Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6021-6040 of 6261 results.
Rakman Ali alias Md. Rakman Ali and others Vs. Hasib Ali Chowdhury and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....servations made above after discussing and considering all the material evidence on record. 18. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... IA 83; Ng, See Hem vs. The Official Assignee Federation of Malaya 5 DLR (PC) 214; Radha Ballav Basak vs. Krishna Sundari Basak 5 DLR 114; Purnendu Kumar Das vs. Hiran Kumar Das 21 DLR 918. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Salam Khan, AR Khan—For the Appellants. Nasiruddin ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Safar Ali and others Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... NA Rouf, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Not represented- State. Criminal Revision Case No. 152 of 1969. Judgment: A Quasim J.- This Rule is directed against an order of conviction and sentence under sections 147, 323 and 324 of the......p; Cases Referred to: Montazuddin and others vs. Crown 8 DLR Dacca 95; MFN Rewail vs. State 8 DLR Dacca 589; Amir Hossain Talukdar and others vs. Crown 9 DLR, Dacca, 71. Lawyers Involved: NA Rouf, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Not represented- State...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Dr. Rati Ranjan Choudhury Vs. Parul Bala Marwari and another, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... meet with disappointment. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs, the judgment and order under appeal is hereby confirmed. Ed. ......rs AIR (1937)(PC)251 corresponding to 64 IA 311; Kesoram Poddar vs. Banamali Dey and ors. AIR 1927 Cal. 141 and Gajadhar Lodha vs. Khas Mahatab Colliery Co. and ors. AIR 1959 Patna 562 ref. Lawyers Involved: DC Bhattacharjee, BB Roy Chowdhury —For the Appellant. SK Sen..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Syed Modaris Ali Vs. Syed Md. Illias Ali and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....he observations made in the judgment. The cost of this appeal will abide by the result. In view of the above order, the cross-objection has lost its importance and is, therefore, rejected. Ed. ......p; Vs. Syed Md. Illias Ali and others.......... ......Respondents Judgment May 6th, 1971. Lawyers Involved: Nasiruddin Chowdhury — For the Appellant. Habibur Rah..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Rabiul Hossain Vs. Chairman, District Council Khulna and DC Khulna and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....Petitioner. Abdul Matin Khan Chowdhury — For the Respondents. Petition No. 138 of 1968. Judgment: Maksum-ul-Hakim J: In this Rule the petitioner challenges the legality of a resolution passed by the Khulna District Council ......; Vs. Chairman, District Council Khulna and DC Khulna and others................Respondents Judgment January 13th, 1971. Lawyers Involved: Ismailuddin Sarkar — For the Petitioner. Abdul Matin ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 92
Abul Hossain and Abul Md. Vs. Amatu Md., 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... For the Petitioner. ATM Afzal — For the Opposite Party No.2. Criminal Revision No. 623 of 1970. Judgment: Abdullah Jabir J.- This Rule is directed against an order passed by Mr. AH Chowdhury, Sessions Judge, Dinajpur, directing ......hminarayan and others vs. Suryanarayan, AIR 1932 Mad. 502; Emperor vs. Asghar and others 37 ALJ 337; Chhadamila Jain and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another AIR I960 SC (India) 41. Lawyers Involved: Md. Jamiruddin Sircar — For the Petitioner. ATM Afzal —..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Bijon Bala Chowdhurani & others Vs. Maniruddin Biswas & others, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....ddin Prodhan PLD 1966 (Dacca) 198. Lawyers Involved: Nizamuddin Haider—For the Petitioners. Latifur Rahman—For the Opposite Party Nos. 1-2. Civil Rule No. 79 of 1967. Judgment: ......ra Nath Chakravarty vs. Trailakya Nath Chakravarty and others 40 CWN 1023; Abdul Aziz. Khan vs. Lalit Mohan Banerji 54 CWN 442; Ajit and others vs. Hacharuddin Prodhan PLD 1966 (Dacca) 198. Lawyers Involved: Nizamuddin Haider—For the Petitioners. Latifur Rah..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Jogomaya Kundu Vs. Sudhir Kumar Kundu and another, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... Criminal Revision Case No. 481 of 1969. Judgment: Habibur Rahman J.- This was a Rule calling upon the Deputy Commissioner, Patuakhali and the opposite-parties to show cause why t......: Md. Sharif vs. Diwan Singh AIR 1940 Lah 95; Ghazan vs. Mt. Bag Bhari, AIR 1932 Lah. 210; Ujir Sheikh vs. Syed AH Sheikh 16 CrLJ 607; Gourhari Gope vs. Alay Gopini, 29 ILR Cal. 724 Lawyers Involved: SA Latif—For the Petitioner. SS Haider—for the Opposit..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Pronab Kumar Majumder Vs. Hatem Mondal and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....ate—For the Petitioner. AM Mahmudur Rahman, Advocate— For the Opposite Party Nos 1 &4. Anwarul Hoq Chowdhury, Advocate— For the Opposite Party No 7. Civil Rule No 364 of 1970. Judgment: ......Ghosh & others (1959) 11 DLR 470; Jamman Mia vs Assistant Custodian of Enemy Property (1969) 21 DLR 562; Shahzada Muhd. Omar Beg vs Sultan Mohammad Khan and others (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 41. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rahim, Advocate—For the Petitioner. AM Mahmudur Rah..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Aminul Islam Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....s not at all been proved and he is entitled to be acquitted. The appeal is allowed. The conviction and sentence passed against the appellant are set aside and he is acquitted of the charge. Ed. ......, 1970. Cases Referred: Sk. Mujibur Rahman & others vs State 15 DLR 549 PLD 1964 Dac 330; Fakku Mia alias Motahar All vs. The State 10 DLR 26; Srinivas Mall vs King Emperor 51 C.W.N 900. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Aziz with Latifur Rahman—For the Appellant. Md. Modabber Hosain —F..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 83
Suriya Begum and others Vs. Alimulla Mallik, and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....Rao and others vs. MO Natesa Chatty, AIR 1948 Madras 138. Lawyers Involved: Aftabuddin Ahmed- For the Petitioners. MA Rouf — For the Opposite Party No. 1. Civil Rule No. 144 of 1967. Judgment: &nb......Afzal vs. Mt. Sardar Begum and others, AIR 1949 Lahore 69; Komorappa Goundan vs. Ramaswamy Goundan, AIR 1948 Madras 150; RK Balaji Rao and others vs. MO Natesa Chatty, AIR 1948 Madras 138. Lawyers Involved: Aftabuddin Ahmed- For the Petitioners. MA Rouf — For the Opp..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Mofazzal Molla and another Vs. Parul Bala Debi and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....Suresh Chandra Sen vs. Jogesh Chandra Sen, 43 CWN 969; Lawyers involved: Syed Mohammad Ali—For the Petitioner. SMA Latif—For the Opposite Party No.1. Civil Rule No. 1324 of 1966. Judgment: T H Khan J.- This Rul......ibi vs. Md. Ali.Shaha, AIR 1941 Cal. 336; Sheosagar Singh vs. Sitaram AIR 1952 Pat. 48; Md. Idris Khan vs. Hajee Erfanuddin, 9 DLR 601; Suresh Chandra Sen vs. Jogesh Chandra Sen, 43 CWN 969; Lawyers involved: Syed Mohammad Ali—For the Petitioner. SMA Latif—For the..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Golam Kader Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....on and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge is hereby set aside. We direct that the appellant be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in connection with any other matter. Ed. ......lip;..Respondent Judgment August 13th, 1970. Cases Referred to: Lai vs. The Crown (1954) 6 DLR (FC) 38; PLD 1954 (FC) 95; State vs. Umed Ali (1963) 15 DLR 712. Lawyers involved: No one- both for the Appellant and Respondent. Appeal No. 174 of 1..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Syed Idris alias Idris Mir and others Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....— the Opposite Party. Criminal Revision No. 642 of 1969. Judgment: Habibur Rahman J.- This Rule is directed against the judgment passed by Mr. MS Rahman, Additional Sessions Judge, 2nd Court......p; August 21st, 1970. Cases Referred to- Emperor Vs. CA Mathews, AIR 1929 Cal. 822. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rasheed with ATM Afzal — For the Petitioners. Not repre..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Keramat Ali and others Vs. Probhat Chandra Majumder, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....he Opposite Party. Criminal Revision No. 400 of 1969 Judgment: H. Rahman J. This Rule is directed against the judgment passed By Mr. M A Ali, Magistrate 1st Class Noakhali, on 15.......bsp; Vs. Probhat Chandra Majumder.........Opposite Party Judgment August 21st, 1972. Lawyers Involved: A. Wahab—For the Petitioners. Humayun Habibur Rasul —F..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
State Vs. Shiraj Ali, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....the further evidence to be adduced, as directed. The condemned prisoner shall continue in the custody till disposal of the Session Case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 DLR (1972) 69. ....... Shiraj Ali.................................... (Condemned Prisoner) Judgment January 26, 1971. Cases Referred to- 33 CWN 136; 13 DLR 289; PLD 1959 Lahore 474, PLD 1960 Lahore 111. Lawyers Involved: A Talukdar with Daliluddin Ahmed—For Condemned Prisoner. AW Mallik with Mu..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Tamiza Khatoon and others Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....iate charge as the learned judge thinks fit. Pending the retrial the accused will remain in custody. Let the records be sent down at once for expeditious disposal of the case. Ed. ...... Cases Referred to- State vs Abed All 14 DLR 701; Jananedra Chandra Ghattak vs. The King Emperor 34 CWN 198; Indur Chand vs. Emperor ILR 42 Cal 1094; Emperor vs Mahbir Prasad ILR 49. Lawyers Involved: Md. Moktar Hossain—For the Appellants. Shah Harmutullah&mdas..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Shuk Deb and another Vs. Province of East Pakistan, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....ly before the conflict of 1965 between India and Pakistan, the property is an enemy property and has, by virtue of the notification dated the 3rd December, 1965, made under the Defence of Pakistan Rules, become an enemy property. Shuk Deb, the Pujari, and some others who are living in the premis......bsp; Vs Province of East Pakistan represented through the Chief Secretary Government of East Pakistan .......Respondents Judgment November 21st, 1969. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed—For the Petitioner. Anwarul Hoque ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 76
State Vs. Abdur Rashid, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....before us could not also indicate the probability of any prejudice having been caused. Accordingly, the question of ordering retrial of the condemned prisoner does not arise at all. Ed. ......andra Mondal 22 DLR 289; Abdul Gani and another vs State, reported in 16 DLR; Khadim vs. The Crown, reported in 1954 PDL (Lah) 69; Quine vs Leatham, reported in (7907; A.C. 495, at page 506. Lawyers Involved: ATM Masud, Deputy Legal Remembrancer with Md Batin—For the State. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 154
Azizur Rahman Vs. Hedayet Ahmed Chowdhury and others, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
.... Lawyers Involved: M H Khandker, Salauddin Ahmed. B K Das-For the Petitioner. Ahmed Sobhan. Md. Ruhul Amin-For Respondents 1 & 2. Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 352 of 1968 with Civil Rule No. 675 (S) of 1969. (Appeal against the Decree of Mr. Md Mosseh, Additional District Judge ...... Ahmed vs. Prafulla Kumar Dey and others 13 DLR 70, Bharat Bhandhu Chattopadhya vs. Ranendra Kumar Dutta and others 70 CLJ 370; Halimunnessa vs. Hemendra Kumar Roy Chowdhury and others 12 DLR 448. Lawyers Involved: M H Khandker, Salauddin Ahmed. B K Das-For the Petitioner. Ahmed Sobhan. Md...Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 137
743742741739738737736734733732730728727725719718716715712711