Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6521-6540 of 8151 results.
Badal Chandra Das and others Vs. Amena Khatun, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... No infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division could be pointed out for our interference. In that view of this, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Badal Chandra Das and others .........Appellants Vs. Amena Khatun .............................Respondent Judgment April 5, 2005. Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advo......cate-on-Record- For the Appellants. Sultan Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 68 of 2004 (From the Judgment and Order dated 12th November 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2468 of 2001..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Kazi Muhammad Khokon Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ellip;……………………………………….Petitioner Vs Deputy Secretary (Registration) Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Secretar...... Lawyers Involved: Abu Sayeed, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-For the Respondents. Civil Review Petition No. 60 of 2005 (From the judgment and Order dated February 2, 2005 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Petition for Leave to Appea..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Sree Girish Chandra Barman Vs. Md. Yasin Ali and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ion of materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. 9. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ip;………Petitioner Vs. Md. Yasin Ali and other ……………………Respondent Judgment May 7, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate, with Probir Neogi, Advocate, instructed b......ion of materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. 9. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Humayun Kabir Khan Vs. Md. Nurul Haque & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....of the view that the High Court Division erred in law in not assessing the evidence properly and thereby discharging the Rule. The appeal is accordingly allowed without costs. Ed. ......n J Humayun Kabir Khan …………........Appellant Vs Md. Nurul Haque & others ...........Respondents Judgment November 28, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Hurunur Rashid, Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-F......of the view that the High Court Division erred in law in not assessing the evidence properly and thereby discharging the Rule. The appeal is accordingly allowed without costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Mokbul Hossain (Md) Vs. Government of BanglaÂdesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ng the appeal. 2. The case of the appellant, in short, is that he joined as Technical Inspector of Food on 28-7-1981. While serving as such he was placed under suspension on 17-11-1981. In a Martial Law Case he was convicted and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and t...... others..................Respondents Judgment August 9, 2006. Cases Referred To- Monoranjan Mukherjee vs Election Commission and others, 1990 BLD 17 = 41 DLR 484. Lawyers Involved: Dr. M Zahir, Senior Advocate, instructed by Amir Hossain Chowdhury, Advoca...... Appellate Tribunal did not consider the matter in its proper perspective and accordingly, arrived at a wrong decision. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 132
Commissioner of Customs and others Vs. Mohammad Ali, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....s illegal and without any legal basis. 7. Accordingly, we do not find any substance in the appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ........Appellants Vs. Mohammad Ali................Respondent Judgment April 19, 2007. Cases Referred To- Bangladesh Vs. Mizanur Rahman, 52 DLR (AD) 149. Lawyers Involved: MA Azim Khair, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advoca......s illegal and without any legal basis. 7. Accordingly, we do not find any substance in the appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Khan Md. Firoj Kabir Vs. Rupali Bank Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ....... Md. Tahed Ali, 47 DLR 326; Messrs Adamjee Jute Mills Ltd vs. Chairman 3rd Labour Court 39 DLR 11; Lal Mamud Vs. Siraj Miah 45 DLR 638; Afsaruddin Ahmed Vs Banque Indosuez, 44 DLR (AD) 136. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. ......en statement the plaintiff on 14-5-98 filed an application praying that the suit be fixed for ex parte hearing as the defendants did not file any written statement within two months as provided in Order VIII, rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The defendants, on the same day, also filed an a..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Arif A. Shekha and others Vs. Secretary, Ministry of IndusÂtries and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and hence the three appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 91. ....... Government of Bangladesh, 27 DLR 551; Government of Bangladesh Vs. Mirza Shahab Ispahani, 40 DLR (AD) 116; Government of Bangladesh vs. Messrs ATJ Industries Limited and others, 28 DLR (AD) 120. Lawyers Involved: Khondaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Dr. M Zahir, Senior Advocate with......hts at Tejgaon Industrial Area through its appointed directors, managers, officers and executives at all relevant times. By notification No.186-61 dated 31-12-1971 passed under the Acting President's Order No. SEC-XIIM-35/71/17 dated 30-12-1971 the company was placed under a Management Board. By a n..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Shahid Hossain Khan (Md) Vs. Abdul Bashed Lashkar and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... decree of permanent injunction. 15. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ......udgment July 17, 2006. Cases Referred To- Buchanen vs Wasley, 245 US 60 at p. 74; Rajahmundry Electronic Supply Corporation vs State of Andhra, (1954) SCR 779 at p. 780. Lawyers Involved: AF Hasan Ariff, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mvi Md Wahidullah, Advocate......ocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No.1. Not represented—Respondent Nos. 2-13. Civil Appeal No. 8 of 2003. (From the Judgment and Order dated July 17, 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 876 of 2002). ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 216
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdur Razzak and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....17. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any grounds to interfere with the impugned judgement and order. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......in J Bangladesh...........................................Appellant Vs. Md. Abdur Razzak and others..................Respondents Judgment February 7, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Md. Firoz Shah, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant Dr. M Zah......17. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any grounds to interfere with the impugned judgement and order. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 117
Kadam Rosul Silicate Works and others Vs. Sonali Bank, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....is set aside. The Money ExecuÂtion case be struck off and the attachment of the apÂpellants' property shall be deemed to be withdrawn. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 294.......ed and the appellants pay an amount of tk. 2000/- to the respondent as cost within three months failing which it will bear interest at the rate of 9% till realization…… ………(10 & 12) Lawyers Involved: ABM Khairul Huque, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate-on-Record, (......absent)—For the Appellants. Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 14 of 1986. (From the Judgment and Order dated 14th SepÂtember, 1984 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Civil Revision No. 28..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 134
Jashimuddin Kanchan (Md) Vs. Md. Ali Ashraf, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....ts and decrees of the High Court DiviÂsion are set aside and those of the lower appellate Court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 289 ......n Vs. Nurannessa Chowdhury, 10 DLR 472; Delbaz Vs. Sarada Sundari Debya, 13 DLR 334; Abdullah and others Vs. Abdul Karim and others, 20 DLR (SC) 205; Ajufannessa Bibi Vs. Safar Mia 30 DLR (SC) 41. Lawyers Involved: MH. Khandkar, Senior Advocate, (AG MohamÂmad Ali, Advocate with him) inÂstruc......ts and decrees of the High Court DiviÂsion are set aside and those of the lower appellate Court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 289 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Upendra Chandra Rishi and ors. Vs. Sufia Begum and ors., 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
.....12.80 passed in Title Suit No. 789 of 1980 is set aside and the said suit is restored to its file and number. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 285; 1990 BLD (AD) 194. ......now of the ex-parte decree for the first time on 20.7.1981. the miscellaneous case having been filed on 05.08.1989, the same was not barred by limitation……………………(20 & 23) Lawyers Involved: Rafique-ul Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Recordâ......hers...........………………….………........Respondents Judgment February 25, 1990. Result: The appeal is allowed with costs. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Order V rule 17 The Civil Rules & Orders Vol. I rr. 69 & 84 (e) The service report not..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Azizul Huq @ Azizul Haque and ors. Vs. State, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....he appellants may make a prayer for bail to the High Court Division which should then consider it. This appeal is thus disposed of. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 284 ......the ad-interim bail shall cease to continue and if the appeal be not disposed of in the High Court Division fresh application may be filed before the High Court Division for bail……………….(3)Lawyers Involved: Abul Quasem, Advocate-on-Record — For the Appellants B. Hossain, Deputy Att......he appellants may make a prayer for bail to the High Court Division which should then consider it. This appeal is thus disposed of. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 284 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Managing Director, WASA Vs. Md. Ali and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ent and order of the High Court Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (AD) (2007) 185. ......hers AIR 1976 SC 2216; EFO Vs. Ram Sanchi, AIR 1973 SC 205, Virigante Navin Vs. Govt of AP and others (2001) 8 SSC 744; The Controller of Auditor Gunted of India Vs. KS Jagunath, AIR 1987 SC 53. Lawyers Involved: Md. Rafiqul Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on......ent and order of the High Court Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (AD) (2007) 185. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 100
Rabia Bhuiyan, MP Vs. Ministry of LGRD & others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ing steps taken to implement the Arsenic Policy, 2004 and the Plan. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed within directions as set out above. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......r Gaur vs. State of Haryana (1995)2 SCC 577; Vineet Narain vs Union of India, AIR 1998 SC 889; MC Mehta vs Union of India, 1999 (6) SCC 12; Dr. Mohiuddin Farooque vs Bangladesh, 55 DLR 613. Lawyers Involved: Dr Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Zahirul Islam, Advocate-o......ing steps taken to implement the Arsenic Policy, 2004 and the Plan. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed within directions as set out above. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 255
Rowshan Ara Begum Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Works and Urban Development, BD, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....in question since said property is an abandoned property. The ground contending which review of our judgment is sought merits no consideration. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......rban Development, Government of Bangladesh and others......Respondents Judgment: December 12, 2006. Case Referred To- Ministry of Works and others vs Helaluddin Ahmed, 4 MLR (AD) 140. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-...... Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented— the Respondents. Civil Review Petition No.101 of 2005 (From the Judgment and Order dated May 15, 2005 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Appeal No.1 of 1999) Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Muinuddin Zulfiquer (Md) Vs. Government of the Republic of BanÂgladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e of the judgment for review. 8. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Muinuddin Zulfiquer (Md) .................................Petitioner Vs Government of the Republic of Bangladesh.......Respondents Judgment November 29, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-R......dvocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. Not represented—The Respondents Civil Review Petition No. 47 of 2005 (From the Judgment and Order dated December 4, 2004 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Ali Hussain Faraji & others Vs. Abdul Ali Pradhania @ Abul and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....The learned Counsel could not point out any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......en J Ali Hussain Faraji & others......................Petitioner Vs. Abdul Ali Pradhania @ Abul and another.......Respondent Judgment August 15, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Nikhilesh Dutta, Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record......The learned Counsel could not point out any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Meghna PET Industries Ltd and others Vs. Md. Mostafa Kamal & others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....faulter borrowers. Accordingly, the application for dismissing the civil petition for leave to appeal Nos. 477-478 of 2005 is allowed. Both the civil petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......nother........Petitioners (In Civil Petition No. 478 of 2005) Vs. Md. Mostafa Kamal & others........Respondents (In both the cases) Judgment May 17, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Zahirul Islam, Advocat......faulter borrowers. Accordingly, the application for dismissing the civil petition for leave to appeal Nos. 477-478 of 2005 is allowed. Both the civil petitions are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 108
23412340233923382337233623332332233123302329232823272326232423232318231723122311