Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6581-6600 of 8188 results.
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Shahabuddin and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... interference by this Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......title in respect of the land in suit, recovery of possession upon evicting the defendants from the land in suit and demolishing the structures in the land in suit and for further declaration that the order dated April 22, 1977 passed by defendant No.3 treating the property in suit as vested property..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 156
AA Raziul Karim Chowdhury Vs. Nasim Bin Rahman & ors., 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....operty in question was not listed as abandoned property It is pertinent to mention that the agreement for sale being of April 21, 1968 it was held by this Division that the same was binding on the Government in the same way as upon the original owner but the same may be cancelled, amended or ter......ing aside the judgment and decree dated January 31, 1999 of the 3rd Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), Chittagong in Other Suit No. 136 of 1996 decreeing the same. 2. The ordering portion of the judgment of the High Court Division reads as follows: "In ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 94
Bazlur Rahman Sarker Vs. Kamala Kanta Barman, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ancelling the mutation went beyond the limit of his power and the order so passed by the defendant No.1 was without jurisdiction. The appellate Court further observed "I am of the view that if Government thinks that the lands in question belong to or the same are in actual occupation of Hind...... 7,1986 of the Court of Munsif (now Assistant Judge), Mithapukur Upazila, Rangpur in Other Class Suit No. 313 of 1983 dismissing the same. 2. The suit was filed seeking declaration that the order dated June 30, 1983 passed by defendant No.1, Additional Deputy Commissioner(Revenue),Rangpur..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Dr. Abdur Rahman and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....nying the allegation of settlement as pleaded in the plaint and stated, inter alia, that the suit land was vacant land in possession of the Bhawal Raj Estate, that it was acquired by the Government as excess khas land of Bhawal Raj Estate under the provision of the State Acquisition an......arya J —This appeal by special leave is against a judgment of a Bench of the High Court Division, setting aside, in exercise of the powers under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, an order made by the first Court of Subordinate Judge, Dacca rejecting the prayer of the respondent f..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Mosharraf Hossain Vs. Md. Amir Hossain, Munsif, Election Tribunal and anr, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....jected to the admission of Exhibit 3 series and also filed two petitions, one against the admission of exhibits and the other for adjourning the hearing of the proceeding to enable him to move the Government for transfer of the case under section 28 of the Local Government Ordinance, 1976. Both ......Mahmud Husain, CJ— This appeal by Special leave arises out of a judgment passed by a Bench of the High Court in writ jurisdiction summarily rejecting the petition filed for declaring the order dated 9 5-77 passed in Election Tribunal Case No. 6 of 1977 by respondent No. 1 declarin..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Baitul Mukarram Vs. Taxation Officer and another, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....g a different meaning which the legislature did not intend thereby. We find no substance in the contention of Mr. Sobhan. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Mahmud Hossain, CJ.—This appeal by special leave arises out of a judgment passed by the then Dacca High Court in Writ petition No. 127 of 1970 filed by the appellant challenging the orders of the respondents imposing urban tax amounting to Tk. 1,11,481.00 for the years 1964-65 to ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Solicitor represented by State, Govt of of Bangladesh Vs. Anisuzzaman Chy & or, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... (Criminal) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J The Solicitor represented by the State, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh…… …Petitioner Vs ...... Not represented-Respondent No.3 Criminal Petition For leave to appeal No. 189 of 2006 (From the judgment and order dated 27-03-2006 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 3659 of..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Amirul Islam and others Vs. The State and another , 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....oresaid. We are fully in agreement with the findings and decisions arrived at by the High Court Division and we find no merit in this application. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......structed by Mahmuda Begum, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No.2. Not represented- Respondent No.1 Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 251 of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated 18th July, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in criminal Revision No.603 of 2005) ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Dock Workers Management Board Vs. Muhammad Ismail and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... their services were regulated by Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act 1980 and that the law was later replaced by the Dock Workers (Regulation of employment) Scheme 1983 and the Government accorded approval of the pay scale of grade-VI for those posts and that in the 30th meet...... Kabir Chowdhury J. - The delay is condoned. 2. The petitioners Dock workers Management Board, Port Training Centre, Chittagong and its Chairman seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 01.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 890 of 2003 making th..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Abdur Rob Mollah Vs. Shahabuddin Ahmed and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... evidence. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......- The appeal has been filed against the judgment dated July 20, 1999 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1825 of 1994 making the Rule absolute upon setting aside the order dated October 18, 1993 of the court of Additional District Judge, Narayangonj in Miscellaneou..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 266
Forest Ranger, Bhaluka Range Office, M.singh & ors Vs. Hamid & sons Ltd. & ors , 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... application under order 41 Rule 19. 4. Mr. A. J. Mohammad Ali, learned Attorney General appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits, inter-alia, that the suit property was acquired by the Government vide Gazette Notification dated 2.4.1956 and vested in the defendant No. 1 under sectio...... No. 4255 of 1997.) Order: Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- Forest Ranger, Bhaluka Range Office and two other Officers being defendant Nos. 1-3 seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 20.4.2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Musammat Sokhina Khatun Vs. Mosammat Rowshanara Begum and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ame to a correct decision in making the rule absolute. We do not find any reason to interfere. In view of the discussion made above the leave petition stands dismissed. Ed. ...... Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent Nos. 1&2 Not represented- Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.1663 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 18.08.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1571 of 2003.) ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
State Vs. A. K. M. Saiful Islam, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... in the appeal accordingly, the appeal is allowed and judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. The aforesaid Sabujbagh P. S. Case proceeds in accordance with law. Ed. ......ructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent Criminal Appeal No.34 of 2000 (From the judgment and order dated 14-11-1999 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No.672 of 1998) ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 90
State Vs. Ali Ahmed and other, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....on is justified to acquit them of the charge. On perusal of the judgment of the High Court Division we do not find any error. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......urt Division in Criminal Appeal No.1361 of 2000) Judgment Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- At the instance of the state this petition for leave to appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 27.08.2002 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No.1361 of 2000 allowing..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Abdul Majid alias Mujibur Rahman Molla Vs. Md. Abdul Matin and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... view expressed by us about the ground taken in the course of hearing we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... of the discussions and the view expressed by us about the ground taken in the course of hearing we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Governor, Bangladesh Bank, Head Office, Dhaka Vs. M. Habibullah Bahar & another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ast submission that the Bangladesh Bank is a Statutory Body which can sue and be sued in its own name and its management is vested in the Board of Directors and the Governor is an appointee of the Government and holds office for a fixed term. Therefore, the writ petition is bad for defect of par......structed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 1. Not represented-For the Respondent No. 2. Civil Appeal No. 258 of 2001 (From the judgment and order dated 16.11.2000 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1672 of 1995) ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Bangladesh Biman Corporation Vs. Lt. Col. (Rtd.) Md. Zainul Abedin and ors, 2000, 29 CLC (AD)
....Mahmudur Rahman J Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J Bangladesh Biman Corporation………………….Appellant (In C.A. Nos. 30 & 32 of 1999) Government of Bangladesh and others ...................... Appellants (In C.A. Nos. 31 & 33 of ......sented- Respondent Nos. 2-3 (In C.A. No. 32 of 1999) Not represented- Respondents (In C.A. Nos. 31 & 33 of 1999) Civil Appeal Nos. 30 and 31 of 1999 (From the judgment and order dated 1 December 1998 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.2775 of 1998 in b..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Md. Kamaluddin and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ts writ jurisdiction. 5. The rule was contested by the writ respondent Nos.1 to 4 filing affidavit-in-opposition denying material averments of the writ petition. It was stated that Government for public purpose and for public interest through Rajdhani Unnoyan Kartipakkah (RAJUK) ......espondent Nos.1-4, 6-42 (In C.P. No. 1735 of 2005) Not represented- Respondent Nos.1-4, 6-45 (In C.P. No 50 of 2006) For Leave to Appeal No.1735 of 2005 (From the Judgment and order dated 31.08.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 3941 of 2002.) ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Mohammad Enayet Rabbi Vs. Sree Sree Shoti Rani Kundho and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....eed the suit. 10. In the background of the aforesaid discussions we do not find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 5, 000/-. Ed. ......eed the suit. 10. In the background of the aforesaid discussions we do not find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 5, 000/-. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Jobeda Bewa & others Vs. Md. Abdur Razzaque, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 MLR (AD) 2007, 16. ......ocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Civil Appeal No. 317 of 2002 (From the judgment and order dated 30.10.2001 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4207 of 1996.) ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
23032302230123002299229822952294229322912290228922862285228422832280227922782277