
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 15 Dec, 2014 | Hits: 1
Singer Bangladesh Ltd Vs. National Board of Bangladesh, 2014, 43 CLC (HCD)
....er J Singer Bangladesh Ltd and 21 another ........Petitioner Vs. National Board of Bangladesh.............. Respondents Judgment December 15, 2014. Result: All the Rules are made absolute. Value Added Tax Act (XXII of 1991); Sections 26(Ka), 35 and 36 Th......; Commissioner of Police, Bombay Vs. Gordhandas Bhanji AIR 1952 SC 16; State of Punjab Vs. Hari Kishan Sharna, AIR 1966 SC 1081; Manseeklal Vithalas Chaohan Vs. State of Gujrat AIR 1997 SC 3400. Lawyers Involved: Moudud Ahmed, Hasan Ariff Senior Advocates with Ahsanul Karim, Khairul Alam C..Category: Constitutional Law, Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 15 Dec, 2014 | Hits: 5
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 14 Dec, 2014 | Hits: 0
Category: Constitutional Law, Contract Law | Date: 11 Dec, 2014 | Hits: 8
Ferdous Ara Zainul Vs. Mahmuda Khatun and others, 2014, 43 CLC (HCD)
....nbsp; Ferdous Ara Zainul.............................Petitioner Vs. Mahmuda Khatun and others..............Opposite Parties Judgment December 11, 2014. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Salauddin Vs. MA Hai 63 DLR (AD) 138; Burmah East......urmah Eastern Ltd Vs. Burmah Eastern employees Union, 18 DLR 709; Abdul Jalil Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd., 53 DLR (AD) 12 and Rasheda Begum Vs. Nurussafa, 2004 BLD (AD) 223 = 9 BLC (AD) 223. Lawyers Involved: Md. Rezaul Islam, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Akhtar Imam with Ra..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 11 Dec, 2014 | Hits: 19
Category: Constitutional Law, Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 8 Dec, 2014 | Hits: 3
Sonali Bank Limited Vs. UT Garments Limited and others, 2014, 43 CLC (HCD)
....ies before it including execution of its decree insofar as it is not inconsistent with the provisions of section 6(Ka) or any other provisions of the Ain. Section 6(Ka), has excluded the operation of Rules 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 in matters of execution of any decree. Artha Rin Adalat shall execute its ......hya Pradesh Vs. Vishnu Prasad; AIR 1962 1593; Palani Goundan Vs. Peria Goundan, AIR 1941 Mad 158; Hazera Begum Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, 12 BLC (AD) 153; AKM Nurul Alam Vs. Bangladesh 46 DLR(AD)113. Lawyers Involved: Md. Eunus, Advocate—For the Plaintiff-Petitioner. MA Azim Khair a..Category: Banking Law | Date: 4 Dec, 2014 | Hits: 4
Category: Constitutional Law, Contempt of Court Law | Date: 4 Dec, 2014 | Hits: 10
A Kader Zilani (Md.) Vs. State and another, 2014, 43 CLC (HCD)
.... for his personal gain...... (51) Time Limit for The Investigation of the Case is Simply Directory in Nature and Not the Mandatory Provisions of Law— So far the time limit is concerned the Rule prescribes to conclude the investigation within 60 'days in two phases or two tires bu......that he had a intention to misappropriate the same for his personal gain...... (51) Time Limit for The Investigation of the Case is Simply Directory in Nature and Not the Mandatory Provisions of Law— So far the time limit is concerned the Rule prescribes to conclude the investigation with..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: 3 Dec, 2014 | Hits: 11
Shariful Alam (Babu) (Md.) Vs. State and another, 2014, 43 CLC (HCD)
....cate—For the Opposite No. 2 Zahirul Hoque Zahir, DAG with Salma Rahman, AAG—For the State. Criminal Revision No. 580 of 2013. Judgment ANM Bashir Ullah J. — This Rule under section 439 read with section 435 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short, the C......essrs Mohammadi Steamship 17 DLR (SC) 487; Darajuddin Kazi Vs. Hafezuddin Kazi, 18 DLR 481; Kohinoor Chowdhury Vs. Sree Kamada Ranjan Bhattacharjee, 2XP (AD) 36; State Vs. Robin 66 DLR (AD) 272. Lawyers Involved: ZH Bhuiyan, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Momtaz Uddin Ahmed (Mehe..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 2 Dec, 2014 | Hits: 9
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Mojibul Haque & others, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)
.... was of no legal effect and also for direction upon the writ-respondents to re-instate him in his service with all service benefits including the arrears. 6. In all the three writ petitions, the Rules Nisi were issued in terms of the prayers made by the respective petitioner(s). 7. The com......52 DLR (AD) 120 and AFM Mustafizur Rahman, Director General, Bangladesh Railway Vs. Monoharan Mazumder, 9 MLR (AD) 251 = 9 BLC (AD) 207 Habibullah Khan Vs. Shah Azharuddin Ahmed; 35 DLR (AD) 72. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, learned Attorney General with Sarder Md. Rushed ]ahangir, lear..Category: Constitutional Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 25 Nov, 2014 | Hits: 20
A.K.M. Fazlul Haque and Others Vs. Privatization Commission and Others, 2014, 43 CLC (HCD)
....lip;……Appellants Vs. Privatization Commission and Others………………Respondent Judgment November 20, 2014 Result: Rule is disposed of. The promotion of the Officers and Employees— Privatization Comm......estion of filling up of the posts by deputationists will not come first as has been the longstanding practice in the Commission………………….(28) Lawyers Involved: A.B.M. Siddiqur Rahman Khan and M. Mainul Islam, Advocates—Fo..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 20 Nov, 2014 | Hits: 0
Molina Rani and others Vs. Gopal Goyala and another, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)
....man Ali J .- This Civil Appeal, by leave, is directed against the judgment and order dated 15-6-2002 passed by a Single Bench, of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5450 of 1998 making the Rule absolute. 2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the respondent No. 1 as plaintiff f......gment November 20, 2014 Result: The appeal is dismissed. The oral and extraneous evidence contradicting the contents of a written instrument is not admissible.......(15) Lawyers Involved: Shameem Khaled Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on-R..Category: Civil Law, Evidence Law | Date: 20 Nov, 2014 | Hits: 6
Meer Ramij Uddin Vs. Meer Judge Meah and others, 2014, 43 CLC (AD)
....is civil petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 10-3-2010 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2821 of 1997 discharging the Rule. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the respondent Nos.1 and 2 as plaintiffs filed P......documents referred are relevant to the case in hand and whether relying on those documents saham can be allotted. There is no bar to allotting saham at this stage in a suit for partition....(14) Lawyers Involved: Kh. Safiuddin Ahmed, Advocates, instructed by, Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Property Law | Date: 20 Nov, 2014 | Hits: 5