Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Amir Sultan Ali Hyder Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... not be binding on the Courts below. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. We, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295.......and of good character, would become the Mutwalli. After the death of the said wakf, Amir Ali Mia became the Mutwalli. He died OH Aril 5, 1967. Five days later, on April 10, 1967 the appellant applied for enrolling himself as Mutwalli. 3. On the same day the respondent No 1, Md. Khurshed Alam, ha...... not be binding on the Courts below. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. We, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295....... Board reported in (1949) 1 DLR 81; Ramjan Khan vs. Obaidul Huq.reported in (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 57; and Shahzada Muhammad Umar Beg vs. Sultan Mahmood Khan and another; reported in PLD 1970-SC 139. Lawyers Involved: M.H. Khondker, Advocate, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record—For the..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 182
Nuruzzaman Chowdhury Vs. Asrarul Hoque Chowdhury and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....e appeal as per judgment dated 22-6-1966. The accounting will be made according to the directions given by the High Court in its judgment. In the result the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ted as follows:—Respondent Nos. 1 to 14 filed under rules 7 and 9 of Order XXXIV of the Code of Civil Procedure, a suit being O/S No. 49 of 1945 in the Second Court of Subordinate Judge, Chittagong for redemption of a kot-mortgage. Their case was that MohaÂmmad Ashraf Chowdhury, their predecessor......e appeal as per judgment dated 22-6-1966. The accounting will be made according to the directions given by the High Court in its judgment. In the result the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......KM Subhan J Nuruzzaman Chowdhury…………………………………….Appellant Vs. Asrarul Hoque Chowdhury and others……………...Respondents. Judgement April 7, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Mozammel Hoque, Senior Advocate, instructed, by Abdur Rab-II, AdvoÂcate-on-Rec..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Mannujan Begum Vs. A. Samad Molla & others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... unsustainable. The appeal is, therefore, allowed and the orders of stay passed by the learned Sub Ordinate Judge are set aside. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ned by the appellant against Respondent No. 1 and 2 was stayed. 2. The appellant instituted a suit in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Khulna being Title Suit No. 1000 of 1966 for specific performance of a contract for sale of land against Respondents No. 1 and 2, the t...... unsustainable. The appeal is, therefore, allowed and the orders of stay passed by the learned Sub Ordinate Judge are set aside. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......llip;…………………..Appellant. Vs. A. Samad Molla & others................... Respondents. Judgment Nov. 24, 1976 Lawyers Involved: Nizamuddin Haider, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record&m..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Md. Shaukat Ali Mia Vs. Administrator of Wakfs and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....r of Wakfs, for its disposal in the manner indicated above, and in accordance with law. The costs of this appeal shall abide the result of proceeding before the Administrator. Ed. ......ppellant from the office of mutwalli. Facts are that the respondent 2, Abdul Quader, brother of the appellant, submitted an application on.27.12-67, to the Administrator of Wakfs, praying for his removal from the Mutwalliship of the Wakf Estate created by Khan Saheb Emdad Ali, and also ......r of Wakfs, for its disposal in the manner indicated above, and in accordance with law. The costs of this appeal shall abide the result of proceeding before the Administrator. Ed. ......lip;…………….. Appellant. Vs. Administrator of Wakfs and others ……….....Respondent. Judgment May 31, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, with Zahir, Advocate & Md. Akkas..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
The State Vs. Fazu Kazi alias Kazi Fazlur RahÂman and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....boration thereof. It is not, however, necessary that independent evidence by itself should be sufficient to sustain a conviction. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ...... feelings between Dr. Abdus Salam (deceased) on one hand and accused Azizur Rahman and respondent Golam Rabbani and their supporters or the other. Accused Azizur Rahman become Chairman of the aforesaid Union Council by defeating Dr. Abdus Salam but Dr. Salam was trying to become Ch...... In the other case, appellant Maqbool Hossain was tried along with Yasin Ahmed, Ghulam Yasin and another for an attempt to bribe a Tahsilder of Multan. The offence was punishable under Martial Law Regulation No. 30 read with Regulation No. 5. Maqbool Hussain was sentenced to five ye......thers .................Respondents. Judgment March 9, 1977 Cases Referred to- Joygun Bibi State (1960) 12 DLR (SC) 157, Moqbul Hossain Vs. State 12 DLR (SC) 217. Lawyers Involved: Sultan Hossain Khan. Deputy Attorney General with B. B. Roy Chowdhury, Ass..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Afsar Ali Moral Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... to transportation for life under section 364 B.P.C. In our view the sentence passed should be read as one passed under section 303/109 B.PC instead of under Section 364 B.P. Code. Ed. ......an, Senior Advocate with Md. Abdur Rahim, Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Abu Bakkar, Advocate on-Record.—For Petitioner. Not Represented—Respondent. Petition for special leave to Appeal No. 22 of 1976. (From the judgment and order dated 4.9.1975 pa...... to transportation for life under section 364 B.P.C. In our view the sentence passed should be read as one passed under section 303/109 B.PC instead of under Section 364 B.P. Code. Ed. ...... The State............ Respondent Judgment January 20, 1977. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate with Md. Abdur Rahim, Advocate, Supreme Court, ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Fakhruddin Mia and other Vs. Mohammad Khodabaksh Sheikh, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....th as second appellate court and a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circumstances. With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......nvolved: Abdur Rahman Advocate, instructed by B. C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. B, Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Special leave to appeal No. 153 of 1977. ( From the judgment and order dated the 9th No......th as second appellate court and a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circumstances. With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Mia and other.........................Petitioners. Vs. Mohammad Khodabaksh Sheikh... ……………Respondent Judgment June 30, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rahman Advocate, instructed by B. C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record&mdas..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
K. M. Zaker Hossain Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ion and as such there was no question of prejudice. There is, therefore, no question of law which calls for our interference. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Senior Advocate with Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed instructed by A. Rob - (2) Advocate-on-Record—For the petitioner. Not represented— For the Respondents. Criminal Petition for Special leave to Appeal No.5 of 1977 (From the Judgment and Order dated 27 th August, 19......ion and as such there was no question of prejudice. There is, therefore, no question of law which calls for our interference. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ya J Fazle Munim J K. M. Zaker Hossain................Petitioner Vs. The State.............................Respondent Judgment Feb. 21, 1977. Lawyers Involved: T. Ali, Senior Advocate with Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed instructed by A. R..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Mansur Ali Vs. Bangladesh and another, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... For the reasons we allow the appeal, set aside the orders of the High Court Division, accept the reference of the Sessions Judge Dacca, and quash the proceedings. Ed. ......; Judgment Kemaluddin Hossain J.- In this appeal the question of law involved is, whether the appellant who is a government officer and therefore a public servant and was on deputation on foreign service basis to serve the Chittaranja......der section 197 of Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. The facts giving rise to the question of law are that, consequent on certain allegations made against the Chittaranjan Cotton Mills Limited, Martial Law Order No. 104 of 1960 was promulgated by the Zonal Martial Law Administrator of East Pa......r............... Respondent Judgment February 23, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Md. Ansar Ali, Advocate, instructed by Md. A. Aziz, Advocate-on-Record&md..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Abdur Rahim Afroze Vs. B. C. Aga and Co. Ltd. and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....therefore, jurisdiction to enter upon arbitration on his appointment and the award made by him was not void. In the result the appeal is dismissed withÂout, however, any order as to costs. Ed. ......l No. 133 of 1965 affirming the judgment and decree passed by the Subordinate Judge, First Court, Chittagong in other suit No. 17 of 1958 in terms of an award. 2. The circumstances leading to the aforesaid suit are as follows B. C. Aga & Co. (hereinafter called the respondent) while carrying on b......therefore, jurisdiction to enter upon arbitration on his appointment and the award made by him was not void. In the result the appeal is dismissed withÂout, however, any order as to costs. Ed. ......houdhury J Abdur Rahim Afroze.......................................Appellant Vs. B. C. Aga and Co. Ltd. and others…………………… Respondents Judgment February 18, 1975. Lawyers Involved: S. R. Pal. Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Abdur Rab, (absent) Ad..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Punjab Ali Pramanik and others Vs. Mohd. Mokarram Hossain, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....er to set aside the sale. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) (1977) 185. ...... Sathiaram Nayar, AIR 1970 Kerala 95 ; Shyamlal Purchit Vs. Jagannath Roy, AIR 1969 Cal. 424; Charanjit Lai Chowdhury, Vs. Union of India AIR 1951 S.C. 14; Shaw & Sons (Salford) Ltd. Vs. Shaw, (1935) 2 K.B. 113 C.A.; Hanumat Gouda Vs. Chichi Giri Gouda Yogan Gouda.&......er to set aside the sale. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) (1977) 185. ......li AIR 1933 Mad. 635; Basanta Kumar vs. Mihirlal AIR 1968. Cal. 604; Manilal Mohan Lai vs. Sajdu Ahmad AIR. 1954 SC 349; S.M. Yousuf and another Vs. Kh. Hafizur Rahman and others 36 DLR 124. Lawyers Involved: Syed A.N.M. Nasiruddin, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. M.H. K..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Bangladesh and another Vs. M/S. A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....show its lawful authority to dispossess forcibly the company from the property upon an alleged plea of cancellation of the lease. For these reasons this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e, instructed by S.S.Hoda. Advocate-on-Record.—For the Respondent No. 1. Not represented—Respondent Nos. 2—8. Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 73 of 1977. (From the Judgment and Order dated the 24th Nov......show its lawful authority to dispossess forcibly the company from the property upon an alleged plea of cancellation of the lease. For these reasons this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......p;……………Petitioners. Vs. M/S. A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others................. Respondents Judgment April 12, 1977. Lawyers Involved: K. A. Bakr Attorney-General, A. Wadud Bhuiyan, Assistant Attorney-General,..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Kumar Ram Narain Roy Chowdhury & anr. Vs. Sonatannessa Bibi & ors., 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....e, is that the appeal is allowed, and the order of the Subordinate Judge dated 31-5-75 is set aside. There shall not however be any order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......ivision refusing to interfere, in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction, with an order of a Subordinate Judge setting aside an order previously made by his predecessor, issuing a commission for examination of two witnesses in India. 2. The appellants have instituted a suit in ......e, is that the appeal is allowed, and the order of the Subordinate Judge dated 31-5-75 is set aside. There shall not however be any order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ........................ Respondents Judgment April 15, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Faqeer Abdul Mannan, Advocate with M.B. Rahman Advocate, instructed by S.M..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Mosharraf Hossain Vs. Bangladesh Jute InÂdustries Corporation and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....gned order has anything to do with the non-suiting of the plaintiff, if he has an arguable case on merit. For these reasons we find no merit in this petition. It is dismissed. Ed. ...... Lawyers Involved: Ahmad Sobhan, Senior Advocate, instructed by S.M. Huq. Advocate-on-Record.—For petitioner. Not represented—For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No.57 of 1977. (From the Judgment and Order dated the 28th Jan......gned order has anything to do with the non-suiting of the plaintiff, if he has an arguable case on merit. For these reasons we find no merit in this petition. It is dismissed. Ed. ......titioner. Vs. Bangladesh Jute Industries Corporation and others…………………Respondents Judgment March 2, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Ahmad Sobhan, Senior Advocate, instructed by S.M. Huq. Advocate-on-Record...Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Haji Abdul Motalib Sowdagar Vs. Faiz Ahmed ChowÂdhury and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ejecting civil petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 141 of 1975. The Courts below were right in rejecting the petitioner's plea. There is no substance in this petition which is dismissed. Ed. ......ker, Senior Advocate — For the Petitioner. Mian Abdul Gafur, Advocate, instructed by B.C. Pandey, Advocate-on-Record. Md. A. Aziz, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 36 of 1977. (From the Judgment and Order dated 7-1-77 passed by t......ejecting civil petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 141 of 1975. The Courts below were right in rejecting the petitioner's plea. There is no substance in this petition which is dismissed. Ed. ...... PLD 1957 Dacca 372; A. Motaleb vs. Mst. Rezia 22 DLR (SC) 134; Ellis & Sons vs. Sisman, 1948(1) All, E.R. 461 and Eastend Dwellings Co. Ltd. vs. Finsbury Borough Council 1951(1) All E.R, 587. Lawyers Involved: M, H. Khandker, Senior Advocate — For the Petitioner. Mian Abdul Gafur, Ad..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Nurun Nabi Mondal and others Vs. Joynal Abedin Khondkar & ors, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; ...... Keri Kolitani, LR 7 IA 115: ILR 5 Cal. 776; 19 WR 367—13 BLR 1 (FB). Lawyers Involved: Md. Golam Rabbani, Advocate, instructed by B. C. Panday, Advocate-on-record—for the Appellants. Md. Yasin, Advocate instructed by Md. A. Aziz, Advocate-on-record—......nbsp; ......Mst. Kausilla, AIR 1932 All. 617; Union Bank Ltd., Vs. Mst. Ram Rati, AIR 1954 All. 595; Maniram Kolita vs. Keri Kolitani, LR 7 IA 115: ILR 5 Cal. 776; 19 WR 367—13 BLR 1 (FB). Lawyers Involved: Md. Golam Rabbani, Advocate, instructed by B. C. Panday, Advocate-on-recor..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Ashraf Ali Sikdar and another Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....e instant case falls within the ambit of a special enactment, namely, the Bangladesh Scheduled Offences (Special Tribunals) Order, 1972. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......der dated 24-06-74 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 297 of 1973) Judgment Ahsanuddin Choudhury J.- In this appeal by special leave the point for consideration is whether the trial held against the appellants for an offence under Article 2(......e instant case falls within the ambit of a special enactment, namely, the Bangladesh Scheduled Offences (Special Tribunals) Order, 1972. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. .......................... Respondent Judgment June 14, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Md. Meser Ali, Senior Advocate, instructed by Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Reco..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Bangladesh Vs. M/s. Sree Kundeswari Aushadhalaya, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....uestion any further. For the reasons, we find no merit in these appeals and they are dismissed, but having regard to the facts and circumstances of the matter, we make no order as to costs. Ed. ......ndeswari Aushadhalaya………...Respondent (In Appeal No. 13 of 1975) M/s. Sakti Aushadhalaya (P) Ltd………………………………Respondent (In Appeal No. 24 of 1976) Mr. M.A. Quddus for M/s. Ayurvedic Kutir .......Respondent (In Appeal No. 25 of 1975) Judgment February 2, 1......uestion any further. For the reasons, we find no merit in these appeals and they are dismissed, but having regard to the facts and circumstances of the matter, we make no order as to costs. Ed. ......¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Respondent (In Appeal No. 24 of 1976) Mr. M.A. Quddus for M/s. Ayurvedic Kutir .......Respondent (In Appeal No. 25 of 1975) Judgment February 2, 1977. Lawyers Involved: K A Bakar, Attorney-General with M/S Sultan Hossain Khan, Deputy Attorney-Gener..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 137
Abul Hayat Choudhury Vs. Nurul Amin and ors., 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....pondent Nos. 13, 14 and 15 is set aside, but the order relating to the election of Respondent No. 2 is not interfered with Respondent No. 1 shall bear the costs of this appeal. Ed. ......hy;tution by which a judgment of the Election Tribunal declaring the election of the appellant as Chairman of the Union Parishad void at the instance of Respondent No. 1, who was a contestant for the office of the Vice-Chairman of the said Parishad. 2. The facts relevant for the purp......pondent Nos. 13, 14 and 15 is set aside, but the order relating to the election of Respondent No. 2 is not interfered with Respondent No. 1 shall bear the costs of this appeal. Ed. ..........................................Respondents Judgment December 8, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmad, Md. Abdur Rouf, Advocate Khademul Islam Chowdh..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 141
Mohiuddin Khan and others Vs. Pakistan River Steamer Ltd. and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....eral provision and as such valid and lawful. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed, but in the circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ent No. 1, and incorporated Company engaged in carrying passengers and cargoes by steamers, under Article 98 of the then Constitution of Pakistan, 1962. 2. The appellants who were formerly employees of the Respondent Company were retrenched by the Respondent Company in pursuance......eral provision and as such valid and lawful. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed, but in the circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......unim J Mohiuddin Khan and others......................Appellants. Vs. Pakistan River Steamer Ltd. and others. ...Respondents Judgment January 4, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab-1, Advocate on Record—For the appellants. Kazi Sha..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 138