Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Moudud Ahmed Vs. State, 1996, 25 CLC (AD)
.... is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 42 ......ch stands settled by various previous decisions of ours. 17. We therefore find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 42 ......ch stands settled by various previous decisions of ours. 17. We therefore find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 42 ......titioner. AW Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney General instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, on-Record—For the Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 108 of 1995 From the Judgment and Order dated 9-5-95 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No. 365 of 1992). J..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 105
Principal, Chittagong Medical College and others Vs. Shahrayar Murshed and others, 1995, 24 CLC (AD)
....o costs. Ed. This Case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 33. ......pugned judgment and order passed by the High Court Division. Accordingly all the appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 33. ......vs. Baldwin (1964) AC 40 (Law Reports 1964) & 16 DLR (SC) 722. Lawyers Involved: Aminul Huq, Attorney-General instructed by B Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellants. Amirul Islam, Senior Advocate, (Zakir Ahmed Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advo......t Appellate Division (Civil) Present: ATM Afzal CJ Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Md. Abdur Rouf J Md. Ismailuddin Sarker J Principal, Chittagong Medical College and others ………………Appellants (In all the Appeals) Vs. Shahrayar Murshed ………..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 169
Hutchison Telecom Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. BD Telegraph & Telephone Board & ors, 1996, 25 CLC (AD)
....enior Advocates with him) instructed by Shamsul Haque Siddique, Advocate-on- Record— For the Petitioner. TH Khan, Senior Advocate (AM Nooruddin Ahmed, Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record — For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave......mit any illegality in discharging the Rule Nisi. 12. We find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 30 ......0) All ER Rep. 530 and Koduri Krishnarao vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1962 (Andhra Pradesh) 249. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Rafiq-ul Huq and Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocates with him) instructed by Shamsul Haque Siddique, Advocate-on- Record— ......ip;……………………………………………….. Petitioner Vs Bangladesh Telegraph and Telephone Board and others……………………&hell..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 251
Bangladesh Telecom (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh T & T Board & others, 1993, 21 CLC (AD)
....Appeal No.73 of 1992). T H Khan, Senior Advocate instructed by NH Khandker, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No.1 (In Civil Appeal No.73 of 1992). Rokanuddin Mahmud, Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No.3 (In Civil Appeal No.73 of 1992). No......etition in respect of this system is allowed. No order as to costs. Civil Appeal No. 3 of 1993 is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 20...... Mohinder Singh vs. Chief Election Commissioner, AIR 1978 (SC) 851; Joseph Vilangandan vs. Executive Engineer, AIR 1978 (SC) 930. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him), instructed by Shamsul Haque Siddique, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appell......al J Latifur Rahman J Bangladesh Telecom (Pvt.) Ltd………………………………………………………………. Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 73 of 1992) Bangladesh Telegraph and Telephone Board and anr. ……………………………Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 3 of 19..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 242
Attar Mia and another Vs. Mahmuda Khatun Chowdhury, 1996, 25 CLC (AD)
....6) 16 ......to cannot be accepted. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 16 ......to cannot be accepted. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 16 ......) Present: ATM Afzal CJ Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Md. Abdur Rouf J Md. Ismailuddin Sarker J Attar Mia and another……………………………&..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Hasina Khatoon and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1996, 25 CLC (AD)
.... others............................................. Respondents Judgment January 30th, 1992 Lawyers Involved: M I Farooqui, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record. —For the Petitioners. Not Represented &md......t follows that the Court of Settlement must now dispose of this matter according to law. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 13 ......t follows that the Court of Settlement must now dispose of this matter according to law. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 13 ...... Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Hasina Khatoon and others ……………………………&..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Jalil and others, 1995, 24 CLC (AD)
....r Rouf J Md Ismailuddin Sarker J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works ……….Appellant Vs. Md. Jalil and others…….Respondents Judgment ...... the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 415, 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 10, 49 DLR (AD) (1997) 26 ...... the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 415, 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 10, 49 DLR (AD) (1997) 26 ...... Md Ismailuddin Sarker J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works ……….Appellant Vs. Md. Jalil and others…….Respondents Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Abdul Wadud Vs. State, 1995, 24 CLC (AD)
....e appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1995) 3 BLT (AD) 236, 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 6.......ded by Act No. XLII of 1992 will be applicable to the pending cases. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1995) 3 BLT (AD) 236, 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 6.......ded by Act No. XLII of 1992 will be applicable to the pending cases. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1995) 3 BLT (AD) 236, 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 6....... Vs. State ………………………………………………………..Respondent Judgment August 22, 1995. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referrd to- Babul and others vs. The State, 15 BLD (1995) (HCD) 88, Md. Aslam vs. State 19 DLR (SC) 242. Lawyers I..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Suruzzamal and others, 1996, 25 CLC (AD)
....p;……………………………………………….. Appellant [In both the Appeals] Vs. Md. Suruzzamal and others ………………………&h......ut any order as to costs. Title Suit No. 339 of 1981 is dismissed and Title suit No. 69 of 1981 is decreed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 1. ......ut any order as to costs. Title Suit No. 339 of 1981 is dismissed and Title suit No. 69 of 1981 is decreed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 1. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: M H Rahman CJ Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Public Works and Urban Development………………………&hellip..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Basiruddin Sarkar Vs. Jasimuddin Sarkar and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....nuddin Munshi vs. Tajaddin and others AIR 1932 Cal 538; (Syed) Abdul Huck and others vs Seetameetti Narayan Naidu and anr. AIR 1938 Mad 14. Lawyers Involved: Muhammad Habibur Rahman, Md. Ayub—For the Appellant. Syed Amjad Hossain, Md. Nowab Alt—For the Respondent......The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. The judgment and decree of the trial Court as upheld by the lower appellate Court are affirmed. Ed. ......The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. The judgment and decree of the trial Court as upheld by the lower appellate Court are affirmed. Ed. ......-Hakim J TH Khan J Basiruddin Sarkar................Appellant Vs. Jasimuddin Sarkar and others............Respondents Judgement August 21, 1970. Cases Referred ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Abdul Gani and others Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... AC 1; Safdar Ali vs. Crown 5 DLR (FC 107; Major Robert Stuart Wauchope vs. Emperor 38 CWN 187; Osimuddin Sarkar vs. The State 13 DLR 197 PLD 1961 (Dacca) 98; Abdul Bari Sikdar The Crown 7 DLR 457; Md. Hekmatullah vs. The Crown 7 DLR 13; Emperor vs. Anwar Ali AIR 1948 Lah. 27; Lt. Hector Thomas ......nt of sentence has become infructuous and it is accordingly discharged. Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned Special Judge wherever he may be in present stationed. Ed. ...... to the learned Special Judge wherever he may be in present stationed. Ed. ......l No. 362 of 1977). Fakir Shahabuddin Ahmed with Fariduddin Ahmed (in Cr. Appeal No. 200 of 1967). Zahurul Huq Khan with Serajul Huq—For the State. Appeal Nos. 290 and 362 of 1967. Revision No. 568 of 1967 Judgment: &nb..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 68
State Vs. Lutfor Fakir, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... and PW, 1 Sk. Elahi Baksh to be the dead body of Dulal Fakir. On such identification, the investigating Officer PW 13 held inquest and sent it to the morgue for post mortem examination. PW 12 Dr. Md. Mohsin held post mortem on the dead body of Dulal Fakir on 27.7.69 and found four incised wound...... allowed to the extent of sentence only and the conviction under section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code is maintained. The appellant is sentenced to undergo transportation for life. Ed. ......ained. The appellant is sentenced to undergo transportation for life. Ed. ......; Vs. Lutfor Fakir.........Accused Judgment September 25th, 1970. Cases Referred to- Emperor vs, Mst Jagia AIR 1938 Pat 308: Haji Yar Muhammad vs. Rahim Dino and others PLD 1960 Kar 769: Abdul Latif Crown 4 DLR (FC) 431: Qutba vs. The Crown 6 DLR (FC) 126: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Rakman Ali alias Md. Rakman Ali and others Vs. Hasib Ali Chowdhury and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....e case, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......servations made above after discussing and considering all the material evidence on record. 18. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......e facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ll be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Dr. Rati Ranjan Choudhury Vs. Parul Bala Marwari and another, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....e facts giving rise to this appeal are, that the plaintiff Dr. Rati Ranjan Sen filed the above mentioned suit for ejectment against two persons, namely, Parul Bala Marwari, the defendant No. 1 and Md. Ibrahim the defendant No.2. The subject-matter of the dispute comprises two Municipal Holdings ...... meet with disappointment. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs, the judgment and order under appeal is hereby confirmed. Ed. ...... meet with disappointment. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs, the judgment and order under appeal is hereby confirmed. Ed. ......reme Court High Court Division Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Present: TH Khan J Dr. Rati Ranjan Choudhury..............Appellant Vs. Parul Bala Marwari and another......Respondents Judgment June 18th, 1970. Cases Referred to: ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Syed Modaris Ali Vs. Syed Md. Illias Ali and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....ris Ali ............Appellant Vs. Syed Md. Illias Ali and others.......... ......Respondents Judgment May 6th, 1971. ......he observations made in the judgment. The cost of this appeal will abide by the result. In view of the above order, the cross-objection has lost its importance and is, therefore, rejected. Ed. ......sons namely, Syed Idris Ali and Syed Ismail Ali but the latter had gone elsewhere and had kept no touch with Idris Ali and with the property in suit. The defendant further alleged that Syed Sirajul Islam Khan who was a mere Benamdar of the defendant was a necessary party to the suit. He also all...........Appellant Vs. Syed Md. Illias Ali and others.......... ......Respondents Judgment May 6th, 1971. Lawyers Involv..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Rabiul Hossain Vs. Chairman, District Council Khulna and DC Khulna and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....s petition was passed without lawful authority and has no legal effect. The petitioner is entitled to his cost of this petition which we assess at Rs. 51.00 (Rupees fifty one-only). Ed. ......s petition was passed without lawful authority and has no legal effect. The petitioner is entitled to his cost of this petition which we assess at Rs. 51.00 (Rupees fifty one-only). Ed. ......sp; Maksum-ul-Hakim J: In this Rule the petitioner challenges the legality of a resolution passed by the Khulna District Council on 23.1.1968 removing the petitioner from the office of Chairman of Islamkati Union Council under Article 25 (3) (b) of the Basic Democracies Order, 1959 as well as an......p; Fazle Munim J Rabiul Hossain... ............Petitioner Vs. Chairman, District Council Khulna and DC Khulna and others................Respondents Judgment January 13th, 1971. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 92
Abul Hossain and Abul Md. Vs. Amatu Md., 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....oncerned. Ed. ...... learned Sessions Judge directing that the petitioner be committed to the Court of Sessions for trial is set aside. Let the records be sent down expeditiously to the court concerned. Ed. ...... learned Sessions Judge directing that the petitioner be committed to the Court of Sessions for trial is set aside. Let the records be sent down expeditiously to the court concerned. Ed. ......e court concerned. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Bijon Bala Chowdhurani & others Vs. Maniruddin Biswas & others, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....the learned Advocate for the petitioners is upheld it will amount to partial pre-emption. The result, therefore, is that the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the learned Advocate for the petitioners is upheld it will amount to partial pre-emption. The result, therefore, is that the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the learned Advocate for the petitioners is upheld it will amount to partial pre-emption. The result, therefore, is that the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. ......mp; others..............Petitioners Vs. Maniruddin Biswas & others.........Opposite Parties Judgment June 11th, 1970. Cases Referred: Afazuddin Mridah and others vs. Mubarakulla and others 5 DLR 445; Sachindra Nath Chakravarty vs. Trailakya Nath Chak..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Kasiruddin Sarkar @ Kasiruddin Fakir Vs. The State, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....R (FC) 56. st Sairan vs. State (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 35; Sultan Ahmad vs. Crown (1954) 6 DLR (FC) 28: Fazal Elahi vs. Crown (1953) 5 DLR (FC) 207. Lawyers Involved: M. Golam Rabbani and Md. Nurul Islam, Advocates—For the Appellant. T Talukdar, Advocate—For the State......ppellant is set aside and he is acquitted from the charge under section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code. He may be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ...... may be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......) DLR (FC) 56. st Sairan vs. State (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 35; Sultan Ahmad vs. Crown (1954) 6 DLR (FC) 28: Fazal Elahi vs. Crown (1953) 5 DLR (FC) 207. Lawyers Involved: M. Golam Rabbani and Md. Nurul Islam, Advocates—For the Appellant. T Talukdar, Advocate—For the S..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Pronab Kumar Majumder Vs. Hatem Mondal and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... 11 DLR 470; Jamman Mia vs Assistant Custodian of Enemy Property (1969) 21 DLR 562; Shahzada Muhd. Omar Beg vs Sultan Mohammad Khan and others (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 41. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rahim, Advocate—For the Petitioner. AM Mahmudur Rahman, Advocate— For......I make no order as to costs. However, I direct the learned Munsif to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible. Let the records of this case be sent down expeditiously. Ed. ......ossible. Let the records of this case be sent down expeditiously. Ed. ......: Nurul Islam J Pronab Kumar Majumder ...................Petitioner Vs. Hatem Mondal and others ............Opposite Parties Judgment November 5th, 1970. Cases Ref..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 100