Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Md. Miah Raja and others Vs. Md. Ijab Uddin and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....correct decision. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 878. ......structed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented-the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1184 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 29.5.2007 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1262 of 2005). ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Shakawatullah Vs. Liquidator, Liquidation Call Dhakeswari Cotton Mills, Dhk & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 875. ......respondent No. 1. Syed M. Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For respondent No. 2. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 3-4. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1087 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 09.04.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2906 of 1999). Ju..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 148
Bangladesh Agriculture Development Corporation Vs. Zinnatul Hossain and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....round of above discussion, we find no cogent ground for our interference in the impugned judgment. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VADC (2008) 872. ......ocate, instructed by Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-6. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1506 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 28-11-2004 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 3059 of 2001.) Judg..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Md. Sonawar Ali Vs. Md. Nonahar Ali alias Monawar Ali , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rence by this Division and further no point of law is also involved in this leave petition. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 869. ......ed by A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 406 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 16th January, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 9779 of 199..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Babul Ahmed and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....llegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. All the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 864. ......ique, Additional Attorney General, Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents (In all cases) Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1082-84 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 3.6.2007 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 5945, 5948 and 5946 o..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 101
Professor Hamida Banu Vs. Vice-Chancellor, Chittagong University & others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....to the cost awarded by the High Court Division to be paid by the writ petitioner to the University Authority. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 861. ......ur Razzak, Senior Advocate, instructed by A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 761 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated the 19.04.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 5361 of 2004.) ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 134
Md. Zakir Hossain and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....irmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 858. ......Choudhury Mohammad Jahangir Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1714 of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated the 22.6.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4942 of 2004.) ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Md. Tazimuddin and others Vs. Md. Mofizul Islam and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....e and possession of the plaintiff. We do not find any substance in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 854. ......s. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos. 1-3. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 4-43. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1642 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 29.05.2007 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1360 of 2001.) ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Md. Maniruddin Vs. Md. Totab Ali @ Kutub Ali , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... calling for interference by this Division, we do not find any merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 846. ...... Nurul Islam Bhuiyan Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 717 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated February 16, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2754 o..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 19
Chairman, T& T Board Vs. Md. Rafiqur Gaznavi and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... aside and consequent thereupon the judgment dated June 10, 1996 passed in Writ Petition Nos. 1170-1172 of 1995 is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 826. ......dent Nos. 20-24 (In Civil Appeal No. 86 of 2000) Not represented-Respondent Nos. 47-52 (In Civil Appeal No. 87 of 2000). Civil Appeal No. 85-87 of 2000. (From the judgment and order dated June 2, 1998 passed by the High Court Division in Review petition Nos.4-6 of 1998) ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Mongal Sarder Vs. Md. Azahar Ali , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....not find any ground to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 822. ......hman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 587 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated March 14, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2544 of 1993). ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Dhaka Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Bank, Dhaka & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....d at a correct decision. There is no cogent ground to interfere with the same. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 232. ......ucted by Haridas Paul, Advocate-on-Record - For Respondent Nos. 2-5 Not represented - Respondent No. 1 Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 281 of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated 01.02.2003 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 6..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 292
Rafique Fakir and others Vs. State and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... we find substance in the submission of the learned Advocate-on-Record. Accordingly, these appeals are allowed. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 239. ......32 of 2000) Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record - For Respondent No. 1(In Criminal Appeal No.33 of 2000) Criminal Appeal Nos. 32 & 33 of 2000. (From the judgment and order dated 12.08.1998 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No. 724 of 1997) ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Md. Mokaddas Ali and others Vs. Artha Rin Adalat (Sub. Judge) Dinajpur & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Referred In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 237. ......dash; the Respondents Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1054 of 2004. Judgment M. M. Ruhul Amin J. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 27.04.2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.47..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Faroque Ahmed Vs. Sub. Judge, 2nd Court & Artha Rin Adalat No. 1, Rangpur & ors , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he correct proposition of law discharged the Rule and so no interfere is called for. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Referred In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 236. ......structed by A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record - For the Petitioner Not Represented - Respondents Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 885 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 25.4.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 606 of 2001) ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Shoma Akter Shoma and another Vs. Bangladesh and Ors., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rs could take resort to the appropriate forum for the purpose. With this observation this petition is disposed of. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 197. ......ructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - For the Petitioners Not represented - Respondents Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 807 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 29th of March, 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2299 of 2003..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Md. Farhat Rahman Vs. Roomee Tareque Moudud, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....n merit. The custody of the child shall remain with his mother till disposal of the Rule. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 193. ...... in Civil Revision No. 4256 of 1999). Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J. - This is a defendant's appeal, by leave, against the judgment of January 18, 2000 of the High Court Division as to an order of discharge of the Rule for default obtained in Civil Revision No.4256 of 1999 which was fil..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 173
Government of Bangladesh and Others Vs. Md. Shamsul Huq, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rganization and Conditions) Act 1975 and have the effect of law. Accordingly the writ petition is maintainable. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 177. ......nior Advocate and Probir Neogi, Advocate appeared with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-record- For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No.218 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 5th November, 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2256 of 2002..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Tripti Industries Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ry as prayed for. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Both the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 163. ......bsp; M. M. Ruhul Amin J. - These petitions for leave to appeal are directed against the common judgment and order dated 04.08.2002 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Trade Mark Appeal N..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 172
Sena Kalyan Sangstha Vs. Bangladesh Thai Aluminum Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... of the discussions made hereinabove we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 172. ......is petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment dated July 14, 2003 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.5657 of 2002 making the Rule absolute upon setting aside the order dated July 3, 2002 (Order No.60 dated 3.7.2002) rejecting the application filed under order 2..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 222