Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6321-6340 of 8151 results.
G. M. Majid Vs. Amjad Hossain Lablu and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... of the aforesaid criminal case. There is therefore no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 268. ......edin J Md. Hassan Ameen J G. M. Majid……………………………………….. Petitioner Vs. Amjad Hossain Lablu and another ........Respondents Judgment March 21, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Sufia Khatun, Advocate...... of the aforesaid criminal case. There is therefore no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 268. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 81
Md. Rezaul Karim Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ect decision. There is, therefore, no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 266. ......p;….............Petitioner Vs. The State represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and others ......Respondents Judgment February 1st, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Monsurul Haque Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Ad......ect decision. There is, therefore, no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 266. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
State Vs. Md. Abdur Rahim, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....een correctly sifted. In the result, there being no substance in this criminal petition, the same is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 263. ...... Islam J Md. Hassan Ameen J The State ………….Petitioner Vs. Md. Abdur Rahim .........Respondent Judgment April 19, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Golam Kibria, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-......een correctly sifted. In the result, there being no substance in this criminal petition, the same is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 263. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Md. Kamruzzaman alias Rentu Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ation by 15 days. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 261. ......ruzzaman alias Rentu ...............Petitioner. Vs The State represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Lalmonirhat..........Respondent Judgment June 22, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Md. Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advo......ation by 15 days. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 261. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Dr. Hafizur Rahman and another Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....y;stance in this petition and find no other alternative but to dismiss the same. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 258. ......man and another ………………Petitioners Vs. The State and another ......................Respondents Judgment March 21, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, represented by Md. Zahirul Is......y;stance in this petition and find no other alternative but to dismiss the same. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 258. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Alhaj Mostafizur Rahman Vs. Rezaul Hoque, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....osal of the rule. There is, therefore, no warrant in law to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 255. ......ad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Alhaj Mostafizur Rahman..............Petitioner Vs. Rezaul Hoque .........Respondent Judgment May 21, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. S.R. Khoshn...... Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Noakhali in Civil Revision Case No. 4 of 2005 affirming order dated 12.1.2005 passed by the Joint District Judge, 2nd Court, Noakhali in violation case under Order 39, Rule 3(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure being Miscellaneous Case No. 30 of 2003 should n..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Abdul Karim Vs. Md. Nurul Islam and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....orrect decision. There is, therefore, no warrant in law to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 252. ......;……………………..Petitioner Vs. Md. Nurul Islam and others ...................Respondents Judgment May 16, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quayum, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocat......orrect decision. There is, therefore, no warrant in law to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 252. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Abdul Mannan Vs. Md. Sohrab Hossain & others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....t find any substance in this petition. The petition is dismissed with cost of Tk. 5, 000/- (five thousand) Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 250. ...... Md. Abdul Matin J Abdul Mannan ...............................Petitioner Vs. Md. Sohrab Hossain & others .......Respondents Judgment January 7, 2008. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-for the Petitioner. Md. Osman Gh......t find any substance in this petition. The petition is dismissed with cost of Tk. 5, 000/- (five thousand) Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 250. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Sanat Kumar Dhar and others Vs. Aminul Haque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....fresh. Since the grounds taken in the review petition in no way are the grounds of review of a judgment, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 248. ......………………………..Petitioners Vs. Aminul Haque and others .........Respondents Judgment December 12, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. S.M....... the Petitioners. S.M. Zillul Huq. Senior Advocate, instructed by Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Review Petition No.23 of 2006. From the Judgment and Order dated July 20, 2005 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal N..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Md. Delwar Hossain Akter & another Vs. Md. Nazrul Islam Khan & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... is no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 242 ; 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 265. ......Akter & another…………..Petitioners Vs. Md. Nazrul Islam Khan & others ...................Respondents Judgment August 29, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mahbubur Rahmen, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not ...... is no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 242 ; 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 265. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Md. Ziarat Hossain Vs. Md. Jaher Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 239. ......ellip;…………Petitioner Vs. Md. Jaher Ali and others…………….........Respondents Judgment August 7, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Sufia ...... or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 239. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Md. Abdul Muttalib Vs. Md. Abdul Wahab, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 237. ......hammad Fazlul Karim J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Abdul Muttalib ...........Petitioner Vs Md. Abdul Wahab ...........Respondent Judgment May 14, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Syed Amirul ......decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 237. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Wali Miah Sodagor Jame Masjid and Madrasha Vs. Abdul Hoque and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ach the High Court Division for early disposal of the Rule, if they so desire. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 234. ......drasha…...Plaintiff-petitioner Vs. Abdul Hoque and others……………..............Defendant-respondents Judgment May 21, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. S. R. Khosh......ach the High Court Division for early disposal of the Rule, if they so desire. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 234. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Md. Fazlur Rahman and others Vs. Haji Md. Manir Khan and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioners. Accordingly, the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (200) 231. ......………............ Defendant-Petitioners Vs. Haji Md. Manir Khan and others............ Plaintiff-Respondents Judgment May 14, 2007. Lawyers Involved: M.A. Gaffar, Advocate, (appeared with the leave of the Court) instructed b...... the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioners. Accordingly, the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (200) 231. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Harich Ahmed Vs. Wali Ullah and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... judgment of the High Court Division calling for interference by this Division. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 228. ......lip;……………….. Petitioners Vs. Wali Ullah and others………...........Respondents Judgment June 26, 2006. Lawyers Involved: A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not ...... A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondents. The Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 90 of 2005. (From the Judgment and Order dated November 9, 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 414 of 1998)...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Nazma Ahmed and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... impugned judgment does not call for our interference. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 224. ......ry of Housing and Public Works, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Bangladesh Secretariet Ramna, Dhaka and another ........Respondents Judgment July 20, 2006. Lawyers Involved: M. I. Farooqui, Senior Advocate (Mohsen Rashid, Advocate, with him) instru...... impugned judgment does not call for our interference. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 224. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Hazera Begum Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....igh Court Division is therefore erratic and perverse. The appeal is therefore allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 220. ......era Begum…………………….Appellant Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others .........Respondents Judgment April 17, 2007. Lawyers Involved: M.I. Farooqui, Senior Advocate, instructed by M.G. Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Re......es not exclude the application of section 56 of the Code in matters of execution of a money decree passed by the Artha Rin Adalat but it only excludes the operation of Rules 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of Order 21 of the Code to ensure that the decree passed by the Artha Rin Adalat is not executed by an..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 111
BFDC Vs. The Chairman, First Labour Court, Dhaka and another, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....cussion we find no merit in the petitions. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed on condonation of delay. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 217. ...... Tejgaon, Dhaka.......Petitioner (In all cases) Vs. The Chairman, First Labour Court, Dhaka and another......Respondents (In all cases) Judgment January 3, 2008. Lawyers Involved: Md. Saidur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner (In all cases). ......or the Respondent No. 2 (In all cases). Not Represented- the Respondent No. 1 (In all the cases). Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1054-59 of 2007. (From the Judgment and Order dated February 26, 2007 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 74..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Bangladesh Vs. Kopil Das, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ground of the discussion made hereinabove we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 214. ......nd, Secretariat Building, Ramna, Dhaka and others ......................Petitioners Vs. Kopil Das .............................Respondent Judgment April 4, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Zainul Abedin, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. J. N. Deb, ......ners. J. N. Deb, Advocate, instructed by A. K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 378 of 2007. (From the Judgment and Order dated December 4, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1178 of 2005)...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Bishwanath Baishnath and others Vs. Narayan Chandra Baishnab, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ound of the discussions made hereinbefore we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 211. ......nath Baishnath and others…………….............Petitioners Vs. Narayan Chandra Baishnab ..........Respondent Judgment July 2, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-record-For the Petitioners. Bivash Chan......Advocate-on-record-For the Petitioners. Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 896 of 2005. (From the Judgment and Order dated April 6, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 178 of 1991). ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
25762575257425732572257125702569256825662565256425632562256125602559255825572556