Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6421-6440 of 8262 results.
G. M. Majid Vs. Amjad Hossain Lablu and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... of the aforesaid criminal case. There is therefore no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 268. .......7.2001 under section 5(1) of the Anti Corruption Act, 1947 and sections 407, 408 and 409 of the Penal Code now pendÂing before the court of the learned Special Judge, Jessore. 2. The prosecution case, in short, is that the complainant petitioner, G.M. Majid, filed a petition before the Senior S...... of the aforesaid criminal case. There is therefore no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 268. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 81
Md. Rezaul Karim Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ect decision. There is, therefore, no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 266. ......2006 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Suo Moto Rule No. 3196 of 2005 issued in Criminal Appeal No. 3128 of 2004 against the petitioner, the Investigating Officer in the case, Md. Rezaul Karim, making the Rule absolute directing for taking stern action against him. ......ect decision. There is, therefore, no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 266. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
State Vs. Md. Abdur Rahim, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....een correctly sifted. In the result, there being no substance in this criminal petition, the same is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 263. ......nviction and sentence. The Reference and appeals were heard together and disposed of by a single judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court Division. 3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 21-06-1998 at about 4.00 p. m. while, the informant (PW.1) Shahnaj Parv......een correctly sifted. In the result, there being no substance in this criminal petition, the same is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 263. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Md. Kamruzzaman alias Rentu Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ation by 15 days. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 261. ......ntencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 2 (two) years and also to pay a fine of Tk. 3,000/-, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for 3 (three) months more. 2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 10-01-1999 at about 23.45 p. m. one Sri Asit Kumar Pramanik, A. S.I., D......ation by 15 days. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 261. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Dr. Hafizur Rahman and another Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....y;stance in this petition and find no other alternative but to dismiss the same. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 258. ......al has been filed against the judgment and order dated 17-01-2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.7242 of 2001 discharging the Rule. The case was filed seeking quashing of the proceedings of G.R. Case No. 382 of 2000 of the Court of Me......y;stance in this petition and find no other alternative but to dismiss the same. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 258. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Alhaj Mostafizur Rahman Vs. Rezaul Hoque, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....osal of the rule. There is, therefore, no warrant in law to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 255. ......ssed by the Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Noakhali in Civil Revision Case No. 4 of 2005 affirming order dated 12.1.2005 passed by the Joint District Judge, 2nd Court, Noakhali in violation case under Order 39, Rule 3(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure being Miscellaneous Case No. 30 of 20......4. Accordingly Diara Khatian Nos. 77 and 78 of Sonapur Mouza, Noakhali were prepared and recorded in their names. Plaintiff-petitioner and his wife Mst. Monowara Khanam, purchased .57 acres of land from plot Nos. 466, 467 and 469 from different recorded tenants between 1991 and 1995 and got ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Abdul Karim Vs. Md. Nurul Islam and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....orrect decision. There is, therefore, no warrant in law to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 252. ......of 2000 allowing the Pre-emption. 2. The respondent No. 1 as pre-emptor filed pre-emption Case No. 37 of 2000 in the Court of the learned Assistant Judge, Madhupur, Tangail on 25.6.2000. The case of the pre-emptor respondent No.1 Md. Nurul Islam, in brief, is that the jote in C.S. Khatian ......rned Assistant Judge, Madhupur, Tangail on 25.6.2000. The case of the pre-emptor respondent No.1 Md. Nurul Islam, in brief, is that the jote in C.S. Khatian No. 168, Plot No. 1326 along with other land in the said Khatian measuring 10-48 acres of land belonged to Loknath Coach. Loknath Coac..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Abdul Mannan Vs. Md. Sohrab Hossain & others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....t find any substance in this petition. The petition is dismissed with cost of Tk. 5, 000/- (five thousand) Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 250. ......at the pre-emptor filed Miscellaneous Case No. 4 of 1998 in the Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Mathbaria, Pirojpur under Section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act for pre-emption of the case land as described in the schedule of the Miscellaneous Petition stating, inter alia, that he i......e pre-emptor filed Miscellaneous Case No. 4 of 1998 in the Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Mathbaria, Pirojpur under Section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act for pre-emption of the case land as described in the schedule of the Miscellaneous Petition stating, inter alia, that he is a c..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Sanat Kumar Dhar and others Vs. Aminul Haque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....fresh. Since the grounds taken in the review petition in no way are the grounds of review of a judgment, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 248. ......Court and thereupon sent back the suit to the trial Court for fresh trial. It was noticed by us that the High Court Division having satisfied that there were sufficient materials to dispose of the case on merit and that to avoid prolongation of the litigation went for consideration of the materi......fresh. Since the grounds taken in the review petition in no way are the grounds of review of a judgment, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 248. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Md. Delwar Hossain Akter & another Vs. Md. Nazrul Islam Khan & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... is no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 242 ; 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 265. ...... defendants refused to do so. Hence is this suit. 3. The defendant Nos.1-3 contested, the suit by filing a joint written statement denying the material allegations made in the plaint. Their case, in short, is that one Azizunnessa was in adverse possession of the suit land for more than 12...... Short facts are that the plaintiffs filed Title Suit No.86 of 1991 in the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka for declaration of title and recovery of khas possession in the suit land as described in the schedule of the plaint stating, inter alia, that the suit land belonged to..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Md. Ziarat Hossain Vs. Md. Jaher Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 239. ...... and/or that the plaintiff was in possession of the suit land prior to the alleged dispossession by the defendants on 15.10.1998. The High Court Division further found that in order to succeed in a case under section 9 of the Specific Relief Act the plaintiff has to prove his possession of the su...... No. 346 of 1998 decreeing in the suit. 2. The plaintiff/petitioner filed the above suit under section 9 of the Special Relief Act praying for restoration of the possession of the suit land on the averments that the suit land originally belonged to Abdul Molla, Sabdul Molla and Jabdu..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Md. Abdul Muttalib Vs. Md. Abdul Wahab, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 237. ......land. When the plaintiff went to the Local Revenue Office to get his name mutated, he learnt that in his kabala dated 24.12.1981 in place of Plot No.193 Plot No.194 was wrongly written. The further case is that the defendant No.1 created a kabala deed dated 21.04.1988 showing transfer of .5 &frac......udge, Jhenidah for a declaration that the registered deed dated 24.03.1988 being No.2969 of 1988 is forged, collusive, inoperative and not binding upon the plaintiffs alleging, inter alia, that the land appertaining to C.S. Khatian No. 320, S.A. Khatian No. 402, Plot No. 193 measuring an area of ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Wali Miah Sodagor Jame Masjid and Madrasha Vs. Abdul Hoque and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ach the High Court Division for early disposal of the Rule, if they so desire. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 234. .......2003 which on transfer was registered as Title Suit No.43 of 2003 in the Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Sadar, Noakhali against the defendant Nos.1 and 2 for permanent injunction. 3. The case of the plaintiff is that one Abdul Latif Mia while owning and possessing his properties......ed 06.03.1944. Accordingly Diara Khatian Nos. 77 and 78 of Sonapur Mouza, District-Noakhali were prepared and recorded in their names. Mostafizur Rahman, proforma defendant purchased 0.57 acres of land from Plot Nos.466, 467, 468 and 469 from different recorded tenants between 1991 and 1995. Whi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Md. Fazlur Rahman and others Vs. Haji Md. Manir Khan and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioners. Accordingly, the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (200) 231. ...... suit land in schedule-I and confirmation of possession in respect of land described in schedule II and for recovery of khas possession in respect of lands described in schedule III. 3. The case of the plaintiff-respondents, in brief, is that the suit land originally belonged to Ramesh C......nts as plaintiff on 12.09.1973 filed the Title Suit No. 223 of 1973 (renumbered as Title Suit No. 8 of1978) before the learned Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court, Sylhet for declaration title in the suit land in schedule-I and confirmation of possession in respect of land described in schedule II and ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Harich Ahmed Vs. Wali Ullah and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... judgment of the High Court Division calling for interference by this Division. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 228. ......nal Assistant Judge, Sadar, Noakhali in Title Suit No. 168 of 1989 decreeing the same with a direction to the defendant to make over possession of the land in suit in favour of the plaintiff and in case of default by the defendant to make over possession the plaintiff would be entitled to g......d January 26, 1994 of the 3rd Court of Additional Assistant Judge, Sadar, Noakhali in Title Suit No. 168 of 1989 decreeing the same with a direction to the defendant to make over possession of the land in suit in favour of the plaintiff and in case of default by the defendant to make over pos&sh..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Nazma Ahmed and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... impugned judgment does not call for our interference. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 224. ...... Mr. M. I. Farooqui, learned Counsel submits, inter alia that service of notice for enlistment of a building in the list of abandoned property is a condition precedent and that in the instant case there being no service of such notice the enlistment of the property as abandoned property is......sion in Writ Petition No. 6187 of 2000 discharging the rule. 2. The petitioners instituted Writ Petition No. 6187 of 2000 stating, inter alia, that one Mrs. Rasheda Ashfaq took lease of the land measuring 19 katha and 7 satak at Plot No.5, Block-NW(D), Road 58, Gulshan Model Town, Dhaka f..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Hazera Begum Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....igh Court Division is therefore erratic and perverse. The appeal is therefore allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 220. ......igh Court Division is therefore erratic and perverse. The appeal is therefore allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 220. ......igh Court Division is therefore erratic and perverse. The appeal is therefore allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 220. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 111
BFDC Vs. The Chairman, First Labour Court, Dhaka and another, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....cussion we find no merit in the petitions. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed on condonation of delay. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 217. ...... (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Abdul Matin J Bangladesh Film Development Corporation, Tejgaon, Dhaka.......Petitioner (In all cases) Vs. The Chairman, First Labour Court, Dhaka and another......Respondents (In a......cussion we find no merit in the petitions. Accordingly, these petitions are dismissed on condonation of delay. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 217. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Bangladesh Vs. Kopil Das, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ground of the discussion made hereinabove we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 214. ......ground of the discussion made hereinabove we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 214. ......n of the Ministry of Land relating to de-requisition of the house in question. 3. Facts in short are that a tin-shed semi pucca house consisting of 3 (three) rooms on an area of 0.06 acre of land within the Sylhet Municipality belonged to Kiron Behari Das, son of Krishna Bihari Das a..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Bishwanath Baishnath and others Vs. Narayan Chandra Baishnab, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ound of the discussions made hereinbefore we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 211. ......to the plaint claiming 1.24 acres of land from schedule 1, .82 acre of land from schedule No.2, .50 acre of land from schedule No.3 and .73 acre of land from schedule 4. 3. Plaintiffs case is that land measuring 10.22 acres owned by Tin Kari in 4 annas share, Brindaban Baishnab in 4......decree dated September 28, 1988 of the Court of Assistant Judge, Kalkini Upazila, Madaripur in Title Suit No.401 of 1984 decreeing the same in preliminary form allotting saham for .46 acre of land out of 1.24 acre in respect of the land described in the schedule No.1, .81 2/3 acre of land i..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
25762575257425732572257125702569256825662565256425632562256125602559255825572556