Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6361-6365 of 6365 results.
Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......Chairmanship of a neutral and independent person and the Company Court after hearing the parties by its order dated 15.4.2002 was pleased to allow the application of the respondent after invoking its jurisdiction under section 85(3) of the Act in view of the facts and circumstances of the case ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Md. Nurul Hoque Miah Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....s. 19. In that view of the observation and direction as above, this appeal is, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ......s. 19. In that view of the observation and direction as above, this appeal is, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ......d of Revenue vide Memo No.3(27) admn.-3/76-453 dated 29-7-1991 refusing anti-dated seniority to the appellant-petitioner Mr. Nurul Hoque Miah over opposite party No.3 Mr. Anawaruddin Ahmed is without jurisdiction and void, that the appellant petitioner is entitled to get anti-dated seniority as Assi..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Md. Mojibul Huq alias Shaikh Md. Mojibul Huq Vs. Md. Yakub Ali, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Courts wrongly traveled beyond the scope of Section 134(5) of the Co-operative Societies Ordinance, 1984 as because the prayer made by the Respondent No. 1 in Miscellaneous Case No. 297 of 1994 was totally a new one from the prayer which Respondent No. 1 made in Appeal Case No. 5 of 1994 and the......he discussions made hereinabove that the contention of the learned Counsel for the appellant that the Respondent No. 1 at different stages came with different cases for adjudication and that in the absence of the appellant the authorities as well as the Court disposed of the case against the appe......4 by filing written objection. As against the judgment of the learned Additional District Judge in Miscellaneous Case no. 297 of 1994 the appellant moved the High Court Division in Revisional jurisdiction but without any success. Thereafter the appellant filed petition for leave to appeal b..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Director of Housing and Settlement Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e was discharged upon observing "the Government never contested the suit. So, the submission that on 11.7.2000, the Government decided to make revision application after obtaining grounds of delay is totally misconceived. Moreover, the Government in fact has not made any revisional application again......n Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ...... inordinate delay of 542 days, cannot be accepted as satisfactory". 6. Leave was granted to consider the submission that under Section 14A of the (Emergency) Requisition of Property Act, 1948 the jurisdiction of Civil Court being barred under the law the suit as was not maintainable and as such ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 189
.... background of the discussions we are of the view no interference with judgment sought to be appealed is called for.
Accordingly the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:...... background of the discussions we are of the view no interference with judgment sought to be appealed is called for.
Accordingly the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:......und not satisfactory he was discharged from service, that the petitioner had no vested right in the service of the City Corporation as Education Officer and as such he was not entitled to invoke writ jurisdiction of the High Court Division.
5. The High Court Division made the Rule absolute on th..
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 96
324307306303299