Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6721-6740 of 8015 results.
Enamul Huq and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
........................................Petitioner Vs. The State...........................Respondent Judgment February 1, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on Record- For the Petitioners Not represented- Respondent ......(Criminal) Present : Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Enamul Huq and another..........................................Petitioner Vs. The State...........................Respondent Judgment February 1, 2005 ...... 16. In view of the discussion above, we are of view that the High Court Division was well justified in dismissing the appeal. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... 16. In view of the discussion above, we are of view that the High Court Division was well justified in dismissing the appeal. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Mohirruddin Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.......... Petitioner Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others ...................Respondents Judgment May 8, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the petitioner ......ion (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Mohirruddin............................................... Petitioner Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others ...................Respondents Judgment&nb......e find that the view taken by the High Court Division is a correct one. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 420. ......e find that the view taken by the High Court Division is a correct one. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 420. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Matiur Rahman Vs. Habibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Matiur Rahman....................... Petitioner Vs. Habibur Rahman and others .......Respondents Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quayum, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Not represe......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Matiur Rahman....................... Petitioner Vs. Habibur Rahman and others .......Respondents Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quayu...... holder in the suit land. 7. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. 8. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... holder in the suit land. 7. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. 8. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Md. Abdur Razzaque Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gar, Dhaka and others…………………..... Respondents Judgment January2, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Baset Majumder, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Not ...... (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdur Razzaque............................................... Petitioner Vs. The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission Secretariat, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, ......ter, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 416. ......ter, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 416. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Sultan Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... AFB Jahan Mia (Md) Vs. Chairman, National Board of Revenue and others, 49 DLR (AD) 122. Lawyers Involved: M. A. Azim Khair, Deputy Attorney General instructed by M.Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners Farooq Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Nurul Islam Bh......ul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of Bangladesh represented by the Principal Secretary to Prime Minister's Office, Tejgaon, Dhaka & another...............Petitioner Vs. Md. Sultan Ahmed ........................................................Respondent ......s, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 378. ......s, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 378. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Jashimuddin & other Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
......Petitioners Vs. The State.........................................................Respondent Judgment January 31, 2006. Lawyers Involved: A.M. Mahbuddin Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner ...... (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Jashimuddin & other.....................................Petitioners Vs. The State.........................................................Respondent Judg......sion upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......sion upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Md. Alimuzzaman Khan Vs. Mohammad Golam Kibria, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sh Small Industries Corporation, Dhaka vs. Mahbub Hossain Chowdhury 29 DLR (SC) 41; M/S. Amin Jute Mills Ltd. vs. M/S. A.R.A.G. Ltd. 28 DLR (AD) 76. Lawyers Involved: Shahid Ahmed Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. ......laim damages for the breach of contract committed by the employer. In this connection, the High Court Division relied on the decisions in the case of Bangladesh Small Industries Corporation, Dhaka Vs. Mahbub Hossain Chowdhury reported in 29 DLR (SC) 41 and the case of M/S. Amin Jute Mills Ltd. V......aterials on record arrived at a correct decision. We find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......aterials on record arrived at a correct decision. We find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Sree Hare Krishna Das Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gladesh, Bangabhaban, Dhaka and others ............Respondents. Judgment May 8, 2004. Case Referred to- 42 DLR (AD) 214. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Not represented- the Respondents &n......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sree Hare Krishna Das...................................................... Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, President Secretariat, Govt. of t......ring the review petition filed by the petitioner, rejected the same. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 146. ......ring the review petition filed by the petitioner, rejected the same. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 146. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Md. Abdul Ali Bhuiyan Vs. Jahura Khatun and Others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the petitioner is not entitled to challenge the same at such belated stage…………………….(5) Lawyers Involved M.G. Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. ......(Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Ali Bhuiyan.........................................Petitioner Vs. Jahura Khatun and Others...................................Respondents Judgme......s any instance of misreading and non-reading. So the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the courts below can not be disturbed. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......s any instance of misreading and non-reading. So the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the courts below can not be disturbed. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Md. Firozul Islam and others Vs. Md. Helalul Islam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....................... Petitioners Vs. Md. Helalul Islam and others ...............Respondents Judgment May 8, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record- For the petitioners Not represented- the Respondents &...... Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Firozul Islam and others.................... Petitioners Vs. Md. Helalul Islam and others ...............Respondents Judgment May 8, 2......he submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, having no leg to stand the leave petition is without any substance. 7. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......he submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, having no leg to stand the leave petition is without any substance. 7. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Osimuddin, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....Bepari vs. Jamini Mohan Das and others 4 DLR, 487. Chapala Sundari Devi vs. Wahed Ali and others 11 DLR, 376. Lawyers Involved: Jainal Abedin, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants. Ex parte- the Respondent. Civil......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Forest, Secretariat Building, Dhaka and others ..........Appellants. Vs. Md. Osimuddin................................Respondent. Judgment June 20, 2005. Cas...... the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ......ahomed Golab vs. Mahomed Sulliman ILR 21 Calcutta series, 612. Flower vs. Lloyd, 10 Chancery Division, 327. Muktamala Dasi vs. Ram Chandra De and others A.I.R. 1927 Calcutta, 84 (31 C.W.N. 258).Sarat Kumar Roy vs. Dharmadas Bhattacharjee 42 C.W.N. 375. Kunjabehari Chakrabarty vs. Krishnadhone Majumd..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t been filed according to rule 4 of Order XXVI of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988, is not maintainable. Lawyers Involved: S. M. Zillul Haque, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. ......ainur Reza Chowdhury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahmed J Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman.......................Petitioned Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others…….........Respondents Judgment ......e Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules 1988 and therefore is not maintainable. Consequently, the Review Petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......e Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules 1988 and therefore is not maintainable. Consequently, the Review Petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Badsha Miah (Md) Vs. Sonali Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Sonali Bank and others.......Respondents Judgment June 15th, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Firoz Shall, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Abdur Raza......cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 103
M Sahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....;..Respondent Judgment May 11, 2005. Case Referred To- Abdul Kader Chowdhury and others vs State 28 DLR (AD) 38. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate,(AKM Zahirul Hoque, Advocate with him) instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Rec......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Bangladesh Vs. AKM Enayetullah, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....M Enayetullah.............................Respondent Judgment December 6, 2004. Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by Firoz Shah, Advocate-on- Record— For the Appellant. TH Khan, Senior Advocate, (Mr. Ajmalul Hossain......t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ......t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ......t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Mustafizur Rahman Vs. Md. Amjad Hossain, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....and others 34 DLR (AD) 266; Harmes and another vs Hinkson AIR 1946 PC 156 and Paresh Chandra Bhowmick vs Hiralal Nath and others 36 DLR (AD) 156. Lawyers Involved: ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Mahbubey Alan, Senior Advocate, instructed by AK......the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Tahedul Islam (Md) and others Vs. Md. Mojibar Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ndra Saha and others 1984 BLD (AD) 320 = 36 DLR (AD) 220; Mohammad Ali Akhand vs Bahatan Nessa and others 1998 BLD (AD) 50 = 3 BLC (AD) 177. Lawyers Involved: Md Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Mahmudul ...... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Division (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate........Petitioner vs State and another... .........Respondents Judgme......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Farida Akhter and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... Union Krisan vs Andhra Pradesh AIR 1993 SC 2178; Kudrat-e-Elahi Panir vs Bangladesh 44 DLR (AD) 319 and Deepchand vs State of Uttar Pradesh (AIR 1959 SC 664). Lawyers Involved: M Zahir, Senior Advocate (Sigma Huda, Advocate with him), instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record—F......Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Ruhul Amin J Md Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Farida Akhter and others.........................Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Cabinet Division & others .........Respondents......ng the cause of democracy through a process which could not be termed as undemocratic. In the result, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 237. ......ng the cause of democracy through a process which could not be termed as undemocratic. In the result, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 237. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 221
Majid Sheikh alias Majid and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....p;……………….Respondent Judgment April 4th, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Ozair Farooq, Senior Advocate, instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Golam......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
19321931193019291925192219191918191719161915191419131912191119101909190819071905