Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6621-6640 of 8162 results.
Md. Nabiul Islam Chy Vs. Joint Regis, Div. Co-operative Office, Rajshahi & ors., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... no merit in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......e fully in agreement with the findings and decisions of the High court Division. In the aforesaid premises, we find no merit in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ent: Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ. - The petitioner is seeking leave against the judgment and order dated 16.05.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in writ Petition No. 1......e fully in agreement with the findings and decisions of the High court Division. In the aforesaid premises, we find no merit in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Department of Narcotics Control Vs. Crown Beverage Ltd., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....l Petition For Leave to Appeal No. 581 of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated 15.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 6818 of 2004) Lawyers Involved: A.J. Mohammad Ali, Attorney General, instructed by Abu Sams Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on– Record-For the petiti......sposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready within 3 (three) months from date for expeditious disposal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: III ADC (2006) 924. ......(12th Floor) 195, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka and another ...........Respondents Judgement April 26, 2006. Civil Petition For Leave to Appeal No. 581 of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated 15.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 6818 of 2004) Lawye......sposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready within 3 (three) months from date for expeditious disposal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: III ADC (2006) 924. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Jahangir Alam and ors., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....irected to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......ision in Writ petition Nos. 8254 of 2002 and 4344 of 2003 be stayed till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......sp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. - Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Planning and four other writ respondents seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 29.08.2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 8......ision in Writ petition Nos. 8254 of 2002 and 4344 of 2003 be stayed till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 87
Md. Mofazzal Hossain Vs. Md. Muklesur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... passed by the learned Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), Chandpur in Title Appeal No. 66 of 1990 by which the judgment and decree dated 20.5.1990 passed by the learned Assistant Judge, Sadar, Chandpur in Title Suit No.138 of 1989 decreeing the suit was affirmed . 2. The petitio......re the paper book out of court in accordance with Rules. In part II of the paper book deposition of both the parties and the exhibited documents in the suit are to be included. Ed. ...... Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on –Record-For the petitioner Respondents Not represented- Respondents Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal no. 191 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 25th July 2004 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3436 of 1993). ......re the paper book out of court in accordance with Rules. In part II of the paper book deposition of both the parties and the exhibited documents in the suit are to be included. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Noor Uddin Vs. Alimuddin and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....rict Judge rejected the application for amendment. The plaintiffs then moved the High Court Division in revisional jurisdiction. The High Court Division allowed the amendment application and made the Rule absolute. 4. We have heard Mr. A. S. M. Khalequzzaman, the learned advocate-on-......mstances, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials arrived at a correct decision. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Nurul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-18. Civil Petition for leave to appeal No.1248 of 2003. (From the Judgment and order dated 29.06.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.4300 of 2002.) ......mstances, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials arrived at a correct decision. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 154
Bhulu Miah and others Vs. Begum Shakhina Khatun and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... extended for further period of 6 (six) months from date. Ed. ...... be deposited within 1 (one) month. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Stay granted earlier be extended for further period of 6 (six) months from date. Ed. ......etitioners Moshiuzzaman, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocte-on-Record- For the Respondents Civil petition for leave to Appeal No.325 of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated 1st February, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1806 of 2004...... be deposited within 1 (one) month. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Stay granted earlier be extended for further period of 6 (six) months from date. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Dr. Mohammad Sarwar Ramiz and others Vs. Dr. Shyam Sundar Kundu (FCPS) & ors, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....petitioners are also permitted to add additional grounds. Ed. ...... Writ Petition No.1735 of 2004 be stayed for 6 (six) months in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.737 of 2005. The petitioners are also permitted to add additional grounds. Ed. ......nbsp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. - Dr. Mohammad Sarwar Ramiz and two other writ respondents filed Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 612 of 2005 against the Judgment and order dated 28.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1735 of 2004 making t...... Writ Petition No.1735 of 2004 be stayed for 6 (six) months in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.737 of 2005. The petitioners are also permitted to add additional grounds. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Md. Belayet Hossain Vs. Abul Fayez Md. Abdullah and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... Judgment June 13, 2005. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Nurul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record. —For the Petitioner A. J. Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate (A.Quayum, Senior Advocate with him), instructed by Aftab Hossain, Ad......such view of the Matter we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned advocate. In view of the discussions made above leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......sp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- The petitioner Md. Belayet Hossain seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 5.4.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4754 of 2003 and Civil......such view of the Matter we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned advocate. In view of the discussions made above leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Fulbaria Market Dokandar Malik Samity Vs. Khatigrastha Dokandar Kallyan Samity, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....arlier be extended for further 6 (six) months from date. Ed. ...... be deposited within one month. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Status quo granted earlier be extended for further 6 (six) months from date. Ed. ......okandar Malik Samity and its General Secretary against judgment dated 16.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5933 of 2001 discharging the rule and thereby affirming the order No. 30 dated 30.10.2001 passed by the learned Senior Assistant Judge 4th Court, Dhaka in Titl...... be deposited within one month. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Status quo granted earlier be extended for further 6 (six) months from date. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Idrisur Rahman Vs. Syed Shahidur Rahman and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Idrisur Rahman, Advocate, Supreme Court of Bangladesh, 42/1, Ka Segun Bagicha, Dhaka……………………......4 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2454 of 2004 be stayed for 6(six) months. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ...... Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record —For Respondent No. 1 Not represented—Respondent Nos. 2-5 Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 346 of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated 02.02.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2454 of 2004). ......4 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2454 of 2004 be stayed for 6(six) months. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 97
Nurun Nabi Mullah and others Vs. Abdul Karim, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... 2. Plaintiffs filed the suit stating, inter alia, that the land measuring 1.15 acres appertaining to plot No. 685 of C.S. Khatian No. 104 corresponding to S.A. Khatian No. 1236 of Mouza Badda under Police Station-Gulshan, District-Dhaka as described in the schedule 'ka' to the plaint ......m of the plaintiffs. In view of the discussions made herein-above we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Judgment: Md. Ruhul Amin J. - This is plaintiffs' appeal by leave against the judgment and order dated July 16, 2001 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 232 o......m of the plaintiffs. In view of the discussions made herein-above we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 40
Abdul Quddus Vs. Raquib Ali being dead his legal heirs Aziruddin and others , 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....er be extended for further 6 (six) months from the date. Ed. ......to be deposited within one month. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Stay granted earlier be extended for further 6 (six) months from the date. Ed. ......shy;ed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on- Record- For the Petitioner Not represented-Respondents Civil Petition for leave to Appeal No. 137 of 2005. (From the Judgment and order dated 28.11.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3664 of 2003.) ......to be deposited within one month. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Stay granted earlier be extended for further 6 (six) months from the date. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
M/S Ashraf Vs. Md. Zahangir Alam & ors, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ected to make the appeals ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......nted earlier in Civil Petition No.223 of 2005 be extended for further 6 (six) months from date. The petitioners are directed to make the appeals ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......etition No. 490 of 2005) Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-7 (In Civil Petition. 223 of 2005) Civil Petition for leave to Appeal Nos.223 and 490 of 2005. (From the Judgment and order dated 04.01.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1463 of 2004.) ......nted earlier in Civil Petition No.223 of 2005 be extended for further 6 (six) months from date. The petitioners are directed to make the appeals ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 97
GM, Rangpur Palli Bidyut Samity Vs. Md. Ali Reza, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... back wages and other benefits. The case of the plaintiff, in short, is that he was appointed as an Assistant Lineman in Rangpur Pally Bidyut Samity-1, Sathibari, Rangpur on 21-4-1984. Since then he had been working there with honesty, integrity and sincerity and during the tenure of his service he ......a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 600, 12 BLC (AD) 7. ...... decree dated 5-1-2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.5360 of 2000). Judgment MM Ruhul Amin J. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 5-1-2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5360 ......a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 600, 12 BLC (AD) 7. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 181
Sudhir Kumar Das and other Vs. Abdul Malek Mia and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....mined the process server and the person in whose presence the summons was served as well as himself. 6. The trial Court, on the findings that petitioner i.e. respondent No.1, failed to adduce any tangible evidence either oral or documentary to substantiate his case of knowing about ...... 13. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......leave, is against the judgment dated March 29, 2001 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in First Miscellaneous Appeal No. 313 of 1981 allowing the same upon setting aside the judgment and order dated September 23, 1980 of the 1st Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), Ba...... 13. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 112
Abu Taleb Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... rightly rejected the petition. 13. We have perused the impugned order of the High Court Division and we do not find any ground to interfere. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... rightly rejected the petition. 13. We have perused the impugned order of the High Court Division and we do not find any ground to interfere. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......d. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. Not represented—The Respondent Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.76 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 12-2-2005 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 386 of 2...... rightly rejected the petition. 13. We have perused the impugned order of the High Court Division and we do not find any ground to interfere. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Esquire Electronics Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....n J Md Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Esquire Electronics Ltd......................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Internal Resources Division (Cus......r Rahman on the other." 9. On the above, we find no substance in the submission of the learned Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. Not represented—The Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.226 of 2004. (From the judgment and order dated 3rd December 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.2580 of 1996). ......r Rahman on the other." 9. On the above, we find no substance in the submission of the learned Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 126
Kazi Md. Abdul Kuddus and another Vs. Kaimon Bewa and Others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Kaimon Bewa and others...........................Respondents Judgment October 18, 2006. Case Referred to- Solaiman (Md) vs Siifia Akhtar Alam being dead, her heirs Narjesa Rahamatullah and others, 49 DLR 288. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur ......rt was in error. 16. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... and decree of the trial Court was in error. 16. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......rt was in error. 16. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Serajul Hoque (Md) Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....tained Rule in Writ Petition No. 94 of 2003. 7. The respondent Nos.2, 3 & 4 have opposed both the Rules by filing separate affidavits-in- opposition and denied the material allegations made in the writ petition. 8. The High Court Division upon hearing discharged both the Rules.......ision upon proper assessment of the materials on' record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Both the petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......81 of 2004). Not represented—Respondent No. 1 (In Civil Petition No. 1382 0/2004). Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos.1381 & 1382 of 2004. (From the judgment and order dated 7-3-2004 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 5587 of 2000 with Writ ......ision upon proper assessment of the materials on' record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Both the petitions are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Sayeda Shajada Hossain & another Vs. Wega Fashion Sweater (Pvt) Ltd & ors., 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ns are dismissed. Ed. ......se such land for similar other public purposes. 8. Therefore, in our view, this is not a good ground for review of our judgment. All the review petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......Respondent Nos. 3-9. (In CRP No. 78 of 2006) Not represented—Respondents (In CRP No. 84 of 2006) Civil Review Petition Nos. 77-78 & 84 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 1 -8-2006 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Appeal Nos. 62, 63 & 64 of 2004......se such land for similar other public purposes. 8. Therefore, in our view, this is not a good ground for review of our judgment. All the review petitions are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
22192218221722162215221422132212221122102209220822072206220522042203220222012200