Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6101-6120 of 6822 results.
AKM Ali Imam Vs. DG, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute & another, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....There is no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 5. ......There is no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 5. ......There is no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 5. ......sp; AKM Ali Imam......................................Petitioner Vs. DG, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute & another................Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 104
S. M. Iqbal Hossain Vs. Managing Director, I F I C Bank Ltd., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....that the High Court Division took a correct view in the matter and as such the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ...... Ed. ...... of the Rules, Regulations, etc. of the bank constituting misconduct warranting removal from service.……..(21, 22 and 27) Cases Referred To- Sonali Bank vs. Ruhul Amin Khan, 46 DLR (AD) 85. Agrani Bank vs. Khandaker Badrudduza, 56 DLR (AD) 136. Lawyers Invol......e Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J S. M. Iqbal Hossain................. Petitioner Vs. Managing Director, International Finance Investment and Commerce (IFIC) Bank Ltd. Head..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 78
M/S. Noor Crokaries and another Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ourt Division has rightly passed the impugned order and no interference is called for. In the aforesaid, premises, we find no merit in this petition and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ourt Division has rightly passed the impugned order and no interference is called for. In the aforesaid, premises, we find no merit in this petition and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ourt Division has rightly passed the impugned order and no interference is called for. In the aforesaid, premises, we find no merit in this petition and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......hury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karirn J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahamed J M/S. Noor Crokaries and another................................ Petitioners Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd. and others…….................. Respondents ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Yousuf Ali Vs. Kazi Syed Shamsul Hoque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n cannot be sustained and so the appeal should be allowed. 22. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. In the facts and circumstances we direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ......m vs. Bangladesh 16 BLD (AD) 110;Kazi Imamuddin Bhuiya Vs. Bangladesh 10 BLC (AD) 2005 page 134. Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad All, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant Ma......n cannot be sustained and so the appeal should be allowed. 22. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. In the facts and circumstances we direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ...... Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Yousuf Ali ..........................................Appellant. Vs. Kazi Syed Shamsul Hoque and others...........Respondents. Judgment 30 Ja..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 178
Abdul Majid Molla Vs. Biswajit Chandra (minor) & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he learned Advocate for the petitioner could not point out any legal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. 9. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed ......he learned Advocate for the petitioner could not point out any legal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. 9. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed ......he learned Advocate for the petitioner could not point out any legal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. 9. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed ......Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present : Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Abdul Majid Molla.......................................Petitioner Vs. Biswajit Chandra (minor) & others……….........Respondents. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Abdur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....itration Appellate Tribunal. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed.......itration Appellate Tribunal. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed.......itration Appellate Tribunal. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed........ Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and other.................................Appellants. Vs. Abdur Rahman and others...........................................Respondents. Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Shahjahan Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... 27 July 2002 Cases Referred To- Sk. All Ahmed vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of Bangladesh, 40 DLR (AD) 170. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque Khan, Additional Attorney General, instructed by Md. Ahsan Ullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record- For t......cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. .................Appellants Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque...............................................Respondent Judgment 22 March 2005 Cases Referred To- Zane Alam Khan vs. Abdul Hamid Chowdhury, 3 BLC (AD) 55; A.B.M. Abdul Baqi vs. Government of Banglades...... (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Government of Bangladesh and others .....................Appellants Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque...............................................Respondent Judgm..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 124
A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited Vs. Janata Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......uhul Amin J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited….......Petitioner Vs. Janata Bank and others........ Respondents Judgment 5 January, 2006 ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
....ayment of VAT which the petitioner avoided to pay is an appealable order in our view, the High Court Division rightly refused to issue the Rule.
6. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
......ayment of VAT which the petitioner avoided to pay is an appealable order in our view, the High Court Division rightly refused to issue the Rule.
6. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
......ayment of VAT which the petitioner avoided to pay is an appealable order in our view, the High Court Division rightly refused to issue the Rule.
6. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
......Present:
Md. Ruhul Amin J
MM Ruhul Amin J
Md. Tafazzul Islam J
Messers Chemico Laboratories Ltd. represented by its Chairman of Tikapara Ghoramara Rajshahi...................Petitioner
Vs.
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of F..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Md. Ashaduzzaman Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ip;……......Respondents. Judgment March 23, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate (Moksudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Rafique-Ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, (Faheemul......pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Ashaduzzaman................ Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh, representedby the Secretary, Ministry of local Government, Engineering and R..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Saifur Rahman Emam Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ision (Civil) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Arnirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Saifur Rahman Emam................. Petitioner Vs. The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ......(AD) 59. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Md. Shafique Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ses Referred To- Kazi Md. Aminul Islam vs. Secretary, Ministry of Law 16 BLD (AD) 110; Moulvi Md. Khurshid Alam vs. Bangladesh 50 DLR (AD) 82. Lawyers Involved: Mr. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-- For the Petitioner Not represented-For the Respondent C......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......area in question and his appointing authority is authorized under the law to curtail the area or jurisdiction in view of the decision of this Division reported in the case of Kazi Md. Aminul Islam Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Law 16 BLD (AD)110 and in the case of Moulvi Md. Khourshid Alam Vs. Bang..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. .............Respondent. Judgment June 22, 2002. Cases Referred To- 18 DLR (H.C) 709, 26 DLR (H.C) 10, 47 DLR (H.C) 163. Lawyers Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Petitioner. Not represented- For the Respondents.......ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain J Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others.................................Petitioners. Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works...................................................Respo..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Messres MS Jafar Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, with Jamiruddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. A.W. Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by M.S. Khan, Advocate-on-Record. — For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No.83 of 1978. With Civil ......late Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Messers MS Jafar...................................................... Appellant Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others ……………..Respondents Judgment ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Com. of In. Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....eal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is hereby set aside and the answer of the question under section 66 (1) must be in the negative. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ad Yunus & Co. P.L.D, 1968 Karachi 805; Mohabir Glass Manufacturing Co. vs. C.I.T.A.I.R, i960 Patna, 516. Lawyers Involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Not represented-The Respondent. ......eal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is hereby set aside and the answer of the question under section 66 (1) must be in the negative. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca ……………………..Appellant. Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur... ……………&h..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Amar Chandra Saha Vs. Ajit Kumar Das, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... mere fact of payment of rent by the Tenant. We, therefore, find no reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. ......igh Court. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Das.........Respondents Judgment June 10, 1976. Lawyers Involved: T. Ali, Advocate, Instructed by Abdur Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant M. H. Khandker, instructed by B, C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil......eme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Fazle Munim J Amar Chandra Saha........Appellant. Vs. Ajit Kumar Das.........Respondents Judgment June 10, 1976. Lawyers..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ust succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division is set aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ...... aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......ust succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division is set aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ...... J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others ……………………………….Appellant. Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sri Sri Madan Gopal Jew Bigraha and ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... of the first appellate Court is empowered to question validity of Hate Court and restore that of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......t of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... of the first appellate Court is empowered to question validity of Hate Court and restore that of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet and others ..........Appellants. Vs. Sri Sri Madan Gopal Jew Bigraha and ors. ...........Respondents. Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
13171314131013071306130413011299129612951294129312921290128912881287128612841279