Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Israt Jahan Kazal, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... March 24, 2004. Case Referred to- Mirza Shahab Ispahani, 40 DLR (AD) 116. Lawyers Involved A. J. Mohammad Ali. Additional Attorney General, instructed by Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-On-Record- For the Appellant Shafiq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Instructed by Md. Afta......ur above discussions, we are of the view that the judgment of the High Court Division requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ur above discussions, we are of the view that the judgment of the High Court Division requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ur above discussions, we are of the view that the judgment of the High Court Division requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Commissioner of Customs and anr Vs. Bangladesh Traders, Dhaka, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....zur Rahman's Case, 51 DLR (AD) 40; Mizanur Rahman's case 52 DLR (AD) 49. Lawyers Involved: A.J. Mohammad (In all the cases) Ali, Additional Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate -on-Record- For the Appellants Dr. M. Zahir. Senior (In all the cases......raders, Dhaka…………………...Respondents (In all the cases) Judgement October 20, 2003. Cases Referred to- Mr. Ayub and others Vs. Collector of Customs and others, Writ Petition No. 1495 of 1996; Rahmania Vanaspati Product Ltd......n made without any lawful authority and of no legal effect and further directing the writ respondents to return the bank guarantees furnished by the writ petitioners are hereby set aside. Ed. ......n made without any lawful authority and of no legal effect and further directing the writ respondents to return the bank guarantees furnished by the writ petitioners are hereby set aside. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Bangladesh Krishi Bank Vs. A.F.M. Farid Uddin and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....hellip;….......Appellant Vs A.F.M. Farid Uddin and others .........Respondents Judgement: May 19, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, M.A. Baqui, Advocate with him, instructed by Md. Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record- For ......he impugned order of compulsory retirement of the Respondent No.1 and as such the same requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......he impugned order of compulsory retirement of the Respondent No.1 and as such the same requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......he impugned order of compulsory retirement of the Respondent No.1 and as such the same requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Sree Promad Chandra Barman & others Vs. Most. Khodeza Khatun Bewa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...........Appellants Vs Most. Khodeza Khatun Bewa and others.........Respondents Judgement February 25, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate -on-Record- For the Appellants Mahbubey Al......y, the High Court Division committed error of law in making the Rule absolute, which requires interference by this court. The appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......y, the High Court Division committed error of law in making the Rule absolute, which requires interference by this court. The appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ffs filed Other Class Suit No. 56 of 1974 in the Court of Subordinate Judge (now joint District Judge), Rangpur for declaration of title stating, inter alia, that the suit land belonged to Basanta Kumar, Haladhar, defendant No.1 and Bharat Chandra in 8 annas share and Abbari Barmani in 8 annas s..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Ali Asgar Khan Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Judgement July 26, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque Khan, Additional Attorney General (Faisal H. Khan, Additional Attorney General with him) instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants A. B. Taz Mohammad, Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab ......Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Ali Asgar Khan, Registrar, Supreme Court of Bangladesh & others....Appellants. Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam being dead his heirs; Most. Afroza Begum& others...............Resp...... suit from the trial court and transferring the same to its own file for trial and disposal and this requires interference by us. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... suit from the trial court and transferring the same to its own file for trial and disposal and this requires interference by us. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Md. Abdul Mannan Akanda Vs. Md. Lutfar Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ellip;.....Petitioner Vs. Md. Lutfar Rahman and others……….........Respondents Judgement April1 0, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate--on-Record- For......yed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdul Mannan Akanda…………………….....Petitioner Vs. Md. Lutfar Rahman and others……….........Respondents Judgement......t been filed fulfilling the requirement of Rule 4 of order XXVI (Part-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. The civil review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......t been filed fulfilling the requirement of Rule 4 of order XXVI (Part-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. The civil review petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Kamrul Hasan, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... vs Kamrul Hasan.........Respondent Judgement July19, 2004. Lawyers Involved: A J Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney General, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record.- For the Appellants Md. Aftab Hossain Advocate-on-Record. - For ......into consideration the basic fact that appointment of the respondent was cancelled in public interest. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with cost of Tk.30.000/- (twenty thousand). Ed. ......into consideration the basic fact that appointment of the respondent was cancelled in public interest. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with cost of Tk.30.000/- (twenty thousand). Ed. ......into consideration the basic fact that appointment of the respondent was cancelled in public interest. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with cost of Tk.30.000/- (twenty thousand). Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 123
Government of Bangladesh Vs. A. S. M. Firoj Uddin Bhuiyan, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....eferred to- Central London Property Trust Ltd Vs. High Trees House Ltd, 1974 QB 130. Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney General instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate -on-Record- For the Appellants Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instru......being dead his heirs Mrs Rosey Firoz and others……... ........Respondents Judgement February 10, 2004. Case Referred to- Central London Property Trust Ltd Vs. High Trees House Ltd, 1974 QB 130. Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad Ali, Additio...... 16. In view of the above we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... 16. In view of the above we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Moksed Ali Mondal Vs. Abdus Samad Mondal and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Vs. Abdus Samad Mondal and others…………..........Respondents. Judgement May 25, 2004. Lawyers Involved: A J Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on–Record- For the Appellants ......Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Moksed Ali Mondal being dead his heirs Md. Abdul Mannan and others...Appellants. Vs. Abdus Samad Mondal and others…………..........Respondents. ......gment and decree passed by the Court of appeal decreeing the plaintiff's suit and this requires interference by us. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......gment and decree passed by the Court of appeal decreeing the plaintiff's suit and this requires interference by us. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Rasheda Begum Vs. M.M. Nurussafa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....hpa Rani Das and another Vs. A.K.M. Habibur Rahman and others, 13 BLD (AD) 217; Mahbubul Huq vs. Md. A. Kader Munshi and others, 52 DLR, 194. Lawyers involved: Mustafa Neaz Muhammad, Advocate instructed by Abu Siddique, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant. Rabi Shankar Chak......ip;…….....Appellant Vs M.M. Nurussafa and others .........Respondents Judgement May 2, 2004. Cases Referred to- Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman, 12 BLD (AD) 247; Abdul Jalil and others Vs. Islamic Bank Bangladesh Ltd., 20......e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ......e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Saleh Ahmed, Estate Officer Bangladesh Railway Vs. A.P.M. Basher, Advocate & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sent: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Saleh Ahmed, Estate Officer, Bangladesh Railway……………......Appellant Vs A.P.M. Basher, Advocate and others .........Respondents Judgement February 25, 2004. Lawyers ......wed. The suit is sent back to the trial Court for disposal in the light of the direction made hereinabove. The record of the trial Court be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......wed. The suit is sent back to the trial Court for disposal in the light of the direction made hereinabove. The record of the trial Court be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......wed. The suit is sent back to the trial Court for disposal in the light of the direction made hereinabove. The record of the trial Court be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
A.N.M. Gaziul Azim Vs. M.A. Kader and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....etitioner Vs M.A. Kader and others..........................Respondents. Judgement January 1, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Khandhker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mustafa Niaz Muhammad, Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Mohammad Nawab Ali, Advoca......ny error and as such no interference is called for. 7. In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition and accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ny error and as such no interference is called for. 7. In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition and accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ny error and as such no interference is called for. 7. In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition and accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Md. Abu Hanif Mia and others Vs. Kad Banu and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....others…………Appellants Vs. Kad Banu and others........Respondents Judgement February 17, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Shaheed Alam, Advocate instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Aftab Md. Ho......Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Abu Hanif Mia and others…………Appellants Vs. Kad Banu and others........Respondents Judgement February 17, 2004. ...... judgment and decree dated 26.01.1994 passed by the High Court Division in 2nd Appeal No. 1204 of 1965 is hereby set aside and those of the court of appeal below are restored. Ed. ...... judgment and decree dated 26.01.1994 passed by the High Court Division in 2nd Appeal No. 1204 of 1965 is hereby set aside and those of the court of appeal below are restored. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
M/s. Standard Match Factory Ltd Vs. Chairman, First Labour Court, Chittagong, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ellant Vs The Chairman, First Labour Court, Chittagong and Other's.........Respondents Judgement February 29, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Md. Khalilur Rahman, Advocate instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant Ex-parte-...... is allowed without an order as to costs and the judgment and order dated 29.8.92 passed by the Labour Court, Chittagong is set aside. The Trade Union Case No. 22 of 1988 is allowed. Ed. ...... is allowed without an order as to costs and the judgment and order dated 29.8.92 passed by the Labour Court, Chittagong is set aside. The Trade Union Case No. 22 of 1988 is allowed. Ed. ...... is allowed without an order as to costs and the judgment and order dated 29.8.92 passed by the Labour Court, Chittagong is set aside. The Trade Union Case No. 22 of 1988 is allowed. Ed. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 131
Pubali Bank Limited Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....c of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, and others ..............Respondents Judgement: July 31, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Saiah Uddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant. Fida M. ......ourt as not abandoned property. 21. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ourt as not abandoned property. 21. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ourt as not abandoned property. 21. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Sonali Bank Vs. Md. Sirajul Hoque Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...., 2004. Case Referred to- Bangladesh Railway Vs. M/s. Sinaf Racht Chartering and Ship Broking Corporation, 5 BLD (AD) 115. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque Khan, Senior Advocate, instructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on- Record -For the Appellant. Not r......Vs Md. Sirajul Hoque Chowdhury and others…………….........Respondents Judgement June 27, 2004. Case Referred to- Bangladesh Railway Vs. M/s. Sinaf Racht Chartering and Ship Broking Corporation, 5 BLD (AD) 115. Lawyers Involv......has quite legally filed the suit impleading the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 as the defendants along with others. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......has quite legally filed the suit impleading the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 as the defendants along with others. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Hasrat Mohani and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....s Vs Shamsur Rahman Chowdhury alias Shamsur Rahman Saha, 51 DLR(AD) 253; 1 BLC (1996) page 105. Lawyers Involved: A. H. M. Mushfiqur Rahman, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant A. H. Amin, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent Nos. 7 &......preme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Government of Bangladesh………....Appellant Vs. Hasrat Mohani and others............Respondents Judgement June 21, 2005. Case Referr......gh Court Division are set aside. The judgment and decree passed by (he Additional District Judge, Rangpur is restored. Consequently the suit stands dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......gh Court Division are set aside. The judgment and decree passed by (he Additional District Judge, Rangpur is restored. Consequently the suit stands dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 156
A. Motaleb Howlader Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....titioner Vs The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Patuakhali…...Respondent Judgement March 17, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Zahirul Haque, Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-On-Record- For the Petitioner Abdur R...... while passing the impugned judgment and order. We do not therefore find any reason to sustain the attack. 7. The petition, under the aforesaid circumstance, stands dismissed. Ed. ...... while passing the impugned judgment and order. We do not therefore find any reason to sustain the attack. 7. The petition, under the aforesaid circumstance, stands dismissed. Ed. ...... while passing the impugned judgment and order. We do not therefore find any reason to sustain the attack. 7. The petition, under the aforesaid circumstance, stands dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Md. Saidur Rahman Shahid Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and another…………… …...Respondents. Judgement January 14, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Ozair Farooq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-On-Record- For the Petitioner Not represente......he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 102
University of Rajshahi Vs. Md. Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan and others.......Respondents Judgement June 13, 2005. Cases Referred to- 3 BLC (AD) 45. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdul Jabbar, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Ajmalul Hossa......have no respect for the ethics and values of the profession. In the background of the aforesaid discussions the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 15,000/-. Ed. ......have no respect for the ethics and values of the profession. In the background of the aforesaid discussions the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 15,000/-. Ed. ......have no respect for the ethics and values of the profession. In the background of the aforesaid discussions the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 15,000/-. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 97