Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 581-586 of 586 results.
Hosne Ara Begum and another Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited, 2000, 29 CLC (AD)
....ory power under Article 109 of the Constitution is not available. For the following reason stated above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 9. ......ischarging the Rule. 2. The material question that was for considering before the High Court Division was, whether a revision or writ petition will lie against an interlocutory order of Artha Rin Adalat. 3. The facts to narrate, in brief, are that, the plaintiff-Islami Bank Bangladesh Limite..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 148
Enamul Haque Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t and order dated 27th June, 2001 passed by the High Court Division discharging the Rule obtained in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 5869 of 2000 refusing to quash proceedings of Jana Nirapatta (Bishesh Bidhan ) Case No. 29 of 2000 (arising out of G. R. Case No. 152 of 2000 (Sadar) Correspondin......greement with the findings and decisions of the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises this petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Abdul Malek and othÂers Vs. Faiz Ahmed and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...., felt difficulty to fault with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. We find no substance in the appeal, which is accordingly dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......Additional District Judge, First Court, Narayangonj allowing the Title Appeal No. 83 of 1994 decreeing the suit upon reversing those of dated 29.3.1994 of the learned Subordinate Judge, Artharin Adalat, Noakhali dismissing the Title Suit No. 25 of 1989. 2. The respondent Nos. 1-4 as the ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
National Bank Limited Vs. Pragati Industries Limited, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nd any error of law and as such it does not call for our interference. 19. In the result the appeal fails. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......High Court Division in First Appeal No.57 of 1992 and cross objection tender No. 227 of 1992 allowing the appeal, setting aside the judgment and decree dated 18 September 1991 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.3. Dhaka, in Money Suit No. 132 of 1991 who dismissed the suit and the cross objection of ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Abul Kalam Azad Vs. Govt of BD, represented by the DC, Dinajpur & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....fter consideration of all the facts and materials exercised its discretion we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......f the trial court and thereby the delay of 201 days was caused in filing the revisional application against the judgment and decree dated 9.3.1998 of the learned Subordinate Judge, Artharin Adalat, Dinajpur, in Other Class Appeal No. 72 of 1991. The High Court Division did not accept the e..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 133
Director of Housing and Settlement Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ...... of delay in filing revisional application against the judgment and decree dated November 18, 1998 of the Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), and 2nd Commercial Court and Artho Rin Adalat no. 2, Dhaka in Title Appeal No. 118 of 1997 affirming the judgment and decree dated April 16..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 189
385360343340326303