Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 6181-6183 of 6183 results.

Md. Mojibul Huq alias Shaikh Md. Mojibul Huq Vs. Md. Yakub Ali, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....ons made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal.  Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs.  Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 9 MLR (AD) 2004, 181. ......ons made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal.  Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs.  Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 9 MLR (AD) 2004, 181. ......ons made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal.  Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs.  Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 9 MLR (AD) 2004, 181. ......ons made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal.  Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs.  Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 9 MLR (AD) 2004, 181. ..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 111

Director of Housing and Settlement Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....rs……….....Respondents Judgment December 9, 2003 Result: The Appeal is allowed. Cases Referred to- Al-Haj Abul Basher, being dead his heirs Hosne Ara Begum and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 50 DLR (AD) 11, Nur Mohammad and others Vs. Moulvi Mainuddin Ahmed and others......n Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ......n Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ......n Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ..

Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 189

M. A. Rashid and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....n (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J M. A. Rashid and others……….....Petitioners Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and other......gment and on the reasoning given above we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......gment and on the reasoning given above we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......gment and on the reasoning given above we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 74