Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Md. Azizur Rahman Vs. Mosammat Nazmun Nahar, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
.... the said Marriage Registrar on 26.1.98 nor any marital relation was established between them. The defendant further stated that the father of the plaintiff with the help of his party men created the collusive affidavit and Kabinnama arid as such the suit is liable to the dismissed. 4. Trial Co..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 26 Jul, 2005 | Hits: 169
Md. Abu Aslam Advocate Vs. Rajshahi University and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....de. 2. Facts giving rise to this Rule in short is that the petitioner as plaintiff instituted the suit for declaration that the appointments of 546 employees (3rd & 4th class) are illegal, collusive, inter alia and against the interest of Rajshahi University and for permanent inÂjuncti..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 25 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 7
Golam Hossain Sikder (Md.) and others Vs. Deputy Commissioner & ors, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....the same was rightly cancelled and the land was rightly taken back in khas khatian of the government; that the plaintiff have no right, title and possession over the suit land and their kabalas being collusive, invalid and without valuable consideration, they are not entitled to get relief in t..Category: Property Law | Date: 19 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 3
Siraj Miah Vs. Mohammad Miah and others, 2005, CLC (HCD)
....nd that since the defendant No.4 is in possession of the suit land, his Bainapatra i.e. exhibit A was a valid and genuine instrument and that the sale deed of the plaintiff, i.e. the Exhibit 1, was a collusive instrument and, as such, it was neither effective nor acted upon. Since the plaintiff had ..Category: Property Law | Date: 7 Feb, 2005 | Hits: 2
SMAH Ltd SMAH Ltd Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....ant Engineer, Bangladesh Railway had no authority to write any letter dated 20‑9‑1986 to the Executive Engineer to de‑requisition the property. The letter dated 20‑9-1986 (Annexure-H) is collusive, concocted and manufactured to grab the land of the Government. The land of CS Plot No.177..Category: Property Law | Date: 16 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 7
Arshed Ali Sikder (Md.) Vs. Gouranga Chandra Shil and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....efendants 1 and 2 appeared and thereafter they sold the suit property to defendant No.3 on 22‑8‑72 at a consideration of Taka 3,000 and the said property is a homestead and the kabala document is collusive and the plaintiff tendered the consideration money which they refused to accept and thus t..Category: Property Law | Date: 10 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 2
Lal Miah (Hajee) Vs. Nurul Amin and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....specific performance of the contract for sale of land for further relief by way of declaration that the sale deeds by the defendant No. 1 in favour of the defendant No. 2 are fraudulent, void, and collusive and not binding upon the plaintiffs. 2. Plaintiff‑respondent Nos. 1 an..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 5 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 147
Jamir Ahmed Vs. Siddique Ahmed Sowdagor and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ds of gift dated 05.02.1960 and 25.11.1986 to the petitioner and the petitioner is in possession of the same and that Other Suit No. 169 of 2001 has been filed with the malafide intention to obtain a collusive decree and that the petitioner being necessary party is required to be added as a defendan..Category: Civil Law | Date: 12 Dec, 2004 | Hits: 156
Most. Shilu Begum Vs. Md. Roshan Akter Rahman, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....d the decree. The defendant No.46 has got a substantial interest in the suit property which she has inherited from her father. But unfortunately the plaintiff and the defendant No.1 to 30 by filing a collusive and fraudulent solenama took the entire property without leaving anything for the defendan..Category: Property Law | Date: 7 Dec, 2004 | Hits: 88
Nurul Haque (Md.) Vs. Anowara Begum and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... 5‑2‑1980 in the Court of the Munsif, Thakurgaon, Dinajpur praying for setting aside the ex parte decree passed on 24‑5‑1979 in the Other Class Suit No.400 of 1978 declaring the same illegal. collusive and not binding upon her and the learned Munsif by his judgment and decree, dated 30‑1â€..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 2
ACI Ltd Vs. Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....d that the registration dated 29‑9‑02 in the name of 'Polyron' granted by defendant No.1 in favour of defendant No.2 as brand name 'Iron Hydroxide Polymaltose Complex' was forged, collusive, antedated and of no legal effect. 3. Then, on 17‑4‑03 the plaintiff made an appl..Category: Civil Law | Date: 23 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 1
Nurul Huq (Md) @ MN Huq Vs. Nirmal Chandra Dutta & anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....dra Dutta instituted the suit for declaration that the compromise decree dated 18‑9‑1991 of the learned Subordinate Judge, First Court, Comilla in title Suit No. 82 of 1982 is fraudulent, collusive, illegal, void and not binding upon him. The aforesaid plaintiff filed the said suit stati..Category: Property Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 103
Abdus Sattar (Md) and ors. Vs. Lalon Mazar Sharif & Seba Sadan Committee & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ving behind the defendant Nos. 4‑12 and they have been possessing the same and 0.30 acres of land of Plot No. 418 has been correctly recorded in the names of defendants. The auction purchase is collusive fraudulent and illegal. 5. We have heard Mr. Md. Nawab Ali, the learned Advoc..Category: Property Law | Date: 11 Feb, 2004 | Hits: 127
Capital Tower Ltd. Vs. Mirpur Mazar Co operative Market Society Ltd. & ors, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... of status quo would not become invalid although party violating such order would expose themselves to legal action. For such violation document cannot be declared void or illegal or fraudulent or collusive when the allotment was made upon due compliance of the procedure for allotment and at the..Category: Property Law | Date: 18 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 216
Jahanara Begum and others Vs. Hazera Khatun, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
.... Order I rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure stating that they are the plaintiffs in Title Suit No. 7 of 1969 that the plaintiffs of the present suit for Specific Performance of Contract created a collusive document in order to grab the property of Title Suit No. 7 of 1969 and further stating tha..Category: Contract Law | Date: 12 May, 2003 | Hits: 251
Aloke Nath Dey Vs. Govt. of BD. rep. by the DC, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....n was liable to be dismissed. The Government of Bangladesh contested the case asserting that the power of attorney dated 11‑9‑1981 in favour of Mr. Lutfor Rahman Sarder was fraudulent, collusive and forged and, as such, Mr. Lutfor Rahman Sarder had no locus standi to file this case f..Category: Property Law | Date: 11 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 436
Shishir Kanti Pal and others Vs. Nur Muhammad and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....n schedule 'A', that there is no reliable material on record in support of the finding of the trial Court that irrevocable power of attorney in the form of deed of exchange, Exhibit 1 is forged and collusive, that on examination of the Exhibit I it is seen that the same was registered by the Mun..Category: Civil Law | Date: 27 Jul, 2002 | Hits: 175
Aroti Rani Paul Vs. Sudarshan Kumar Paul and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....ving received the said property, the plaintiff has been possessing the same. But the defendant No. 2 being influenced by some local people started the aforesaid Vested Property Case on the basis of a collusive report from defendant No. 3 the local Circle Officer (Rev) and illegally passed an order o..Category: Family Law | Date: 1 Apr, 2002 | Hits: 181
Mahmood Alam (Md.) and another Vs. Moklesur Rahman Bhuiya, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....land. On 29-5-1995, they received a legal notice issued on behalf of the defendant No. 1 and after inquiry, they came to know for the first time that the defendants created some forged, antedated and collusive papers in the names of Habib Box and Nabijan Mia through their sons, Yousuf and Younus as ..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 4
Dudu Mia and others Vs. Ekram Miah Chowdhury and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....ection 42 Plaintiff cannot have mere declaration of title in the suit property without seeking further declaration either that the impugned decree was not binding on him being collusive or void ab initio and as such his suit for mere declaration of title was not maintainable..Category: Civil Law | Date: 5 Aug, 2001 | Hits: 136