Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6581-6600 of 8015 results.
Sree Amulya Ratan Chowdhury& ors Vs. Sreemati Shaibalini Ghose & ors., 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
.... 27, 1997 Cases Referred to- Hajee Abdus Sattar v. Mahiuddin & ors 38 DLR (AD) 97; Amritalal vs. Uttam Lal, AIR 1939 Calcutta 216. Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on- Record-For the Appellants (in all appea....... In view of the discussion made above we find no way but to dismiss these appeals. 17. In the result, therefore, the appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ....... In view of the discussion made above we find no way but to dismiss these appeals. 17. In the result, therefore, the appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......No. 50 of 1995) Hari Sankar Chowdhury................Appellant (In Civil Appeal No.51 of 1995) Amulya Ratan Chowdhury............Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 52 of 1995) Anil Kumar Dutta ………..Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 53of 1995) vs Sr..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Md. Umed Ali and another Vs. Mst. Hamida Khatoon and another, 1999, 28 CLC (AD)
....;...... plaintiff-Appellant Vs Mst. Hamida Khatoon and another ...................Respondent Judgment May 20,1998 Lawyers Involved: Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Ex-parte-For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No.......lorem Court fee in the trial court for the said relief within 3(three) months from date. 13. The appeal is allowed in the above terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ......lorem Court fee in the trial court for the said relief within 3(three) months from date. 13. The appeal is allowed in the above terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ......lorem Court fee in the trial court for the said relief within 3(three) months from date. 13. The appeal is allowed in the above terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Md. Sadequr Rahman Vs. Munawar Jute Mills Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lip;…Appellant vs Munawar Jute Mills Ltd. and others ......................Respondents Judgment November 10, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque, Advocate, instructed by md. Nawab Alt, Advocata-on-Record-For the Appellant Mahbubur Rahman, ......d legal basis and as such not sustainable in law. The direction for refund is not legally sustainable. 14. The appeal is thus allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......d legal basis and as such not sustainable in law. The direction for refund is not legally sustainable. 14. The appeal is thus allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......d legal basis and as such not sustainable in law. The direction for refund is not legally sustainable. 14. The appeal is thus allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Md. Wasim Mia Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....te, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Netrokona…………..Respondent Judgement: March 28, 2004 Lawyers Involved: A. F. M. Mesbahuddin, Senior Advocate instructed by A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on- Record-For the Petitioner Not repre......emplated under Section 9(1) of the Ain. The submissions merit consideration. Leave is granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed. ......emplated under Section 9(1) of the Ain. The submissions merit consideration. Leave is granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed. ......emplated under Section 9(1) of the Ain. The submissions merit consideration. Leave is granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Selim A Khan Vs. Md. Harun Malik and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....;……..Petitioner Vs Md. Harun Malik and another.....................Respondent Judgment January 2, 2005. Lawyers Involved: M. A. Samad, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not re......t of the High Court Division and we do not find that there is any error of law calling for interference by us. In view of the discussion made above the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......t of the High Court Division and we do not find that there is any error of law calling for interference by us. In view of the discussion made above the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......t of the High Court Division and we do not find that there is any error of law calling for interference by us. In view of the discussion made above the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Abdur Rouf Sarder Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
..........Respondent Judgment March 16, 2006. Case Referred to- Siddique Munshi Vs. The State, 44 DLR (AD) 169. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-Petitioner. Not represe......Rouf Sarder...............Petitioner Vs The State...........................Respondent Judgment March 16, 2006. Case Referred to- Siddique Munshi Vs. The State, 44 DLR (AD) 169. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, in......o. In such circumstances we do not find any reason to lay our hands. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 800. ......o. In such circumstances we do not find any reason to lay our hands. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 800. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 52
S. M. Emdadul Hossain (Bulbul) Vs. Jinnur Hosain and another, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
............Petitioner Vs. Jinnur Hosain and another.........................Respondent Order: August 8, 2004. Result: Leave is granted. Lawyers Involved: Mansurul Hoq Chowdhury, Advocate instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Shorful Islam Kh......iminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J S. M. Emdadul Hossain (Bulbul).................................Petitioner Vs. Jinnur Hosain and another.........................Respondent Order: August 8, 2004. ...... order dated 26.07.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 8491 of 2001 is stayed for a period of 6 (six) months from dated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... order dated 26.07.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 8491 of 2001 is stayed for a period of 6 (six) months from dated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Md. Nurul Amin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ellip;...Petitioner vs The State represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Pabna.....Respondents Judgment November 28, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-Respondent Criminal Petition fo......has been mentioned above, we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ......has been mentioned above, we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ......has been mentioned above, we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Mahbubur Rahman Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....e Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka Collectorate Building, Dhaka.........Respondent Judgment August 1, 2004. Result: The leave petition is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-R......e Division (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mahbubur Rahman..........................Petitioner Vs. The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka Collectorate Building, Dhaka.............. made on behalf of the petitioner we do not find any ground to lay our hands. There being no substance in the petition, the said leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... made on behalf of the petitioner we do not find any ground to lay our hands. There being no substance in the petition, the said leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Mizanur Rahman alias Mithu and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....………………………………...Respondent Order November 22, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners Firoz Shah......granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Md. Golam Mostafa alias Gholam Mostafa and others Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.................Petitioner Vs The State...............................Respondent Judgement February 29, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Kazi Shahadat Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Mvi Md. Wahidull......sideration. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Let the order of stay granted earlier be extended for further 6(six) months from date. Ed. ......sideration. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Let the order of stay granted earlier be extended for further 6(six) months from date. Ed. ......sideration. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Let the order of stay granted earlier be extended for further 6(six) months from date. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Chair, Board of Int. and Secondary Education, Jessore and others Vs. Nazir Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....) 65; Secretary, Ministry of Communications, Road and Road Transport Division and another Vs. Md. Azizur Rahman and others, 46 DLR (AD) 19. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate, instructed by ......: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Chairman, Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Jessore and others …..Appellants. Vs. Md. Nazir Ahmed and another...................Respondents Judgment Ma......lity. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......lity. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Bangladesh Bank & others Vs. Messers Fabrica Nacional De Monedy Timbre & others, 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
....ts vs Messers Fabrica Nacional De Monedy Timbre & others..............Respondents Judgment April 1, 1997. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Md. Aftab Hoss......ive body of lawyers may consider the matter and move the Government if found necessary. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ive body of lawyers may consider the matter and move the Government if found necessary. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ive body of lawyers may consider the matter and move the Government if found necessary. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Abul Hashem Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....er Vs. The State represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Cox's Bazar...........Respondent Judgment March 7, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim, Advocate instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-R...... (Criminal) Present: Syed J. R Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Abul Hashem..........................Petitioner Vs. The State represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Cox's Bazar...........Respondent ......of case under the Provisions of Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan (Bishes Bidhan) Ain, 1995 in the light of the observation/direction made above. The leave petition is thus disposed of. Ed. ......of case under the Provisions of Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan (Bishes Bidhan) Ain, 1995 in the light of the observation/direction made above. The leave petition is thus disposed of. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Mona alias Zillur Rahman Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....pellant (In Jail) vs The State…………………..Respondent Judgment March 7, 2004 Lawyers Involved: Idrisur Rahman, Advocate instructed by A. K. M. Shahaidul Huq Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not repr......satisfactory. So the delay is not condoned. Therefore, both on merits and on delay. This petition for leave to appeal loses merits for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......satisfactory. So the delay is not condoned. Therefore, both on merits and on delay. This petition for leave to appeal loses merits for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......satisfactory. So the delay is not condoned. Therefore, both on merits and on delay. This petition for leave to appeal loses merits for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Nurul Amin Vs. Md. Ismail and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
........Petitioner Vs. Md. Ismail and other........................Respondents Judgement January 16, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Khandaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on- Record-For the Petitioner. Dr. M. Zahir,...... Present Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M.A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Amin .............................Petitioner Vs. Md. Ismail and other........................Respondents Judgement January 1......) months. The petitioner is permitted to add additional grounds. However, the proceedings before the lower Court below shall continue in accordance with law. Ed. ......) months. The petitioner is permitted to add additional grounds. However, the proceedings before the lower Court below shall continue in accordance with law. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Mohammad Salim Ahmed @ Md. Salim Miah Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....titioner vs The State…………………….Respondent Judgment November 20, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-the Respondent Criminal Petition......nd order of conviction. We in facts and circumstances do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The petition having no substance is dismissed. Ed. ......nd order of conviction. We in facts and circumstances do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The petition having no substance is dismissed. Ed. ......nd order of conviction. We in facts and circumstances do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The petition having no substance is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Md. Jahangir Alam (Selim) Vs. Md. Hebjul Bari and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Hebjul Bari and others…………………...Respondents Judgment August 3, 2004 Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Abdur Rob Chowdh......without any order as to cost. The impugned judgment and order dated 13-04-2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 536 of 2003 are hereby set aside and the rule so issued is hereby recalled. Ed. ......without any order as to cost. The impugned judgment and order dated 13-04-2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 536 of 2003 are hereby set aside and the rule so issued is hereby recalled. Ed. ......without any order as to cost. The impugned judgment and order dated 13-04-2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 536 of 2003 are hereby set aside and the rule so issued is hereby recalled. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Chief Engin, Dredger Direct, BD Water Dev. Board. Vs. Chairman, 2nd Lbour Court, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....both Appeals) Vs Chairman, 2nd Labour Court and others........ Respondents (In both Appeals) Judgment May 13, 2002. Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Abdul Hakim Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain. Advocate-on- Record-For the Appellants (In Criminal Appe......ed to be taken away without issuing a show cause. 17. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed without any orders to costs. Ed. ......ed to be taken away without issuing a show cause. 17. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed without any orders to costs. Ed. ......ed to be taken away without issuing a show cause. 17. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed without any orders to costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Md. Abdul Jalil Vs. Mosammat Shefali Begum and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
........................Appellant Vs. Mosammat Shefali Begum and others.....Respondents Judgment May 17, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdul Majid, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Shamsul H......ourt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J M.A. Aziz J Md. Abdul Jalil....................Appellant Vs. Mosammat Shefali Begum and others.....Respondents Judgment May ......ingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment dated 6.1.1997 passed in Civil Revision No. 3254 of 1992 is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 715. ......ingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment dated 6.1.1997 passed in Civil Revision No. 3254 of 1992 is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 715. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
20832082208120802079207820772076207520742073207220712070206920682067206620652064