Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Abdur Noor Chowdhury Vs. State and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 113 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 23.1.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 876 of 2006.) Judgment &......rd and the law involved rejected the application under section 561A Cr. PC summarily. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 268. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
State Vs. Abdur Rahim Shikder, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ondents (In both the Cases) Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 498-99 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 4th April, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 974 of 1990 along with Criminal......signed by the learned Advocate for the petitioner merits no consideration. Accordingly, both the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 265. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
State Vs. Md. Firoj Ahmed, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ioner. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record -For the Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 296 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 24.07.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 1900 of 2004.) Judgment ......In the above facts and circumstances of the case we find no merit in this petition and accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 263. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Md. Dawad Ali Sardar Vs. Kazi Mujibar Rahman & others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....nd the appellate Court after hearing dismissed the appeal by judgment and order dated 12.07.2002. Being aggrieved the accused respondent preferred Criminal Revision No. 686 of 2002 before the High Court Division and the High Court Division after hearing made the Rule absolute and the judgme......tion 307 of the Penal Code because that would be a futile exercise. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 260. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Misir Ali and another Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.129 of 2006 (From the judgment and order dated 19.11.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No.878 of 2003.) Judgment &n......shy;ment of the High Court Division calling for interference by this Court. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 258. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
State Vs. Nantu Biswas and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....d by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Not represented- the Respondents. Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 2000. (From the order dated 23.07.1995 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No.343 of 1990.) Judgment &nb......ia are found guilty under Sections 302/34 B.P.C and they are directed to serve the remaining period of their sentence if any. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 254. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Md. Habibur Rahman Islam Vs. Secretary, Ministry of LGRD, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....e-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- For Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 800 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 21.6.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4504 of 2003). Judgment &nb......y;ingly the above decision of the High Court Division does not call for any interference. 6. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 252. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21
M. Tofazzal Ahmed Vs. Jashim Uddin Haydar Faruque, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ted by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 550 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 30th August, 2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 51 of 2004) Judgment &nbs......ate for the petitioner deserve no consideration. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 250. ..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 210
Giasuddin Chowdhury & anr Vs. Military Estate Officer, Central Circle, Dhk, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... by Md. Ibrahim Khalil, Advocate-on-record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 109 of 2008. (From the judgment and order dated 2nd December, 2007 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1810 of 2005) Judgment &n......any cogent reason to differ with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 248. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Nekbar Ali Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Zainul Abedin, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 693 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated the 19th April, 2006 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 6298 of 2003) Judgment &nb...... substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 246. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Harunullah Akhand Vs. Abdul Latif & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e-an-Record- For the Petitioners. Not represented- Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1150 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 26.06.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3214 of 1997.) Judgment &n......rect decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 243. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Md. Delowar Hossain Vs. Md. Nurul Hoque and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1188 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 07-12-2004 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2605 of 2004) Judgment &nbs......submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner merit no consideration. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 241. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Mojibar Matubbar and others Vs. Abdul Hamid Matubbar, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....bsp; Civil Appeal No. 332 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 24.6.1999 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1482 of 1996.) Judgment ......fers legal infirmity and is liable to be set aside. The appeal is therefore allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 238. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Azaharuddin Ahmed Vs. T. N. T. others Board and Others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....titioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 244 of 2006 (From the judgment and order dated the 6th and 7th July, 2004 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 3601 of 1996) Judgment &nb...... substances in the submissions of the Advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 236. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Raghunath Sarker Vs. Ramnath Sarker, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ecord-For the Appellant. Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 37 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 21-05-2001 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 448 of 2000) Judgment ......are of the opinion that the appeal has got no merit and accordingly, the same is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 232. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Shahabuddin and others Vs. Mahtab Uddin & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sp; Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 812 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 05.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3195 of 1998.) Judgment &nb......correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 229. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Md. Ashrafuzzaman & others Vs. Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation & ors, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....Respondent No. 2. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 1, 3-5. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1634 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 13.07.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4388 of 2003.) Judgment &n...... correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 226. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Ranju Roy and other Vs. Jibesh Ranjan Roy and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Not represented- the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 545 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 24.1. 2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3898 of 1997). Judgment &......r infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 223. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdur Rob and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....angir, Advocate-on Record-For respondent No.1. Not represented- For respondent Nos.2-13. Civil Appeal No.14 of 2000. (From the judgment and order dated 19.6.1997 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No.79 of 1990) Judgment &n......irst Appeal No.79 of 1990 is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 219. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Mst. Sufia Khanam Mst. @ Sufia Khatun & another Vs. Md. Abdul Rouf @ Tara Miah, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....with the leave of the Court). Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 182 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 13.12.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2716 of 2001.) Judgment &n......ecord arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 217. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20