Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6401-6420 of 6818 results.
Swami Joytirghananda Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Khulna and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....er discharging the Rule are set aside and the Petition No. 245 of 1966 is restored to file for hearing according to law. There shall, however, be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. .......—This appeal by special leave is against an order of a Bench of the Dacca High Court discharging a rule, arising out of a Writ Petition under Article 98 of the Pakistan Constitution of 1952 for default. 2. The appellant is the Secretary of Khulna Sebasram which is an Association r......er discharging the Rule are set aside and the Petition No. 245 of 1966 is restored to file for hearing according to law. There shall, however, be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......nanda………..….Appellant. Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Khulna and others…………..Respondents. Judgment, Dec 9, 1975. Lawyers Involved: B.N. Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by A. Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record&mdas..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Dacca Improvement Trust Vs. Waliullah and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... a formal decree, as a matter of fact, was prepared after the filing of the said appeal. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......p;…....Respondents Judgment January 29, 1976. Cases Referred to: Jagadish Bhargava Vs. Jawaharlal Bhargava and others A.I.R. 1961(S.C.) 832; Secretary of State for India Vs. Mask & Co. L. B. 67 I. A. 222 = A.I.R. 1940 P.C 105; Abdul Rouf and others Vs. Ab...... a formal decree, as a matter of fact, was prepared after the filing of the said appeal. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ia Vs. Mask & Co. L. B. 67 I. A. 222 = A.I.R. 1940 P.C 105; Abdul Rouf and others Vs. Abdul Hamid Khan in 16 D.L.R. (S.C.) 515; Phool Chand Vs. Gopal Lal, reported in A.I.R. 1967, 1470; Lawyers Involved: Shamsul Huq Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by Mr. A. Rab-H, Advocate..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca Vs. M/S. Ata Hossain Khan Ltd., 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....that this appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court are set aside and that of the Appellate Tribunal restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 141.......g, calendar printing on papers and also printing on tiny. The relevant assessment years were -1956-57, 1957-58 and 1958-59 and the rates of gross profits were shown at 34%, 33.6% and 35% respectively for the said years. The Income-Tax Officer on a consideration of the return filed by the assesse......that this appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court are set aside and that of the Appellate Tribunal restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 141.......= 160(2) Taxation 130; Pandit Brothers Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, AIR 1955 Punjab 42 = 1954 (26) ITR 159; Ghanshyamdas Farmanand Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (1952-21 ITR 79 at page 81). Lawyers Involved: A.W. Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, instructed by A. M. Khan Chowdhury, Advocate-..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 164
Abul Hossain & ors. Vs. The State and anr., 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....e learned counsel on the facts and circumstances of the case, there arises no question for review of the decision of this Division. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......etition No. 2 of 1976. (Arising out of judgment and order dated 17. 6. 75 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 24 of 1974). Judgment: Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J.—This petition is for review of the judgment dated 17. 6. 75 passed by this Division in Criminal Appeal No. 24 of 197......e learned counsel on the facts and circumstances of the case, there arises no question for review of the decision of this Division. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......im, J. Abul Hossain & ors………...Petitioners. Vs. The State and anr………...Respondents. Judgment April 6, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Shaukat Alt Khan, Advocate, with A. Basel Majumdar, Advocate, instructed b..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Messres A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....sturb the decision of the High Court Division. Subject to the observation made above, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 120. ......is against a judgment of a Bench of the High Court Division and it arises out of an application filed under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh. Leave was granted for interpretation of Articles 4 and 8 of President's Order No. 16 of 1972 (The Bangladesh Abandoned......sturb the decision of the High Court Division. Subject to the observation made above, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 120. ......charya J Government of Bangladesh......Appellant. Vs. Messrs A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others…….Respondents Judgement March 15, 1976. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Faqeer Shahabuddin Ahmed, Attorney-General with Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attor..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Karnaphuli Rayon and Chemical Ltd. Vs. The Govt. of Bangladesh and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....petition summarily. 2. The appellant, which is a public Limited Company, is engaged in the manufacture, inter alia of rayon yarn, filed a petition under Article 5(b) of the Martial Law Proclamation read with Article 6(2) of the Provisional Constitution Order of 1969 before the High ......ngaged in the manufacture, inter alia of rayon yarn, filed a petition under Article 5(b) of the Martial Law Proclamation read with Article 6(2) of the Provisional Constitution Order of 1969 before the High Court of East Pakistan for a declaration that the order imposing excise duty on the ......sing a Writ petition summarily. 2. The appellant, which is a public Limited Company, is engaged in the manufacture, inter alia of rayon yarn, filed a petition under Article 5(b) of the Martial Law Proclamation read with Article 6(2) of the Provisional Constitution Order of 1969 befor......ers, Sons & Maxim Ltd. Vs. Evans (1910) A.C. 444 of page 445; Messers Usmania Glass Sheet Factory Limited Vs. Sales T s Officer, Chittagong (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 43T— PLD 1971 SC 205. Lawyers Involved: M. Habibur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by A. Bakkar, Advocate-on-Record&m..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Haji Md. Shariatullah Vs. Ashrafun Nessa Bibi and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....g regard to the considerations made above we find no substance in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 91. ......tullah filed, in the 3rd Court of the Subordinate Judge, Dacca, an application under section 96 of the East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for pre-emption of certain land purchased on 19-3-66 by respondent No. 2 Rehana Begum. An objectio......g regard to the considerations made above we find no substance in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 91. ...... Singh Hazari Vs. Juman Meah,13 D.L.R. 105; Ankala Venkata Reddy Vs. Manchala Venkata Reddy (A.I.R. 1915 Madras 1222; Dharani Dhar Ghose Vs. Phanibhusan Mukherjee 50 C.W.N. 837. Lawyers Involved: Golam Rabbani, Advocate, instructed by Md. Behter Ali, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Khondkar Mohiuddin Vs. Syed Moin Ahmed, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....dgment and decree of the High Court are set aside and the judgment and decree of the Court of Additional District Judge are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 85. ......l by special leave is against a judgment of a Division Bench of the Dacca High Court in a Second Appeal, setting aside an appellate judgment of reversal and dismissing a suit brought by the appellant for declaration of title and recovery of possession. 2. Plaintiff's case is that the property in......dgment and decree of the High Court are set aside and the judgment and decree of the Court of Additional District Judge are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 85. ......I.R. 1929 Cal. 152; Ramji Patal Vs. Rao Kishore Singh, L.R. 56 LA. 280 = 33 C.W.N. 893 = A.I.R. 1929 P.C, 190; Misrailal Vs. Mst. Surji, 9 D.L.R. 375; Abdul Majid Vs. Khalil 12 D.L.R. (S.C.) 132. Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, with S.C. Das, Advocate, instructed by A. W. Mian, ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Mozaffar Ahmed Vs. Md. Osman and anr, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... is .barred by limitation. The appeal shall be disposed of on the evidence already on record. The appeal is disposed of in aforesaid terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ......, J.—This is an appeal on special leave from the judgment and decree of a Division Bench of the High Court of East Pakistan, Dacca, in a second appeal. The appeal arises out of a suit for a declaration that the land in dispute formed part of a Wakf estate of which the appellant...... is .barred by limitation. The appeal shall be disposed of on the evidence already on record. The appeal is disposed of in aforesaid terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ......oz Ahmed Choudhury (1952) 4 DLR 604—1951 PLR (1) Dacca, 576; Badrul Huq Rashidi Vs. Shah Hossain Ahmed AIR, 1935. Allahabad 278; Gobinda Chandra Vs. A. Majid, A.I.R. 1944 Calcutta 163. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nurul Huq, Advoc..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 239
Azizur Rahman and another Vs. Sree Kailash Chand Burmecha and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....the basis of what is just and convenient in each case. The result therefore is that this appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 65. ......n Bench of the Dacca High Court refusing to exercise its revisional jurisdiction to interfere with an order of appointment of a receiver under Order 40 rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure in a suit for partition in which appellants are Defendants No. 6 and 7. 2. Respondents No. 1 to 8 institut......the basis of what is just and convenient in each case. The result therefore is that this appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 65. ...... Tea Company Limited (1968) 20 DLR (Dac.) 54, PLD 1969 Dacca 946; Mt. Tulsha Devi Vs. Shah Chironjeelal and others AIR 1943 All. 1; Anadilal and others Vs. Ram Sarup and others, AIR 1936 All 495. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by A. Rab-II, Advocate-on-Rec..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
.... call such additional evidence on the question as it may deem fit.
In the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 61. ......t and Decree date 24-2-1966 passed by the Dacca High Court in S. A. No. 1917 of 1961).
Judgment
Kemaluddin Hossain J.—This is a Defendant's appeal by special leave arising out of a suit for recovery of possession of the suit land upon declaration of the plaintiffs title therein. The su...... call such additional evidence on the question as it may deem fit.
In the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 61. ......ahadur Vs. Srinath, Chakrabarti 31 C.W.N. 135, Kumar Rai Vs. Baraboni Coal, A.I.R. 1935 Calcutta 36, Jemarat Ali Vs. Rahman Sardar, 17 DLR 589, Pramatha Nath Vs. Kamir Mondal, 17 DLR (SC) 392.
Lawyers Involved:
B. N. Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by A. Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record—For t..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Syed Mofazzal Hossain Vs. The Election Commissioner and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ......nder the Union Parishad and Pourashava (Election) Rules in respect of Bechali Union Parishad within the Sub-Division of Narail in the district of Jessore and the appellant contested the said election for the office of Chairman of the said Union Parishad, which was held on 21. 12. 73. The appella......the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ...... Syed Mofazzal Hossain…………...Appellant. Vs. The Election Commissioner and others……..Respondents. Judgment November 24, 1975. Result: The Appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Shah Azizur Rahman with Latifur Rahman, Advocates, instructed by B. Hossain, A..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Bangladesh Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......cree against Respondent 2, Md. Belayet Ali Khan, a Government Contractor in O. C. suit No. 59 of 1962. During the pendency of the suit, Respondent No. 1 applied to the Subordinate Judge, Rajshahi, for attachment of Rs. 25,785/- lying in deposit for due performance of contract made by the judgmen......l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Shanthanand Gir Vs. Mahant Basundevanand Gir, I.L.R. 52 All. 619 same case A.I.R. 1930, All. 225; C.V. Raghavayya Vs. Chamria Talkie Distributors and another, A.I.R. 1958 Andhra Pradesh 31. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by A. W. Mallick, A..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for expeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......ent of the Coal Controller at Patenga. Appellant Sarwaruddin of Appeal No. 29 is an Inspector in the office of Coal Controller. As per agreement between the stockist firm and the Coal Controller, the former was to deliver coal on permits issued by the latter. A Permit No. 63/3138 for fifteen hundred......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for expeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......ult: The appeals are dismissed. Cases Referred to- Raja Huq Newaz V. Mohd. Afzal, 19 DLR (SC) 369; Muhammad Vs. Muzammel Khan, PLD 1967 (SC) 317, Gianchand Vs. State, 1968 Pakistan Criminal Law Journal (SC) 764, R.P. Kapur Vs. State, AIR 1960 (SC) 866, M.S. Khawaja Vs. State, 17 DLR (SC) 1..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 225
Abdur Razzaque & anr Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......der dated 24-2-75 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 330 of 197 3.) Judgment: Ahsanuddin Chowdhury, J.—In this appeal by special leave the point for consideration whether there has been a proper compliance of the requirements of section 342, Cr......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......Appellants. Vs. The State............................Respondent Judgment Jan. 14, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Aleem-Al-Razee, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Rccord.&mda..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
The Com. of Income-tax Chittagong zone, Ctg. Vs. M/s Everett Orient Line Corpn, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ght in so far it allowed the three assessees' initial depreciation under s. 10(2)(vi) of the Act. We find no reason to interfere. All the three appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......n-resident shipping companies. Their registrations are in the United States of America. The Companies received some of their incomes in the then Pakistan by their ships touching Pakistan ports for loading and unloading cargoes. 3. The respondents were assessed to income tax by th......ght in so far it allowed the three assessees' initial depreciation under s. 10(2)(vi) of the Act. We find no reason to interfere. All the three appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......sp; 1948 A.C. 422, and Davigdor Goldsmid Vs. Inland Revenue Commissioners 1953 A.C. 347 Income Tax, Madras Vs. Mir Mohammad Ali 1964 (53) ITR, 165; Abdul Wahab Vs. The Crown, 7 DLR (FC) 87. Lawyers Involved: A. W. Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by A.M. Khan C..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 134
Government of Bangladesh & ors Vs. M/s. Samir & Co, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ct, and therefore no question of irregular exercise of jurisdiction does arise in this case. The result therefore is that this appeal is dismissed but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......tration Act. This appeal was filed by Pakistan and two of its officers and is now being prosecuted by Bangladesh. 2. Respondent Firm is a Government Contractor who was given earth filling work for development of the site for construction of the Telephone Factory at Tongi on the basis of an ag......ct, and therefore no question of irregular exercise of jurisdiction does arise in this case. The result therefore is that this appeal is dismissed but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......t Davarc Vs. Bala Chandra Ganesh Thakur, reported in A.I.R. 1931 Bom 539; The Governor General of India in Council Vs. Bilas Singh, and Nalini Ranjan Guha Vs. Union of India, A.I.R. 1954 Cal. 462. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Additional Attorney-General, with Mahmudul Islam, Assistant..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 258
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone Vs. M/s. Gulistan Cinema Co., 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....urally. from them, it is neither arbitrary nor capricious. There is hardly any to disturb this finding of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ce under section 66(2) of the Income-Tax Act. 2. The assessee Gulistan Cinema Co., Dacca, an unregistered firm of exhibitor of Cinema films submitted the return of income of their business for the assessment year 1960-61. They claimed deductions under section 10(2) of the Act, a sum of ......urally. from them, it is neither arbitrary nor capricious. There is hardly any to disturb this finding of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Provincial Library Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax East Pakistan, PLD 1958 (S.C.) 81; Harjina & Co. (Pak) Ltd., Karachi Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) P.L.D. 1963 Karachi, 996. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Chowdhury, Sr. Advocate, instructed by Mr. A. M. Khan Chowdhur..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 126
Ayub Ali Howladar Vs. Election Tribunal Bagerhat, Khulna and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... in this Division. We do not find any error in the conclusion of the Tribunal, nor in the decision of the High Court Division. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs. Ed. ......id votes as valid in favour of the appellant. After excluding invalid votes, he found the margin between the respondent Nani Chandra and the appellant 38, which was less than the invalid votes cast for the appellant. He therefore concluded that the result of the election was materially affected f...... in this Division. We do not find any error in the conclusion of the Tribunal, nor in the decision of the High Court Division. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs. Ed. ......n Tribunal Bagerhat, Khulna and others…...Respondents Judgment Nov. 20, 1975. Lawyers Involved: Fazlul Karim, Advocate instructed by SS Huda, Advocate- on- Record- For th..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 101
Golam Hafez Mia Vs. Khadem Ali Meah, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....s of the arrival of the records in the court below, shall be dismissed with cost. The cost of this appeal shall abide the result of the suit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 311. ......ond Appeal No. 1114 of 1997). Judgment Kemaluddin Hossain J.- In this appeal interpretation of some of the provisions of the Public Demands Recovery Act, 1913 are involved. Facts material for the appeal are that dispute between plaintiff appellant, Golam Hafez Mia, and defendant respon......s of the arrival of the records in the court below, shall be dismissed with cost. The cost of this appeal shall abide the result of the suit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 311. ......nda Mallik, 9 DLR 57; Purna Chandra Vs. Dinabandhu Mukherjee I.L.R. 34 Cal 811; Abtabur Rahman Vs. Madan Mia, 19 DLR 333; Tarangini Debi 19 DLR 57; Keramat Ali Vs. Mohammad Yunus, 15 DLR (SC) 130. Lawyers Involved: M. Nurullah, Advocate, instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the App..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
963962961958957956955954953950949947946945944943942941939938