Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 601-620 of 2631 results.
Abdul Quddus & Another Vs. The State, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ment. Accused appellant Abdul Quddus has produced the true copy of nikanama showing marriage between P.W.2 Ferdousi Begum and accused appellant Abdul Quddus on 19-5-79 solemnised by the Marriage Registrar and Kazi of Chelopara, Bogra. P.W.2 has stated that she was raped by both the appellants Q......accused appellants under section 366 of the Penal Code is also upheld. Let the lower Court records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 18. ......accused appellants under section 366 of the Penal Code is also upheld. Let the lower Court records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 18. ......accused appellants under section 366 of the Penal Code is also upheld. Let the lower Court records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 18. ..Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: 6 May, 1982 | Hits: 1
Narendralal Chowdhury & others Vs. Bimal Kanti Chowdhury & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... regard to the facts and circumstances of the case we direct the parties to bear their own costs of this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 40. ...... regard to the facts and circumstances of the case we direct the parties to bear their own costs of this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 40. ...... regard to the facts and circumstances of the case we direct the parties to bear their own costs of this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 40. ...... regard to the facts and circumstances of the case we direct the parties to bear their own costs of this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 40. ..Category: Civil Law, Property Law | Date: 4 May, 1982 | Hits: 1
Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd Vs. M/S Brestern Shipping Company Ltd. & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... 97,075/- only. The plaintiffs claim for interest at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... 97,075/- only. The plaintiffs claim for interest at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... 97,075/- only. The plaintiffs claim for interest at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ......;cates— For the Defendant No.3. Admiralty Suit No.15 of 1980. Judgment MH Rahman J.—The plaintiff Albert David (Bangladesh) Limited, a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913 is a nationalised concern under the Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation i..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 29 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 7
Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd. Vs. M/S Brostern Shipping Company Ltd. & Others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ......p;Manzurur Rahim, Advocates-For defendant no. 3 Admiralty Suit No. 15 of 1980 Judgment M.H. Rahman J.- The plaintiff Albert David (Bangladesh) Limited, a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913 is a nationalized concern under the Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation i..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Corporate Law | Date: 29 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 7
....y is controlled, supervised and managed under the Bangladesh Industrial Enterprises Nationalization Order, 1972 (P.O. No. 27 of 1972) by the BCIC and that the company did not file any report with the Registrar of joint Stock Companies. But this witness has asserted that the plaintiff company has got......ordered that the suit be decreed for a sum of Tk. 10, 27,502/- only against defendant Nos. 1 and 2 and 3 with costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 356
......pervised and managed under the Bangladesh Industrial Enterprises Nationalization Order, 1972 (P.O. No. 27 of 1972) by the BCIC and that the company did not file any report with the Registrar of joint Stock Companies. But this witness has asserted that the plaintiff company has got its own Board of D......ndant Nos. 1 and 2.
A.R. Yusuf, Manzurur Rahim-For the defendant No. 3
Admiralty Suit No. 14 of 1980
Judgment
M.H. Rahman J. - The plaintiff, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, and now a nationalized concern under the Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corpora..
Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Corporate Law | Date: 12 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 5
Bashir Ahmed Vs. Abdul Shaheed, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....e sent down at once for expeditious disposal of the suit. Md. Altaf Hossain Khan J.— I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 154 ......e sent down at once for expeditious disposal of the suit. Md. Altaf Hossain Khan J.— I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 154 ......e sent down at once for expeditious disposal of the suit. Md. Altaf Hossain Khan J.— I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 154 ......e sent down at once for expeditious disposal of the suit. Md. Altaf Hossain Khan J.— I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 154 ..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 17 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 1
Surendra Mohan Shaha Vs. Government of Bangla¬desh and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....alpur, to imprisonment till rising of the court and also to pay a fine of Tk. 3000/- each, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 10 days each. They are directed to deposit the find to the Registrar of this court within 10 days from date. Md. Altaf Hossain J. — I agree. Th......sit the find to the Registrar of this court within 10 days from date. Md. Altaf Hossain J. — I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)110 ......sit the find to the Registrar of this court within 10 days from date. Md. Altaf Hossain J. — I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)110 ......sit the find to the Registrar of this court within 10 days from date. Md. Altaf Hossain J. — I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)110 ..Category: Contempt of Court Law | Date: 5 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 3
Salehuddin Khan Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ut in the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. A.T.M. Afzal—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)120 ......oval of Chairman and Members of any other non-statutory Commission. (17) Framing of rules on pay, allowances, privileges of Member of non-statutory Commissions. (24) Transfer and posting of Joint Secretaries in the Secretariat. (28) Making of Rules regulating the appointment and condi......ut in the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. A.T.M. Afzal—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)120 ......ut in the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. A.T.M. Afzal—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)120 ..Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Neerala Tea Estate & another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board & ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....the case, we direct that the contesting respondent No.2 do pay cost to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 7. ......d how the Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting could initiate a file on the subject. 5. Be that as it may, the file further reveals that there was a note by Mr. Monwarul Islam Joint Secretary of the Prime Minister's Secretariat that there may be certain difficulties ......the case, we direct that the contesting respondent No.2 do pay cost to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 7. ......the case, we direct that the contesting respondent No.2 do pay cost to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 7. ..Category: Constitutional Law, Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Neerala Tea Estate Ltd. And Another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board and Others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....nces of the ease, we direct that the contesting respondent No. 2 do pay colt to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 161. ......tood how the Ministry of State for Information and Broad casting could initiate a file on the subject. 4. Be that as it may, the file further reveals that there was a note by Mr. Monwarul Islam, Joint Secretary of the Prime Minister's Secretariat that there may be certain difficulties in na......nces of the ease, we direct that the contesting respondent No. 2 do pay colt to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 161. ......nces of the ease, we direct that the contesting respondent No. 2 do pay colt to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 161. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Gopal Chandra Mondol Vs. Lashmat Dasi, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....dge, Dacca are hereby affirmed. But in the facts and circumstances of the case the parties are directed to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 145 ......dge, Dacca are hereby affirmed. But in the facts and circumstances of the case the parties are directed to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 145 ......dge, Dacca are hereby affirmed. But in the facts and circumstances of the case the parties are directed to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 145 ......dge, Dacca are hereby affirmed. But in the facts and circumstances of the case the parties are directed to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 145 ..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 7 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 3
Syed Abdul Aziz Vs.Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation and others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
.... observation this rule is discharged. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 54. ...... observation this rule is discharged. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 54. ...... observation this rule is discharged. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 54. ......il in 1974, 5000 gallons were found short on measurement with the help of calliberation chart available in the Barge. He alleged that the measurement taken with the help of Flow Metre of the Oil Companies differed greatly with the measurement taken by Calliberation Chart available in the Barge ..Category: Administrative Law, Constitutional Law | Date: 18 Nov, 1981 | Hits: 2
Kiron Chandra Das Vs. Sirajul Hoque Patwari, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
.... the learned Sub-ordinate Judge, Noakhall affirming those of the Munsif, Third Court, Noakhall passed in a suit for more declaration that a sale deed No. 5058 registered on 30.6.70 at the Senbagh Sub-Registrar Office purported to have been executed by the plaintiff on 17.4.70 with respect to 1.25 ac......affirmed but in the facts and circumstances of the case. I direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 255 ......affirmed but in the facts and circumstances of the case. I direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 255 ......affirmed but in the facts and circumstances of the case. I direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 255 ..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 6 Nov, 1981 | Hits: 2
Saad Ahmed Vs. The State, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
..../-, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 15 days more. Let the records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 75. ....../-, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 15 days more. Let the records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 75. ....../-, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 15 days more. Let the records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 75. ....../-, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 15 days more. Let the records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 75. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 3 Nov, 1981 | Hits: 1
Archana Proshad Nandi Vs. Miss Chilia Randolph and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....t of the full purchase money, and the judgment of the Courts below are set aside without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) (1982) 106. ......t of the full purchase money, and the judgment of the Courts below are set aside without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) (1982) 106. ......t of the full purchase money, and the judgment of the Courts below are set aside without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) (1982) 106. ......t of the full purchase money, and the judgment of the Courts below are set aside without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) (1982) 106. ..Category: Contract Law | Date: 28 Oct, 1981 | Hits: 234
Jamil Huq (Ex-Captain) Vs. Bangladesh & Others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....tion is rejected. The varbal prayer for stay of the execution of the sentences made by Mr. M.H. Khandker is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 488 ......tion is rejected. The varbal prayer for stay of the execution of the sentences made by Mr. M.H. Khandker is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 488 ......tion is rejected. The varbal prayer for stay of the execution of the sentences made by Mr. M.H. Khandker is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 488 ......tion is rejected. The varbal prayer for stay of the execution of the sentences made by Mr. M.H. Khandker is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 488 ..Category: Constitutional Law, Criminal Law | Date: 22 Sep, 1981 | Hits: 2
Md. Ismail & others Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....'). Earlier the respondent society applied on 11.1.79 to the Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives for an administrative approval of its aforesaid how sing scheme. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies forwarded the said application to the said Ministry which accord......he Additional Deputy Commissioner (L.A.) Dacca, respondent No. 3 without any result. They then moved the respondent No. 1. Secretary. Ministry of Land Administration and Land Reforms in revision. The Joint Secretary of the Ministry, who heard their petitions rejected the same on the ground that as n......he operation of the impugned order of requisition is stayed till 21st October, 1981 from date. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 4, 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 407 ......ion that there is no substance in the petitions. 6. The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 96 of the second group is Dacca Housing Corporation Limited, a public limited company registered under the Companies Act. The purpose of the company is to purchase lands at market price, develop them and all..Category: Property Law | Date: 19 Aug, 1981 | Hits: 2
Md. Amjad Molla Vs. Syeduzzaman Molla & Others, 1981, 9 CLC (AD)
.... 4, 7 and 11 is sufficient to support the finding of the trial court that Ext. 4 is an antedated document. P.W. 4 found the accused persons executing the impugned Kabala on 28th July, 1975 at the Sub-Registrar's Office putting its date as "5.7.75". The sale-deed, Ext. 4. shows that the......e trial court restored. Accused respondents who are on bail are directed to surrender to their bail bonds to serve their sentence. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 448 ......e trial court restored. Accused respondents who are on bail are directed to surrender to their bail bonds to serve their sentence. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 448 ......e trial court restored. Accused respondents who are on bail are directed to surrender to their bail bonds to serve their sentence. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 448 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 14 Jul, 1981 | Hits: 0
Bengal Water Ways Ltd & Another
....rds I concur with the judgment delivered by my learned brother Masud J. and dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 435 ......rds I concur with the judgment delivered by my learned brother Masud J. and dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 435 ......rds I concur with the judgment delivered by my learned brother Masud J. and dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 435 ......thers…………………………………..Respondent Judgment July 8, 1981 Result: Appeal dismissed Companies Act (VII of 1913), Section 162. Winding up of Private Company It is well settled..Category: Corporate Law | Date: 8 Jul, 1981 | Hits: 0
Nazera Begum Vs. Motahar Ali Miah being dead, his heirs, Faruk Mia & others, 1981, 10 CLC (HDC)
.... of time i.e. between the 1st Aswin 1370 B.S. to 30th Kartick 1374 B.S. ……………………(8) Cases Referred to- Shamsuddin Ahmed, Advocate Vs. Registrar, High Court East Pakistan, 19 D.L.R. (SC) 483; A. G. Maline Vs. the State, 19 D.L.R. 381; ......ourts below are hereby affirmed. As no one appears on behalf of the respondent, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 49 ......ourts below are hereby affirmed. As no one appears on behalf of the respondent, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 49 ......ourts below are hereby affirmed. As no one appears on behalf of the respondent, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 49 ..Category: Contract Law | Date: 30 Jun, 1981 | Hits: 2
93349338933292289226955695509553933392299555934195599346151097219222965296509546