Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Alhaj Mostafizur Rahman Vs. Rezaul Hoque, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... No.1416 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 31.8.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3530 of 2005). Judgme......osal of the rule. There is, therefore, no warrant in law to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 255. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Abdul Karim Vs. Md. Nurul Islam and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....r Respondent No. 1. Not Represented- For Respondent Nos. 2-10. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1098 of 2005. (From the judgment and order, dated 26.6.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 6589 of 2002). Judgment &n......orrect decision. There is, therefore, no warrant in law to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 252. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Abdul Mannan Vs. Md. Sohrab Hossain & others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....r Respondent No. 1. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 2-6. Civil Petition for leave to Appeal No. 395 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 08.08.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2920 of 2002). Judgment &......t find any substance in this petition. The petition is dismissed with cost of Tk. 5, 000/- (five thousand) Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 250. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Sanat Kumar Dhar and others Vs. Aminul Haque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....g review has been filed against the judgment dated July 20, 2005 in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1635 of 2003. The civil petition for leave to appeal was filed against the judgment of the High Court Division dated July 16, 2003 in Civil Revision No. 3197 of 1998 which was filed against ......fresh. Since the grounds taken in the review petition in no way are the grounds of review of a judgment, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 248. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Md. Delwar Hossain Akter & another Vs. Md. Nazrul Islam Khan & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 918 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 08.05.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3794 of 2000). Judgment &...... is no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 242 ; 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 265. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Md. Ziarat Hossain Vs. Md. Jaher Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....r. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 537 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 4th January, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3313 of 1999). Judgment &...... or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 239. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Md. Abdul Muttalib Vs. Md. Abdul Wahab, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ucted by A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 835 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 19.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1386 of 2002). Judgment &nb......decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 237. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Wali Miah Sodagor Jame Masjid and Madrasha Vs. Abdul Hoque and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....espondent Nos. 1 and 2. None represented- For Respondent No. 3. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1415 of 2005. (From the order dated the 31 st August, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3529 of 2005). Judgment &......ach the High Court Division for early disposal of the Rule, if they so desire. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 234. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Md. Fazlur Rahman and others Vs. Haji Md. Manir Khan and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....the Petitioners. None represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 797 of 2005. (From the Judgment and order dated the 16th April of 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3780 of 2000). Judgment &...... the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioners. Accordingly, the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (200) 231. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Harich Ahmed Vs. Wali Ullah and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondents. The Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 90 of 2005. (From the Judgment and Order dated November 9, 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 414 of 1998). Judgment &n...... judgment of the High Court Division calling for interference by this Division. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 228. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Nazma Ahmed and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
..... S. M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1621 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 06.07,2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.6187 of 2000). Judgment &nbs...... impugned judgment does not call for our interference. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 224. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Hazera Begum Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....dul Hug, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 2. Not Represented- For Respondent No. 1. Civil Appeal No.268 of 2003 (From the judgment and order dated 5.11.2001 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1124 of 2001.) Judgment &nb......igh Court Division is therefore erratic and perverse. The appeal is therefore allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 220. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 111
BFDC Vs. The Chairman, First Labour Court, Dhaka and another, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Represented- the Respondent No. 1 (In all the cases). Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1054-59 of 2007. (From the Judgment and Order dated February 26, 2007 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 746, 747,748, 749,750 and 751 of 2006). Judg......cussion we find no merit in the petitions. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed on condonation of delay. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 217. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Bangladesh Vs. Kopil Das, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....d by A. K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 378 of 2007. (From the Judgment and Order dated December 4, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1178 of 2005). Judgment &n......ground of the discussion made hereinabove we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 214. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Bishwanath Baishnath and others Vs. Narayan Chandra Baishnab, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 896 of 2005. (From the Judgment and Order dated April 6, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 178 of 1991). Judgment &n......ound of the discussions made hereinbefore we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 211. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Md. Baki Vs. Md. Fazlul Haque and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....r Respondent Nos. 1-2. Not represent- Respondents Nos. 3-6. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1678 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 15th me, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5028 of 2008). Judgment &n......as such no interference is called for in the findings and decisions of the High Court Division and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (200) 209. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Sec, Min. of Energy & Mineral Resource, Govt. of BD Vs. Q.C. Petroleum Ltd. & ors, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Civil Appeal No.125 of 2000 (From the judgment and order dated 1.3.1994 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.279 of 1994). Judgment &...... question The appeal is accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 205; 14 BLC (AD) (2009) 57. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 94
Sunil Kumar Das Vs. Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Shahidul Haq, Advocate on Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 341 of 2007. (From the judgment dated 15.02.2007 passed by the High Court Division in Trade Mark Appeal No. 21 of 2003). Judgment Md. Abdul Matin J. - This ......High court Division committed no illegality in dismissing the appeal. We find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 202. ..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 196
Dr. Mohammad Sarwar Ramiz & others Vs. Dr. Shyam Sundar Kundu (FCPS) & others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ot represented- Respondent Nos. 3-14 (In Civil Appeal No. 210 of 2005) Civil Appeal Nos. 209 & 210 of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated 28.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1735 of 2004.) Judgment &n......Court Division requires interference by us. 19. Both the appeals are accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 181. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Delwar Hossain Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....For the Petitioner. Not represented – the Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 485 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 22-08-2006 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1429 of 2004). Judgment Md. Hassan Ameed J....... we are of the opinion that there is no substance in this petition for leave to appeal and accordingly the same is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 986. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43