Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Haji Alauddin Vs. State and another, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....erence by this Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed and thereby the impugned judgment and order is confirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 165. ......din J Md. Hassan Ameen J Haji Alauddin ......................Appellant Vs. The State and another….........Respondents Judgment June 15, 2008. Lawyer Involved: Khondakar Mahbub Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Adv......erence by this Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed and thereby the impugned judgment and order is confirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 165. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Maksudun Nabi Joarder Vs. Md. Rafiq alias Abdur Rafiq Khan and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 153. ......ellip;.Petitioners (In Civil Petition No. 454 of 2008) Vs. Md. Rafiq alias Abdur Rafiq Khan and others….Respondents (In both Cases) Judgment June 2, 2008. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner (In both cases). ...... in error in not considering that the ex parte decree sought to be executed is one for recovery of possession and the petitioner has filed the above. Miscellaneous Case No. 28 of 2005 under Order IX Rulel 1 on the allegation that summon of the suit was not served upon him and the above mi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 18
Shahjahan Mridha Vs. Jalal Sikder and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....nce and as such the impugned judgment and order does not call for our interference and accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 147. ...... Shahjahan Mridha………………..Petitioner Vs. Jalal Sikder and others…..... Respondents Judgment November 14, 2007. Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not r......nce and as such the impugned judgment and order does not call for our interference and accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 147. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Md. Nurul Hoque Sarker Vs. Janata Bank, Tan Bazar Branch, Narayangonj and other, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....re is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 142. ......h, Narayangonj and other....Respondents Judgment August 3, 2008. Case Referred To- Sultana Jute Mills Ltd and others vs. Agrani Bank and others, 46 DLR (AD) 174. Lawyers Involved: Nurul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner S.R. Kho......re is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 142. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Abdur Rashid Bepari Vs. Soleman Ali, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....d any illegality or error of law so as to warrant interference by this court. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 139. ......tin J Abdur Rashid Bepari.........Petitioner Vs. Soleman Ali being dead his heirs: Most Golenur Bewa and others .......Respondent Judgment February 6, 2008. Lawyers Involved: A. Y. Mosihuzzaman, Advocate instructed by Mr. Md. Nawab Ali, advocate-on-......d any illegality or error of law so as to warrant interference by this court. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 139. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21
Elahi Mondal Vs. Juran Mondal and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... there being no illegality or infirmity in the above decision no interference is called for. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 135. ......l……………………Petitioner Vs. Juran Mondal and others……........Respondents Judgment July 30, 2008. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advo...... there being no illegality or infirmity in the above decision no interference is called for. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 135. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Abdul Halim Bhuiyan & others Vs. Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....e facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to review impugned judgment. Accordingly, the review petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 133. ......ivil Appeal No. 86 of 2005). Vs. Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, TCB Bhaban, 1 Kawran Bazar, Dhaka, & anothÂer .............Respondents (In all the cases) Judgment August 6, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate (Abdur Rab Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, with ......B and also violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to them under Articles 28-31 of the Constitution and also the impugned orders being issued in disregard of the Employment of Labour (Standing Order) Act, 1965 the orders were liable to be struck down. 3. The rules were opposed by TCB-the p..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Mohammad Akbar Chowdhury Vs. Khalilur Rahman and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....le and affirmed the judgment of the appellate court. We find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 130. ......Abdul Matin J Mohammad Akbar Chowdhury….............Petitioner Vs. Khalilur Rahman and others ................Respondents Judgment January 29, 2009. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Mohammad Abul Bashar, Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-o......le and affirmed the judgment of the appellate court. We find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 130. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Jitendra Nath Bachar Vs. Badhakanta Sardar, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... hesitation to agree with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 127. ......nother...... Plaintiff-petitioners. Vs. Badhakanta Sardar being dead his heirs;1(a)Phulchand Sardar and others....... Respondents. Judgment February 5, 2008. Lawyers Involved Md. Abu Siddique, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not rep&sh...... hesitation to agree with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 127. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Ahmed Safa Vs. Amin Sharif and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....be an issue and does not deserve to be decided here. We find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 125. ......ed Safa……………….... Petitioner Vs. Amin Sharif and others……............Respondents Judgment December 5, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Harendra Nath Nandy, Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-o......be an issue and does not deserve to be decided here. We find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 125. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Md. Solaiman and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....re is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 121. ......rs .......Respondents. (In both cases) Judgment July 7, 2008. Case Referred to- State of Haryana and others vs. Lal Chand and others, AIR 1984 Supreme Court 1326. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advo......re is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 121. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Md. Tazimuddin and others Vs. Md. Mafizul Islam and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ew of the judgment passed by this Court. We find no merit in this review petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 117. ...... Md. Tazimuddin and others……………Petitioners Vs. Md. Mafizul Islam and others ......Respondents Judgment October 20, 2008. Lawyers Involved: Md. Awlad Ali, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocat......ew of the judgment passed by this Court. We find no merit in this review petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 117. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Narryan Chandra Das Vs. Sree Joydeb Datta and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... cost of Tk. 20,000/- as directed by the High Court Division. With this modification as to cost this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 110. ...... Narryan Chandra Das……………......Petitioner Vs. Sree Joydeb Datta and others…........Respondents Judgment January 7, 2008. Lawyers Involved: Abul Kalam Mainuddin, Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Re...... cost of Tk. 20,000/- as directed by the High Court Division. With this modification as to cost this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 110. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....n and the writ petition is not maintainable. 6. We find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 89. ......atin J Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury….................Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others….....Respondents Judgment July 1, 2008. Lawyers involved: S.N. Goswami, Advocate instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Rec......n and the writ petition is not maintainable. 6. We find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 89. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
RAJUK Vs. Dhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority and other, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....o have been done without lawful authority. We find no merit in the petition and accordingly the same is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 80. ......ty and other……Respondents Judgment November 29, 2007. Case Referred To- Central London Property Trust Ltd. Vs. High Trees House Ltd. (1947)1 KB 130. Lawyers Involved: T.H.Khan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Waliul Islam, Advocate-on-Rec......o have been done without lawful authority. We find no merit in the petition and accordingly the same is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 80. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Abdul Samad Khan Vs. Sree Dulal Chandra Ghose and Another, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... the High Court Division in First Miscellaneous Appeal No. 613 of 1991 is set aside. There is no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 78. ......………………......Appellant Vs. Sree Dulal Chandra Ghose and Another……........Respondents Judgment March 14, 2005. Lawyers Involved: A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-record- For the Appellant. Ex-part...... the High Court Division in First Miscellaneous Appeal No. 613 of 1991 is set aside. There is no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 78. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Abdul Khaleque Vs. Abdul Noor and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....rit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 75; 26 BLD (AD) 2006, 63. ......ul Islam J Abdul Khaleque…………......Appellant Vs. Abdul Noor and others………Respondents Judgment July 26, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advoca......rit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 75; 26 BLD (AD) 2006, 63. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Abdul Haris Akan Vs. Thana Nirbahi Officer, Sreepur, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ing the prayer of the petitioner. We find no substance in this petition and accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 73. ...........................Petitioners Vs. Upazila/Thana Nirbahi Officer, Sreepur, P.O. Sreepur, Gazipur and others............... Respondents Judgment January 10, 2008. Lawyers Involved: Nurul Islam Bhuiya, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Mrs. M......laneous Case No.13 of 1996 rejecting an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for recalling the order dated 15.07.1997 dismissing the Miscellaneous Case No. 13 of 1996 under Order 41, Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. The facts, in short, are that the prede..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Government of Bangladesh and another Vs. Mrs. Rawshan Ara Begum and another, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... in our opinion is of no merit. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 65. ......61; Bangladesh Vs. Md. Shajahan (2000) 20 BLD (AD), 166; Asma Begum Vs. Bangladesh and others (2001) 21 BLD (AD), 134; Mostafa Kamal Vs. First Court of Settlement and others 48 DLR (AD), 61. Lawyers Involved: A.J. Mohammad Ali, Attorney General, instructed by Wahidullah, Advocate-on......nce No. LIV of 1985),that whereabouts of the original allottee and her daughter were not known from the very day of promulgation of the Bangladesh Abandoned Property (Control, Manage and Disposal) Order,1972 (President's Order No.16 of 1972) and the owner of the property having failed to occupy,..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Bangladesh Muktijoddha Kalyan Trust and another Vs. Md. Arshad Ali and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ound of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 58. ......ktijoddha Kalyan Trust and another……….Petitioners Vs Md. Arshad Ali and others……….....Respondents Judgment July 22, 2007. Lawyers involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on......ound of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 58. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 408