Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6061-6080 of 6818 results.
Mofizur Rahman Khan Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... disposed of in these terms, without any cost. In the result, Civil Appeal Nos. 73 and 124 of 1981 are dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 321. ...... attempts to validate the action taken under the earlier repugnant section. 2. Decision has already been given. Now while agreeing with the conclusion, some general observations of mine is called for, It Is first to be observed that Bangladesh Parliament by virtue of Article 65 has plenary or ...... disposed of in these terms, without any cost. In the result, Civil Appeal Nos. 73 and 124 of 1981 are dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 321. ...... Corp. City of Abmadabad Vs. New S.S. & Wag Ld. AIR 1970 (SC) 1292; Farzand Ali V West Pakistan (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 208; Sai Md. vs. W st Pakistan PLR (1958)(SC) 181; Millner V. Raita Commonwealth Law Report Vol 66(1942-43): Basanto Co. Ghosh vs. Emperor AIR 1944 (P.C.) 36. Lawyers Involved..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 188
Abdul Halim Mollah @ Monohar Mollah & anr Vs. Member, App Tribunal Dacca & ors., 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....nion is that such appeal cannot be entertained. I would, therefore, allow the appeal. Order of the Court By the majority judgment the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......nbsp; Ruhul Islam J.—This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment dated July 3, 1979 of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 109 of 1979. 2. Facts necessary for disposal of the appeal are that the appellants filed the above noted writ petition before the ......nion is that such appeal cannot be entertained. I would, therefore, allow the appeal. Order of the Court By the majority judgment the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......Cases Referred To- Dr. Hori Ram Singh V. Emperor, AIR 1939 P.C. 43; S. Kuppuswami Rao V. King AIR 1949; F.C.I. Golzar Hasan Shah V. Gholam Murtaza (1970) 22 DLR S.C. 258. Lawyers Involved: Shaukat Ali Khan, Advocate, instructed by A. Basel Majumder, Advocat..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 40
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Misfor Ali and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....the statute. The preamble of the President's Order No. 9 of 1972 reads as under: — "Whereas the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh has been established by the Proclamation of Independence of Bangladesh, read with the Provisional Constitution of Banglad...... Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Power and Water Resources ……………… Appellants Vs. Md. Misfor Ali and others…………………………&h......ges, the appeal must succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and the Writ Petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......ellip;……………………………………………Respondents Judgment March 18, 1982. Lawyers Involved: Matiur Rahman, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advoca..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 92
....dgment and order by the High Court Division are set aside. The appeals are allowed without any order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD)(1982) 298; 3 BLD (AD) 1983, 48.
......as calculated by the assessee and raise it to a higher percentage.
The trading accounts of the respective assessee was rejected on valid grounds and action of the Deputy Commissioner of Taxes for taking recourse to section 13 and making estimate for finding out the total sale and the gross p......dgment and order by the High Court Division are set aside. The appeals are allowed without any order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD)(1982) 298; 3 BLD (AD) 1983, 48.
......t. However in that circumstance the assessing officer must record a clear finding of his so doing.
Case Referred to-
Commissioner of Income-tax v. M/s Ata Hossain Khan Ltd. 28 DLR (AD) 141.
Lawyers Involved:
Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on R..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Matiur Rahman, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ourt Division is set aside and the Writ Petition is dismissed with the modification that; the punishment is altered to compulsory retirement. No order as to costs. Ed. ...... Engineer by his order dated 6ih December, 1973 asked him to submit, necessary estimate immediately. The allegation is that instead of taking up the works he wrote to the Superintending Engineer to forward a copy of administrative approval of the proposed construction. Exception was taken fo......ourt Division is set aside and the Writ Petition is dismissed with the modification that; the punishment is altered to compulsory retirement. No order as to costs. Ed. ......p;………………..Respondent Judgment March 4, 1982. Case Referred To- M.A. Hai vs. Trading Corporation (1980) 32 DLR (AD) 46. Lawyers Involved: A.W Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-o..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Rajan Miah Vs. Abdur Rashid and another, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... of the trial court judgment by the appellate Court below was justified and the plaintiff is not entitled to any relief. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ......dash;This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court Division in Second Appeal No. 467 of 1972. 2. Plaintiff is the appellant. He filed a suit for declaration of his title and for recovery of khas possession. The suit was decreed by the trial...... of the trial court judgment by the appellate Court below was justified and the plaintiff is not entitled to any relief. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ...... Vs Abdur Rashid and another…………………………….. Respondents Judgment March 25, 1982. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate on Record.—For the Appellants. B. K. Da..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Chowdhury Ramzan Ali and another, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ed without any order as to costs. The orders of the Court below are set aside, the proceedings of claims of the appellant before the Company Judge will proceed according to law. Ed. ......passed by a Division Bench of the High Court in Company Appeal No. 6 of 1968. 2. The Income Tax Officer, Companies Circle, made an assessment u/s. 23 of the Income Tax Act for the year 1962-63 demanding Rs. 11,98,326/- as tax from the Official Liquidator, Dacca Ele......ed without any order as to costs. The orders of the Court below are set aside, the proceedings of claims of the appellant before the Company Judge will proceed according to law. Ed. ......gh Investment Co. Vs G-G. in Council AIR 1947 (PC) 78; Ravi Paint Colour & Varnish Works Ltd. Vs Federation of Pakistan PID 1954 (Lab) 551; Sargodha Trading Co. AIR 1943 (Lah) 228. Lawyers Involved: A.K.M Mozammel Huq Bhuiyan. Advocate with Rabia Bhuiyan, Advocate, instruc..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Hajee Khabiruddin Ahmed Vs. Md. Salam Kabir, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ter the lapse of a reasonable time. For the reason stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial court restored. Ed. ......t of a Bench of the High Court Division passed in First Appeal No. 122 of 1976 on June 25, 1981. 2. The appellant instituted Title Suit No. 357 of 1974 in the 1st Court of Subordinate Judge, Dacca for ejectment of the respondent from the suit premises on the ground of default and bonafide requi......ter the lapse of a reasonable time. For the reason stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial court restored. Ed. ...... Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Hajee Khabiruddin Ahmed…………………Appellant Vs. Md. Salam Kabir…………………………..... Respondent Judgment April 1, 1982. Lawyers Involved: S R. Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Santiranjan Karmaker, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Rokeya Khatun Vs. Alijan @ Alijan Bepari and ors., 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....he modification that the suit is decreed in part in favour of the appellant to the extent of the 1/3 rd share in the suit property. Respondent No. 1 is to pay cost of the appeal. Ed. ......ming benefit under a document executed by a pardanashin lady was not fastened with burden of proof to show that the lady had independent advice and she properly understood the terms of the deeds before she executed the same. 2. Facts in short necessary for appreciation of the questio......he modification that the suit is decreed in part in favour of the appellant to the extent of the 1/3 rd share in the suit property. Respondent No. 1 is to pay cost of the appeal. Ed. ......ber 10, 1981. Cases Referred To- Farid un Nesa vs. Mukhtar Ahmed 52 I.A. 342; Ruhalla vs. Hananlli Begumia AIR 1928 PC 303; Hem Chandra vs. Suradhani Debya AIR (1940) PC 134. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Salam, Senior Advocate instructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate-on- Reco..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
....persona! hearing has, in any way, prejudiced the respondent.
For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:
......l No. 160 of 1972.
2. The plaintiff-respondent who is an Overseer in the employment of the appellant University filed O. C. Suit No 185 of 1968 in the First Court of Munsiff Sadar, Mymensingh, for a declaration that the order of his dismissal from service on October 30, 1968 was illegal, void......ined in the foregoing clauses formal inquiry may be dispensed with when the order of dismissal is passed on the strength of facts or conclusions arrived at by a Judicial trial or trial by a Court Martial or when the accused is absconding, or adopting means to prolong or delay the conclusion of ......
Vs.
Md. Abdul Hye Bhuiyan………………………………………………….. Respondents
Judgment
September 11, 1981.
Result:
The appeal is allowed.
Lawyers Involved:
Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, M. Hoque, Advocate with him, instructe..
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Abu Bakkar Vs. Nazir Ahmed, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....sion are set aside and those of the lower appellate court are restored. The respondent shall pay costs of the appeal to the appellant. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD)(1982) 237. ......II of 1951), Section 95. The maximum period of limitation of mortgage under section 95 of the State Acquisition Act 1950 was 15 years and with amendment by ordinance no. XXI of 1969 maximum period for usufructuary mortgage was reduced to seven years. However, right of redemption subsists for sixt......sion are set aside and those of the lower appellate court are restored. The respondent shall pay costs of the appeal to the appellant. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD)(1982) 237. ......plete usufructuary mortgage for a period not exceeding 7 years on the expiry of which the mortgagor may get back possession by an application to the Sub divisional Magistrate……….(5 and 6). Lawyers Involved: A. K. M Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate M. Giasuddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by M..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Khondker Moshtaque Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... in the Central Jail. It is stated: ''This action was taken simultaneously with the assumption of the office of the Chief Martial law Administrator by the then Chief of Army Staff, vide the Third Proclamation dated 28-11-76. Amendments of Regulations 4 and 11 of the Martial Law Regulation No.1 o......orrupt and Illegal means and by abuse of his official position and thereby pecuniary advantage of Tk. 4,58,631/-. In the other case the allegation was that the appellant during his tenure as Minister for Commerce and Foreign Trade from 19-2-74 to 14-8-75 by corrupt or illegal means and by abusing hi...... 103 of the Constitution from the judgment In Writ Petition Nos. 928 and 929 of 1979 discharging the Rule, Facts are as fellow: The appellant Khondker Moshtaque Ahmed was convicted by the Special Martial Law Court No. VIII in Case No. 1 of 1977 and Case No. 3 of 1977. Both the appeals were heard......; State Vs. Zia-Ur-Rahman PLD 1973 (SC) 49; Federation of Pakistan Vs. Saeed Ahmed PLD (SC) 151; Jamil Huq Vs. Bangladesh (1982) 34 DLR(AD) 125; A Rouf Vs. Abdul Hamid Khan (1965 17 DLR (SC) 515. Lawyers Involved: MH Khandker and Khandker Mahbub uddin Ahmed, Senior Advocates with Nizamuddin ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 287
Lebu Mia Vs. Ganesh Chandra Nath and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....al below and remit the case back to the said Court of appeal below for its disposal in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 220....... and others...................Respondent Judgment March 17, 1982. Result: The Appeal is allowed. The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 (Act XXVIII of 1951) Section 96. A case for pre-emption filed prior to completion of registration under section 60 of the Registration Act, ......al below and remit the case back to the said Court of appeal below for its disposal in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 220.......ut by then the document had been registered and so the pre-maturity could be said to have been cured……..(3) Case Referred to- Abdur Rahman @ Abdul Rahman Vs. Maklis Ali, 31 DLR (AD) 118. Lawyers Involved: Md. Hannan, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 65
Bangladesh Vs. Hon'ble Judge, Prize Court, HCD, Supreme Court Building, Dacca, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....e learned Attorney-General are found unacceptable, not because it lack reasons but such reason has no support in law. The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. ......Appeal No. 4 of 1979 which was preferred by the appellant against the Judgment of the Judge, Prize Court, High Court Division. 2. On April 28 1979 the appellant filed an application before the prize Court, for 9 direction for allocating and transfer of the Prize Fund of the proceedi......e learned Attorney-General are found unacceptable, not because it lack reasons but such reason has no support in law. The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. ......Present : F.K.M.A. Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of Bangladesh……………&hel..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 116
Abdul Hamid Vs. Abdul Jabbar , 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....o this modification the appeal is allowed, the order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Subordinate Judge is restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......Civil Revision No. 1034 of 1980). Judgment: Shahabuddin Ahmed J.- In this appeal by special leave the question for determination is whether the provision for restitution as contained in section 144 of the Code ......o this modification the appeal is allowed, the order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Subordinate Judge is restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......t Vs. Abdul Jabbar…………………………………... Respondents Judgment Feb. 18, 1982. Lawyers Involved: SM. Zillul Huq Advocate, Supreme Court instructed by Md Aftab Hossain, Adv..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Bangladesh & others Vs. A. K. M. Zahangir Hossain, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... member of the said 'disciplined force' if he has been illegally dismissed, removed, discharged, reduced in rank or compulsorily retired. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 173. ......s. Dhirendra Nath Sarkar ……………………………………Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 126 of 1979). Judgment October 21, 1981. Result: If a member of any disciplined force is aggrieved by an order of a Court or tribunal established under law relating to the discipli...... member of the said 'disciplined force' if he has been illegally dismissed, removed, discharged, reduced in rank or compulsorily retired. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 173. ......N Sharma, AIR 1965 SC 1595; APHL Conference, Shillong Vs. WA Sangma, AIR 1977 SC 2155; Durga Shanker Mehta Vs. Raghuraj Singh, AIR 1954 SC 520; Royal Aquarium Vs. Parkinson 1892 (1) CB 436 (466). Lawyers Involved: K. A. Bakr, Attorney-General, with A.W. Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney-General, inst..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 188
General Manager Jamuna Oil Company Ltd. Vs. Golap Rahman & another, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....dinance shows that the Court itself either cannot compel the attendance of such member or extract his advice. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......inated. He was given one month's salary in lieu of notice and other benefits to which he was entitled. Respondent No. 1 filed an application under section 25(1)(b) of the Standing Orders Act before the Labour Court, Chittagong on 13.10.77. He prayed for setting aside the order of terminatio......dinance shows that the Court itself either cannot compel the attendance of such member or extract his advice. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......al Bank of Pakistan vs Md. Golam Mostofa, (1975) 27 DLR 158; Aminul Islam vs. James Finlay, (1974) 26 DLR (SC) 33; Project-in-Charge, Paruma Ltd., vs. Aminur Rahman Khan, (1979) 31 DLR 124. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate (Abdul Azim, Advocate with him) Instructe..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Bangladesh Vs. Winifred Rubi & ors., 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... 7. In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. And the Judgement of the High Court Division are set aside and the writ petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost. Ed. ......t of the High Court Division of Writ Petition No. 43 of 1978. By order dated 19.7.1977 the Additional Deputy Commissioner Land Acquisition requisitioned the premises at 85, Kakrail Road, Dacca for the accommodation of Little Flower School, under the Emergency Requisition of Property Act. Le...... 7. In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. And the Judgement of the High Court Division are set aside and the writ petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost. Ed. ...... Vs Winifred Rubi & ors………………………………..Respondents Judgment Feb. 24, 1982. Lawyers Involved: K. A, Bakr, Attorney General, A.W. Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney General, with ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 65
Md. Habibur Rahman & ors. Vs. Hasen Ali Mondal and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....atal so as to nullify the notification issued on February 4, 1980. The appeal is allowed. The order of the High Court Division is set aside and the Writ Petition dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......nged the validity of the notification dated 4th February 1980 removing him from office with effect from lst February 1980. Facts leading to his removal are as follows: 3. The member of the aforesaid Union Parishad sent a letter to the Sub Divisional Officer, Bogra (Sadar) who is the presc......atal so as to nullify the notification issued on February 4, 1980. The appeal is allowed. The order of the High Court Division is set aside and the Writ Petition dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......hellip;……………... Respondents Judgment April 2, 1980. Case Referred to- Azizul Molla vs. Taher Ali Sarder (1980) 32 DLR (AD) 61. Lawyers Involved: Md, Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, Mahbubey Alam, Advocate with him, instr..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Md. Enayet Ali Vs. Munsif of First Court at Khulna & Election Tribunal and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... Court By the majority decision, the appeal is allowed. The orders of the Courts below are set aside and the election petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost. Ed. ......hul Islam J.—I have gone through the proposed judgment written by my learned brother Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. and I find it difficult to agree with some of his reasons and the conclusions for allowing the appeal and setting aside the Judgment of the Election Tribunal. ...... Court By the majority decision, the appeal is allowed. The orders of the Courts below are set aside and the election petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost. Ed. ......……...Appellant. Vs. Munsif of First Court at Khulna & Election Tribunal and others....................... Respondents Judgment June 19, 1981. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, (M/S Zamiruddin A..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 121
15361535153415331531153015291528152715251524152315221520151915181517151615151514