Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6721-6740 of 8005 results.
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Osimuddin, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....Bepari vs. Jamini Mohan Das and others 4 DLR, 487. Chapala Sundari Devi vs. Wahed Ali and others 11 DLR, 376. Lawyers Involved: Jainal Abedin, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants. Ex parte- the Respondent. Civil......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Forest, Secretariat Building, Dhaka and others ..........Appellants. Vs. Md. Osimuddin................................Respondent. Judgment June 20, 2005. Cas...... the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ......ahomed Golab vs. Mahomed Sulliman ILR 21 Calcutta series, 612. Flower vs. Lloyd, 10 Chancery Division, 327. Muktamala Dasi vs. Ram Chandra De and others A.I.R. 1927 Calcutta, 84 (31 C.W.N. 258).Sarat Kumar Roy vs. Dharmadas Bhattacharjee 42 C.W.N. 375. Kunjabehari Chakrabarty vs. Krishnadhone Majumd..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t been filed according to rule 4 of Order XXVI of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988, is not maintainable. Lawyers Involved: S. M. Zillul Haque, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. ......ainur Reza Chowdhury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahmed J Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman.......................Petitioned Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others…….........Respondents Judgment ......e Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules 1988 and therefore is not maintainable. Consequently, the Review Petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......e Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules 1988 and therefore is not maintainable. Consequently, the Review Petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Badsha Miah (Md) Vs. Sonali Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Sonali Bank and others.......Respondents Judgment June 15th, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Firoz Shall, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Abdur Raza......cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 103
M Sahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....;..Respondent Judgment May 11, 2005. Case Referred To- Abdul Kader Chowdhury and others vs State 28 DLR (AD) 38. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate,(AKM Zahirul Hoque, Advocate with him) instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Rec......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Bangladesh Vs. AKM Enayetullah, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....M Enayetullah.............................Respondent Judgment December 6, 2004. Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by Firoz Shah, Advocate-on- Record— For the Appellant. TH Khan, Senior Advocate, (Mr. Ajmalul Hossain......t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ......t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ......t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Mustafizur Rahman Vs. Md. Amjad Hossain, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....and others 34 DLR (AD) 266; Harmes and another vs Hinkson AIR 1946 PC 156 and Paresh Chandra Bhowmick vs Hiralal Nath and others 36 DLR (AD) 156. Lawyers Involved: ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Mahbubey Alan, Senior Advocate, instructed by AK......the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Tahedul Islam (Md) and others Vs. Md. Mojibar Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ndra Saha and others 1984 BLD (AD) 320 = 36 DLR (AD) 220; Mohammad Ali Akhand vs Bahatan Nessa and others 1998 BLD (AD) 50 = 3 BLC (AD) 177. Lawyers Involved: Md Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Mahmudul ...... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Division (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate........Petitioner vs State and another... .........Respondents Judgme......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Farida Akhter and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... Union Krisan vs Andhra Pradesh AIR 1993 SC 2178; Kudrat-e-Elahi Panir vs Bangladesh 44 DLR (AD) 319 and Deepchand vs State of Uttar Pradesh (AIR 1959 SC 664). Lawyers Involved: M Zahir, Senior Advocate (Sigma Huda, Advocate with him), instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record—F......Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Ruhul Amin J Md Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Farida Akhter and others.........................Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Cabinet Division & others .........Respondents......ng the cause of democracy through a process which could not be termed as undemocratic. In the result, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 237. ......ng the cause of democracy through a process which could not be termed as undemocratic. In the result, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 237. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 221
Majid Sheikh alias Majid and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....p;……………….Respondent Judgment April 4th, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Ozair Farooq, Senior Advocate, instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Golam......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Abdul Kashem Vs. Amirun Nahar and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
......................Petitioner Vs. Amirun Nahar and others.................Respondents Judgment March 5, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. ASM Kh......ivision (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J Abdul Kashem............................Petitioner Vs. Amirun Nahar and others.................Respondents Judgment March 5,...... view of the discussion made above, the petition is found to be without merit. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 86. ...... view of the discussion made above, the petition is found to be without merit. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 86. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
State Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....…………………………(13) Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney-General (Golam Kibria, Deputy Attorney-General with him) instructed by Md. Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Abdul Baset Majumder, Senior Advocate (Mr. Subrata Chowdh...... (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J State………………………………………………………...Appellant Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another………… Respondents Judgment March 28, 2006. Re......e set aside. In view of the discussion made above, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:11 MLR (AD) 2006, 203. ......e set aside. In view of the discussion made above, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:11 MLR (AD) 2006, 203. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 184
Ali Akbar (Md) Vs. Shajirannessa Bewa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....thers........Respondents Judgment November 23, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Kh MS Hasan, Advocate (appeared with the leave of the Court) instructed by Md Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record&mdas......nsidered unsustainable. 14. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......nsidered unsustainable. 14. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......nsidered unsustainable. 14. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Capt. (Retd.) B. Akram Ahmed Khan Vs. BD Oil, Gas & Mineral Resources Corpn. & or, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... 1981 BLD (AD) 61 = 33 DLR (AD) 186; Bangladesh Biman Corporation vs Government of Bangladesh and others, 2000 BLD (AD) 230 = 5 BLC (AD) 169. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Aftab Hossian, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant (In Civil Appeal ......n (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Abu Sayeed Ahmed J MM Ruhul Amin J Capt. (Retd) B Akram Ahmed Khan Chowdhury ...........Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Oil, Gas and Mineral Resources Corporation & other...........Respondents ......is accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs, the connected Civil Petition No. 400 of 2003 is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 BLD (AD) 2008, 126. ......is accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs, the connected Civil Petition No. 400 of 2003 is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 BLD (AD) 2008, 126. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Election Commission Vs. Alhaj Advocate Md. Rahmat Ali, MP and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Election Commission......................Appellant [In both the Appeals] Vs. Alhaj Advocate Md. Rahmat Ali, MP and others.........Respondents [In CA No. 54 of 2006] Judgment ......hul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Election Commission......................Appellant [In both the Appeals] Vs. Alhaj Advocate Md. Rahmat Ali, MP and others.........Respondents [In CA No. 54 of 2006]......on, as above, in the findings and observations/ directives given by the High Court Division in the impugned judgment and order. The parties will bear their respective costs. Ed. ......on, as above, in the findings and observations/ directives given by the High Court Division in the impugned judgment and order. The parties will bear their respective costs. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 159
Ashequr Rahman (Md) Vs. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... vs Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute……………Respondents Judgment February 2nd, 2003 Lawyers Involved: Matiur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Mrs Azra Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Nurul Isl...... that proceeding against him was not concluded within 180 days as per Regulation 43(8) of the Regulations. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... that proceeding against him was not concluded within 180 days as per Regulation 43(8) of the Regulations. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... that proceeding against him was not concluded within 180 days as per Regulation 43(8) of the Regulations. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Aynul Sheikh and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Aynul Sheikh and others........Petitioners vs State.................................Respondents Judgement July 19, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Md Nawab All, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Abdur Rouf, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed......Code and they are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years each and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. ......Code and they are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years each and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. ......Code and they are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years each and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
AKM Shamsuddin alias Kalam Doctor and other Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lias Kalam Doctor and other......Petitioners vs State.................................Respondent Judgment June 22nd, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Prabir Haider, Advocate (appeared with the leave of the Court), instructed by Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-R......ave perused the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division and on the reasons stated above we do not find any error therein. The criminal petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. ......ave perused the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division and on the reasons stated above we do not find any error therein. The criminal petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. ......ave perused the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division and on the reasons stated above we do not find any error therein. The criminal petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Paper Converting & Packaging Ltd. Vs. Govt. of the People’s Repub of BD and ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others.......Respondents Judgment January 4th, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md Aftab Hossnin, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. Not ......esent: KM Hasan CJ Md Fazlul Karim J Md Tafazzul Islam J Paper Converting & Packaging Ltd.................. Petitioner Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others.......Respondents ...... been accrued to the plaintiff-petitioner in respect of the same for any declaration or any permanent injunction as sought for in the instant suit. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... been accrued to the plaintiff-petitioner in respect of the same for any declaration or any permanent injunction as sought for in the instant suit. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Anwar Hossain Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh, 1989, 18 CLC (AD)
....(1919) (AC) 935 In-Re Initiative and Referendum; (1883) 9 (AC) 117 Hodge Vs. The Queen; 17 D.L.R. (SC) 384 and A.I.R. 1977 Allahabad 488 Full Bench. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Zakir Ahmed Advocates with him), instructed by Kazi Shahabuddin Ahmed, A...... (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Anwar Hossain Chowdhury.................Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 42 of 1988) Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry o......Petition No. 3 of 1989 is disposed of in terms of this Order. 6. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1989) BLD (Special Issue) 1, 41 DLR (AD) (1989) 165. ......Petition No. 3 of 1989 is disposed of in terms of this Order. 6. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1989) BLD (Special Issue) 1, 41 DLR (AD) (1989) 165. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 1934
19151914191319121911191019091908190719051904190319021901190018991898189718961895