Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
National Tea Company Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Habiganj and ors, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Habiganj and ors .....Respondents Judgment September 6 2007. Lawyers Involved: Rafique-ul Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mvi Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J National Tea Company Ltd..........................Appellant Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Habiganj and ors .....Respondents Judgment ......eement dated March 19, 1988 was not legal and the said action was taken without lawful authority. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......eement dated March 19, 1988 was not legal and the said action was taken without lawful authority. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Harun-or-Rashid (Md.) Vs. Pubali Bank Ltd. and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....egum vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd., 5 MLR (AD) 290 = 53 DLR (AD) 9; Antibiotic Stores vs. Subordinate Judge, 55 DLR (AD) 13. Lawyers Involved: Rafique-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. AK......t: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Harun-or-Rashid (Md.)...........................Appellant Vs. Pubali Bank Ltd. and others ................Respondents Judgment ......accordingly, set aside. The appeal is accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 18. ......accordingly, set aside. The appeal is accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 18. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 157
Golam Sarwar Hiru Vs. State and other, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....Hiru....................Petitioner Vs. The State and other...........Respondents Judgment July 10, 2002. Result: The petition is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- th...... (AD) 26. ......rmity for our interference with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (AD) 103; 14 BLC (AD) 26. ......rmity for our interference with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (AD) 103; 14 BLC (AD) 26. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
State Vs. Abdul Kader alias Kada and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Karim vs. State and another, (1981) 1 BLD (AD) 200; Abdur Rashid vs. the State, 27 DLR (AD) 1. Lawyers Involved: Mohammad Ali Akand, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate- on-Record- For the appellant. Abdul Jabbar, Advocate, instructed by Muhammad Nawab All......11, 38. ......ts are directed to surrender to their respective bail bond to serve out the remaining part of their sentence awarded by the trial Court. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) 2011, 38. ......ts are directed to surrender to their respective bail bond to serve out the remaining part of their sentence awarded by the trial Court. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) 2011, 38. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Tariqul Islam Khan Vs. Mohammad Hanif & ors, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... M. Rafiul Karim & ors................................Respondents (In C. P. No.747 of 2007). Judgment October 3, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate instructed by Nurul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on- Record- For the Petitioner (In all cases)&......ling for interference by this court. 18. In the above facts and circumstances we find no merit in the leave petitions. Accordingly all the three petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......ling for interference by this court. 18. In the above facts and circumstances we find no merit in the leave petitions. Accordingly all the three petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......ling for interference by this court. 18. In the above facts and circumstances we find no merit in the leave petitions. Accordingly all the three petitions are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 199
Md. Salahuddin Khan Vs. Most. Halima Akhter Khatoon and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
............Petitioner Vs. Most. Halima Akhter Khatoon and others…................Respondents Judgment April 19, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Saleemullah Advocate, instructed by Sufi......esent: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Hassan Ameen J Md. Salahuddin Khan.............................................Petitioner Vs. Most. Halima Akhter Khatoon and others…................Respondents Judgment......ct decision. The learned counsel could not point at any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the. High Court Division so as to call for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ct decision. The learned counsel could not point at any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the. High Court Division so as to call for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Belal Hossain Vs. Kazi Jane Alam & others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
...., 2007. Result: The leave petition is dismissed. Case Referred To- Nur Mohammad vs. Badruddoza Chowdhury and another, 42 DLR (AD) 116. Lawyers Involved: A.J. Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Md. Abdul Wadud Bh......e Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Hassan Ameen J Belal Hossain.....................Petitioner Vs. Kazi Jane Alam & others .................Respondents Judgment May 8, 2007. Re......the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:......the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Abdul Awal and others Vs. Narayan Chandra Das, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Abdul Awal and others.........Petitioners Vs. Narayan Chandra Das.........Respondent Judgment August 2, 2007. Lawyers Involved: A. Y. Ahmed Ali Sardar, Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on- Record-For the Petitioners Mahmud...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Abdul Awal and others.........Petitioners Vs. Narayan Chandra Das.........Respondent Judgment August 2, 2007. Law......of justice. 10. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......of justice. 10. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Md. Suruzzman Vs. Md. Ahamed Ali and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
........Petitioner Vs. Md. Ahamed Ali and others........................ ...........Respondents Judgment May 22, 2007 Lawyers Involved: Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on Record- For the Petitioner N.H. Khandaker, Advocate-on-Record- For the Responde......ppellate Division (Civil) Present: Muhammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Suruzzman.....................................................Petitioner Vs. Md. Ahamed Ali and others........................ ...........Respondents Judgment...... the possession. 7. In view of the above, we find no substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Ed. ...... the possession. 7. In view of the above, we find no substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Md. Imdad Hossain and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....th the cases). Judgment April 22, 2007. Case Referred To- 2 BLD (AD) 16. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab Choudhury, Senior Advocate, instructed by Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners Tabarak...... M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Hassan Ameen J Mr. Md. Imdad Hossain and others ................Petitioners (In both the cases) Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, M......t no error was committed by the AAT in allowing the appeals and thereby in setting aside the judgment and order of the AT. Accordingly the petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......t no error was committed by the AAT in allowing the appeals and thereby in setting aside the judgment and order of the AT. Accordingly the petitions are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 125
State Vs. Joinal Fakir & another, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Vs. Joinal Fakir & another.........Respondents Judgment November 28, 2007 Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rouf, Deputy Attorney General. Instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Not represented- Respondent......ellate Division (Criminal) Present: M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Hassan Ameen J Md. Abdul Matin J The State......................................Petitioner Vs. Joinal Fakir & another.........Respondents Judgment November 28, 2007......sion made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......sion made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
State Vs. Md. Liton Miah @ Babu, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Liton Miah @ Babu.........Respondent Judgment July 27, 2002. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque Khan, Additional Attorney General, instructed by Md. Ahsan Ullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Not represented- For the Respondent Criminal P......ion (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J The State......................................Petitioner Vs. Md. Liton Miah @ Babu.........Respondent Judgment July 27, 2002. L......o warrant our interference. This petition is also barred by 30 (thirty) days and the explanation for condonation is not satisfactory. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......o warrant our interference. This petition is also barred by 30 (thirty) days and the explanation for condonation is not satisfactory. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Khalid Alom Chowdhury Vs. State, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....om Chowdhury......Petitioner Vs The State.........................Respondent Judgment September 2, 2007 Lawyers Involved: Khondokar Mahbub Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner &nb......n filing the revisional application. 13. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly, petition is dismissed. Ed. ......n filing the revisional application. 13. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly, petition is dismissed. Ed. ......n filing the revisional application. 13. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly, petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Messrs N. F. M. Universal Estate Ltd. Vs. A. N. M. Obaidul Islam, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.........Petitioner Vs. A. N. M. Obaidul Islam being dead his heirs: Gulshan Begum and others.........Respondents Judgment October 30, 2007 Lawyers Involved: Rafique-Ul-Huq Huq, Senior Advocate (Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate and S. M. Manir, Advocate with him) instructed...... M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Matin J Messrs N. F. M. Universal Estate Ltd. represented by its Managing Director Abdul Awal (Minto).........................Petitioner Vs. A. N. M. Obaidul Islam being dead his heirs: Gulshan Begum and others.........Respondents ......caused any failure of justice. In view of our discussions as above we find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 10. ......caused any failure of justice. In view of our discussions as above we find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 10. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Mohammad Miah Vs. Atiar Rahman Miah, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....Miah......................Petitioner Vs Atiar Rahman Miah................Respondent Judgment February 11, 2004 Lawyers Involved: Md. Lutfor Rahman Mandal, Advocate instructed by Mohd. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Not represent......sion of the suit land 8. In the circumstances, we find no legal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......sion of the suit land 8. In the circumstances, we find no legal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......sion of the suit land 8. In the circumstances, we find no legal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Md. Ujir Biswas and another Vs. Md. Karim Box Sardar & others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....itioners Vs. Md. Karim Box Sardar & others...............................Respondents Judgment February 9, 2004. Lawyers Involved: AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record- For Respon......Amin J M.M Ruhul Amin J Md. Ujir Biswas and another …………………………………… Petitioners Vs. Md. Karim Box Sardar & others...............................Respondents Judgm...... 8. The learned advocate for the petitioner could not point out legal infirmity in the judgment of the High' Court Division. 9. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... 8. The learned advocate for the petitioner could not point out legal infirmity in the judgment of the High' Court Division. 9. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Abdul Mohit and others Vs. Social Investment Bank Ltd & ors., 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Engineering Co Ltd., AIR 1992; Md. Shamsuzzaman Khan Vs. M.S. Islam and others, 28 DLR 101; Chahia Fibre Co vs. Abdul Jabbar 20 DLR (SC) 335. Lawyers Involved: Shafique Ahmed, Senior Advocate (A.K.M. Nazrul Islam, Senior Advocate and Rafiqul Islam Mehdi, Advocate with him), instruc......s ....................................Appellants (In Civil Appeal No. 93 of 2002). Major (Retd) Dr. Rezaul Haque & ors.................Appellants (In Civil Appeal No. 94 of 2002). Vs. Social Investment Bank Ltd & ors........................Respondents (In both the app......terference with the impugned order. These appeals are accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 82. ......terference with the impugned order. These appeals are accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 82. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 147
Md. Nurul Islam Bhuiyan and another Vs. Bangladesh, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
...................Respondents Judgment January 29, 2007. Cases Referred to- 16 DLR (SC) 281; 25 DLR (HC) 476. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate, appeared on behalf of Md. Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advo...... of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 11. In the aforesaid premises, we find no substance in this review petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 11. In the aforesaid premises, we find no substance in this review petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 11. In the aforesaid premises, we find no substance in this review petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Joynab Begum and others Vs. Shaheb Ali Akunji & others , 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....(AD) 153 = 2 BLC (AD) 92; Md Yeasin Khan vs. DC, Brahmanbaria 2 MLR (AD) 211 and Nurul Islam vs Amirul Islam 4 MLR (AD) 363 = 3 BLC (AD) 222. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quayum, Senior Advocate, Md Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellants. Mahbubey Alam, Senior...... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Joynab Begum and others... .....................Appellants Vs. Shaheb Ali Akunji & others ..............Respondents Judgment Apri...... Court Division being not sustainable is liable to be set aside. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 14. ...... Court Division being not sustainable is liable to be set aside. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 14. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Noor-e-Alam Jahangir (Md), English Teacher, Rifles Pub School & College Vs. BD, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....(5) Case Referred to: Mafizul Haque vs Mofizur Rahman 48 DLR (AD) 121. Lawyers involved: Md. Noor-e-Alam Jahangir—Petitioner-in-person. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 7 Not represented—Respondent Nos. 3-6...... Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Noor-e-Alam Jahangir (Md), English Teacher, Rifles Public School and College……. Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education and......or apparent on the face of the judgment sought to be reviewed. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 12. ......or apparent on the face of the judgment sought to be reviewed. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 12. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 68