Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 581-600 of 735 results.
Jitendra Nath Bachar Vs. Badhakanta Sardar, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... hesitation to agree with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 127. ...... hesitation to agree with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 127. ...... hesitation to agree with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 127. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
M/S. S. Rahman & Company Limited and another Vs. UCBL and ors., 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... judgment and order dated 11.01.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.2727 of 2000 making the Rule absolute preferred against judgment and order dated 21.01.1996 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat, First Court, Chittagong in Mortgage Suit No.33 of 1991 for removing errors of the......ent and order dated 11.01.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.2727 of 2000 making the Rule absolute preferred against judgment and order dated 21.01.1996 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat, First Court, Chittagong in Mortgage Suit No.33 of 1991 for removing errors of the final......ightly corrected by the High Court Division. We find no substance in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009)51. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Irshad Hossain Vs. Bangladesh, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.....2007 for hearing of the rule issued therein. 2. Short fact of the case is that the aforesaid Writ Petition No. 988 of 2005 was filed by the writ petitioner challenging section 47(3) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 (Act VII of 2003) as well as the proceedings of Artha Rin Suit No. 315 o......for hearing of the rule issued therein. 2. Short fact of the case is that the aforesaid Writ Petition No. 988 of 2005 was filed by the writ petitioner challenging section 47(3) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 (Act VII of 2003) as well as the proceedings of Artha Rin Suit No. 315 of 2004......ot required to be unduly and overly sensitive in this regard The Civil Miscellaneous Petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 82. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 80
State Bank of India Vs. Saudi-Bangladesh Industrial and Investment Co. Ltd. & anr, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....1999 permitting defendant respondents to file Memorandum of Appeal with bank guarantee. 2. The facts of the case, in short, are that the petitioner filed Money Suit No.77 of 1994 in the Artha Rin Adalat against the respondents and others for recovery of Tk. 32,31,99,460.38. After cont......ermitting defendant respondents to file Memorandum of Appeal with bank guarantee. 2. The facts of the case, in short, are that the petitioner filed Money Suit No.77 of 1994 in the Artha Rin Adalat against the respondents and others for recovery of Tk. 32,31,99,460.38. After contest th......ting aside the impugned judgment and decree passing in F.A.T. No.358 of 1999 dated 14.06.1999 by the High Court Division. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 37. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 96
Janata Bank Vs. Rezwanul Haque and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....l Haque Patwary and the property measuring 32.71 decimals or .3271 ajutangsha described in the auction notice dated 14.3.2006 as well as in the Execution Case No.198 of 2005 now pending before the Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj (respondent No.1) originally belonged to their predecessor-in-interes......e Patwary and the property measuring 32.71 decimals or .3271 ajutangsha described in the auction notice dated 14.3.2006 as well as in the Execution Case No.198 of 2005 now pending before the Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj (respondent No.1) originally belonged to their predecessor-in-interest late......not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 996. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 19
Probir Kumar Rakshit Vs. Abdus Sabur & others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....fore, erratic and perverse. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLC (AD) (2009) 28; 29 BLD (AD) 2009, 43. ......fore, erratic and perverse. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLC (AD) (2009) 28; 29 BLD (AD) 2009, 43. ......fore, erratic and perverse. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLC (AD) (2009) 28; 29 BLD (AD) 2009, 43. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Md. Mokaddas Ali and others Vs. Artha Rin Adalat (Sub. Judge) Dinajpur & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Tafazzal Islam J Md. Mokaddas Ali and others ……………....Petitioners Vs Artha Rin Adalat (Sub-ordinate Judge) Dinajpur & others…….....Respondents ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Tafazzal Islam J Md. Mokaddas Ali and others ……………....Petitioners Vs Artha Rin Adalat (Sub-ordinate Judge) Dinajpur & others…….....Respondents Judgmen...... correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Referred In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 237. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Faroque Ahmed Vs. Sub. Judge, 2nd Court & Artha Rin Adalat No. 1, Rangpur & ors , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Kabir Chowdhury J Faroque Ahmed………………………………..Petitioner Vs Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court and Artha Rin Adalat No. 1, Rangpur and others ………………… ...... Chowdhury J Faroque Ahmed………………………………..Petitioner Vs Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court and Artha Rin Adalat No. 1, Rangpur and others ………………… Respon......he correct proposition of law discharged the Rule and so no interfere is called for. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Referred In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 236. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 78
M/s. Karnaphuli Traders Vs. Joint District Judge, First Artha Rin Adalat & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... M.M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J M/s. Karnaphuli Traders…………………Petitioner Vs. Joint District Judge, First Artha Rin Adalat and others……. Respondents Judgment March 09, 2006. .......M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J M/s. Karnaphuli Traders…………………Petitioner Vs. Joint District Judge, First Artha Rin Adalat and others……. Respondents Judgment March 09, 2006. La......ion summarily. The impugned order does not, therefore, call for any interference. The petition is thus dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 75. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Azad Shahnewaz Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, Dinajpur and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....resent: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Azad Shahnewaz……………………Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, Dinajpur and others …………....Respondents Judgmen......: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Azad Shahnewaz……………………Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, Dinajpur and others …………....Respondents Judgment ......f the discussions made herein above we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 77. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Kaiser A. Chowdhury and others Vs. M/s. Zakir Hossain Re-Rolling Mills and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... arising out of Writ Petition No.6156 of 2005 moved under Article 102 (2) of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh against the order dated 25-07-2005 passed by the learned Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Chittagong in Artha Rin Execution Case No.132 of 2005. 2. The case of ......ng out of Writ Petition No.6156 of 2005 moved under Article 102 (2) of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh against the order dated 25-07-2005 passed by the learned Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Chittagong in Artha Rin Execution Case No.132 of 2005. 2. The case of the pe......ieve that the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioners have got no merit and accordingly, the same is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 776. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Uttara Bank Ltd. Vs. Subordinate Judge and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... petition was filed challenging the order dated 30-5-1999 passed by the respondent No.1 of the writ petition in Miscellaneous Case No.24 of 1998 arising out of money Execution Case No.11 of 1998 of Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka. The Habib Bank Limited instituted Money Suit No.48 of 1992 in Artha R......ion was filed challenging the order dated 30-5-1999 passed by the respondent No.1 of the writ petition in Miscellaneous Case No.24 of 1998 arising out of money Execution Case No.11 of 1998 of Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka. The Habib Bank Limited instituted Money Suit No.48 of 1992 in Artha Rin Ada......urt to decide the claim by Uttara Bank Limited in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 229. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Badal Chandra Das and others Vs. Amena Khatun, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....der dated 12 November 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2468 of 2001 discharging the Rule issued against judgment and decree dated 11-1-2001 of the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Rajshahi in Title Appeal No.130 of 1999 reversing those dated 28-2-1999 by the Se......ted 12 November 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2468 of 2001 discharging the Rule issued against judgment and decree dated 11-1-2001 of the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Rajshahi in Title Appeal No.130 of 1999 reversing those dated 28-2-1999 by the Senior A...... could be pointed out for our interference. In view of this, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 94. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Abul Kashem Howlader & ors. Vs. Md. Kashem Ali Khan and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....on 6-12-1958 as fraudulent and not binding upon the plaintiffs. The petition is disposed of aforesaid modification. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 86. ......on 6-12-1958 as fraudulent and not binding upon the plaintiffs. The petition is disposed of aforesaid modification. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 86. ......on 6-12-1958 as fraudulent and not binding upon the plaintiffs. The petition is disposed of aforesaid modification. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 86. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Md. Nasirullah Vs. Md. Ziauddin Khan & Others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....that the point raised was well answered in the impugned judgment. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 BLD (AD) (2008) 185. ......that the point raised was well answered in the impugned judgment. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 BLD (AD) (2008) 185. ......that the point raised was well answered in the impugned judgment. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 BLD (AD) (2008) 185. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Oriental Bank Ltd. former Al-Baraka Bank Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. A B Siddiq (Ludu), 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....dgment and order dated 27-4-2004 and 2-4-2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2235 of 2000 discharging the Rule by majority decision and refusing to interfere with decree of Artha Rin Adalat No. 4, Dhaka dismissing the suit as against guarantor respondent No.1. 2. T...... and order dated 27-4-2004 and 2-4-2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2235 of 2000 discharging the Rule by majority decision and refusing to interfere with decree of Artha Rin Adalat No. 4, Dhaka dismissing the suit as against guarantor respondent No.1. 2. The fac...... by this Division. In such view of the matter we find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 BLC (AD) (2008) 144. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 122
AQM Shah Alam Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh and ors., 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....rging the Rule and also vacating the order of stay. 2. Brief facts are that the petitioner filed the above writ petition challenging the proceeding of Money Execution Case No. 48 of 2004 of Artha Rin Adalat No. 3 Dhaka stating that City Bank Limited, the respondent No. 3, hereinafter refe......the Rule and also vacating the order of stay. 2. Brief facts are that the petitioner filed the above writ petition challenging the proceeding of Money Execution Case No. 48 of 2004 of Artha Rin Adalat No. 3 Dhaka stating that City Bank Limited, the respondent No. 3, hereinafter referred t......f any kind calling for interference by this Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 BLC (AD) (2008) 122; V ADC (2008) 198. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Dr. S.M. Yunus Ali Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ul Islam J Md. Abdul Matin J Dr. S.M. Yunus Ali…………………………..Petitioner Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & another……………………&hell......am J Md. Abdul Matin J Dr. S.M. Yunus Ali…………………………..Petitioner Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & another………………………&he......on do not suffer from any illegality or infirmity so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 167. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 91
DC (Railway Land and Building) Vs. Md. Moshiur Rahman (Miran) (Minor) and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4696 of 2001 making the Rule absolute obtained against the judgment and decree dated August 9, 2001 of the Court of Joint District Judge and 3rd Court of Artha Rin Adalat, Dhaka passed in Title Appeal No. 32 of 1998 reversing the judgment and decree dat......Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4696 of 2001 making the Rule absolute obtained against the judgment and decree dated August 9, 2001 of the Court of Joint District Judge and 3rd Court of Artha Rin Adalat, Dhaka passed in Title Appeal No. 32 of 1998 reversing the judgment and decree dated Oct......the appellate Court and thereby restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 142. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Sonali Bank Vs. Md. Mostafa Kamal & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....the application for dismissing the leave petitions is allowed. Both the civil petitions accordingly are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 493. ......the application for dismissing the leave petitions is allowed. Both the civil petitions accordingly are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 493. ......the application for dismissing the leave petitions is allowed. Both the civil petitions accordingly are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 493. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 103
29602945293029242918288428492848283628352829278627802778275927522745273227242675