Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6601-6620 of 8015 results.
Kanai Lal Roy Vs. Swaraswati Roy, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.........Appellant Vs. Swaraswati Roy alias Srimati Swaraswati Roy and others............Respondents Judgment October 31, 2004 Lawyers Involved: M.K. Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Abdul Qu...... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Kanai Lal Roy.... ..............Appellant Vs. Swaraswati Roy alias Srimati Swaraswati Roy and others............Respondents Jud......e with law by giving opportunity to the concerned party to produce the will itself in question and prove it by adducing evidence". There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......osition is that while compromise petition was filed before the High Court Division the appellant was shown to have been represented by the learned Advocates md. Mihir Kanti Majumdar and Mr. Swapon Kumar Datta. The appellant categorically asserted before the High Court Division that he had never ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Sree Sukhendu Nath Saha and others Vs. Hamangini Saha, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Bakar Mollah vs. Abdul Majid Moral (2201) 6 MLR (AD) 151; Md. Naimuddin Sarder @ Naimuddin Sarder vs. Md. Abdul Kalam Biswas 39 DLR (AD) 237 Lawyers Involved: Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants Nurul Amin, Advocate instructed by A.K. M. Shahidul Hu...... Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sree Sukhendu Nath Saha and others…………………………….Appellants Vs. 1. Hamangini Saha being dead her heirs 1 (a) Swapan Kumar Roy and others……......fs in the land in suit. In view of the discussions made herein-above we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......Sukhendu Nath Saha and others…………………………….Appellants Vs. 1. Hamangini Saha being dead her heirs 1 (a) Swapan Kumar Roy and others……….Respondents Judgment March 21, 2006. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Trading Corporation of Bangladesh Vs. Md.Abdul Halim Bhuiyan & others (31), 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Md.Abdul Halim Bhuiyan & others (31)..............Respondents (in Civil Appeal No. 56 of 2005). Judgment April 27, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Dr. A. K. M. Ali, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant (in all the cases) ......ty in the impugned orders. The High Court Division, therefore, was not justified in making the Rules absolute. All the appeals are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ty in the impugned orders. The High Court Division, therefore, was not justified in making the Rules absolute. All the appeals are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ty in the impugned orders. The High Court Division, therefore, was not justified in making the Rules absolute. All the appeals are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Mainul Islam Vs. State and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... 2003) The State & others...............Respondent (In Criminal Petition No. 190 of 2003) Judgment October 14, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab all, Advocate on Record-For the Petitioner(In both the Cases) Abdul Basel Majumder, Senior Advocat......e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ......e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ......e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Dulal @ Md. Dulal Talukder and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lal Talukder and another.............Petitioner Vs The State...........................Respondents Judgment May 24, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Nizamul Huq, Advocate instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners Md. Abdur Rouf......with as prayed for. Bail granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......with as prayed for. Bail granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......with as prayed for. Bail granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Shahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....owdhury J Shahabuddin ..........Petitioner Vs. The State...............Respondent Judgment November 20, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not Represented-Respondent Criminal Petition f......ate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Shahabuddin ..........Petitioner Vs. The State...............Respondent Judgment November 20, 2005 Law...... commit any illegality in rejecting the application filed under Section 561A of the code of Criminal procedure. There is no substance in this petition and hence it is dismissed. Ed. ...... commit any illegality in rejecting the application filed under Section 561A of the code of Criminal procedure. There is no substance in this petition and hence it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Abdul Mannan alias A. Mannan Vs. Mosammat Nurbanu & another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ioner Vs Mosammat Nurbanu & another ....................................Respondent Judgment November 8, 2003 Lawyers Involved: Obaidur Rahman Mustafa, Advocate instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not Respondent-R......pports the evidence of P.Ws 1 and 2 strongly. We find no infirmity in the Judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the criminal leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......pports the evidence of P.Ws 1 and 2 strongly. We find no infirmity in the Judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the criminal leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......pports the evidence of P.Ws 1 and 2 strongly. We find no infirmity in the Judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the criminal leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Samar Uddin and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....;……………………………….Respondent Judgement December 10, 2003. Lawyers Involved: M. A. Gaffer, Advocate (appeared with leave of the court) instructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Hug, Advocate-on-Record...... Modaris Ullah of village Goyghar, PS. and District Moulavibazar be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet for a period of 6 (Six) months from date. Ed. ...... Modaris Ullah of village Goyghar, PS. and District Moulavibazar be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet for a period of 6 (Six) months from date. Ed. ...... Modaris Ullah of village Goyghar, PS. and District Moulavibazar be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet for a period of 6 (Six) months from date. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Farukur Rahman @ Farook and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ate………………………Respondent (In all cases) Judgment August 12, 2003. Lawyers Involved: Mujubur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab AH, Advocate-on- Record-For the Appellants (In all cases) ......al Appeal No.14/2001) Sajjad Shaheen @ Prince...................Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 15/2001) Miraj Hossain...............Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No.16/2001) Vs. The State………………………Respond......ce to the appellants before us. In the aforesaid premises, we are of the view that the appellants are entitled of get benefit of doubt. As a result, all the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......ce to the appellants before us. In the aforesaid premises, we are of the view that the appellants are entitled of get benefit of doubt. As a result, all the appeals are allowed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Md. Golam Murtuza @ Isphil Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....………………………….Respondent Judgment October 20, 2003 Lawyers Involved: Khondoker Mahbub Hossain Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants M.A. Rouf, Dep......ions Jude is erroneous and can not be sustained in law. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the accused-appellant is set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......ions Jude is erroneous and can not be sustained in law. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the accused-appellant is set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......ions Jude is erroneous and can not be sustained in law. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the accused-appellant is set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Delip Kumar Shaha Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ellip;……………………………..Respondent Judgment February 25, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not Respondent-Respondent. Criminal Petition...... and accordingly dismissed the appeal. Since the High Court Division in its judgment considered all the points as raised, the criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ...... and accordingly dismissed the appeal. Since the High Court Division in its judgment considered all the points as raised, the criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ...... Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Habibur Rahman alias Habu and othÂers Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rs......................Petitioner Vs The State..............................Respondents Judgment August 31, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not ......But the courts below did not consider this vital aspect of the prosecution case. Petitioners are directed to prepare the paper book out of court in accordance with rules. Ed. ......But the courts below did not consider this vital aspect of the prosecution case. Petitioners are directed to prepare the paper book out of court in accordance with rules. Ed. ......But the courts below did not consider this vital aspect of the prosecution case. Petitioners are directed to prepare the paper book out of court in accordance with rules. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 31
State Vs. Moniruzzaman Kazi alias Thanda Kazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Thanda Kazi..........Respondent (In all cases) Judgment October 20, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Golam Kibria, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on -Record-For the Appellants Shahadat Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. ......commit any error in acquitting the accused. In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in this appeal. The criminal appeal is therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......commit any error in acquitting the accused. In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in this appeal. The criminal appeal is therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......commit any error in acquitting the accused. In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in this appeal. The criminal appeal is therefore, dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
BUET Vs. Dr. Nizamuddin & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ip;…………………………..Respondents Judgment January 30, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mr. Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on- Record-For the Appellants Khandakar...... a disputed question of fact it cannot be considered in a writ petition. For the reasons and discussions made above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... a disputed question of fact it cannot be considered in a writ petition. For the reasons and discussions made above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... a disputed question of fact it cannot be considered in a writ petition. For the reasons and discussions made above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Satish Chandra Mondal Vs. Ayjuddin Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....6; Shahid Nasim and 2 other Vs. Syeda Imtiaz Khatoon, PLD 1997 (Lahore) 243; Umedewal Moti Ram vs. Deva ILR (1866) 2 Bombay 547. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by S. R. Khoshnabish, Advocate-on -Record-For the Appellant. Md. Nawab ...................Appellant vs Ayjuddin Gazi being dead his heirs Amjad Gazi and others.......Respondents Judgment May 3, 2006 Cases Referred to- Ramdhari Rai Vs. Gorakh Rai, AIR 1931 (Patna) 236; Shahid Nasim and 2 other Vs. Syeda Imtiaz Khatoon, PLD 1997 (......rcumstances was well justified to interfere with the same in revisional jurisdiction. For the reasons and discussions above the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......rcumstances was well justified to interfere with the same in revisional jurisdiction. For the reasons and discussions above the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sree Subas Chandra Sarker , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rs Ashish Chakraborty and others Vs. Md. Abdur Rob Alias Mvi. Md. Abdur Rob, 49 DLR AD) 96. Lawyers Involved: M.A. Azim Khair, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate instructed by F......s. vs Sree Subas Chandra Sarker being dead his heirs: Indira Rani Sarker.....Respondent Judgment April 6, 2006. Cases Referred to- Perusal Rani Sen Gupta Vs. Bangladesh (1983) 3 BLD(AD) 277; Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Hou......llate Court. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order of costs. Ed. ......llate Court. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order of costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Chair, Board of Int. & Sec. Education, Jessore & ors Vs. Golam Quddus & anr, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....2) Serajul Haque & anr.......................Respondents (In C. A. No 250 of 2002) Judgment May 22, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Sk. Awsaful Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants (In all the cases) ......g the rules absolute. The judgment therefore does not call for our interference. In view of the discussion made above, the appeals are dismissed without any order of to costs. Ed. ......g the rules absolute. The judgment therefore does not call for our interference. In view of the discussion made above, the appeals are dismissed without any order of to costs. Ed. ......g the rules absolute. The judgment therefore does not call for our interference. In view of the discussion made above, the appeals are dismissed without any order of to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Wazed Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e Referred To- Abdul Mannan vs. Kulada Ranjan Mowali 31 DLR (AD) 195. Lawyers Involved: A. H. M. Mushfiqur Rahman, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants Not represented-Respondents Civil Appeal No. 5...... J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Pirojpur and others....................Appellants Vs. Md. Wazed Ali and others……………………......er alluvion. In the light of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......er alluvion. In the light of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Md. Sirajuddin Mondal and other Vs. Mosammat Miration Nessa and othÂers, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.......Appellants Vs Mosammat Miration Nessa and others..................Respondents Judgment March 23, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab All Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1 Dr. Rafiqur R......n established by the plaintiff that Jairuddin did not surrender his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2, 000/- Ed. ......n established by the plaintiff that Jairuddin did not surrender his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2, 000/- Ed. ......n established by the plaintiff that Jairuddin did not surrender his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2, 000/- Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Chairman, Bangladesh Telephone and Telegraph Board Vs. Mohammad Toufique & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...... Petitioner vs. Mohammad Toufique and others..................................Respondents Judgement May 17, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqul Huq, Senior Advocate (Rais Uddin Ahmed, Advocate with leave of the court) instructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, ......paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. The order of status quo passed on 07.08.2005 vacated. Ed. ......paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. The order of status quo passed on 07.08.2005 vacated. Ed. ......paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. The order of status quo passed on 07.08.2005 vacated. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 97
20632062206020592058205720562055205420532052205120502049204820472046204520442043