Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Chair, Board of Int. and Secondary Education, Jessore and others Vs. Nazir Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lity. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......s and Mineral Corporation, 51 DLR, 104; 4 BLC (AD) 65; Secretary, Ministry of Communications, Road and Road Transport Division and another Vs. Md. Azizur Rahman and others, 46 DLR (AD) 19. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Abd...... Advocate, instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on- Record-Respondents No. 1. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-4. Civil Appeal No. 164 of 2004 (From the Judgment and Order dated August 2,2001 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2634 of 1998) ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Bangladesh Bank & others Vs. Messers Fabrica Nacional De Monedy Timbre & others, 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
....ive body of lawyers may consider the matter and move the Government if found necessary. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ladesh Bank & others..........Defendant-Appellants vs Messers Fabrica Nacional De Monedy Timbre & others..............Respondents Judgment April 1, 1997. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocat...... K. S. Nabi, Attorney General and Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate-Amicus Curiae. Not represented-Respondent No. 3. Civil Appeal No. 4 of 1995 (From the Judgment and Order dated December 11, 1994 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Civil order No. 4061 of 1..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Abul Hashem Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....of case under the Provisions of Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan (Bishes Bidhan) Ain, 1995 in the light of the observation/direction made above. The leave petition is thus disposed of. Ed. ......bul Hashem..........................Petitioner Vs. The State represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Cox's Bazar...........Respondent Judgment March 7, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim, Advocate instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record......vocate instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-Respondents Criminal Petition for leave to Appeal No. 45 of 2004 (From the Judgment and Order dated 10.01.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1250 of 1996) ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Mona alias Zillur Rahman Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....satisfactory. So the delay is not condoned. Therefore, both on merits and on delay. This petition for leave to appeal loses merits for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......na alias Zillur Rahman.........Convict Appellant (In Jail) vs The State…………………..Respondent Judgment March 7, 2004 Lawyers Involved: Idrisur Rahman, Advocate instructed by A. K. M. Shahaidul Huq Advocate-on-...... Idrisur Rahman, Advocate instructed by A. K. M. Shahaidul Huq Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-Respondent Criminal Appeal No. 158 of 2001 (From Judgment Order dated 29.03.2001 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 283 of 1998) ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Nurul Amin Vs. Md. Ismail and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....) months. The petitioner is permitted to add additional grounds. However, the proceedings before the lower Court below shall continue in accordance with law. Ed. ......ir Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Amin .............................Petitioner Vs. Md. Ismail and other........................Respondents Judgement January 16, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Khandaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali,......) months. The petitioner is permitted to add additional grounds. However, the proceedings before the lower Court below shall continue in accordance with law. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Mohammad Salim Ahmed @ Md. Salim Miah Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nd order of conviction. We in facts and circumstances do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The petition having no substance is dismissed. Ed. ......Salim Ahmed @ Md. Salim Miah...........Petitioner vs The State…………………….Respondent Judgment November 20, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represente......nvolved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-the Respondent Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 214 of 2003 (From the Judgment and Order dated 24 05.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1784 of 2003 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Md. Jahangir Alam (Selim) Vs. Md. Hebjul Bari and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....without any order as to cost. The impugned judgment and order dated 13-04-2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 536 of 2003 are hereby set aside and the rule so issued is hereby recalled. Ed. ......am (Selim)....................Appellant vs Md. Hebjul Bari and others…………………...Respondents Judgment August 3, 2004 Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, ......, Senior Advocate, instructed by Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on Record-For Respondent No.1 Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-4 Civil Appeal No. 231 of 2003 (From the Judgment and Order dated 13th April, 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Writ petition No. 536 of 2003) ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Chief Engin, Dredger Direct, BD Water Dev. Board. Vs. Chairman, 2nd Lbour Court, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ed to be taken away without issuing a show cause. 17. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed without any orders to costs. Ed. ......llip;……….. Appellants (In both Appeals) Vs Chairman, 2nd Labour Court and others........ Respondents (In both Appeals) Judgment May 13, 2002. Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Abdul Hakim Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain. Advocate-o......ondent nos. 2 & 3 (In Criminal Appeal No. 100 of 1998) Ex-parte-Respondent No. 1(In Criminal Appeal No. 100 of 1998) Civil Appeal No. 99-100 of 1998 (From the Judgment and Order dated 27-10-1997 passed by the High Court Division in writ petition No. 2126 of 1994 and judg..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Md. Abdul Jalil Vs. Mosammat Shefali Begum and othÂers, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment dated 6.1.1997 passed in Civil Revision No. 3254 of 1992 is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 715. ...... M.A. Aziz J Md. Abdul Jalil....................Appellant Vs. Mosammat Shefali Begum and others.....Respondents Judgment May 17, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdul Majid, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-......cate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos. 1-4. Not Represented-For Respondent Nos. 5-8. Civil Appeal No. 235 of 2001. (From the Judgment and Order dated 6.1.1997 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3254 of 1992). ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Kanai Lal Roy Vs. Swaraswati Roy, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e with law by giving opportunity to the concerned party to produce the will itself in question and prove it by adducing evidence". There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......m J Kanai Lal Roy.... ..............Appellant Vs. Swaraswati Roy alias Srimati Swaraswati Roy and others............Respondents Judgment October 31, 2004 Lawyers Involved: M.K. Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-R......ord-For the Appellant Abdul Quayum, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents Civil Appeal No. 234 of 2003 (From the Judgment and Order dated August 17, 2002 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Appeal No. 151 of 2000) ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Sree Sukhendu Nath Saha and others Vs. Hamangini Saha, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....fs in the land in suit. In view of the discussions made herein-above we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......(ESSO) and Abdur Razzak, 16 DLR (SC) 287; Md. Abu Bakar Mollah vs. Abdul Majid Moral (2201) 6 MLR (AD) 151; Md. Naimuddin Sarder @ Naimuddin Sarder vs. Md. Abdul Kalam Biswas 39 DLR (AD) 237 Lawyers Involved: Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants Nurul ......ocate instructed by A.K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1(a) Not represented.....Respondent Nos. 2-4 Civil Appeal No. 43 of 2001 (From the Judgment and Order dated December 8,1997 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2419 of 1990) ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Shamsul Huq Sarker Vs. Enamul Huq Sarker and ors., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....on decided the case correctly and no interference is called for. In the premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......r Chowdhury J Shamsul Huq Sarker...............................Appellant vs Enamul Huq Sarker and ors.....................Respondent Judgment March 8, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Shamsul Huq Sarker(in person)-For the Appellant Not represented......arch 8, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Shamsul Huq Sarker(in person)-For the Appellant Not represented-Respondents Civil Appeal No. 131 of 2001 (From the Judgment and Order dated 31.07.2000 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 664 of 1994) ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Trading Corporation of Bangladesh Vs. Md.Abdul Halim Bhuiyan & others (31), 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ty in the impugned orders. The High Court Division, therefore, was not justified in making the Rules absolute. All the appeals are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..........Appellant (in all the cases) vs Md.Abdul Halim Bhuiyan & others (31)..............Respondents (in Civil Appeal No. 56 of 2005). Judgment April 27, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Dr. A. K. M. Ali, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Recor......and also violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to them under Articles 28-31 of the Constitution and also the impugned orders being issued in disregard of the Employment of Labour (Standing Order) Act, 1965 the orders were liable to be struck down. 3. The rules were opposed by TCB-..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Mainul Islam Vs. State and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ...........Respondent (In Criminal Petition No. 189 of 2003) The State & others...............Respondent (In Criminal Petition No. 190 of 2003) Judgment October 14, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab all, Advocate on Record-For the Petitioner(In both the Ca...... Not represented-Respondent Nos. 7 &8 (In Criminal Petition No. 190 of 2003) Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 189 & 190 of 2003 (From the Judgment and Order Dated 26.11.2002 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 527 of 2000 and Cri..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Dulal @ Md. Dulal Talukder and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....with as prayed for. Bail granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ...... Kabir Chowdhury J Dulal @ Md. Dulal Talukder and another.............Petitioner Vs The State...........................Respondents Judgment May 24, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Nizamul Huq, Advocate instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-Fo...... Rouf, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on- Record-For the Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 45 of 2003 (From the Judgment and Order dated 18.01.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No. 625 of 1999) ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Shahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... commit any illegality in rejecting the application filed under Section 561A of the code of Criminal procedure. There is no substance in this petition and hence it is dismissed. Ed. ......ammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Shahabuddin ..........Petitioner Vs. The State...............Respondent Judgment November 20, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not Repre......volved: Md. Aftab Hossain Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not Represented-Respondent Criminal Petition for Leave-to Appeal No. 195 of 2003 (From the Judgment and Order dated 28.10.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 12022 o..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Abdul Mannan alias A. Mannan Vs. Mosammat Nurbanu & another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....pports the evidence of P.Ws 1 and 2 strongly. We find no infirmity in the Judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the criminal leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......s A. Mannan..................................Petitioner Vs Mosammat Nurbanu & another ....................................Respondent Judgment November 8, 2003 Lawyers Involved: Obaidur Rahman Mustafa, Advocate instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-...... Advocate instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not Respondent-Respondent Criminal Petition for leave to Appeal No. 130 of 2003 (From Judgment and Order dated 7th May. 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No. 1156 of 200) ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Samar Uddin and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Modaris Ullah of village Goyghar, PS. and District Moulavibazar be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet for a period of 6 (Six) months from date. Ed. ......p;…………………………………………….Respondent Judgement December 10, 2003. Lawyers Involved: M. A. Gaffer, Advocate (appeared with leave of the court) instructed by A......instructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Hug, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners Not Respondent-Respondent Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 179 of 2003 (From Judgment and Order dated 26.4 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1127 of 1998) ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Farukur Rahman @ Farook and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ce to the appellants before us. In the aforesaid premises, we are of the view that the appellants are entitled of get benefit of doubt. As a result, all the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......minal Appeal No.16/2001) Vs. The State………………………Respondent (In all cases) Judgment August 12, 2003. Lawyers Involved: Mujubur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab AH, Advocate-on-......ty Attorney General, instructed by Md. Ataur Rahman Khan, Advocate-on- Record-For the Respondents (In Crl. A. No. 15-16/2001) Criminal Appeal No. 14-16 of 2001 (From the Judgment and Order dated 9th December, 1998 passed by the High Court Division in Death Reference No. 22 of 1994)..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Md. Golam Murtuza @ Isphil Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ions Jude is erroneous and can not be sustained in law. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the accused-appellant is set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......ppellant vs The State………………………………….Respondent Judgment October 20, 2003 Lawyers Involved: Khondoker Mahbub Hossain Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, A...... Appellants M.A. Rouf, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No.13 of 2002 (From the Judgment and Order dated 14th November, 2000 passed by the High Court Division, in Criminal Appeal No.772 of 199..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 53