Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 601-614 of 614 results.
Abdus Sattar and others Vs. IFIC Bank Ltd., 2000, 29 CLC (AD)
....llip;….Petitioner Vs. International Finance Investment and Commerce Bank Ltd………….Respondent Judgment: December 7, 1999. The Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 (IV of 1990), Section 7(2) Bank guarantee can not construe securi......hellip;.Petitioner Vs. International Finance Investment and Commerce Bank Ltd………….Respondent Judgment: December 7, 1999. The Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 (IV of 1990), Section 7(2) Bank guarantee can not construe security dep......ip;.Petitioner Vs. International Finance Investment and Commerce Bank Ltd………….Respondent Judgment: December 7, 1999. The Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 (IV of 1990), Section 7(2) Bank guarantee can not construe security deposit...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Latifur Rahman J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J A M Mahmudur Rahman J Abdus Sattar and others………………….Petitioner Vs. I..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 115
Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited Vs. Al-Haj Md Shafiuddin Howlader& another, 2000, 29 CLC (AD)
....hellip;…….Appellant Vs. Al-Haj Md Shafiuddin Howlader& another……………...Respondent Judgment February 29, 2000. The Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 (IV of 1990), Section 5(5) The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V o......;…….Appellant Vs. Al-Haj Md Shafiuddin Howlader& another……………...Respondent Judgment February 29, 2000. The Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 (IV of 1990), Section 5(5) The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908......llip;….Appellant Vs. Al-Haj Md Shafiuddin Howlader& another……………...Respondent Judgment February 29, 2000. The Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 (IV of 1990), Section 5(5) The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), O......(5) The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Order IX, rule 9 From the absence of any provision in the Ain prohibiting filing of an application under Order 9 rule 9 of the Code and from the specific mention of the Code in sub-section (5) of section 5 of the Ain it is clear th..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Abdur Rahim Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others, 2000, 29 CLC (AD)
....gment and order requires no interference by this Court. The appeal is dismissed with cost to the respondents. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (AD) (2000) 71. ......gment and order requires no interference by this Court. The appeal is dismissed with cost to the respondents. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (AD) (2000) 71. ......gment and order requires no interference by this Court. The appeal is dismissed with cost to the respondents. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (AD) (2000) 71. ...... Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Abdur Rahim Chowdhury………………..Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others ……………….Respondents Judgment Fe..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Nur Islam (Md) Vs. Agrani Bank, 1995, 24 CLC (AD)
....ion dated 27 February 1994 summarily dismissing his application under section 151 CPC in Civil Order No. 1074 of 1994. 2. Against the petitioner Money Suit No. 9 of 1992 was tiled in the Court of Artha Rin Adalat and Subordinate Judge, Jamalpur, by the respondent Agrani Bank, Jamalpur, for reali......ted 27 February 1994 summarily dismissing his application under section 151 CPC in Civil Order No. 1074 of 1994. 2. Against the petitioner Money Suit No. 9 of 1992 was tiled in the Court of Artha Rin Adalat and Subordinate Judge, Jamalpur, by the respondent Agrani Bank, Jamalpur, for realisation......27 February 1994 summarily dismissing his application under section 151 CPC in Civil Order No. 1074 of 1994. 2. Against the petitioner Money Suit No. 9 of 1992 was tiled in the Court of Artha Rin Adalat and Subordinate Judge, Jamalpur, by the respondent Agrani Bank, Jamalpur, for realisation of ......e Court, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record — For the Petitioner. Not represented — the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 343 of 1994. (From the Judgment and order dated 27-2-1994 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Order No. 1074 of 1994. Jud..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Karnafuli Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. United Commercial Bank Ltd. and others, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
.... without issuing any Rule and without hearing the petitioner. 2. The respondent-Bank filed Mortgage Suit No. 37 of 1994 against the petitioner and other in the Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong for recovery of Taka 25, 96, 27,209.04 and on 26-2-95 filed an applica......ut issuing any Rule and without hearing the petitioner. 2. The respondent-Bank filed Mortgage Suit No. 37 of 1994 against the petitioner and other in the Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong for recovery of Taka 25, 96, 27,209.04 and on 26-2-95 filed an application u......ssuing any Rule and without hearing the petitioner. 2. The respondent-Bank filed Mortgage Suit No. 37 of 1994 against the petitioner and other in the Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong for recovery of Taka 25, 96, 27,209.04 and on 26-2-95 filed an application under...... Latifur Rahman J Md. Abdur Rouf J Md. Ismailuddin Sarker J Karnafuli Cotton Mills Ltd................... Petitioner Vs. United Commercial Bank Ltd. and others............... Respondents Judgment November 8th, 1995 Cases Referr..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Bangladesh House Building Finance Corpn. Vs. Jahan Ara Akhtar & others , 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
.... Order, 1973 (President’s Order No. 7 of 1973) for the reliefs mentioned therein in respect of the amounts due from the borrower-respondents. When the said applications were pending the Artha Rin Adalat Act, 1990 (Act No IV of 1990), briefly, the Act, was promulgated on 20 January, 19......, 1973 (President’s Order No. 7 of 1973) for the reliefs mentioned therein in respect of the amounts due from the borrower-respondents. When the said applications were pending the Artha Rin Adalat Act, 1990 (Act No IV of 1990), briefly, the Act, was promulgated on 20 January, 1990. Se......73 (President’s Order No. 7 of 1973) for the reliefs mentioned therein in respect of the amounts due from the borrower-respondents. When the said applications were pending the Artha Rin Adalat Act, 1990 (Act No IV of 1990), briefly, the Act, was promulgated on 20 January, 1990. Sectio......ppellant. Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Abdul Quasem, Advocate-on-Record — For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 54 of 1995 (From the judgment and order dated 5 January, 1995 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Civil Revision No. 1419..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 117
Khairunnessa being dead, her heirs F. Alam & ors Vs. Zobaida Nahar @ Zharna & ors, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
....rder dated 8 June 1995 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in FA No. 79 of 1993 which arose out of the judgment and decree dated 16 March 1993 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No. 4, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 110 of 1992 decreeing the suit. 2. The rele......ated 8 June 1995 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in FA No. 79 of 1993 which arose out of the judgment and decree dated 16 March 1993 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No. 4, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 110 of 1992 decreeing the suit. 2. The relevant f...... 8 June 1995 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in FA No. 79 of 1993 which arose out of the judgment and decree dated 16 March 1993 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No. 4, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 110 of 1992 decreeing the suit. 2. The relevant facts...... Present: ATM Afzal CJ Latifur Rahman J Mustafa Kamal J Md. Abdur Rouf J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J Khairunnessa being dead, her heirs Feroz Alam and ors ……Appellants. Vs. Zobaida Nahar @ Zharna & ors…&hellip..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Moon Garments Industries and others Vs. Janata Bank, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
....udgment ATM Afzal CJ. - The petitioners are defendants in Money Suit No. 37 of 1995 brought by the respondent Janata Bank for recovery of taka 33,86,214.99 in the Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.1 Dhaka. The petitioners filed written statement on 21-3-96 and shortly before t......t ATM Afzal CJ. - The petitioners are defendants in Money Suit No. 37 of 1995 brought by the respondent Janata Bank for recovery of taka 33,86,214.99 in the Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.1 Dhaka. The petitioners filed written statement on 21-3-96 and shortly before the dat...... ATM Afzal CJ. - The petitioners are defendants in Money Suit No. 37 of 1995 brought by the respondent Janata Bank for recovery of taka 33,86,214.99 in the Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.1 Dhaka. The petitioners filed written statement on 21-3-96 and shortly before the date of...... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Md. Abdur Rouf J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J Moon Garments Industries and others …………………………..............Petitioners Vs. Janata Bank, Foreign ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 137
Shahid Miah Vs. State, 2000, 30 CLC (AD)
.... section 561A Cr.P.C. by the High Court Division. 6. The submissions do not merit consideration. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 11. ...... section 561A Cr.P.C. by the High Court Division. 6. The submissions do not merit consideration. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 11. ...... informant. The accused petitioner thereafter left for Bangladesh and was living in England since his departure. The informant filed an application on 23-8-1998 in the Court of Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Adalat, Hobiganj against the final report praying for taking cognizance of the offence against the a...... 14, 2000. Result: The petition is dismissed. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1908 (V of 1898), Section 561A Where criminal proceeding has been initiated legally in a competent court and it cannot be shown that such criminal proceeding, if is allowed to continue, will be “abuse of..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Hosne Ara Begum and another Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited, 2000, 29 CLC (AD)
.... of 1994 discharging the Rule. 2. The material question that was for considering before the High Court Division was, whether a revision or writ petition will lie against an interlocutory order of Artha Rin Adalat. 3. The facts to narrate, in brief, are that, the plaintiff-Islami Bank Banglad......94 discharging the Rule. 2. The material question that was for considering before the High Court Division was, whether a revision or writ petition will lie against an interlocutory order of Artha Rin Adalat. 3. The facts to narrate, in brief, are that, the plaintiff-Islami Bank Bangladesh Li......ischarging the Rule. 2. The material question that was for considering before the High Court Division was, whether a revision or writ petition will lie against an interlocutory order of Artha Rin Adalat. 3. The facts to narrate, in brief, are that, the plaintiff-Islami Bank Bangladesh Limite......R (AD) (2001) 9. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 148
Abdul Malek and others Vs. Faiz Ahmed and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... learned Additional District Judge, First Court, Narayangonj allowing the Title Appeal No. 83 of 1994 decreeing the suit upon reversing those of dated 29.3.1994 of the learned Subordinate Judge, Artharin Adalat, Noakhali dismissing the Title Suit No. 25 of 1989. 2. The respondent Nos. 1-......, felt difficulty to fault with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. We find no substance in the appeal, which is accordingly dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......Additional District Judge, First Court, Narayangonj allowing the Title Appeal No. 83 of 1994 decreeing the suit upon reversing those of dated 29.3.1994 of the learned Subordinate Judge, Artharin Adalat, Noakhali dismissing the Title Suit No. 25 of 1989. 2. The respondent Nos. 1-4 as the ...... is accordingly dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
National Bank Limited Vs. Pragati Industries Limited, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No.57 of 1992 and cross objection tender No. 227 of 1992 allowing the appeal, setting aside the judgment and decree dated 18 September 1991 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.3. Dhaka, in Money Suit No. 132 of 1991 who dismissed the suit and the cross obj......the High Court Division in First Appeal No.57 of 1992 and cross objection tender No. 227 of 1992 allowing the appeal, setting aside the judgment and decree dated 18 September 1991 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.3. Dhaka, in Money Suit No. 132 of 1991 who dismissed the suit and the cross objection......High Court Division in First Appeal No.57 of 1992 and cross objection tender No. 227 of 1992 allowing the appeal, setting aside the judgment and decree dated 18 September 1991 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.3. Dhaka, in Money Suit No. 132 of 1991 who dismissed the suit and the cross objection of ......p; Shafique Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Subrata Chowdhury, Advocate with him), instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 28 of 1996 (From the judgment and order dated 22.08.1994 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No.57 of 1992) J..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Abul Kalam Azad Vs. Govt of BD, represented by the DC, Dinajpur & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....udgment of the trial court and thereby the delay of 201 days was caused in filing the revisional application against the judgment and decree dated 9.3.1998 of the learned Subordinate Judge, Artharin Adalat, Dinajpur, in Other Class Appeal No. 72 of 1991. The High Court Division did not acc......fter consideration of all the facts and materials exercised its discretion we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......f the trial court and thereby the delay of 201 days was caused in filing the revisional application against the judgment and decree dated 9.3.1998 of the learned Subordinate Judge, Artharin Adalat, Dinajpur, in Other Class Appeal No. 72 of 1991. The High Court Division did not accept the e......d Fazlul Karim, J. Md. Hamidul Haque, J.Md. Tafazzul Islam, J. Abul Kalam Azad.....................Petitioner. Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dinajpur and others........Respondents. Judgment 8 November 2003 Lawyers Involved: Md. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 133
Director of Housing and Settlement Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ......tion of delay in filing revisional application against the judgment and decree dated November 18, 1998 of the Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), and 2nd Commercial Court and Artho Rin Adalat no. 2, Dhaka in Title Appeal No. 118 of 1997 affirming the judgment and decree dated Apri...... of delay in filing revisional application against the judgment and decree dated November 18, 1998 of the Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), and 2nd Commercial Court and Artho Rin Adalat no. 2, Dhaka in Title Appeal No. 118 of 1997 affirming the judgment and decree dated April 16......is Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 189
605595593558544524523446386385343340326303