Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6061-6080 of 6088 results.
Panna Biswas Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... J Judgment 19th May 2002 Panna Biswas…………………Petitioner Vs. The State..........................Respondent Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-Respondent. Crimi......rred by 324 days and the explanation given for the delay is not satisfactory. This petition on merit as well as on point of limitation has got no leg to stand and hence is dismissed. Ed ......Judgment 19th May 2002 Panna Biswas…………………Petitioner Vs. The State..........................Respondent Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-Respondent. Criminal Petiti......sp; Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J K. M. Hasan J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Judgment 19th May 2002 Panna Biswas…………………Petitioner Vs. The State..........................Respondent Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Ad..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Enamul Haque Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....mises this petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......greement with the findings and decisions of the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises this petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......greement with the findings and decisions of the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises this petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......ion (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Enamul Haque... .............Petitioner Vs. The State..........Respondent Judgment July 20, 2002. Lawy..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Srwardi Shaikh and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ssed the appeal. Interference is not called for accordingly this petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ecord, the learned Judges of the High Court Division rightly dismissed the appeal. Interference is not called for accordingly this petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......aikh and others……….....Petitioners. Vs. The State……………..Respondent Judgment 22nd July 2002 Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not Represented-Respondent. Criminal Petition N......ppellate Division (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Srwardi Shaikh and others……….....Petitioners. Vs. The State……………..Respondent Judgment 22nd July 2002&..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Ali Akbor Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....reme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Mahmudul Amin CJ Md. Ruhul Amin J K. M. Hasan J &nb......ntitled to be discharged from the charge framed against him. 6. In the afore state of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. Ed. ......p; Md. Ruhul Amin J K. M. Hasan J Ali Akbor Khan.................Petitioner Vs. The State.........................Respondent ......san J Ali Akbor Khan.................Petitioner Vs. The State.........................Respondent Judgment ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....uld not be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. The points raised merit consideration. Accordingly leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed ......uld not be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. The points raised merit consideration. Accordingly leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed ......and to pay a fine of Tk. 5000/- each and in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6(six) months more and also convicting the accused petitioners 1,2 and 4 namely Wahed Sheikh, Mozid Sheikh Alias Mozid and Manik Sarder respectively under section 201 of the Penal Code and sentencing each of...... Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Judgment 20th July 2002 Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others………………Petitioners. Vs. The State................................Respondent Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Sh..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nt reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......sion rightly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......llip;………. (16) Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate (Subrata Chowdhury, Advocate with him), Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Abdur Razzaque Khan, Additional Attorney Gene......vision (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal ...................Appellant. Vs. The State…...Respondent. Judgment August 14, 2004. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95
National Board of Revenue and others Vs. Mustafizur Rahman, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....ny order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ith reference to the relevant provisions of the concerned SRO. In view of the above matter, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ith reference to the relevant provisions of the concerned SRO. In view of the above matter, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......late Division Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J KM Hasan J Md. Fazlul Haque J National Board of Revenue and others...............Appellants Vs. Mustafizur Rahman ..................Respondent Judgment January 21, 2003. Result: ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Mohiuddin and others Vs. Shwkat Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ers...........Appellants Vs. Shwkat Ali and others .......Respondents Judgment 23rd May 2005 Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, instructed......to interfere with the same. 12. On the reasonings stated above, we do not find any substance in this appeal, which is, therefore, dismissed of contest without any order as to costs. Ed. ......pellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mohiuddin and others...........Appellants Vs. Shwkat Ali and others .......Respondents Judgment 23rd May 2005 Lawyers Involved: ......me Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mohiuddin and others...........Appellants Vs. Shwkat Ali and others .......Respondents Judgment 23rd May 2005 Lawyers In..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Jobayer Hossain and others Vs. Noor Hafez and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....xclusive possession………..(8) Lawyers Involved: Khandakar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Abdus Salam Khan, Senior Advocate within him), instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate (A......ithout any order as to costs. Accordingly the suit is remanded to the trial Court for disposal in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made above. Ed. ......ossession………..(8) Lawyers Involved: Khandakar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Abdus Salam Khan, Senior Advocate within him), instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate (Abdul Quayu...... (Civil) Present: Mahmudul Amin Choudhury C J Mohammad Gholam Rabbani J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Jobayer Hossain and others.......Appellants Vs. Noor Hafez and another............Respondents Judgment 20 November 20..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Meghna Textile Mills Limited Vs. Md. Barkatullah & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....itional ground. 10. The appellants are permitted to make the appeals ready for hearing within 6(six) months. Ed ......six) months. 9. The petitioners are permitted to add additional ground. 10. The appellants are permitted to make the appeals ready for hearing within 6(six) months. Ed ...... No. 899 of 2002) Md. Abdul Kader & others.....Respondents (in C. P. No. 900 of 2002) Md. Labu Mia & others..............Respondents, (in C. P .No. 901 of 2002) Md. Idris Ali & others...............Respondents, (in C. P. No. 902 of 2002) Judgment ......il) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Meghna Textile Mills Limited .........Petitioner.(in all the cases) Vs. Md. Barkatullah & others...........Respondents (in C. P. No. 898 of 2002) Md. Abdus Salam ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 120
M/S. Concord Engineers & Construction Ltd Vs. Chief Engineer Road & Highways Dept, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....chindra Lal Das and others Vs. Hriday Ranjan Das being dead his heirs: Bimal Kanti Das and others, 40 DLR(AD) 56. Lawyers Involved: Rafique-Ul-Haq, Senior Advocate instructed by Mvi Md. Wahidullah Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Fida M. Kamal, Additional Attorney Gen...... We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the unreasoned impugned judgment and order. For the reason aforesaid, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......hways Department, Government of the People's Republic Bangladesh, Sarak Bhaban, PS. Ramna, Dhaka.....Respondent Judgment 13th August 2004 Cases Referred to- Hashmat Ali Jamadar and others Vs. Asmat Ali Jamadar, 6 DLR 478; Sachindra Lal Das and others Vs. Hriday Ran......p; Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain, C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M.A. Aziz, J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury, J M/S. Concord Engineers and Construction Ltd.........Appellant. Vs. The Chief Engineer Road and Highways Department, Government of the People's Republic Bang..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 229
Khalilur Rahman A.S. P. S. B Dhaka Vs. Md. Kamrul Ahsan and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ccordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 486. ......discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 486. ......discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 486. ......reme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Khalilur Rahman A.S. P. S. B Dhaka............................Appellant Vs. Md. Kamrul Ahsan and others.................Respondents Judgment July 5, 2005. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Syed Afzal Nowab Vs. G. M. Yousuf and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....l Nowab ...........Plaintiff-Appellant Vs. G. M. Yousuf and others... Defendant-Respondents. Judgment 2nd June 1997 Lawyers Involved: M.A. Wahab Miah, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-On-Record...........For the Appellant Sirajuddin Ahmed, Advocate-......e in Bangladesh, the question of forming any opinion by the Government is not at all relevant. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......e in Bangladesh, the question of forming any opinion by the Government is not at all relevant. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......urt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: A.T.M. Afzal C J Latifur Rahman J Mohammad Abdur Rouf J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J Syed Afzal Nowab ...........Plaintiff-Appellant Vs. G. M. Yousuf and others... Defendant-Respondents. Judgment 2nd June 1997 Lawyer..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 128
Abdul Malek and others Vs. Faiz Ahmed and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the High Court Division. We find no substance in the appeal, which is accordingly dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......, felt difficulty to fault with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. We find no substance in the appeal, which is accordingly dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......dents Judgment 16th November 2003 Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim, Advocate, instructed by Santi Ranjan Karmakar, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. A. J. Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos. 1-4. ......y order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
National Bank Limited Vs. Pragati Industries Limited, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nk Limited ............Appellant. Vs. Pragati Industries Limited..... Respondent. Judgment 8th August 2005 Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant Shafique Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Su......nd any error of law and as such it does not call for our interference. 19. In the result the appeal fails. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......nd any error of law and as such it does not call for our interference. 19. In the result the appeal fails. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain, C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. National Bank Limited ............Appellant. Vs. Pragati Industries Limited..... Respondent. Judgment 8th August 2005 Lawye..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Shafiqur Rahman and others Vs. Mahbub Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ion. We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......sessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Md. Tafazzul Islam J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. Shafiqur Rahman and others…………………………......... Petitioners. Vs. Mahbub Ali and others....... Respondents. Judgment 2nd January, 2006 Lawyers Involved: ......uhul Amin J. Md. Tafazzul Islam J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. Shafiqur Rahman and others…………………………......... Petitioners. Vs. Mahbub Ali and others....... Respondents. Judgment 2nd January, 2006 Lawyers Inv..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Sena Kalyan Sangstha Vs. Haji Sufi Fazal Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 197. ......arned Counsel of the petitioners. The review petitions are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 197. ......arned Counsel of the petitioners. The review petitions are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 197. ...... Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Sena Kalyan Sangstha and another..............Petitioners Vs. Sufi Fazal Ahmed and others ..................Respondents Judgment July ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Chairman, BADC, Dhaka Vs. S.M. Ali Imam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....here is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 83. ......ind merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 83. ......esent: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Chairman, Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation, Dhaka..........Appellant. Vs. S.M. Ali Imam and others.... Respondents Judgment March 12, 2005. The Co...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Chairman, Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation, Dhaka..........Appellant. Vs. S.M. Ali Imam and others.... Respondents Judgment March 12, 200..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Kamal Uddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....State represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Comilla….......Respondent. Judgment 12 December 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Rafiqul Islam Mia, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab All, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner......commit any error in passing the impugned judgment and order. 15. In view of-the discussion made above we do not find any substance in the petition. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......nt. Judgment 12 December 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Rafiqul Islam Mia, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab All, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. A. J. Mohammad Ali, Attorney General, instructed by Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record For the Respondent. &nbs......eme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. Kamal Uddin.........................Petitioner. Vs. The State represented by the Deputy..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 103
State Vs. Mofizuddin and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rrect decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......nd correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......nd correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......inal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. M.M. Ruhul Amin J. Md. Tafazzul Islam J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. The State.................................Petitioner. Vs. Mofizuddin and others ......... Respondents. Judgment 29 November 2005 Criminal Petit..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 83
361360357356355354351350349348347346345343340337335334332331