Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6121-6140 of 6751 results.
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....strative Tribunal Case No.282 of 1999 rejecting as premature the application filed under section 4(2) of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1980 for respondent's reinstatement in service as Assistant Director after setting aside the order dated 11.11.1999 putting him under suspension and also the ......ne Alam Khan vs. Abdul Hamid Chowdhury, 3 BLC (AD) 55; A.B.M. Abdul Baqi vs. Government of Bangladesh, 4 BLC (AD) 213. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney General, (Faisal H. Khan, Assistant Attorney General with him), instructed by Md. Ahsanullah Patwar......stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Anarul Islam and others Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....l Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 406 & 420. A partner can not be alleged to have misappropriated or cheated when an amount was entrusted to the accused for the partnership business. The Managing Director and Director of the Company not depositing the remittance with the account of the company b......he company may proceed against the accused-appellants for the allegations in the petition of complaint in the appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......he company may proceed against the accused-appellants for the allegations in the petition of complaint in the appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......he company may proceed against the accused-appellants for the allegations in the petition of complaint in the appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Md. Saifur Rahman Emam Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Mr. Munsurul Hoque Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Mr. Fida M. Kamal, Additional Attorney General, instructed by Mr. A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent ......ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Habibur Rahman.........................Appellant. Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., represented by its Managing Director and others….…… Respondents Judgment July 31, 2005. Result: The appeal i......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Md. Shafique Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Messres MS Jafar Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......issed. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, with Jamiruddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. A.W. Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by M.S. Khan, Advocate-on-Record. — For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No......point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Amar Chandra Saha Vs. Ajit Kumar Das, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... mere fact of payment of rent by the Tenant. We, therefore, find no reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. ...... mere fact of payment of rent by the Tenant. We, therefore, find no reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. ...... mere fact of payment of rent by the Tenant. We, therefore, find no reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. ...... mere fact of payment of rent by the Tenant. We, therefore, find no reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ust succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division is set aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (N. H. Khondaker, Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant. Md. Moksudur Rahman, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain. Advocate on-Record.—For the Respondent. Civil Appea......ha and others ……………………………….Appellant. Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and Land Reforms and another……………Respon......ust succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division is set aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sri Sri Madan Gopal Jew Bigraha and ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... of the first appellate Court is empowered to question validity of Hate Court and restore that of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......vs. The Province of East Pakistan (1967) 19 DLR 106; Tanvir Ahmed Siddiky Vs. The Province of East Pakistan (1968)20 DLR (SC) 144. Lawyers Involve: Md. Moksudur Rahman, Dy. Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on- Record —For the Appellants. Ex Parte&m...... of the first appellate Court is empowered to question validity of Hate Court and restore that of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... of the first appellate Court is empowered to question validity of Hate Court and restore that of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury & others Vs. Gani Ahmed and others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by special leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ......is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by special leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ......is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by special leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ......is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by special leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdus Subhan &. others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....n of P.O. 16 of 1972 is illegal and as such the provision of M.L.R. VII 1977 has no application. The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255.......ing never abandoned by the owner before, forcible eviction of the possessors of such right from the premises is illegal under PO XVI of 1972. Lawyers Involved: Maksudur Rahman, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record, —For the Petitioners. Md. Aftab Hossain,......n of P.O. 16 of 1972 is illegal and as such the provision of M.L.R. VII 1977 has no application. The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255.......n of P.O. 16 of 1972 is illegal and as such the provision of M.L.R. VII 1977 has no application. The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abdul Jabbar Khan @ Jabbar Khan & ors Vs. State and another, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....oned in the original complaint petition and sent up for trial by the police and he will be guided by the principles enunciated above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 247 ......arkar vs Abdul Gani, 18 Cr.LJ. 626. Lawyers Involved: Md. Meser All, Senior Advocate instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Md. Moksudor Rahman, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on- Record—For Respondent No. 1. Not represented—......oned in the original complaint petition and sent up for trial by the police and he will be guided by the principles enunciated above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 247 ......oned in the original complaint petition and sent up for trial by the police and he will be guided by the principles enunciated above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 247 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Bangladesh Vs. Hail Abdul Gani Biswas and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ion of the High Court Division set aside and remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 233 ......ctions which are not alive before the promulgation of President's Order No. 88 of 1972 they are concluded by the transactions past and closed………..(11) Lawyers Involved: K. A. Bakr Attorney-General, with Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate o......ion of the High Court Division set aside and remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 233 ......ion of the High Court Division set aside and remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 233 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Wahid Ali and ors Vs. State, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....e the orders of the High Court and that of the Sessions Judge and direct that the proceedings are to continue in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 229 ......tition under section 27 of the Special Powers Act. Lawyers Involved: A. Hasib, Advocate, instructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Abdus Sahan, Additional Attorney General, Matiur Rahman, Asst. Attorney-General, instructed by A Rob-I, Advocate-on-Record.—For t......e the orders of the High Court and that of the Sessions Judge and direct that the proceedings are to continue in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 229 ......e the orders of the High Court and that of the Sessions Judge and direct that the proceedings are to continue in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 229 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 33
M/s. Hossain Ahmed Vs. M/s. H. D Hossain & Brothers, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
.... allowed with cost and the order of the High Court Division in staying the operation of the order of the District Judge is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 223 ......Shafiqur Rahman Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. K.A. Bakr, Attorney-General, A.W. Bhuiyan, Asstt. Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For R...... allowed with cost and the order of the High Court Division in staying the operation of the order of the District Judge is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 223 ...... allowed with cost and the order of the High Court Division in staying the operation of the order of the District Judge is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 223 ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 94
Nasiruddin Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh & ors, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....t Division and remit the case back to it for decision in the light of the observation made above. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 216 ......e at the time of such withdrawal or revocation. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Abdus Sobhan, Addl. Attorney-General, with Matiur Rahman, Asst. Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—......t Division and remit the case back to it for decision in the light of the observation made above. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 216 ......t Division and remit the case back to it for decision in the light of the observation made above. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 216 ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 157
Abu Taleb Mridha Vs. State, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....se and the Court has quashed the proceedings on merit as against that accused. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 209 ......nal Appeal Nos. 29 and 30 of 1977. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqul Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record — For the Appellant. Abdus Sobhan, Additional Attorney-General, with Matiur Rahman, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by M. R. Khan, Advocate-on-Recor......se and the Court has quashed the proceedings on merit as against that accused. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 209 ......se and the Court has quashed the proceedings on merit as against that accused. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 209 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Abdur Rashid Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Cabinet Affairs, Establishment Div & ors, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ere will be no order as to costs. Order of the Court By Majority view the appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 201 ......ere will be no order as to costs. Order of the Court By Majority view the appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 201 ......ere will be no order as to costs. Order of the Court By Majority view the appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 201 ......ere will be no order as to costs. Order of the Court By Majority view the appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 201 ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Bangladesh and ors Vs. Somboon Asavaham, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....e foregoing reasons, the appeals are allowed with costs. The order of the High Court Division is set aside and the writs are re-called. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 194 ......ngkolnimite...............Respondent (in C. A. 83 of 1979) Thai Ware Industry...............Respondent (in C.A. 84 of 1979) Judgment Dec 4. 1979. Lawyers Involved: K. A. Bakr, Attorney-General with Sultan Ahmed, Deputy Attorney-General, and A. W. Bhuiyan, Asstt. Attorney-Genera......e foregoing reasons, the appeals are allowed with costs. The order of the High Court Division is set aside and the writs are re-called. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 194 ......e foregoing reasons, the appeals are allowed with costs. The order of the High Court Division is set aside and the writs are re-called. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 194 ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 246
12991297129312921290128912881286128412791277127612751274127212711270126812671266