Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6361-6380 of 8005 results.
Sree Girish Chandra Barman Vs. Md. Yasin Ali and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Yasin Ali and other ……………………Respondent Judgment May 7, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate, with Probir Neogi, Advocate, instructed by Md. Ahsan Ullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record-Fo...... (Civil) Present Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sree Girish Chandra Barman………………………Petitioner Vs. Md. Yasin Ali and other ……………………R......ion of materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. 9. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ion of materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. 9. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Humayun Kabir Khan Vs. Md. Nurul Haque & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....llip;……........Appellant Vs Md. Nurul Haque & others ...........Respondents Judgment November 28, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Hurunur Rashid, Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Hasan Faiz Siddi......of the view that the High Court Division erred in law in not assessing the evidence properly and thereby discharging the Rule. The appeal is accordingly allowed without costs. Ed. ......of the view that the High Court Division erred in law in not assessing the evidence properly and thereby discharging the Rule. The appeal is accordingly allowed without costs. Ed. ......ent-pre-emptor filed the Miscellaneous Case (Preemption) No. 44 of 1987 in the Court of Assistant Judge, Bhandaria, Pirojpur seeking pre-emption of the case land stating, inter alia, that Hara Kumar Debnath was a co-sharer in Khatian No. 1533. He transferred his share to respondent No. 2 by ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Mokbul Hossain (Md) Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....udgment August 9, 2006. Cases Referred To- Monoranjan Mukherjee vs Election Commission and others, 1990 BLD 17 = 41 DLR 484. Lawyers Involved: Dr. M Zahir, Senior Advocate, instructed by Amir Hossain Chowdhury, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant. Ex pa......n (Civil) Present Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Mokbul Hossain (Md) ...............Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others..................Respondents Judgment ...... Appellate Tribunal did not consider the matter in its proper perspective and accordingly, arrived at a wrong decision. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... Appellate Tribunal did not consider the matter in its proper perspective and accordingly, arrived at a wrong decision. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 132
Commissioner of Customs and others Vs. Mohammad Ali, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... April 19, 2007. Cases Referred To- Bangladesh Vs. Mizanur Rahman, 52 DLR (AD) 149. Lawyers Involved: MA Azim Khair, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellants. AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul K Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Commissioner of Customs and others......Appellants Vs. Mohammad Ali................Respondent Judgment April 19, 2007. C......s illegal and without any legal basis. 7. Accordingly, we do not find any substance in the appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......s illegal and without any legal basis. 7. Accordingly, we do not find any substance in the appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Mir Kalimuddin and others Vs. Md. Dukhi Mondal and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
..............Petitioners Vs. Md. Dukhi Mondal and others…………... Respondents Judgment April 5, 2003. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record — For the Petitioners. Nurul Amin, Advocate instructed by AKM Shahi...... Ed. ......gh Court Division. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......gh Court Division. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Khan Md. Firoj Kabir Vs. Rupali Bank Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e Mills Ltd vs. Chairman 3rd Labour Court 39 DLR 11; Lal Mamud Vs. Siraj Miah 45 DLR 638; Afsaruddin Ahmed Vs Banque Indosuez, 44 DLR (AD) 136. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate (Probir Neogi, ......preme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Khan Md. Firoj Kabir...................................Appellant Vs. Rupali Bank Ltd. and others... ...................Respondents Judgment Mar......nbsp; Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......nbsp; Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Arif A. Shekha and others Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Industries and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....gladesh Vs. Mirza Shahab Ispahani, 40 DLR (AD) 116; Government of Bangladesh vs. Messrs ATJ Industries Limited and others, 28 DLR (AD) 120. Lawyers Involved: Khondaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Dr. M Zahir, Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record and......urt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Arif A. Shekha and others............................Appellants Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Industries and another..................................Respondents ......do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and hence the three appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 91. ......do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and hence the three appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 91. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Shahid Hossain Khan (Md) Vs. Abdul Bashed Lashkar and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....red To- Buchanen vs Wasley, 245 US 60 at p. 74; Rajahmundry Electronic Supply Corporation vs State of Andhra, (1954) SCR 779 at p. 780. Lawyers Involved: AF Hasan Ariff, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mvi Md Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Khan ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Shahid Hossain Khan (Md) .....................Appellant Vs. Abdul Bashed Lashkar and others..........Respondents Judgment July 17, 2...... decree of permanent injunction. 15. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ...... decree of permanent injunction. 15. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 216
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdur Razzak and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
............................Appellant Vs. Md. Abdur Razzak and others..................Respondents Judgment February 7, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Md. Firoz Shah, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant Dr. M Zahir, Senior Advocate, instructed by Nurul ......nt: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Bangladesh...........................................Appellant Vs. Md. Abdur Razzak and others..................Respondents Judgment February......17. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any grounds to interfere with the impugned judgement and order. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......17. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any grounds to interfere with the impugned judgement and order. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 117
Kadam Rosul Silicate Works and others Vs. Sonali Bank, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....k. 2000/- to the respondent as cost within three months failing which it will bear interest at the rate of 9% till realization…… ………(10 & 12) Lawyers Involved: ABM Khairul Huque, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate-on-Record, (absent)—For the Appellants. Asrarul...... (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Kadam Rosul Silicate Works and others.............................Appellant Vs. Sonali Bank.........................…………………………………….......Responde......is set aside. The Money Execution case be struck off and the attachment of the appellants' property shall be deemed to be withdrawn. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 294.......is set aside. The Money Execution case be struck off and the attachment of the appellants' property shall be deemed to be withdrawn. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 294...Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 134
Jashimuddin Kanchan (Md) Vs. Md. Ali Ashraf, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....lbaz Vs. Sarada Sundari Debya, 13 DLR 334; Abdullah and others Vs. Abdul Karim and others, 20 DLR (SC) 205; Ajufannessa Bibi Vs. Safar Mia 30 DLR (SC) 41. Lawyers Involved: MH. Khandkar, Senior Advocate, (AG Mohammad Ali, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Reco......ivil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Jashimuddin Kanchan (Md).........………………………………………….Appellant Vs. Md. Ali Ashraf...........……………………………………………..............Res......ts and decrees of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the lower appellate Court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 289 ......ts and decrees of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the lower appellate Court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 289 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Upendra Chandra Rishi and ors. Vs. Sufia Begum and ors., 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....e on 20.7.1981. the miscellaneous case having been filed on 05.08.1989, the same was not barred by limitation……………………(20 & 23) Lawyers Involved: Rafique-ul Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. M Nurullah, Senio......(Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Upendra Chandra Rishi and others.………………...…………..Appellants Vs. Sufia Begum and others...........………………….………........Respondents Judg.......12.80 passed in Title Suit No. 789 of 1980 is set aside and the said suit is restored to its file and number. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 285; 1990 BLD (AD) 194. .......12.80 passed in Title Suit No. 789 of 1980 is set aside and the said suit is restored to its file and number. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 285; 1990 BLD (AD) 194. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Azizul Huq @ Azizul Haque and ors. Vs. State, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....o continue and if the appeal be not disposed of in the High Court Division fresh application may be filed before the High Court Division for bail……………….(3)Lawyers Involved: Abul Quasem, Advocate-on-Record — For the Appellants B. Hossain, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by AW M...... (Criminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Azizul Huq @ Azizul Haque and ors................................Appellants Vs. The State..................................……………………………………...Respo......he appellants may make a prayer for bail to the High Court Division which should then consider it. This appeal is thus disposed of. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 284 ......he appellants may make a prayer for bail to the High Court Division which should then consider it. This appeal is thus disposed of. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 284 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Managing Director, WASA Vs. Md. Ali and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... 1973 SC 205, Virigante Navin Vs. Govt of AP and others (2001) 8 SSC 744; The Controller of Auditor Gunted of India Vs. KS Jagunath, AIR 1987 SC 53. Lawyers Involved: Md. Rafiqul Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. Amirul Islam...... ......ent and order of the High Court Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (AD) (2007) 185. ......ent and order of the High Court Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (AD) (2007) 185. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 100
Rabia Bhuiyan, MP Vs. Ministry of LGRD & others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....t Narain vs Union of India, AIR 1998 SC 889; MC Mehta vs Union of India, 1999 (6) SCC 12; Dr. Mohiuddin Farooque vs Bangladesh, 55 DLR 613. Lawyers Involved: Dr Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Ex-parte&...... MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Rabia Bhuiyan, MP…………………………………..Appellant. Vs. Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development & others... ..................Res......ing steps taken to implement the Arsenic Policy, 2004 and the Plan. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed within directions as set out above. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......ing steps taken to implement the Arsenic Policy, 2004 and the Plan. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed within directions as set out above. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 255
Rowshan Ara Begum Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Works and Urban Development, BD, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....thers......Respondents Judgment: December 12, 2006. Case Referred To- Ministry of Works and others vs Helaluddin Ahmed, 4 MLR (AD) 140. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented—......in question since said property is an abandoned property. The ground contending which review of our judgment is sought merits no consideration. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......in question since said property is an abandoned property. The ground contending which review of our judgment is sought merits no consideration. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......in question since said property is an abandoned property. The ground contending which review of our judgment is sought merits no consideration. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Muinuddin Zulfiquer (Md) Vs. Government of the Republic of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...................Petitioner Vs Government of the Republic of Bangladesh.......Respondents Judgment November 29, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. Not repre......e of the judgment for review. 8. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e of the judgment for review. 8. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e of the judgment for review. 8. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Ali Hussain Faraji & others Vs. Abdul Ali Pradhania @ Abul and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
..........................Petitioner Vs. Abdul Ali Pradhania @ Abul and another.......Respondent Judgment August 15, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Nikhilesh Dutta, Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioners. Not repre......Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Hassan Ameen J Ali Hussain Faraji & others......................Petitioner Vs. Abdul Ali Pradhania @ Abul and another.......Respondent Judgment August 1......The learned Counsel could not point out any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......su; then on 10-2-71 Goman sold his OJO acres to Khagendra; Banga on 13-11-28 also sold 0.40 acres to one Afzal Khan who then sold it to Cherag Ali on 3-4-57 and on 3-4-57 Cherag Ali sold it to Noba Kumar; Banga died leaving two sons Chandra Kumar and Joy Chandra; by dint of different transaction..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Meghna PET Industries Ltd and others Vs. Md. Mostafa Kamal & others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....78 of 2005) Vs. Md. Mostafa Kamal & others........Respondents (In both the cases) Judgment May 17, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record— For the Petitioners (In Civil ...... Meghna PET Industries Ltd..........Petitioner (In Civil Petition No. 477 of 2005) Prime Edible Oil Ltd. & another........Petitioners (In Civil Petition No. 478 of 2005) Vs. Md. Mostafa Kamal & others........Respondents (In both the cases) Judgm......faulter borrowers. Accordingly, the application for dismissing the civil petition for leave to appeal Nos. 477-478 of 2005 is allowed. Both the civil petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......faulter borrowers. Accordingly, the application for dismissing the civil petition for leave to appeal Nos. 477-478 of 2005 is allowed. Both the civil petitions are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Collector of Customs, Chittagong & anr Vs. M.M Shafullah and ors., 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....thers Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs AIR 1958 Calcutta 232. Lawyers Involved: K.A. Bakr, Attorney-General with Sultan Hossain Khan, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by A. W. Malik, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Aminul Haq, Advocates-on-Record For the Respond......bsp; Syed A. B. Nahmud Hossain CJ Kemaluddin Hossain J D. C. Bhaitacharya J Collector of Customs, Chittagong & anr……………Appellants Vs. M.M Shafullah and ors………….…Respondents Judgment......he language of S. 167(9B) of the Act. For these reasons this appeal fails and it is dismissed, but having regard to the circumstance of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. ......he language of S. 167(9B) of the Act. For these reasons this appeal fails and it is dismissed, but having regard to the circumstance of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 92
23392338233723362334233323322331233023292328232723262324232323182317231223112310