Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Mirza Shahab Ispahani Vs. Government of the Peoples’ Republic of Bangladesh, 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)
....orks, Secretariat Building, Dhaka..........................Respondent Judment March 31, 1987. Cases Referred to- State of Bombay vs. Pandurang Vinayak and others, A.I.R. 1953 (S.C) 244; East End Dwelling Co. Ltd. vs. Finsbury Borough Council, 1951 (2) All England Law Reports, 587; Me......was the District and Sessions Judge of Sylhet. The petitioner was born in Calcutta on the 14ih September, 1941, but had come to Dhaka with his parents after partition of India as his father opted for Pakistan and came to serve as Law Secretary of the then Province of East Bengal. The parents of the ..Category: Immigration and Citizenship Law | Date: | Hits: 188
M/s. Ayat Ali Bhuiyan & Company Ltd. Vs. Janata Bank, 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)
..../s. Ayat Ali Bhuiyan & Company Ltd................Petitioner Vs. Janata Bank………………………..Opposite party Judgment July 30, 1987. Cases Referred to: P.P.Gupta vs. East Asiatic Co. 1960 All 184, Mst. Arifa Begum vs. Khulki Mohammad Naqbi, 21 DLR (WP) 209 and Sur......bservation made above. Therefore, we make Rule absolute in the above terms without any order as to costs. ARM Amirul Islam J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (1988) 56...Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Shahjahan Ali Khan (Md) and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
.... and others……………Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others..................................Respondents Judgment October 26, 1999. Cases Referred To- Province of East Pakistan and others Vs. Sirajul Hoque Patwary 19 DLR (SC) 281; Dr Nurul Islam Vs. Bangladesh 33......others……………Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others..................................Respondents Judgment October 26, 1999. Cases Referred To- Province of East Pakistan and others Vs. Sirajul Hoque Patwary 19 DLR (SC) 281; Dr Nurul Islam Vs. Bangladesh 33 DLR ..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 191
Humayun Majid Vs. Bangladesh Bureau of Anti-Corruption and ors., 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....ould not be declared to have been taken without any lawful authority and to be of no legal effect. 2. The short facts leading to the issuance of the Rule are, that the then Government of erstwhile East Pakistan granted lease of a piece of land measuring 10.88 kathas to M/S M Enam Elahi & Brot......not be declared to have been taken without any lawful authority and to be of no legal effect. 2. The short facts leading to the issuance of the Rule are, that the then Government of erstwhile East Pakistan granted lease of a piece of land measuring 10.88 kathas to M/S M Enam Elahi & Brothers,..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 232
M Saleem Ullah, Advocate and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....t space as a park and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The case of the petitioners, inter alia, is that the then Government of erstwhile East Pakistan developed the vast Mirpur area into residential plots and nucleus house for a resident......ce as a park and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The case of the petitioners, inter alia, is that the then Government of erstwhile East Pakistan developed the vast Mirpur area into residential plots and nucleus house for a residential e..Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 259
Tahera Begum and others Vs. First Court of Settlement and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....per. 2. The petitioners' case is that one Md. Mujtaba Siddique, son of late Mustafa Siddique was the original owner of the disputed property which was allotted to him by Government of the then East Pakistan through a letter dated 23-1-1960 and pursuant to the aforesaid allotment letter a deed...... 2. The petitioners' case is that one Md. Mujtaba Siddique, son of late Mustafa Siddique was the original owner of the disputed property which was allotted to him by Government of the then East Pakistan through a letter dated 23-1-1960 and pursuant to the aforesaid allotment letter a deed of a..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
AVP, Uttara Bank Ltd. Vs. Shahabuddin Khan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....ofazzal Hossain and others 44 DLR (AD) 260; Managing Director, Rupali Bank Ltd. vs. Md. Nazrul Islam Patwary 1995 BLD (AD) 169 = 48 DLR (AD) 62; Indo-Pakistan Corporation Ltd. vs. Chairman 21 DLR 285 Eastern Mercantile Bank Ltd. vs. Mohammad Shamsuddin 21 DLR (SC) 365. Lawyers involved: ......ahabuddin Khan and others...………Opposite-Parties Judgment June 27, 2006. Cases Referred To- Mujibur Rahman Sarkar vs. Chairman, Labour Court, Khulna 31 DLR 301; Indo-Pakistan Corporation Ltd. vs. Chairman, Labour Court 21 DLR 265; Dosta Textile Mills Ltd. vs. Sudhan..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Torab Ali (Md) Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and Others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....968 through which the deed was executed and registered in favour of Haji Abdur Rahim. During SA Operation, the RoR in respect of the suit land was wrongly published in the name of the Government of East Pakistan and with a view to remove the cloud Haji Abdur Rahim initiated Miscellaneous Case No. ......Thereafter, Nripendra Chandra Chakravartty while possessing the suit land entered into a contact of exchange with Haji Md Abdur Rahim who was a resident of Assam Province. At that time the Defence of Pakistan Rules was promulgated and, as such, Nripendra Chandra Chakravartty could not execute and re..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
State Vs. Md. Roushan Mondal @ Hashem , 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
.... adult counterparts. They worked in the factories and foundries and were made to labour more than their physiques would allow and in horrendous conditions. This happened as much in the West as in the East. Such tales are only too well illustrated in the writings of eminent novelists such as Charles ......pressed by us in this judgment. Send down the lower Court's records along with a copy of this judgment at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (2007) 72, 26 BLD (HCD) (2006) 549. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 167
Siddiqur Rahman Vs. Chairman, Divisional Labour Court and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
.... Referred To- General Manager, Jamuna Oil Co. Ltd vs Golap Rahman and another 34 DLR (AD) 166 and Aminul Islam and others vs James Finlay and Co. Ltd 26 DLR (AD) 33; Project-in-Charge, Paruma (Eastern) Ltd vs Mr Aminur Rahman Khan and another 31 DLR 124; General Manager, Jamuna Oil Co. vs Gol......(AD) 166 and Aminul Islam and others vs. James Finlay and Co. Ltd. reported in 26 DLR (AD) 33. In the case reported in 26 DLR (AD) 33 the Appellate Division while considering section 9(6) of the East Pakistan Labour Disputes Act, 1965 read with Rule 34 of the Industrial Disputes Rules, 1960 decided ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 108
State Vs. Badshah Mollah, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....ful and reliable. His evidence cannot but be taken with a grain of salt. 26. It has been held in the case of Jahur Vs. Crown reported in 6 DLR 246 by a Division Bench of the High Court of the then East Pakistan that "without independent evidence of corroboration it is not possible to accept the e......nd reliable. His evidence cannot but be taken with a grain of salt. 26. It has been held in the case of Jahur Vs. Crown reported in 6 DLR 246 by a Division Bench of the High Court of the then East Pakistan that "without independent evidence of corroboration it is not possible to accept the extra-..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Bangladesh Shipping Corporation Vs. Rafique Ahmed, 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)
....46D, 46E, 46F, 46G, 46H were added after Rule 46 of Order 21 C.P.C. by the Calcutta High Court and that consequently the said rules 46A-46H of Order 21 were treated to be the existing law of the then East Bengal (later East Pakistan) within the jurisdiction of the then High Court of Dacca under the ......were added after Rule 46 of Order 21 C.P.C. by the Calcutta High Court and that consequently the said rules 46A-46H of Order 21 were treated to be the existing law of the then East Bengal (later East Pakistan) within the jurisdiction of the then High Court of Dacca under the relevant laws made on th..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 212
Abdul Khalek Khan Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
.... holding that the plaintiff had title in the land in dispute and the order dated 3.10.1961 cancelling his settlement by the Board of Revenue was null and void. The appeal of the defendant Province of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) was allowed by the learned Additional District Judge setting aside th......ing that the plaintiff had title in the land in dispute and the order dated 3.10.1961 cancelling his settlement by the Board of Revenue was null and void. The appeal of the defendant Province of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) was allowed by the learned Additional District Judge setting aside the jud..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Iftekhar Ahmed Majumder Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)
....relation between an independent order and the fact of independent detention. The order of detention purporting to continue an illegal detention cannot be sustained. 9. In the case of Government of East Pakistan vs. Mrs. Rowshan Bijaya Shaukat Ali Khan reported in 18 DLR (SC) 1966 at page 214 the ......ion between an independent order and the fact of independent detention. The order of detention purporting to continue an illegal detention cannot be sustained. 9. In the case of Government of East Pakistan vs. Mrs. Rowshan Bijaya Shaukat Ali Khan reported in 18 DLR (SC) 1966 at page 214 the decis..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 40
Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust (BLAST) Vs. Bangladesh and Others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....Charge of Sutrapur PS has forwarded the said recommendation on 18-12-98 and the same was also endorsed by the Assistant Police Commissioner Demra Zone, DMP on 18-12-98 and by the Deputy Commissioner (East) Dhaka Metropolitan Police on 19-12-98 and sent to the authority concerned by memo No.671 dated......a copy of this order to the home Ministry and IGP for their information and necessary action in the light of observations in the judgment. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 4 BLC (1999), 600. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 106
BLAST Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....accordance with law and eviction of the petitioners, without proper notice and without allowing sufficient time is arbitrary, illegal, without lawful authority and being violative of section 5 of the East Pakistan Government Land and Buildings (Recovery of Possession) Ordinance, 1970. In support of ......dance with law and eviction of the petitioners, without proper notice and without allowing sufficient time is arbitrary, illegal, without lawful authority and being violative of section 5 of the East Pakistan Government Land and Buildings (Recovery of Possession) Ordinance, 1970. In support of her c..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 171
State Vs. Chief Editor, Manabjamin and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)_Part Two
....these developments and, as we shall presently show, they steered a middle course. 229. In India, after the advent of the British, the judicial system underwent changes. The Courts set up by the East India Company were exclusively executive. Thereafter a new judicial system comprising three t......rse of justice or the due administration thereof, but it is sufficient that they should be calculated to have that effect. As to what 'calculated' means in this context has been pointed out by the Pakistan Supreme Court in the case of Abdus Salam, Editor Pakistan Observer and others Vs. The State..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Atiar Rahman Khan and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....ance of the petitioner is not legally maintainable. 4. The learned Assistant Judge upon hearing the parties by order dated 30 May, 1990 rejected the plaint on the reasonings that after repeal of East Pakistan Enemy Property (lands and buildings) Administration and Disposal Order, 1966 and all r......of the petitioner is not legally maintainable. 4. The learned Assistant Judge upon hearing the parties by order dated 30 May, 1990 rejected the plaint on the reasonings that after repeal of East Pakistan Enemy Property (lands and buildings) Administration and Disposal Order, 1966 and all rights..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 149