Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 601-620 of 4173 results.
Sunder Ali being dead his heirs A. Hannan & ors. Vs. Md. Serajul I. Sarker & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....pose of the same expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......allowed. The trial Court is directed to proceed with the trial of Title Suit No. 4 of 1995 and to dispose of the same expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......allowed. The trial Court is directed to proceed with the trial of Title Suit No. 4 of 1995 and to dispose of the same expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sunder Ali being dead his heirs Abdul Hannan and others .........Appellants Vs. Md. Serajul Islam Sarker & others................Respondents Judg..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 102
Rokeya Begum Vs. Md. Nurul Absar and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ions made herein before we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly the appeals are allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......e granted the relief prayed for. 28. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly the appeals are allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......e granted the relief prayed for. 28. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly the appeals are allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. .............Respondents (In C.A.No.84 of 1999) Md. Nurul Alam and others……………...............Respondents (In C.A.No.85 of 1999) Judgment April 25, 2004 Cases Referred To- Jadav Chandra Mali Vs. Abdul Khaleque and others, 27 DLR (AD) 114; Md. Jabed Ali and others Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal a..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 42
Abdul Jabbar Vs. Md. Lokman Hossian, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... the High Court Division in making the Rule absolute. 12. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... the High Court Division in making the Rule absolute. 12. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......issed. Ed. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 21 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 69
Executive Engineer, LGED, Rangpur Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....any effect. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ......d dated 22‑6-2000 is accordingly set aside. The arbitration agreement now ceases to have any effect. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ......d dated 22‑6-2000 is accordingly set aside. The arbitration agreement now ceases to have any effect. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ......rt High Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J Siddiqur Rahman Miah J Executive Engineer, LGED, Rangpur................Appellant Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd...................................Respondent Judgment A..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 11 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 3
Agrani Bank, rep. by the Chairman, BoD, & ors. Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ngly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... 14. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... 14. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M M Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Agrani Bank, represented by the Chairman, Board of Directors, and others .....Appellants Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza ......................Respondent Judgment ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 130
Ananda Builders Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Authority and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....al is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 31. ...... Court Division do not call for any interference. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 31. ...... Court Division do not call for any interference. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 31. ......1. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 215
Sec. Min. of Law, Justice & Par. Affairs & ors. Vs. Md. Borhan Uddin and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....rdingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......p; Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others .......Appellants Vs. Md. Borhan Uddin and others……..................Respondents Ju..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 201
SM Jillur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ccordingly, is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... 9. In view of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. The appeal, accordingly, is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... 9. In view of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. The appeal, accordingly, is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......nbsp; Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J SM Jillur Rahman ..............Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others .......................Respondents Judgment A..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 259
Shakawat Hassan Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....; Sheikh A. Awal Deputy Attorney-General with Saifuddin Md. Aminur Rahman, Assistant Attorney-General-For the State. Criminal Miscellaneous case No.26...... This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 244. ...... This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 244. ......gh Court Division (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Khademul Islam Chowdhury J Afzal Hossain Ahmed J Shakawat Hassan.................................Petitioner Vs. State.................................................Opposite Party Judgment &nb..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 4 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 1
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Mridha & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....d of our discussions made hereinabove we find merit in all these appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......on in quashing the proceedings of the special cases. 32. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find merit in all these appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......on in quashing the proceedings of the special cases. 32. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find merit in all these appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......lowed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: 30 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 74
Ershad Ali Sikder (Md) Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ject. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ......e are in respectful agreement with the aforesaid observation which manifests the correct exposition of law on the subject. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ......e are in respectful agreement with the aforesaid observation which manifests the correct exposition of law on the subject. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ...... (Criminal) Present: Md. Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Ershad Ali Sikder (Md).....................Petitioner Vs. State ...........................................Respondent Judgment..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 22 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 332
Mosharraf Hossain (Md) (Babul) Vs. Bangladesh, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....Ordinance. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......passed in the light of the resolution which was taken after due compliance of the law as in section 13(3) of the Ordinance. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......passed in the light of the resolution which was taken after due compliance of the law as in section 13(3) of the Ordinance. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Mosharraf Hossain (Md) (Babul) …………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh………………………&hellip..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 16 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 269
Akram Hossain (Md.) Vs. Sahera Khatun and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 317. ......nt District Judge is directed to hear and dispose of the suit within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 317. ......nt District Judge is directed to hear and dispose of the suit within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 317. ......05) 317. ..Category: Contract Law | Date: 8 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 5
Ataur Rahman (Md.) another Vs. Edruc Limited, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....is Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 337. ......tainable and are therefore, liable to be dismissed. In the result, the applications are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 337. ......tainable and are therefore, liable to be dismissed. In the result, the applications are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 337. ......Supreme Court High Court Division (Statutory Original Civil Jurisdiction) Present: Syed Amirul Islam J Ataur Rahman (Md.) another......................Petitioners Vs. Edruc Limited ..........................................Respondent Judgment March..Category: Company Law | Date: 3 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 8
Govt. of BD. rep. by Sec., Min. of Post, T&T & ors. Vs. Abul Khair, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....following, the principles of natural justice. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......llate Tribunal when apparently the respondent has not been dealt with in accordance with law following, the principles of natural justice. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......llate Tribunal when apparently the respondent has not been dealt with in accordance with law following, the principles of natural justice. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Md. Tafazzal Islam J Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Post, Telegraph and Tele communication and others....................Petitioners Vs. Abul Khair.... Respondent Judgment February 23, 2004. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 23 Feb, 2004 | Hits: 125
Jalil Brothers and ors. Vs. Humayun Majid and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....High Court Division. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......e matter in its proper perspective and we find no illegality or irregularity in the decision of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......e matter in its proper perspective and we find no illegality or irregularity in the decision of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: SJR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Jalil Brothers and ors...................Appellants Vs. Humayun Majid and ors................Respondents Judgement February 18, 2004. Th..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 18 Feb, 2004 | Hits: 133
State Vs. Nazrul Islam @ Nazrul, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... Lawyers Involved: Nikhilesh Dutta, Deputy Attorney-General, with Mohammed Abdul Baset, Assistant Attorney-General and Fara Mahmuda, Assistant Attorney-General- For the State-Appellant. Md. Khalilur Rahman‑ For the Condemned Prisoner. Death Reference No.11 of 2001 with Jail Appe...... a copy of his judgment for future reference. Send down the lower court records. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 289. ...... a copy of his judgment for future reference. Send down the lower court records. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 289. ......sent: SK Sinha J MM Rahman Bhuiyan J State…………………………………………Appellant Vs. Nazrul Islam @ Nazrul……………Condemned Prisoner Judgme..Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: 20 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 5
Selim Saial Vs. A. Majid Molla and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....and another Vs. Mohammad Khoda Baksu Sheikh, 29 DLR (SC) 268; Akrab Ali Vs. Zaihiruddin, 30 DLR (SC) 81; Abdul Matin Chowdhury Vs. Chapala Rani Sen and others, 37 DLR (AD) 205; Naimuddin Sardar Vs. Md. Abdul Kalam, 41 DLR (AD) 3; Jasimuddin Kanchan Vs. Ali Ashraf, 42 DLR (AD) 289; Mazharul Borhan...... parties to bear their respective costs of the litigation. Lower Court's Record be sent down as immediate as possible. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 15 BLT (HCD) (2007) 69. ......) (2007) 69. ......ted in: 15 BLT (HCD) (2007) 69. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 20 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 6
State Vs. Moslemuddin (Md), 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ned no reason to interfere with the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......tence is illegal". In view of above position we fined no reason to interfere with the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......tence is illegal". In view of above position we fined no reason to interfere with the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......rt Division and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: 19 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 96
Abdus Sobhan Mandal (Md) Vs. Md. Jonab Ali Fakir & others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....e above reasons, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ....... We are fully in agreement with the above findings of the high court Division. For all the above reasons, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ....... We are fully in agreement with the above findings of the high court Division. For all the above reasons, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed JR Mudassir Husain J Ruhul Amin J Abdus Sobhan Mandal (Md)......Petitioner Vs. Md. Jonab Ali Fakir & others ………Respondents Judgmen..Category: Civil Law | Date: 18 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 264
16122613209024137591361348878132124130890489101501298894859014682