Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6141-6160 of 6458 results.
Abdul Gani and others Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... AC 1; Safdar Ali vs. Crown 5 DLR (FC 107; Major Robert Stuart Wauchope vs. Emperor 38 CWN 187; Osimuddin Sarkar vs. The State 13 DLR 197 PLD 1961 (Dacca) 98; Abdul Bari Sikdar The Crown 7 DLR 457; Md. Hekmatullah vs. The Crown 7 DLR 13; Emperor vs. Anwar Ali AIR 1948 Lah. 27; Lt. Hector Thomas ......nt of sentence has become infructuous and it is accordingly discharged. Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned Special Judge wherever he may be in present stationed. Ed. ......ssed by Mominullah, Hossain Khan, Anjumannessa Bibi and others. Next day Omar went to the Anticorruption office at 33 Bijoynagar, Dacca, and reported the fact to the Anti-corruption officer Mujibar Rahman; an Assistant Inspector attached to District Anti-corruption Branch, Dacca, who advised him ......l No. 362 of 1977). Fakir Shahabuddin Ahmed with Fariduddin Ahmed (in Cr. Appeal No. 200 of 1967). Zahurul Huq Khan with Serajul Huq—For the State. Appeal Nos. 290 and 362 of 1967. Revision No. 568 of 1967 Judgment: &nb..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 68
State Vs. Lutfor Fakir, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... and PW, 1 Sk. Elahi Baksh to be the dead body of Dulal Fakir. On such identification, the investigating Officer PW 13 held inquest and sent it to the morgue for post mortem examination. PW 12 Dr. Md. Mohsin held post mortem on the dead body of Dulal Fakir on 27.7.69 and found four incised wound...... allowed to the extent of sentence only and the conviction under section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code is maintained. The appellant is sentenced to undergo transportation for life. Ed. ......sentenced to undergo transportation for life. Ed. ......; Vs. Lutfor Fakir.........Accused Judgment September 25th, 1970. Cases Referred to- Emperor vs, Mst Jagia AIR 1938 Pat 308: Haji Yar Muhammad vs. Rahim Dino and others PLD 1960 Kar 769: Abdul Latif Crown 4 DLR (FC) 431: Qutba vs. The Crown 6 DLR (FC) 126: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Rakman Ali alias Md. Rakman Ali and others Vs. Hasib Ali Chowdhury and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....e case, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......servations made above after discussing and considering all the material evidence on record. 18. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..........Appellants Vs. Hasib Ali Chowdhury and others..............................Respondents Judgment April 10th, 1970. Cases Referred to- Ahmedur Rahman and others vs. Abul Majid and ors. 14 DLR 471; Amjedali Khan vs. Raj Kumar Das and others 6 ......ll be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Premhari Barman and others Vs. Commissioner of Taxation, East Pak. Dacca, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....ingly, our answer to the second question is in the affirmative. 12. In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case, we direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ......ingly, our answer to the second question is in the affirmative. 12. In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case, we direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ......r Singh Majithia vs. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, CP and UP 1942 (10) ITR 457. Lawyers Involved: BN Chowdhury, Pradip Kumar Guha — For the Applicant. Mohammad Habibur Rahman — For the Respondent. Reference Case No. 9 of 1961. Judgment: &...... Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Syed Modaris Ali Vs. Syed Md. Illias Ali and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....ris Ali ............Appellant Vs. Syed Md. Illias Ali and others.......... ......Respondents Judgment May 6th, 1971. ......he observations made in the judgment. The cost of this appeal will abide by the result. In view of the above order, the cross-objection has lost its importance and is, therefore, rejected. Ed. ...... Md. Illias Ali and others.......... ......Respondents Judgment May 6th, 1971. Lawyers Involved: Nasiruddin Chowdhury — For the Appellant. Habibur Rahman — For the Respondents. Appeal from Original Decree No. 131 of 1962. Jud...........Appellant Vs. Syed Md. Illias Ali and others.......... ......Respondents Judgment May 6th, 1971. Lawyers Involv..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Bijon Bala Chowdhurani & others Vs. Maniruddin Biswas & others, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....the learned Advocate for the petitioners is upheld it will amount to partial pre-emption. The result, therefore, is that the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the learned Advocate for the petitioners is upheld it will amount to partial pre-emption. The result, therefore, is that the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Lalit Mohan Banerji 54 CWN 442; Ajit and others vs. Hacharuddin Prodhan PLD 1966 (Dacca) 198. Lawyers Involved: Nizamuddin Haider—For the Petitioners. Latifur Rahman—For the Opposite Party Nos. 1-2. Civil Rule No. 79 of 1967. Judgment: ......mp; others..............Petitioners Vs. Maniruddin Biswas & others.........Opposite Parties Judgment June 11th, 1970. Cases Referred: Afazuddin Mridah and others vs. Mubarakulla and others 5 DLR 445; Sachindra Nath Chakravarty vs. Trailakya Nath Chak..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Kasiruddin Sarkar @ Kasiruddin Fakir Vs. The State, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....R (FC) 56. st Sairan vs. State (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 35; Sultan Ahmad vs. Crown (1954) 6 DLR (FC) 28: Fazal Elahi vs. Crown (1953) 5 DLR (FC) 207. Lawyers Involved: M. Golam Rabbani and Md. Nurul Islam, Advocates—For the Appellant. T Talukdar, Advocate—For the State......ppellant is set aside and he is acquitted from the charge under section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code. He may be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......ed in any other connection. Ed. ......) DLR (FC) 56. st Sairan vs. State (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 35; Sultan Ahmad vs. Crown (1954) 6 DLR (FC) 28: Fazal Elahi vs. Crown (1953) 5 DLR (FC) 207. Lawyers Involved: M. Golam Rabbani and Md. Nurul Islam, Advocates—For the Appellant. T Talukdar, Advocate—For the S..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Jogomaya Kundu Vs. Sudhir Kumar Kundu and another, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... Vs. Sudhir Kumar Kundu and another……...Opposite Parties Judgment November 16th, 1970. Cases Referred: Md. Sharif vs. Diwan Singh AIR 1940 Lah 95; Ghazan vs. Mt. Bag Bhari, AIR 1932 Lah. 210; Ujir Shei......of restoration of possession. There is, therefore, no ground for this Court to interfere with the order passed by the appellate Court. In the result, the Rule is discharged. Ed. ...... appellate Court. In the result, the Rule is discharged. Ed. ......titioner Vs. Sudhir Kumar Kundu and another……...Opposite Parties Judgment November 16th, 1970. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Pronab Kumar Majumder Vs. Hatem Mondal and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... 11 DLR 470; Jamman Mia vs Assistant Custodian of Enemy Property (1969) 21 DLR 562; Shahzada Muhd. Omar Beg vs Sultan Mohammad Khan and others (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 41. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rahim, Advocate—For the Petitioner. AM Mahmudur Rahman, Advocate— For......I make no order as to costs. However, I direct the learned Munsif to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible. Let the records of this case be sent down expeditiously. Ed. ...... 21 DLR 562; Shahzada Muhd. Omar Beg vs Sultan Mohammad Khan and others (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 41. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rahim, Advocate—For the Petitioner. AM Mahmudur Rahman, Advocate— For the Opposite Party Nos 1 &4. Anwarul Hoq Chowdhury, Advocat......: Nurul Islam J Pronab Kumar Majumder ...................Petitioner Vs. Hatem Mondal and others ............Opposite Parties Judgment November 5th, 1970. Cases Ref..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Aminul Islam Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....R 549 PLD 1964 Dac 330; Fakku Mia alias Motahar All vs. The State 10 DLR 26; Srinivas Mall vs King Emperor 51 C.W.N 900. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Aziz with Latifur Rahman—For the Appellant. Md. Modabber Hosain —For the State. Criminal Appeal No. 204 of 1958. Judgment: Abdulla......s not at all been proved and he is entitled to be acquitted. The appeal is allowed. The conviction and sentence passed against the appellant are set aside and he is acquitted of the charge. Ed. ......pellate Jurisdiction Present: Abdullah Jabir J Aminul Islam………….Appellant Vs The State…………..Respondent Judgment June 5th, 1970. Cases Referred: Sk. Mujibur Rahman & others vs State 15 DLR 549 PLD 1964 Dac 330; Fakku Mia alias Motahar All vs. The State ...... Abdullah Jabir J.- This appeal arises out of the judgment of A. Q. Chowdhury, Senior Special Judge, Jessore convicting the appellant Aminul Islam under sub-section (2) of section 5 of Act 11 of 1947 and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- in ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 83
Mofazzal Molla and another Vs. Parul Bala Debi and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....lla and another..........Petitioner Vs. Parul Bala Debi and others. ...........Opposite Party Judgment June 25, 1970. Cases Referred to: Akina Bibi vs. Md. Ali.Shaha, AIR 1941 Cal. 336; Sheosagar Singh vs. Sitaram AIR 1952 Pat. 48; Md. Idris Khan vs. ......on remand to the trial Court for disposal of the case in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made in this judgement. I leave the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ......the said compromise decree in the said Rent Suit No. 602 of 1962 of that Court, alleging, inter alia, that she neither filed the said rent suit, nor did she execute any power in favour of Mr. Ataur Rahman engaging him as her pleader. She further alleged that there was no person Jagadish by name ......I leave the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Golam Kader Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....on and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge is hereby set aside. We direct that the appellant be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in connection with any other matter. Ed. ......on and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge is hereby set aside. We direct that the appellant be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in connection with any other matter. Ed. ......et at liberty forthwith if not wanted in connection with any other matter. Ed. ......970. Cases Referred to: Lai vs. The Crown (1954) 6 DLR (FC) 38; PLD 1954 (FC) 95; State vs. Umed Ali (1963) 15 DLR 712. Lawyers involved: No one- both for the Appellant and Respondent. Appeal No. 174 of 1968. Judgment: TH ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Syed Idris alias Idris Mir and others Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....dingly made absolute. The impugned order of conviction and sentence passed against the accused-petitioners is set aside. The accused-petitioners are discharged from their bail bonds. Ed. ......dingly made absolute. The impugned order of conviction and sentence passed against the accused-petitioners is set aside. The accused-petitioners are discharged from their bail bonds. Ed. ......side. The accused-petitioners are discharged from their bail bonds. Ed. ......preme Court High Court Division Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction Present: Habibur Rahman J. Syed Idris alias Idris Mir and others................ Petitioners Vs. State…......................Opposi..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 82
AKM Shamsuzzaman Khan Vs. Chairman EPRTC, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....e of the amount of Rs. 8400.00 should be so deposited within the period stipulated as above. The appellant worker is entitled to his costs throughout and we order accordingly. Ed. ......e of the amount of Rs. 8400.00 should be so deposited within the period stipulated as above. The appellant worker is entitled to his costs throughout and we order accordingly. Ed. ......awyers Involved: M A Aziz - For the Appellant. Abdus Subhan — For the Respondents Appeal from original order No. 25 of 1968. (Appeal against the order of Mr. MH Rahman, District Judge and Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation, Dacca, dated the 19th day of June,...... M A Aziz - For the Appellant. Abdus Subhan — For the Respondents Appeal from original order No. 25 of 1968. (Appeal against the order of Mr. MH Rahman, District Judge and Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation, Dacca, dated the 19th day of June, 1967 in Workmen Miscel..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Basanta Kumar Basak Vs. Santosh Kumar Basak and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....all the material documentary and oral evidence on record in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made above. The costs of this appeal will abide the result. Ed. ......all the material documentary and oral evidence on record in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made above. The costs of this appeal will abide the result. Ed. ......, 1970. Cases Referred to- Joy Kumar Dutta and others vs Sitamath Dutta, 4 DLR 400; Sudhir Chandra Singha Sarma and others vs Debesh Kumar Singh Sarma 13 DLR 232; Md Abdur Rahman Bhuiyan vs Prafulla Chandra Majumdar 13 DLR 865; Maheschandra Das Choudhury vs Mukunda Chan......il Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Nurul Islam J Basanta Kumar Basak.............Plaintiff—Appellant Vs. Santosh Kumar Basak and others........Respondents Judgment July 23rd, 1970. Cas..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Serajul Hoque Muktar and others Vs. ARM Mustanesar Billah & others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... appeal is dismissed with costs; and the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below are affirmed. The leave as prayed for under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is refused. Ed. ...... appeal is dismissed with costs; and the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below are affirmed. The leave as prayed for under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is refused. Ed. ...... this connection Mr. Rab has referred to the decision in the case of Malik Manzoor Elahi vs Lala Bishambar Das and another 16 DLR (SC) 246; PLD 1964 (SC) 137. In the said case Mr Justice Hamoodur Rahman, as his Lordship then was, observed: "It further seems to us that the prov......15 of the Letters Patent is refused. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Keramat Ali and others Vs. Probhat Chandra Majumder, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....ioners the order of conviction under sections 447 and 379 PPC cannot be sustained. This Rule is accordingly, made absolute. The order of conviction and sentence is set aside. Ed. ......ioners the order of conviction under sections 447 and 379 PPC cannot be sustained. This Rule is accordingly, made absolute. The order of conviction and sentence is set aside. Ed. ......ingly, made absolute. The order of conviction and sentence is set aside. Ed. ......r of conviction and sentence is set aside. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Tamiza Khatoon and others Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
.... State vs Abed All 14 DLR 701; Jananedra Chandra Ghattak vs. The King Emperor 34 CWN 198; Indur Chand vs. Emperor ILR 42 Cal 1094; Emperor vs Mahbir Prasad ILR 49. Lawyers Involved: Md. Moktar Hossain—For the Appellants. Shah Harmutullah—For the State. C......iate charge as the learned judge thinks fit. Pending the retrial the accused will remain in custody. Let the records be sent down at once for expeditious disposal of the case. Ed. ...... 7. The trial was held with the aid of 4 assessors all of whom found the accused Tamiza Khatun, Amina Khatun and Soley alias Soleman guilty and 3 of them found accused Monglu alias Mukhlesur Rahman guilty under sections 302/109 while one found him not guilty. The learned Judge in agreement......he case. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Rahman Ali Vs. Upendra Lal Sarkar, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....h;For the Appellants. Mahmudul Islam for BN Chowdhury, Advocate—For the Respondents. Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 384 of 1961. Appeal against the decree of Mr. Md. Moseeh, Subordinate Judge 3rd Court of Zilla Chittagong dated the 12th day of July 1960 in tit...... and for all and the cost for appointment of the pleader commissioner will be borne by the plaintiff, 18. Leave as prayed for under clause 15 of the Letters Patent is granted. Ed. ......yed for under clause 15 of the Letters Patent is granted. Ed. ......; Vs. Upendra Lal Sarkar...........Plaintiff-Respondent Judgment January 13th, 1970. Cases Referred to- Raja Mia and others vs Sunity Bhusan Sen in 55 CWN (3 DLR) 155; Kalikesh Biswas and others vs Gheasuddin Ahm..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
State Vs. Abdur Rashid, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....before us could not also indicate the probability of any prejudice having been caused. Accordingly, the question of ordering retrial of the condemned prisoner does not arise at all. Ed. ......before us could not also indicate the probability of any prejudice having been caused. Accordingly, the question of ordering retrial of the condemned prisoner does not arise at all. Ed. ......tep-sister of Hobi Durani, for the second time after the death of his first wife some 8 or 10 years ago. By his first wife, Yasin Sheik has two sons, namely, the condemned prisoner Abdur Rashid and Rahman and two daughters. The prisoner Abdur Rashid and his brother Rahman are both married. In th......; Vs Abdur Rashid………….. Respondents Judgment July 8th, 1970. Cases Referred to- State Vs Purna Chandra Mondal 22 DLR 289; Abdul Gani and another vs State, reported in 16 DLR; Khadim vs. The Crown,..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 154
745744743740739736735734733732728727725724722720719716713712